search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) (NOVA)

Primary Purpose

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Guselkumab dose 1
Guselkumab dose 2
Guselkumab dose 3
Placebo
Sponsored by
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the baseline visit as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history
  • Have HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomic areas (examples include but are not limited to left and right axilla; or left axilla and left inguinocrural fold)
  • Had an inadequate response to an adequate course of appropriate oral antibiotics for treatment of HS (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to oral antibiotics for treatment of their HS) in the investigator's opinion
  • Have a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at the screening and baseline visit
  • Must agree to daily use (throughout the entirety of the study) of one of the following over-the-counter treatments to the body areas affected with HS lesions: either soap and water, or a topical antiseptic wash containing chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, or benzoyl peroxide, or a dilute bleach bath

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other active skin disease or condition (example, bacterial, fungal or viral infection) that could have interfered with assessment of HS
  • Has a draining fistula count of greater than (>) 20 at the baseline visit
  • Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to the baseline visit
  • Receipt of systemic non-biologic therapies for the treatment of HS less than (<) 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
  • Receipt of any oral antibiotic treatment for HS or inflammatory disorders within 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama Birmingham
  • Olympian Clinical Research
  • Renstar Medical Research
  • Park Avenue Dermatology
  • Olympian Clinical Research
  • Forcare Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Great Lakes Clinical Trials
  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Hamzavi Dermatology
  • Central Dermatology
  • Clinical Studies Group
  • Ohio State University
  • Oregon Medical Research Center
  • University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
  • Clinical Partners, LLC
  • Progressive Clinical Research
  • Dermatology Associates of Seattle
  • Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation
  • Skin Centre for Dermatology
  • York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre
  • K. Papp Clinical Research
  • Bispebjerg Hospital
  • Sjaellands University Hospital
  • Hopital Prive d'Antony
  • Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis
  • CHU de Nice
  • Polyclinique de Courlancy
  • Hopital Charles Nicolle
  • CHU Saint-etienne
  • Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse
  • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin (CCM)
  • Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH
  • Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik
  • Städtisches Klinikum Dresden
  • Universitaetsklinik Erlangen
  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt
  • Haut- und Laserzentrum Freising
  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
  • Universitaetsmedizin Mainz
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • Radboudumc
  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1

Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2

Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab

Arm Description

Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 administered Intravenously (IV) followed by guselkumab dose 2 administered subcutaneously.

Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 subcutaneously.

Participants will receive placebo IV and SC and an additional SC placebo dose at Week 12 then cross over at Week 16 to receive guselkumab dose 2 and dose 3 SC and placebo SC.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Participant's Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
Change from baseline in total AN count at Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. The participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. A lower score (that is, negative change score) indicates improvement in the Quality of Life.
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score based on HSSD was reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 75 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 90 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved 100 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved an AN count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Abscess Count of 0 at Week 16 For Participants With Baseline Abscess Count Greater Than 0
Percentage of participants who achieved abscess count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline abscess count greater than (>) 0 were reported.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Abscesses at Week 16
Change from baseline in number of abscesses at Week 16 was reported.
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. A total symptom score, also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period.
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. Change from baseline in each individual HSSD component scale (other than pain in the past 24 hours) tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor and itchiness symptom, pain, and current pain score (rated on a scale of 0 [no symptom experience] to 10 [worst possible symptom experience]) were reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Draining Fistula Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Draining Fistula Count Greater Than 0
Percentage of participants who achieved draining fistulas count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline draining fistula count >0 were reported. Draining fistula were defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Week 16
Change from baseline in number of draining fistulas at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula are defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Nodules Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Inflammatory Nodule Count Greater Than 0
Percentage of participants who achieved inflammatory nodules count of 0 at Week 16 in participants with baseline inflammatory nodules count >0 were reported.
Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16
Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With HS-IGA Score of Inactive (0) or Almost Inactive (1) at Week 16 Among Participants With HS-IGA Score of Moderate Activity (3) or Severe Activity (4) at Baseline
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. Among participants with score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline, the same anatomic site selected for evaluation at the baseline were re-evaluated at Week 16. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1) at Week 16 among participants with HS-IGA score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline were reported.
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16
The HADS has been developed to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in hospitalized participants and in outpatients. It comprises 14 items, seven to assess anxiety (HADS-A), namely items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13; and seven to assess depression (HADS-D), namely items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Each item receives a score from 0 to 3 on a Likert Scale. The total score for each HADS-A and HADS-D scale is obtained by adding the individual scores for each item, with the maximum score 21. The presence or absence of depression and anxiety was defined, for each respective scale, based on the following cutoff values: HADS (anxiety): 0-8 equal to (=) no anxiety; greater than (>) 9 = anxiety; HADS (depression): 0-8 = no depression; >9 = depression.
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 16
Change from baseline in hs-CRP at Week 16 was reported. Serum samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Change from Baseline was calculated as: ([hs-CRP value at Week 16 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline value]).
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
The PGIC of HS Severity is a questionnaire that measures participants' perceived change (improvement or deterioration) in severity of their HS. Participants rated how his/her HS has changed since the beginning of the study using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 which indicates "a lot better now" to 7 which indicates "a lot worse now" with a neutral center point 4 which indicates ("neither better nor worse"). Participants' PGIC of HS Severity scale score at Week 16 were reported

Full Information

First Posted
August 9, 2018
Last Updated
May 18, 2021
Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03628924
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Acronym
NOVA
Official Title
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate Guselkumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 4, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 22, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 22, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hidradenitis Suppurativa

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
184 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 administered Intravenously (IV) followed by guselkumab dose 2 administered subcutaneously.
Arm Title
Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 subcutaneously.
Arm Title
Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive placebo IV and SC and an additional SC placebo dose at Week 12 then cross over at Week 16 to receive guselkumab dose 2 and dose 3 SC and placebo SC.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Guselkumab dose 1
Other Intervention Name(s)
CNTO 1959
Intervention Description
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 IV.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Guselkumab dose 2
Other Intervention Name(s)
CNTO 1959
Intervention Description
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 SC in Group 1, 2 and Group 3.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Guselkumab dose 3
Other Intervention Name(s)
CNTO 1959
Intervention Description
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 3 SC in Group 3.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Participants will receive matched placebo SC and IV in group 1, 2 and 3 with an additional placebo SC dose in Group 3.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
Description
HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Time Frame
Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Participant's Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
Description
Change from baseline in total AN count at Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
Description
DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. The participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. A lower score (that is, negative change score) indicates improvement in the Quality of Life.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16
Description
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score based on HSSD was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 75 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 90 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved 100 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved an AN count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Abscess Count of 0 at Week 16 For Participants With Baseline Abscess Count Greater Than 0
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved abscess count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline abscess count greater than (>) 0 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in the Number of Abscesses at Week 16
Description
Change from baseline in number of abscesses at Week 16 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 16
Description
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. A total symptom score, also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Description
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. Change from baseline in each individual HSSD component scale (other than pain in the past 24 hours) tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor and itchiness symptom, pain, and current pain score (rated on a scale of 0 [no symptom experience] to 10 [worst possible symptom experience]) were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Draining Fistula Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Draining Fistula Count Greater Than 0
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved draining fistulas count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline draining fistula count >0 were reported. Draining fistula were defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Week 16
Description
Change from baseline in number of draining fistulas at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula are defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Nodules Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Inflammatory Nodule Count Greater Than 0
Description
Percentage of participants who achieved inflammatory nodules count of 0 at Week 16 in participants with baseline inflammatory nodules count >0 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16
Description
Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
Description
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With HS-IGA Score of Inactive (0) or Almost Inactive (1) at Week 16 Among Participants With HS-IGA Score of Moderate Activity (3) or Severe Activity (4) at Baseline
Description
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. Among participants with score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline, the same anatomic site selected for evaluation at the baseline were re-evaluated at Week 16. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1) at Week 16 among participants with HS-IGA score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline were reported.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16
Description
The HADS has been developed to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in hospitalized participants and in outpatients. It comprises 14 items, seven to assess anxiety (HADS-A), namely items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13; and seven to assess depression (HADS-D), namely items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Each item receives a score from 0 to 3 on a Likert Scale. The total score for each HADS-A and HADS-D scale is obtained by adding the individual scores for each item, with the maximum score 21. The presence or absence of depression and anxiety was defined, for each respective scale, based on the following cutoff values: HADS (anxiety): 0-8 equal to (=) no anxiety; greater than (>) 9 = anxiety; HADS (depression): 0-8 = no depression; >9 = depression.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 16
Description
Change from baseline in hs-CRP at Week 16 was reported. Serum samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Change from Baseline was calculated as: ([hs-CRP value at Week 16 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline value]).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
Description
The PGIC of HS Severity is a questionnaire that measures participants' perceived change (improvement or deterioration) in severity of their HS. Participants rated how his/her HS has changed since the beginning of the study using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 which indicates "a lot better now" to 7 which indicates "a lot worse now" with a neutral center point 4 which indicates ("neither better nor worse"). Participants' PGIC of HS Severity scale score at Week 16 were reported
Time Frame
Week 16

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Have moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the baseline visit as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history Have HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomic areas (examples include but are not limited to left and right axilla; or left axilla and left inguinocrural fold) Had an inadequate response to an adequate course of appropriate oral antibiotics for treatment of HS (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to oral antibiotics for treatment of their HS) in the investigator's opinion Have a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at the screening and baseline visit Must agree to daily use (throughout the entirety of the study) of one of the following over-the-counter treatments to the body areas affected with HS lesions: either soap and water, or a topical antiseptic wash containing chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, or benzoyl peroxide, or a dilute bleach bath Exclusion Criteria: Any other active skin disease or condition (example, bacterial, fungal or viral infection) that could have interfered with assessment of HS Has a draining fistula count of greater than (>) 20 at the baseline visit Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to the baseline visit Receipt of systemic non-biologic therapies for the treatment of HS less than (<) 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit Receipt of any oral antibiotic treatment for HS or inflammatory disorders within 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Olympian Clinical Research
City
Largo
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33770
Country
United States
Facility Name
Renstar Medical Research
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34470
Country
United States
Facility Name
Park Avenue Dermatology
City
Orange Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32073
Country
United States
Facility Name
Olympian Clinical Research
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Forcare Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33624
Country
United States
Facility Name
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60640
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
City
Plainfield
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46168
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hamzavi Dermatology
City
Fort Gratiot
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48059
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Dermatology
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Studies Group
City
Henderson
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89052
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Medical Research Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97223
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Partners, LLC
City
Johnston
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02919
Country
United States
Facility Name
Progressive Clinical Research
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Associates of Seattle
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98101-1498
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6H 5L5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Skin Centre for Dermatology
City
Peterborough
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K9J 5K2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre
City
Richmond Hill
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4C 9M7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
K. Papp Clinical Research
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2J 1C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Bispebjerg Hospital
City
København NV
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2400
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Sjaellands University Hospital
City
Roskilde
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-4000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Hopital Prive d'Antony
City
Antony
ZIP/Postal Code
92160
Country
France
Facility Name
Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis
City
La Rochelle
ZIP/Postal Code
17019
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Nice
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06200
Country
France
Facility Name
Polyclinique de Courlancy
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51100
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Charles Nicolle
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76031
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Saint-etienne
City
St Priest En Jarez
ZIP/Postal Code
42270
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
France
Facility Name
Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin (CCM)
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44791
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik
City
Darmstadt
ZIP/Postal Code
64297
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Städtisches Klinikum Dresden
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01067
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinik Erlangen
City
Erlangen
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt
City
Frankfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Haut- und Laserzentrum Freising
City
Freising
ZIP/Postal Code
85354
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
City
Heidelberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsmedizin Mainz
City
Mainz
ZIP/Postal Code
55131
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9700 RB
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Radboudumc
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs