search
Back to results

A Study to Test Safety, Tolerability, and the Way the Body Absorbs, Distributes, and Gets Rid of a Study Drug Called MOR106, in Healthy Subjects and in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Primary Purpose

Healthy, Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MOR106
Placebo
Sponsored by
Galapagos NV
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Healthy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Part 1:

  • Male between 18-50 years of age (extremes included), on the day of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Subjects between 65-88 kg (extremes included) with a body mass index (BMI) between 18-30 kg/m², inclusive.
  • Judged to be in good health based upon the results of a medical history, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and screening laboratory profile prior to the initial investigation medicinal product (IMP) administration.

Part 2 and Part 3:

  • Male or female between 18-65 years of age (extremes included), on the day of signing ICF.
  • A BMI between 18-30 kg/m², inclusive.
  • Diagnosis of AD for at least one year since first diagnosis as per Hanifin and Rajka Criteria.
  • EASI ≥ 12 at screening and ≥ 16 at the baseline visit (Day 1 predose)
  • ≥ 10% BSA of AD involvement at screening.
  • IGA score ≥ 3 (on 0-4 IGA scale).
  • Willingness to use an additive free, basic, bland emollient twice daily for at least seven days before the baseline visit and throughout the study.
  • Subject is a candidate for systemic therapy and is not responding adequately or has a contraindication to topical corticosteroids (TCS) and / or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), per investigator's judgment.

Exclusion Criteria:

Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3:

  • Known hypersensitivity to IMP ingredients as determined by the investigator (such as, but not limited to, anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization).
  • Prior treatment with MOR106.
  • Any concurrent illness, condition, disability, or clinically significant abnormality (including laboratory tests, ≥ New York Heart Association Classification (NYHA) III/IV) or clinically significant illness in the three months prior to initial IMP administration that, in the investigator's opinion, represents a safety risk for the subject's participation in the study, may affect the interpretation of clinical safety or efficacy data, or may prevent the subject from safely completing the assessments required by the protocol.
  • History of, or current immunosuppressive condition.

In addition for Part 2 and 3:

  • Active chronic or acute skin infection requiring treatment with systemic (oral, sc or iv) antibiotics, antivirals or antifungals within 4 weeks of baseline, or clinical signs of infective eczema within 1 week before baseline (Day 1 pre-dose).
  • Having used any of the following treatments:

    i) Exposure to a biologic therapy for AD. ii) Immunosuppressive/ immunomodulating drugs (e.g. systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.) within 4 weeks of baseline. iii) Phototherapy (ultraviolet (UVB) or Psoralen Ultraviolet A [PUVA]) for AD within four weeks of baseline. iv) Treatment with TCS or TCI within two weeks before the baseline visit. v) Treatment with biologics (for non-AD indications) within five half-lives (if known) or 12 weeks prior to baseline visit, whichever is longer. vi) Regular use (more than two visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within four weeks of the screening visit.

Sites / Locations

  • Klinikum Augsburg Süd
  • Municipal Hospital Dessau
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
  • University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Dermatology
  • Medical Faculty University Clinic Magdeburg, University dermatology clinic
  • Vest Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy
  • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
  • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
  • Arensia
  • MEU
  • MeDiNova North London
  • MeDiNova East London
  • MeDiNova South London

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm 7

Arm 8

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

MOR106 Single Dose A, i.v. infusion, Part 1

MOR106 Single Dose B, s.c. injection, Part 1

MOR106 Single Dose C, s.c. injection, Part 1

MOR106 Single Dose D, s.c. injection, Part 1

MOR106 Repeated Doses E, s.c. injection, Part 2

Placebo s.c.injection, Part 2

MOR106 Repeated Doses F, s.c. injection, Part 3

Placebo s.c.injection, Part 3

Arm Description

A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by i.v. infusion.

A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection.

A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection.

A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection.

Repeated doses of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection with a loading dose on the first day of administration.

Corresponding Placebo will be administered by s.c. injection.

Repeated doses of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection with a loading dose on the first day of administration.

Corresponding Placebo will be administered by s.c. injection.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The number of incidents of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) Part 1.
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of single doses of MOR106 administered s.c. in comparison to i.v.
The number of incidents of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) Part 2.
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of MOR106 administered s.c.
The number of incidents of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) Part 3.
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of MOR106 administered s.c.
AUC ratio between s.c. and i.v. dosing (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) Part 1.
To determine the relative bioavailability following sc route of administration.
Area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) Part 1.
To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MOR106.
Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) Part 1.
To characterize the PK of MOR106.
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) Part 1.
To characterize the PK of MOR106.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) Part 1.
To monitor the occurrence of ADA after single administrations of MOR106.
Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) Part 2.
To monitor the occurrence of ADA after multiple administrations of MOR106.
Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) Part 3.
To monitor the occurrence of ADA after multiple administrations of MOR106.
MOR106 serum concentrations after multiple s.c. administrations Part 2.
Steady-state will be assessed using MOR106 serum concentrations.
MOR106 serum concentrations after multiple s.c. administrations Part 3.
Steady-state will be assessed using MOR106 serum concentrations.
Percent change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Percent change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥50% overall improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥50% overall improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time to first response of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement with 50% Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time to first response of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement with 50% Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score,The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score,The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score reduction of ≥2 Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score reduction of ≥2 Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Percent change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of SCORAD.The SCORAD evaluates the extent of atopic dermatitis and ranges between 0 and 103. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Percent change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of SCORAD.The SCORAD evaluates the extent of atopic dermatitis and ranges between 0 and 103. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Absolute and percent change in body surface area (BSA), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of POEM. The POEM is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 28 and a minimum score of 0.
Absolute and percent change in body surface area (BSA), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of POEM. The POEM is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 28 and a minimum score of 0.
Weekly change from baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Part 2.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by NRS. An 11-point (0 - 10) scale will be used to assess itch (pruritus). 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable'.
Weekly change from baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Part 3.
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by NRS. An 11-point (0 - 10) scale will be used to assess itch (pruritus). 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable'.

Full Information

First Posted
September 20, 2018
Last Updated
March 16, 2020
Sponsor
Galapagos NV
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03689829
Brief Title
A Study to Test Safety, Tolerability, and the Way the Body Absorbs, Distributes, and Gets Rid of a Study Drug Called MOR106, in Healthy Subjects and in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Official Title
A Parallel-design Phase 1 Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics/Exposure Following Different Single Dose Levels of MOR106 (Administered Subcutaneously or Intravenously) in Healthy Male Subjects (Randomized, Open-label), and in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Repeated Subcutaneous Dosing Over 12 Weeks)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
MOR106 clinical development in atopic dermatitis was stopped for futility
Study Start Date
August 13, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Galapagos NV

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The clinical study consists of three parts: Part 1 with healthy volunteers. Part 2 and Part 3 including subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (a skin disease). For Part 1 the main goal of the study is to compare the safety, tolerability, and exposure of administration of the test drug via an injection in a skin layer just under the surface (subcutaneous), to administration of the test drug into the vein (intravenous). For Part 2 and Part 3 the main goal of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of administration of the test drug via an injection in a skin layer just under the surface (subcutaneous) during 12 weeks of treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Healthy, Atopic Dermatitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Part 1 - randomized open label. Part 2 and Part 3 - randomized double blind.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
44 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MOR106 Single Dose A, i.v. infusion, Part 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by i.v. infusion.
Arm Title
MOR106 Single Dose B, s.c. injection, Part 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection.
Arm Title
MOR106 Single Dose C, s.c. injection, Part 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection.
Arm Title
MOR106 Single Dose D, s.c. injection, Part 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A single dose of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection.
Arm Title
MOR106 Repeated Doses E, s.c. injection, Part 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Repeated doses of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection with a loading dose on the first day of administration.
Arm Title
Placebo s.c.injection, Part 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Corresponding Placebo will be administered by s.c. injection.
Arm Title
MOR106 Repeated Doses F, s.c. injection, Part 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Repeated doses of MOR106 will be administered by s.c. injection with a loading dose on the first day of administration.
Arm Title
Placebo s.c.injection, Part 3
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Corresponding Placebo will be administered by s.c. injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
MOR106
Intervention Description
The active pharmaceutical drug substance of MOR106 is a human immunoglobulin gamma-1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that binds with a high apparent affinity to human interleukin-17C (IL-17C).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Corresponding placebo s.c. injections.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of incidents of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) Part 1.
Description
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of single doses of MOR106 administered s.c. in comparison to i.v.
Time Frame
From study drug administration until Day 50 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
The number of incidents of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) Part 2.
Description
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of MOR106 administered s.c.
Time Frame
From study drug administration until Day 197 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
The number of incidents of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to Adverse Events (AEs) Part 3.
Description
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of MOR106 administered s.c.
Time Frame
From study drug administration until Day 155 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
AUC ratio between s.c. and i.v. dosing (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) Part 1.
Description
To determine the relative bioavailability following sc route of administration.
Time Frame
Between Day 1 study period and Day 50 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
Area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) Part 1.
Description
To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MOR106.
Time Frame
Between Day 1 study period and Day 50 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) Part 1.
Description
To characterize the PK of MOR106.
Time Frame
Between Day 1 study period and Day 50 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) Part 1.
Description
To characterize the PK of MOR106.
Time Frame
Between Day 1 study period and Day 50 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) Part 1.
Description
To monitor the occurrence of ADA after single administrations of MOR106.
Time Frame
From baseline through Day 50 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) Part 2.
Description
To monitor the occurrence of ADA after multiple administrations of MOR106.
Time Frame
From baseline through Day 197 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
Occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) Part 3.
Description
To monitor the occurrence of ADA after multiple administrations of MOR106.
Time Frame
From baseline through Day 155 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
MOR106 serum concentrations after multiple s.c. administrations Part 2.
Description
Steady-state will be assessed using MOR106 serum concentrations.
Time Frame
Between Day 1 study period and Day 197 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
MOR106 serum concentrations after multiple s.c. administrations Part 3.
Description
Steady-state will be assessed using MOR106 serum concentrations.
Time Frame
Between Day 1 study period and Day 155 postdose or early discontinuation (ED) visit
Title
Percent change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Percent change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥50% overall improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥50% overall improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Time to first response of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement with 50% Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Time to first response of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement with 50% Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score. The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score,The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of EASI score,The EASI score ranges are between 0 (no eczema) and 72. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
at Day 85 visit
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
at Day 85 visit
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score reduction of ≥2 Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
at Day 85 visit
Title
Proportion of subjects who achieve an Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) score reduction of ≥2 Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of IGA score, an assessment scale to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) score. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
at Day 85 visit
Title
Percent change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of SCORAD.The SCORAD evaluates the extent of atopic dermatitis and ranges between 0 and 103. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Percent change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of SCORAD.The SCORAD evaluates the extent of atopic dermatitis and ranges between 0 and 103. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Absolute and percent change in body surface area (BSA), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of POEM. The POEM is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 28 and a minimum score of 0.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Absolute and percent change in body surface area (BSA), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by use of POEM. The POEM is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 28 and a minimum score of 0.
Time Frame
From baseline to Day 85
Title
Weekly change from baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Part 2.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by NRS. An 11-point (0 - 10) scale will be used to assess itch (pruritus). 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable'.
Time Frame
From screening until Day 197 or early discontinuation (ED) visit twice daily
Title
Weekly change from baseline in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Part 3.
Description
To assess the efficacy of MOR106 by NRS. An 11-point (0 - 10) scale will be used to assess itch (pruritus). 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable'.
Time Frame
From screening until Day 155 or early discontinuation (ED) visit twice daily

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Part 1: Male between 18-50 years of age (extremes included), on the day of signing the informed consent form (ICF). Subjects between 65-88 kg (extremes included) with a body mass index (BMI) between 18-30 kg/m², inclusive. Judged to be in good health based upon the results of a medical history, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and screening laboratory profile prior to the initial investigation medicinal product (IMP) administration. Part 2 and Part 3: Male or female between 18-65 years of age (extremes included), on the day of signing ICF. A BMI between 18-30 kg/m², inclusive. Diagnosis of AD for at least one year since first diagnosis as per Hanifin and Rajka Criteria. EASI ≥ 12 at screening and ≥ 16 at the baseline visit (Day 1 predose) ≥ 10% BSA of AD involvement at screening. IGA score ≥ 3 (on 0-4 IGA scale). Willingness to use an additive free, basic, bland emollient twice daily for at least seven days before the baseline visit and throughout the study. Subject is a candidate for systemic therapy and is not responding adequately or has a contraindication to topical corticosteroids (TCS) and / or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), per investigator's judgment. Exclusion Criteria: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3: Known hypersensitivity to IMP ingredients as determined by the investigator (such as, but not limited to, anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization). Prior treatment with MOR106. Any concurrent illness, condition, disability, or clinically significant abnormality (including laboratory tests, ≥ New York Heart Association Classification (NYHA) III/IV) or clinically significant illness in the three months prior to initial IMP administration that, in the investigator's opinion, represents a safety risk for the subject's participation in the study, may affect the interpretation of clinical safety or efficacy data, or may prevent the subject from safely completing the assessments required by the protocol. History of, or current immunosuppressive condition. In addition for Part 2 and 3: Active chronic or acute skin infection requiring treatment with systemic (oral, sc or iv) antibiotics, antivirals or antifungals within 4 weeks of baseline, or clinical signs of infective eczema within 1 week before baseline (Day 1 pre-dose). Having used any of the following treatments: i) Exposure to a biologic therapy for AD. ii) Immunosuppressive/ immunomodulating drugs (e.g. systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.) within 4 weeks of baseline. iii) Phototherapy (ultraviolet (UVB) or Psoralen Ultraviolet A [PUVA]) for AD within four weeks of baseline. iv) Treatment with TCS or TCI within two weeks before the baseline visit. v) Treatment with biologics (for non-AD indications) within five half-lives (if known) or 12 weeks prior to baseline visit, whichever is longer. vi) Regular use (more than two visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within four weeks of the screening visit.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helen Timmis, MB CHB
Organizational Affiliation
Galapagos NV
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Klinikum Augsburg Süd
City
Augsburg
ZIP/Postal Code
86179
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Municipal Hospital Dessau
City
Dessau
ZIP/Postal Code
06847
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
1307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Dermatology
City
Erlangen
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medical Faculty University Clinic Magdeburg, University dermatology clinic
City
Magdeburg
ZIP/Postal Code
39120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Vest Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy
City
Recklinghausen
ZIP/Postal Code
45657
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
City
Alicante
ZIP/Postal Code
03010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Arensia
City
Kapitanivka
ZIP/Postal Code
08112
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
MEU
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
MeDiNova North London
City
Northwood
ZIP/Postal Code
HA6 2RN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
MeDiNova East London
City
Romford
ZIP/Postal Code
RM1 3PJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
MeDiNova South London
City
Sidcup
ZIP/Postal Code
DA14 6LT
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Test Safety, Tolerability, and the Way the Body Absorbs, Distributes, and Gets Rid of a Study Drug Called MOR106, in Healthy Subjects and in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs