search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma

Primary Purpose

Eosinophilic Asthma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Reslizumab
Placebo
Sponsored by
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Eosinophilic Asthma

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 75 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is male or female, 12 through 75 years of age, with a previous diagnosis of asthma.
  • The patient has had at least 1 asthma exacerbation requiring oral, intramuscular (im), or intravenous (iv) corticosteroid use for at least 3 days over the past 12 months before screening.
  • The patient has a current blood eosinophil level of at least 400/μl.
  • The patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration.
  • The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5 at the screening and baseline (before the 1st dose of study drug) visits.
  • The patient is taking inhaled fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 μg, or equivalent, daily. Chronic oral corticosteroid use (no more than 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) is allowed. If a patient is on a stable dose, eg, 2 weeks or more of oral corticosteroid treatment at the time of study enrollment, the patient must remain on this dose throughout the study. The patient's baseline asthma therapy regimen (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids up to a maximum of 10 mg of prednisone daily or equivalent, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipooxygenase inhibitors, or cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days prior to screening and baseline, and must continue without dosage changes throughout study.
  • All female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative pregnancy test ß-human chorionic gonadotropin [ß-HCG]) at screening (serum) and baseline (urine).
  • Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study.
  • Written informed consent is obtained. Patients 12 through 17 years old must provide assent.
  • The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, ECG evaluation (at screening), serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.

    • Other criteria apply; please contact the investigator for more information.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a clinically meaningful co-morbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety.
  • The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome.
  • The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). Patients with pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis) will also be excluded.
  • The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening).
  • The patient is using systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating or other biologic agents (including, but not limited to, anti-IgE mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, or anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti TNF] mAb) within 6 months prior to screening.
  • The patient has previously received an anti-hIL-5 monoclonal antibody (eg, reslizumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab).
  • The patient has any aggravating medical factors that are inadequately controlled (eg, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and uncontrolled diabetes).
  • The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or, if of childbearing potential, and not using a medically accepted, effective method of birth control (eg, barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, IUD, or steroidal contraceptive [oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected]) are excluded from this study. NOTE: Partner sterility alone is not considered an acceptable form of birth control.

    • Other criteria apply; please contact the investigator for more information.

Sites / Locations

  • Teva Investigational Site 58
  • Teva Investigational Site 61
  • Teva Investigational Site 37
  • Teva Investigational Site 56
  • Teva Investigational Site 34
  • Teva Investigational Site 52
  • Teva Investigational Site 55
  • Teva Investigational Site 18
  • Teva Investigational Site 49
  • Teva Investigational Site 65
  • Teva Investigational Site 51
  • Teva Investigational Site 74
  • Teva Investigational Site 35
  • Teva Investigational Site 64
  • Teva Investigational Site 60
  • Teva Investigational Site 68
  • Teva Investigational Site 30
  • Teva Investigational Site 31
  • Teva Investigational Site 62
  • Teva Investigational Site 50
  • Teva Investigational Site 66
  • Teva Investigational Site 32
  • Teva Investigational Site 63
  • Teva Investigational Site 72
  • Teva Investigational Site 38
  • Teva Investigational Site 33
  • Teva Investigational Site 643
  • Teva Investigational Site 641
  • Teva Investigational Site 644
  • Teva Investigational Site 642
  • Teva Investigational Site 645
  • Teva Investigational Site 261
  • Teva Investigational Site 264
  • Teva Investigational Site 260
  • Teva Investigational Site 262
  • Teva Investigational Site 263
  • Teva Investigational Site 160
  • Teva Investigational Site 163
  • Teva Investigational Site 164
  • Teva Investigational Site 165
  • Teva Investigational Site 161
  • Teva Investigational Site 162
  • Teva Investigational Site 166
  • Teva Investigational Site 185
  • Teva Investigational Site 181
  • Teva Investigational Site 182
  • Teva Investigational Site 180
  • Teva Investigational Site 284
  • Teva Investigational Site 287
  • Teva Investigational Site 286
  • Teva Investigational Site 280
  • Teva Investigational Site 281
  • Teva Investigational Site 285
  • Teva Investigational Site 283
  • Teva Investigational Site 301
  • Teva Investigational Site 300
  • Teva Investigational Site 401
  • Teva Investigational Site 400
  • Teva Investigational Site 404
  • Teva Investigational Site 403
  • Teva Investigational Site 405
  • Teva Investigational Site 423
  • Teva Investigational Site 430
  • Teva Investigational Site 431
  • Teva Investigational Site 432
  • Teva Investigational Site 425
  • Teva Investigational Site 428
  • Teva Investigational Site 429
  • Teva Investigational Site 426
  • Teva Investigational Site 422
  • Teva Investigational Site 427
  • Teva Investigational Site 433
  • Teva Investigational Site 421
  • Teva Investigational Site 420
  • Teva Investigational Site 705
  • Teva Investigational Site 700
  • Teva Investigational Site 702
  • Teva Investigational Site 703
  • Teva Investigational Site 701
  • Teva Investigational Site 704
  • Teva Investigational Site 723
  • Teva Investigational Site 722
  • Teva Investigational Site 726
  • Teva Investigational Site 724
  • Teva Investigational Site 727
  • Teva Investigational Site 720
  • Teva Investigational Site 721
  • Teva Investigational Site 744
  • Teva Investigational Site 742
  • Teva Investigational Site 740
  • Teva Investigational Site 741
  • Teva Investigational Site 743
  • Teva Investigational Site 745
  • Teva Investigational Site 507
  • Teva Investigational Site 509
  • Teva Investigational Site 501
  • Teva Investigational Site 500
  • Teva Investigational Site 511
  • Teva Investigational Site 502
  • Teva Investigational Site 504
  • Teva Investigational Site 545
  • Teva Investigational Site 551
  • Teva Investigational Site 549
  • Teva Investigational Site 550
  • Teva Investigational Site 553
  • Teva Investigational Site 555
  • Teva Investigational Site 542
  • Teva Investigational Site 552
  • Teva Investigational Site 546
  • Teva Investigational Site 581
  • Teva Investigational Site 584
  • Teva Investigational Site 586
  • Teva Investigational Site 587
  • Teva Investigational Site 582
  • Teva Investigational Site 585
  • Teva Investigational Site 580
  • Teva Investigational Site 589
  • Teva Investigational Site 583
  • Teva Investigational Site 588
  • Teva Investigational Site 602
  • Teva Investigational Site 604
  • Teva Investigational Site 603
  • Teva Investigational Site 601
  • Teva Investigational Site 780
  • Teva Investigational Site 782
  • Teva Investigational Site 783
  • Teva Investigational Site 781
  • Teva Investigational Site 784

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg

Arm Description

Placebo administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses.

Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Frequency of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) During 12 Months of Treatment
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means.
Frequency of Each of the Two Criteria for Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs)
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals for the two criteria were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average FEV1 was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) to Week 16
The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were "patient-specific," which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ACQ was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE)
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. The distributions were compared by a log rank test stratified by baseline usage of oral corticosteroid (yes or no) and geographical region (US or other).
Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control; info obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ASUI was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement in asthma symptoms. Information was obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Use Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit patients were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) SABA use was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count Over 16 Weeks and 52 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test at each scheduled visit, and from all patients experiencing a serious adverse event, an adverse event leading to withdrawal, or an exacerbation of asthma symptoms. The during treatment average eosinophil counts were estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline values correlate to reduced asthma severity.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L Aspartate aminotransferase: >=3*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L Alanine aminotransferase: >=3*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: >= 3*ULN. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. Bilirubin: >=34.2 μmol/L White blood cells: <=3.0 or >20 10^9/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L Neutrophils: <=1.0 10^9/L Eosinophils: >10.0 % Platelets: <75 or >=700 10^9/L Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria Sitting pulse - high 12-17 yr: >100 and increase of >= 30 beats/minute (bpm) Sitting pulse - low >=18 yr: <50 and decrease of >=30 bpm Sitting pulse - high >=18 yr: >100 and increase of >=30 bpm Sitting systolic blood pressure - low >=18 yr: <90 and decrease of >=30 mmHg Sitting systolic blood pressure - high >=18 yr: >160 and increase of >=30 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low 12-17 yr: <55 and decrease of >=12 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low >=18 yr: <50 and decrease of >=12 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high >=18 yr: >100 and increase of >=12 mmHg Respiratory rate >=18 yr: >24 and increase of >=10 breaths/minute Body temperature - low 12-17 yr: <96.5° Fahrenheit or <35.8° Celsius Body temp - low >=18 yr: <96.5° F or <35.8° C Body temp - high >=18 yr: >100.5° Fahrenheit
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study
The immunogenicity of reslizumab was assessed by measuring for the presence of anti-reslizumab antibodies at baseline, weeks 16, 32, 48, and 52 or early withdrawal. Blood samples for anti-reslizumab antibodies assessment were also obtained from all patients (inside or outside of the US) experiencing a serious adverse event, an adverse event leading to withdrawal, or an exacerbation of asthma symptoms.

Full Information

First Posted
January 28, 2011
Last Updated
November 5, 2021
Sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01287039
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
Official Title
A 12-Month, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of treatment with reslizumab in patients with eosinophilic asthma.
Detailed Description
Demonstrate the efficacy of reslizumab, at a dose of 3 mg/kg administered iv every 4 weeks over 12 months, as assessed by the reduction in frequency of clinical asthma exacerbations (CAEs) during 12 months. An exacerbation event will be considered a CAE if the patient meets either or both of the criteria listed below and this is corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days asthma-related emergency treatment The above criteria must be corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate worsening in the clinical signs and symptoms of asthma.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eosinophilic Asthma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
489 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses.
Arm Title
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Reslizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cinquil, humanized monoclonal antibody, CEP-38072
Intervention Description
Patients were administered intravenously over 15 to 30 minutes reslizumab at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg at baseline and once every 4 weeks relative to baseline over 48 weeks for a total of 13 doses.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo (20 mM sodium acetate, 7% sucrose), administered intravenously (iv) once every 4 weeks over 52 weeks, for a total of 13 doses administered. Each patient received a specific volume of placebo to match the volume of reslizumab on the basis of the patient's body weight.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) During 12 Months of Treatment
Description
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means.
Time Frame
Day 1 to Week 52
Title
Frequency of Each of the Two Criteria for Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs)
Description
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals for the two criteria were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means.
Time Frame
Day 1 to Week 52
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Description
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average FEV1 was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements.
Time Frame
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) to Week 16
Description
The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were "patient-specific," which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in quality of life.
Time Frame
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Description
The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ACQ was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time Frame
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE)
Description
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. The distributions were compared by a log rank test stratified by baseline usage of oral corticosteroid (yes or no) and geographical region (US or other).
Time Frame
Day 1 to Day 478 (longest treatment time plus 2 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Description
The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control; info obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ASUI was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement in asthma symptoms. Information was obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms.
Time Frame
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Use Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Description
SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit patients were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) SABA use was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Time Frame
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count Over 16 Weeks and 52 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Description
Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test at each scheduled visit, and from all patients experiencing a serious adverse event, an adverse event leading to withdrawal, or an exacerbation of asthma symptoms. The during treatment average eosinophil counts were estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline values correlate to reduced asthma severity.
Time Frame
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 or early withdrawal
Title
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Description
An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Time Frame
Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The last postbaseline value for approximately 20 patients in each
Title
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
Description
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L Aspartate aminotransferase: >=3*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L Alanine aminotransferase: >=3*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: >= 3*ULN. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. Bilirubin: >=34.2 μmol/L White blood cells: <=3.0 or >20 10^9/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L Neutrophils: <=1.0 10^9/L Eosinophils: >10.0 % Platelets: <75 or >=700 10^9/L Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Time Frame
Week 4 to Week 65. The last postbaseline value for approximately 20 patients in each
Title
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
Description
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria Sitting pulse - high 12-17 yr: >100 and increase of >= 30 beats/minute (bpm) Sitting pulse - low >=18 yr: <50 and decrease of >=30 bpm Sitting pulse - high >=18 yr: >100 and increase of >=30 bpm Sitting systolic blood pressure - low >=18 yr: <90 and decrease of >=30 mmHg Sitting systolic blood pressure - high >=18 yr: >160 and increase of >=30 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low 12-17 yr: <55 and decrease of >=12 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low >=18 yr: <50 and decrease of >=12 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high >=18 yr: >100 and increase of >=12 mmHg Respiratory rate >=18 yr: >24 and increase of >=10 breaths/minute Body temperature - low 12-17 yr: <96.5° Fahrenheit or <35.8° Celsius Body temp - low >=18 yr: <96.5° F or <35.8° C Body temp - high >=18 yr: >100.5° Fahrenheit
Time Frame
Week 4 to Week 65. The last postbaseline value for approximately 20 patients in each
Title
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study
Description
The immunogenicity of reslizumab was assessed by measuring for the presence of anti-reslizumab antibodies at baseline, weeks 16, 32, 48, and 52 or early withdrawal. Blood samples for anti-reslizumab antibodies assessment were also obtained from all patients (inside or outside of the US) experiencing a serious adverse event, an adverse event leading to withdrawal, or an exacerbation of asthma symptoms.
Time Frame
Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 52

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient is male or female, 12 through 75 years of age, with a previous diagnosis of asthma. The patient has had at least 1 asthma exacerbation requiring oral, intramuscular (im), or intravenous (iv) corticosteroid use for at least 3 days over the past 12 months before screening. The patient has a current blood eosinophil level of at least 400/μl. The patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration. The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5 at the screening and baseline (before the 1st dose of study drug) visits. The patient is taking inhaled fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 μg, or equivalent, daily. Chronic oral corticosteroid use (no more than 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) is allowed. If a patient is on a stable dose, eg, 2 weeks or more of oral corticosteroid treatment at the time of study enrollment, the patient must remain on this dose throughout the study. The patient's baseline asthma therapy regimen (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids up to a maximum of 10 mg of prednisone daily or equivalent, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipooxygenase inhibitors, or cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days prior to screening and baseline, and must continue without dosage changes throughout study. All female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative pregnancy test ß-human chorionic gonadotropin [ß-HCG]) at screening (serum) and baseline (urine). Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Written informed consent is obtained. Patients 12 through 17 years old must provide assent. The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, ECG evaluation (at screening), serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis. Other criteria apply; please contact the investigator for more information. Exclusion Criteria: The patient has a clinically meaningful co-morbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety. The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome. The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). Patients with pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis) will also be excluded. The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening). The patient is using systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating or other biologic agents (including, but not limited to, anti-IgE mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, or anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti TNF] mAb) within 6 months prior to screening. The patient has previously received an anti-hIL-5 monoclonal antibody (eg, reslizumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab). The patient has any aggravating medical factors that are inadequately controlled (eg, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and uncontrolled diabetes). The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening. The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 6 months prior to screening. Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or, if of childbearing potential, and not using a medically accepted, effective method of birth control (eg, barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, IUD, or steroidal contraceptive [oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected]) are excluded from this study. NOTE: Partner sterility alone is not considered an acceptable form of birth control. Other criteria apply; please contact the investigator for more information.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Expert, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 58
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 61
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 37
City
Orange
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 56
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 34
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 52
City
DeBary
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 55
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 18
City
Valrico
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 49
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 65
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 51
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 74
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 35
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 64
City
Boys Town
State/Province
Nebraska
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 60
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 68
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 30
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 31
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 62
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 50
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 66
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 32
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 63
City
Boerne
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 72
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 38
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 33
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 643
City
Nedlands
State/Province
Western Australia
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 641
City
Clayton
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 644
City
Daw Park
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 642
City
Frankston
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 645
City
Liverpool
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 261
City
Bruxelles
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 264
City
Bruxelles
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 260
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 262
City
Jambes
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 263
City
Liège
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 160
City
Rancagua
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 163
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 164
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 165
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 161
City
Temuco
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 162
City
Valdivia
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 166
City
Valparaiso
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 185
City
Bogota
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 181
City
Bogotá
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 182
City
Cali
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 180
City
Floridablanca
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 284
City
Breclav
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 287
City
Brno
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 286
City
Liberec
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 280
City
Olomouc
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 281
City
Olomouc
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 285
City
Olomouc
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 283
City
Tabor
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 301
City
Hvidovre
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 300
City
Odense
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 401
City
Balassagyarmat
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 400
City
Miskolc
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 404
City
Mosonmagyaróvár
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 403
City
Sopron
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 405
City
Törökbálint
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 423
City
Ashkelon
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 430
City
Beer-Sheva
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 431
City
Haifa
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 432
City
Haifa
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 425
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 428
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 429
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 426
City
Kfar Saba
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 422
City
Petach Tikva
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 427
City
Ramat Gan
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 433
City
Ramat Gan
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 421
City
Rehovot
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 420
City
Tel-Aviv
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 705
City
Batu Caves
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 700
City
Kuala Lumpur
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 702
City
Kuala Lumpur
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 703
City
Kuantan
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 701
City
Penang
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 704
City
Taiping
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 723
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 722
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 726
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 724
City
Dunedin
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 727
City
Hamilton
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 720
City
Tauranga
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 721
City
Wellington
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 744
City
Governor Mangubat Drive, Dasma
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 742
City
Manila
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 740
City
Quezon City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 741
City
Quezon City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 743
City
Quezon City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 745
City
Quezon City
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 507
City
Bialystok
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 509
City
Bydgoszcz
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 501
City
Bystra
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 500
City
Ostrow Wielkopolski
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 511
City
Poznan
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 502
City
Sopot
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 504
City
Tarnow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 545
City
Barnaul
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 551
City
Kazan
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 549
City
Kemerovo
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 550
City
Nizhniy Novgorod
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 553
City
Novosibirsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 555
City
Novosibirsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 542
City
St. Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 552
City
Tomsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 546
City
Yaroslavl
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 581
City
Cape Town
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 584
City
Cape Town
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 586
City
Cape Town
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 587
City
Centurion
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 582
City
Durban
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 585
City
Durban
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 580
City
Johannesburg
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 589
City
Johannesburg
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 583
City
Pretoria
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 588
City
Pretoria
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 602
City
Göteborg
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 604
City
Göteborg
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 603
City
Linköping
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 601
City
Malmö
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 780
City
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 782
City
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 783
City
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 781
City
Muang
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 784
City
Nakhon Ratchasima
Country
Thailand

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31626990
Citation
Nair P, Bardin P, Humbert M, Murphy KR, Hickey L, Garin M, Vanlandingham R, Chanez P. Efficacy of Intravenous Reslizumab in Oral Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):555-564. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31262379
Citation
Carr WW, McDonald M, Meizlik P. Effect of intravenously administered reslizumab on spirometric lung age in patients with moderate-to-severe eosinophilic asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jul 1;40(4):240-249. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4225.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30964365
Citation
Han S, Kim S, Kim H, Suh HS. Cost-utility analysis of reslizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma inadequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists in South Korea. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1605159. Epub 2019 May 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30346831
Citation
Bateman ED, Djukanovic R, Castro M, Canvin J, Germinaro M, Noble R, Garin M, Buhl R. Predicting Responders to Reslizumab after 16 Weeks of Treatment Using an Algorithm Derived from Clinical Studies of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb 15;199(4):489-495. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1668OC.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30193936
Citation
Weinstein SF, Katial RK, Bardin P, Korn S, McDonald M, Garin M, Bateman ED, Hoyte FCL, Germinaro M. Effects of Reslizumab on Asthma Outcomes in a Subgroup of Eosinophilic Asthma Patients with Self-Reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):589-596.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28159511
Citation
Brusselle G, Germinaro M, Weiss S, Zangrilli J. Reslizumab in patients with inadequately controlled late-onset asthma and elevated blood eosinophils. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;43:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25736990
Citation
Castro M, Zangrilli J, Wechsler ME, Bateman ED, Brusselle GG, Bardin P, Murphy K, Maspero JF, O'Brien C, Korn S. Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 May;3(5):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00042-9. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Erratum In: Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Apr;3(4):e15. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Oct;4(10 ):e50.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs