A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ESO-101 in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Primary Purpose
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ESO-101
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients aged 18-70 years;
- Confirmed clinicopathological diagnosis of EoE (eosinophilic esophagitis);
Active and symptomatic EoE, defined as:
- peak eosinophil count ≥15 eosinophils/high-powered field (hpf) at 2 levels of the esophagus at the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) as measured in a total of 6 hpfs derived from 6 biopsies, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus;
- either a dysphagia or odynophagia severity sore of ≥4 on a 11-point numeric rating scale for ≥1 day during the 7 days before Screening (Visit 1);
- Written informed consent;
- Willingness and ability to comply with the protocol for the duration of the trial;
- Negative pregnancy test at Screening (Visit 1) and Day 0 (Visit 3) in women of childbearing potential (i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and bilateral oophorectomy);
Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use (for a least 3 monthly cycles before the screening endoscopy [Visit 2] and until 4 weeks after the last intake of IMP) a highly effective method of contraception or birth control (failure rate less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly). Reliable methods for this trial are:
- combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal);
- progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable);
- intrauterine device or intrauterine hormone-releasing system;
- bilateral tubal occlusion;
- a vasectomized sexual partner;
- sexual abstinence (only accepted as true abstinence when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient; periodic abstinence [e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods, and withdrawal] is not an acceptable method of contraception).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, possibly pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the trial period;
- Current or past (within the last 3 months) alcohol or drug abuse;
- Initiation of a diet-modifying food restriction within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until EOT (end of treatment);
- Use of systemic corticosteroids or biologic immunomodulators within 3 months before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
- History of non-response to treatment of EoE with topical corticosteroid drugs (defined as no improvement of clinical symptoms of EoE after a minimum of 4 weeks corticosteroid therapy used at appropriate doses according to the investigator's judgment) or requirement of cessation of corticosteroid therapy for EoE treatment due to oral candidiasis or systemic corticosteroid side effects;
- Use of corticosteroids for treatment of EoE within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
- Use of inhalable (pulmonary or nasal) corticosteroids within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
- Asthma requiring corticosteroid therapy in the seasonal allergy period according to the investigator's judgment based on anamnesis until the EOT;
- Change in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosing regimen within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
- Use of systemic leukotriene receptor antagonists, immunosuppressant therapy, or chronic oral or systemic anticoagulants (such as coumarin derivates, novel oral and subcutaneous anticoagulants) within 2 weeks before Screening (Visit 1) until the EOT;
- Unable to swallow a test tablet of about the size of the IMP capsule used in the trial;
- History of diabetes mellitus;
- Other severe comorbid condition, concurrent medication, or other issue that renders the patient unsuitable to participate in the trial in the judgment of the investigator, including but not limited to: comorbid condition with an estimated life expectancy of ≤12 months, dialysis, severe pulmonary (requiring home oxygen, uncontrolled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Gold III/IV) or cardiovascular conditions (heart failure New York Heart Association III and IV, uncontrolled hypertension systolic blood pressure by repeated measurement >180mmHg);
- History of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer, or carcinoma in situ of cervix) or treatment with anticancer therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy for cancer treatment, targeted therapy or gene therapy) within 12 months before Screening (Visit 1) until the EOT;
- Known intolerability or hypersensitivity to mometasone furoate or any of the IMP excipients (e.g. bovine gelatin, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, glycerol, sorbitol);
- Systemic autoimmune disorders or any condition requiring immunosuppression (e.g. methotrexate, cyclosporine, interferon alpha, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, antibodies to immunoglobulin E) within 3 months before Screening (Visit 1);
- Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the trial or presence of any condition that impacts compliance with the trial procedures;
- Use of any investigational or non-registered product (medicinal product or medical device) within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
- Employee at the trial center, spouse, partner or child of investigators or sub-investigators or employee of the sponsor.
- History of or active non-EoE gastrointestinal disease including eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, oral or esophageal mucosal infection of any kind, and esophageal varices;
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease with Los Angeles Grade B or higher, or erosive esophagitis Grade 2 or above;
- Presence of Barrett's esophagus with a maximum length of ≥3 cm with intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia, peptic stricture, achalasia, significant hiatal hernia >3 cm, esophageal scleroderma, or diagnosis of Lichen planus;
- Emergency endoscopy for bolus impaction within 2 weeks before Screening (Visit 1);
- Any mouth or dental condition that prevents normal eating;
- History of (dilation within the previous 8 weeks) or current severe endoscopic structural abnormality in esophagus (e.g. high-grade stenosis where an 8-10 mm endoscope cannot pass without dilatation at the screening endoscopy [Visit 2]);
- Diagnosed liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension;
- History of upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 8 weeks before Screening (Visit 1);
- Known allergy to β-lactoglobulin (cow milk protein).
Sites / Locations
- Facharztzentrum Eppendorf
- Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Medizinische Fakultät Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A. ö. R.
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
- Amsterdam University Medical Center
- Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
- Centrum Medyczne Sonomed Sp. z o.o.
- Centrum Medyczne Med-GASTR Sp. z o.o.
- Hospital Universitario Vall d' Hebrón
- Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
- Hospital Universitario Central De Asturias
- Hospital de Navarra
- Hospital General de Tomelloso
- Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega
- Hospital de Viladecans
- Universitätsspital Zürich
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
ESO-101
Placebo
Arm Description
Oral use of 1 hard gelatin capsule (800 μg)
Oral use of 1 hard gelatin capsule
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Absolute change in peak eosinophil count from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Proportion of patients with histological remission, defined as the reduction of peak eosinophil count in all esophageal samples to <15 eosinophils/hpf at end of treatment, overall and determined differentially in each of the 3 esophageal segments
Biopsy samples will be taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5). At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields (hpfs) with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Proportion of patients with a peak eosinophil count in all esophageal samples of <6 eosinophils/hpf at end of treatment, overall and determined differentially in each of the 3 esophageal segments
Biopsy samples will be taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5). At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields (hpfs) with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Proportion of patients with an improvement in the dysphagia severity score from Baseline to end of treatment
Patients will rate the dysphagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. At Visit 3 (Day 0) and Visit 5 (end of treatment), the worst severity scores out of the 7 days preceding the respective visit will be used for the assessment. The score assessed at Visit 3 (Day 0) at the center before IMP intake will serve as baseline score. Patients will additionally assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Absolute change in mean eosinophil count from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Relative change in mean eosinophil count from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Proportion of patients with a relative reduction in peak eosinophil count of ≥30 percent from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Proportion of patients with a relative reduction in peak eosinophil count of ≥50 percent from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Proportion of patients with a relative reduction in peak eosinophil count of ≥75 percent from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Proportion of patients with histological remission AND improvement in the dysphagia severity score from Baseline to end of treatment
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Additionally, patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Absolute change in dysphagia and odynophagia severity scores from Baseline
Patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Relative change in dysphagia and odynophagia severity scores from Baseline
Patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Time to achieve symptom relief (defined as 50 percent improvement in the dysphagia or odynophagia symptoms on an NRS compared to Baseline)
Patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Change in the EREFS from Baseline to end of treatment
The EREFS score (Eosinophilic esophagitis endoscopic reference score) is a classification and grading system for the endoscopic assessment of the esophageal features of eosinophilic esophagitis. The grading is used either to assess the severity of endoscopic findings from 0=´none´ to 2 or 3=´severe´ or to classify 0=´absent´ or 1=´present´.The total score will be calculated and compared between Baseline and end of treatment. A higher score correlates with more severe eosinophilic esophagitis symptoms.
Incidence of treatment-emergent Adverse Events
All Adverse Events occurring from the first investigational medicinal product administration onwards are defined as treatment-emergent Adverse Events.
Incidence of treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events
All Serious Adverse Events occurring from the first investigational medicinal product administration onwards are defined as treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events.
Incidence of AESI
The following AEs are defined as AEs of special interest (AESI), if these events were not already present at Visit 2:
Oral candidiasis;
Oropharyngeal candidiasis.
Local tolerability
The local tolerability of the IMP administration will be evaluated daily throughout the treatment period in the patient diary. Patients should indicate whether they had any discomfort in mouth, throat or esophagus while taking IMP on a VAS (Visual analog scale) ranging from 'no discomfort' to 'the worst imaginable discomfort'. The first assessment on Day 0 recorded in the patient diary after IMP intake will be considered Baseline.
Patient-reported treatment satisfaction at end of treatment based on questions about handling, taste, and time necessary for administration
Patients will be asked to answer a questionnaire about their satisfaction with the IMP treatment at Visit 5. Questions will cover the general satisfaction with the IMP, the swallowability of the IMP, and the frequency of administration. Answers involve gradings from 0 (the best outcome) to 3 or 4 (the worst outcome) plus an indication for the preference of single or multiple administrations of the investigated product.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04849390
First Posted
April 2, 2021
Last Updated
September 20, 2023
Sponsor
EsoCap AG
Collaborators
FGK Clinical Research GmbH, FGK Representative Service B.V.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04849390
Brief Title
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ESO-101 in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Official Title
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial Evaluating the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of ESO-101 in Adult Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
June 29, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
EsoCap AG
Collaborators
FGK Clinical Research GmbH, FGK Representative Service B.V.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of ESO-101 in adult patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Patients will be screened at 2 visits (Visit 1 and Visit 2) during which their eligibility will be assessed based on endoscopy-independent criteria (Visit 1) and based on the histologic assessment of esophageal biopsy samples taken during the screening endoscopy (Visit 2). Eligible patients will be randomized 2:1 to once-daily treatment with ESO-101 or placebo and treated for 28 days starting on Day 0. Further clinic visits will be performed at Day 14 (Visit 4) and Day 28 (Visit 5, end of treatment) to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety. In addition, a safety follow-up call will be scheduled 2 weeks after the end of treatment (Day 42, Visit 6).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The placebo will be identical to the test product in terms of appearance, constitution of inactive ingredients, packaging, labeling and administration.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
43 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ESO-101
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Oral use of 1 hard gelatin capsule (800 μg)
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Oral use of 1 hard gelatin capsule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ESO-101
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mometasone furoate (800 μg)
Intervention Description
Daily administration in the evening at bedtime for 28 days
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Daily administration in the evening at bedtime for 28 days
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Absolute change in peak eosinophil count from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patients with histological remission, defined as the reduction of peak eosinophil count in all esophageal samples to <15 eosinophils/hpf at end of treatment, overall and determined differentially in each of the 3 esophageal segments
Description
Biopsy samples will be taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5). At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields (hpfs) with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Proportion of patients with a peak eosinophil count in all esophageal samples of <6 eosinophils/hpf at end of treatment, overall and determined differentially in each of the 3 esophageal segments
Description
Biopsy samples will be taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5). At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields (hpfs) with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
End of treatment (Visit 5 = day 28)
Title
Proportion of patients with an improvement in the dysphagia severity score from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
Patients will rate the dysphagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. At Visit 3 (Day 0) and Visit 5 (end of treatment), the worst severity scores out of the 7 days preceding the respective visit will be used for the assessment. The score assessed at Visit 3 (Day 0) at the center before IMP intake will serve as baseline score. Patients will additionally assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 3) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 28 days after Visit 3)
Title
Absolute change in mean eosinophil count from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Relative change in mean eosinophil count from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Proportion of patients with a relative reduction in peak eosinophil count of ≥30 percent from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Proportion of patients with a relative reduction in peak eosinophil count of ≥50 percent from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Proportion of patients with a relative reduction in peak eosinophil count of ≥75 percent from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Histology results of the biopsies at Visit 2 will be considered baseline values. For the peak number of eosinophils, hematoxylin and eosin stained esophageal biopsy specimen will be assessed and the high-powered fields with the highest density of eosinophils will be counted.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Proportion of patients with histological remission AND improvement in the dysphagia severity score from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The processing and analysis of biopsy samples taken at Visit 2 and end of treatment (Visit 5) will be performed blinded at a central laboratory according to a laboratory manual. At both visits, 6 biopsy samples will be taken, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus. Additionally, patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2 + 3) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Absolute change in dysphagia and odynophagia severity scores from Baseline
Description
Patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 3) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 28 days after Visit 3)
Title
Relative change in dysphagia and odynophagia severity scores from Baseline
Description
Patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 3) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 28 days after Visit 3)
Title
Time to achieve symptom relief (defined as 50 percent improvement in the dysphagia or odynophagia symptoms on an NRS compared to Baseline)
Description
Patients will rate the dysphagia and odynophagia severity score daily on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale): 0 = 'no symptoms' to 10 = 'worst possible symptoms'. Patients will assess the severity score of the actual day in the patient diary daily after IMP intake starting on Day 0.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 3) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 28 days after Visit 3)
Title
Change in the EREFS from Baseline to end of treatment
Description
The EREFS score (Eosinophilic esophagitis endoscopic reference score) is a classification and grading system for the endoscopic assessment of the esophageal features of eosinophilic esophagitis. The grading is used either to assess the severity of endoscopic findings from 0=´none´ to 2 or 3=´severe´ or to classify 0=´absent´ or 1=´present´.The total score will be calculated and compared between Baseline and end of treatment. A higher score correlates with more severe eosinophilic esophagitis symptoms.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 2) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 4-7 weeks after Visit 2)
Title
Incidence of treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Description
All Adverse Events occurring from the first investigational medicinal product administration onwards are defined as treatment-emergent Adverse Events.
Time Frame
Visit 3 (Day 0) to day 42
Title
Incidence of treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events
Description
All Serious Adverse Events occurring from the first investigational medicinal product administration onwards are defined as treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events.
Time Frame
Visit 3 (Day 0) to day 42
Title
Incidence of AESI
Description
The following AEs are defined as AEs of special interest (AESI), if these events were not already present at Visit 2:
Oral candidiasis;
Oropharyngeal candidiasis.
Time Frame
Visit 2 (day -21 to -1) to Visit 6 (day 42)
Title
Local tolerability
Description
The local tolerability of the IMP administration will be evaluated daily throughout the treatment period in the patient diary. Patients should indicate whether they had any discomfort in mouth, throat or esophagus while taking IMP on a VAS (Visual analog scale) ranging from 'no discomfort' to 'the worst imaginable discomfort'. The first assessment on Day 0 recorded in the patient diary after IMP intake will be considered Baseline.
Time Frame
From Baseline (Visit 3) to end of treatment (Visit 5 = 28 days after Visit 3)
Title
Patient-reported treatment satisfaction at end of treatment based on questions about handling, taste, and time necessary for administration
Description
Patients will be asked to answer a questionnaire about their satisfaction with the IMP treatment at Visit 5. Questions will cover the general satisfaction with the IMP, the swallowability of the IMP, and the frequency of administration. Answers involve gradings from 0 (the best outcome) to 3 or 4 (the worst outcome) plus an indication for the preference of single or multiple administrations of the investigated product.
Time Frame
At end of treatment (Visit 5 = day 28)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patients aged 18-70 years;
Confirmed clinicopathological diagnosis of EoE (eosinophilic esophagitis);
Active and symptomatic EoE, defined as:
peak eosinophil count ≥15 eosinophils/high-powered field (hpf) at 2 levels of the esophagus at the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) as measured in a total of 6 hpfs derived from 6 biopsies, 2 each from the proximal, mid, and distal segment of the esophagus;
either a dysphagia or odynophagia severity sore of ≥4 on a 11-point numeric rating scale for ≥1 day during the 7 days before Screening (Visit 1);
Written informed consent;
Willingness and ability to comply with the protocol for the duration of the trial;
Negative pregnancy test at Screening (Visit 1) and Day 0 (Visit 3) in women of childbearing potential (i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and bilateral oophorectomy);
Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use (for a least 3 monthly cycles before the screening endoscopy [Visit 2] and until 4 weeks after the last intake of IMP) a highly effective method of contraception or birth control (failure rate less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly). Reliable methods for this trial are:
combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal);
progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable);
intrauterine device or intrauterine hormone-releasing system;
bilateral tubal occlusion;
a vasectomized sexual partner;
sexual abstinence (only accepted as true abstinence when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient; periodic abstinence [e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods, and withdrawal] is not an acceptable method of contraception).
Exclusion Criteria:
Women who are pregnant, lactating, possibly pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the trial period;
Current or past (within the last 3 months) alcohol or drug abuse;
Initiation of a diet-modifying food restriction within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until EOT (end of treatment);
Use of systemic corticosteroids or biologic immunomodulators within 3 months before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
History of non-response to treatment of EoE with topical corticosteroid drugs (defined as no improvement of clinical symptoms of EoE after a minimum of 4 weeks corticosteroid therapy used at appropriate doses according to the investigator's judgment) or requirement of cessation of corticosteroid therapy for EoE treatment due to oral candidiasis or systemic corticosteroid side effects;
Use of corticosteroids for treatment of EoE within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
Use of inhalable (pulmonary or nasal) corticosteroids within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
Asthma requiring corticosteroid therapy in the seasonal allergy period according to the investigator's judgment based on anamnesis until the EOT;
Change in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosing regimen within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
Use of systemic leukotriene receptor antagonists, immunosuppressant therapy, or chronic oral or systemic anticoagulants (such as coumarin derivates, novel oral and subcutaneous anticoagulants) within 2 weeks before Screening (Visit 1) until the EOT;
Unable to swallow a test tablet of about the size of the IMP capsule used in the trial;
History of diabetes mellitus;
Other severe comorbid condition, concurrent medication, or other issue that renders the patient unsuitable to participate in the trial in the judgment of the investigator, including but not limited to: comorbid condition with an estimated life expectancy of ≤12 months, dialysis, severe pulmonary (requiring home oxygen, uncontrolled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Gold III/IV) or cardiovascular conditions (heart failure New York Heart Association III and IV, uncontrolled hypertension systolic blood pressure by repeated measurement >180mmHg);
History of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer, or carcinoma in situ of cervix) or treatment with anticancer therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy for cancer treatment, targeted therapy or gene therapy) within 12 months before Screening (Visit 1) until the EOT;
Known intolerability or hypersensitivity to mometasone furoate or any of the IMP excipients (e.g. bovine gelatin, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, glycerol, sorbitol);
Systemic autoimmune disorders or any condition requiring immunosuppression (e.g. methotrexate, cyclosporine, interferon alpha, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, antibodies to immunoglobulin E) within 3 months before Screening (Visit 1);
Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the trial or presence of any condition that impacts compliance with the trial procedures;
Use of any investigational or non-registered product (medicinal product or medical device) within 4 weeks before the screening endoscopy (Visit 2) until the EOT;
Employee at the trial center, spouse, partner or child of investigators or sub-investigators or employee of the sponsor.
History of or active eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, oral or esophageal mucosal infection of any kind, and esophageal varices;
Gastroesophageal reflux disease with Los Angeles Grade B or higher, or erosive esophagitis Grade 2 or above;
Presence of Barrett's esophagus with a maximum length of ≥3 cm with intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia, peptic stricture, achalasia, significant hiatal hernia >3 cm, esophageal scleroderma, or diagnosis of Lichen planus;
Emergency endoscopy for bolus impaction within 2 weeks before Screening (Visit 1);
Any mouth or dental condition that prevents normal eating;
History of (dilation within the previous 8 weeks) or current severe endoscopic structural abnormality in esophagus (e.g. high-grade stenosis where an 8-10 mm endoscope cannot pass without dilatation at the screening endoscopy [Visit 2]);
Diagnosed liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension;
History of upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 8 weeks before Screening (Visit 1);
Known allergy to β-lactoglobulin (cow milk protein).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Isabelle Racamier
Organizational Affiliation
EsoCap AG (Malzgasse 9, 4052 Basel, Switzerland)
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Facharztzentrum Eppendorf
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Medizinische Fakultät Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A. ö. R.
City
Magdeburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
City
München
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Amsterdam University Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
City
Dordrecht
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Sonomed Sp. z o.o.
City
Szczecin
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Med-GASTR Sp. z o.o.
City
Łódź
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Vall d' Hebrón
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Central De Asturias
City
Oviedo
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de Navarra
City
Pamplona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General de Tomelloso
City
Tomelloso
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega
City
Valladolid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de Viladecans
City
Viladecans
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Universitätsspital Zürich
City
Zürich
Country
Switzerland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ESO-101 in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs