search
Back to results

A Time-motion Study Comparing Self- to Nurse-vaccination With Influenza Vaccine

Primary Purpose

Influenza, Vaccination Site Reactions (HT)

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intanza
Vaxigrip
Sponsored by
Brenda Coleman
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Influenza focused on measuring influenza, vaccine, administration

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 69 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medically stable men or women 18 to 69 years of age (inclusive)
  • Work in any capacity (including physicians and midwives with admitting privileges), volunteer, or student at participating hospital
  • Able to read, understand, and respond to questionnaires
  • Able to read, understand, and sign an informed consent form
  • Available for follow-up for 8 days post-vaccination
  • Participants in Part B (repeat administration) of the study must also have participated in the previous randomized control trial of self- versus nurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine and must have attempted to self-administer the vaccine

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already received 2012-13 influenza vaccine
  • History of a severe reaction following influenza vaccination
  • Known allergy to components of study vaccines (Intanza® or Vaxigrip®)
  • History of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) within 8 weeks following influenza vaccination
  • Acute febrile illness (>37.9ºC orally) within the past 48 hours (participation may be deferred until recovery for these subjects)

Sites / Locations

  • Center for Vaccinology
  • Mount Sinai Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Nurse-administered IM

Self-administered intradermal

Repeat self-administration intradermal

Arm Description

Nurse-administered intramuscular influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip, 0.5 mL)

Self-administered intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza 0.1 mL)

Self-administration of intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza 0.1 mL) by participants who self-administered an intradermal vaccine in our 2010 study

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to Administer Influenza Vaccine (in Seconds)
Time required to explain vaccination, obtain consent, administer vaccine, and register vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Acceptability of Vaccine
The post-vaccination (Day 0) and follow-up (Day 8) questionnaires include questions on the participant's preference for intradermal or intramuscular injections and questions about their preference for administration by a healthcare provider or self-vaccination.
Success Rate
Successful administration, defined as being able to self-vaccinate (or for RN to provide vaccine) on the first attempt. Will be calculated using the number of participants who are successful divided by the number of participants randomized to group.
Local & Systemic Reactogenicity
Maximum self-reported diameter of redness, induration, and swelling, and maximum intensity and duration of itchiness, fever, muscle ache, joint pain, headache, fatigue, feeling unwell, and injection site pain as reported on Day 8 after vaccination
Pain at Injection Site
Self-perceived pain of injection will be recorded on an 11-point visual analogue scale immediately following vaccination (Day 0) and at follow-up (Day 8)

Full Information

First Posted
August 13, 2012
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Sponsor
Brenda Coleman
Collaborators
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01665807
Brief Title
A Time-motion Study Comparing Self- to Nurse-vaccination With Influenza Vaccine
Official Title
A Time-Motion Study to Compare Self-vaccination With Intanza® Intradermal Influenza Vaccine to Nurse-administered Vaxigrip® Intramuscular Influenza Vaccine in Small Group Settings of Health Care Workers
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Brenda Coleman
Collaborators
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that people working in an acute care hospital setting will be able to successfully self-administer the intradermal vaccine (Intanza) in less time than nurse-administration of the regular intramuscular influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip). The investigators also hypothesize that people administering the intradermal vaccine for the second time will take less time to successfully administer than people administering it for the first time.
Detailed Description
Vaccination of healthcare workers has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity in the patients they care for, as well as reducing illness and absenteeism in the healthcare workers themselves, and healthcare worker vaccination programs have been shown to be cost-effective for hospitals because of the reduced absenteeism. Although influenza vaccination programs based on nurse-administered intramuscular vaccination are effective, easy access to vaccination for hospital staff remains a challenge, in part because of large numbers of staff working evening, night and weekend shifts. In addition, in the Canadian setting, increasing the efficiency of all hospital programs is a priority. If regular recipients of seasonal vaccine became accustomed to the practice, self-administration may significantly improve the efficiency of pandemic mass vaccination campaigns.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Influenza, Vaccination Site Reactions (HT)
Keywords
influenza, vaccine, administration

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
868 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Nurse-administered IM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nurse-administered intramuscular influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip, 0.5 mL)
Arm Title
Self-administered intradermal
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Self-administered intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza 0.1 mL)
Arm Title
Repeat self-administration intradermal
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Self-administration of intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza 0.1 mL) by participants who self-administered an intradermal vaccine in our 2010 study
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Intanza
Intervention Description
Intanza influenza vaccine, trivalent split-virion, inactivated, approved for the 2012-2013 influenza season in northern hemisphere
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Vaxigrip
Intervention Description
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, split-virion, inactivated, approved for the 2012-2013 influenza season in the northern hemisphere
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Administer Influenza Vaccine (in Seconds)
Description
Time required to explain vaccination, obtain consent, administer vaccine, and register vaccination
Time Frame
Vaccination (Day 0)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acceptability of Vaccine
Description
The post-vaccination (Day 0) and follow-up (Day 8) questionnaires include questions on the participant's preference for intradermal or intramuscular injections and questions about their preference for administration by a healthcare provider or self-vaccination.
Time Frame
Follow up (Day 8)
Title
Success Rate
Description
Successful administration, defined as being able to self-vaccinate (or for RN to provide vaccine) on the first attempt. Will be calculated using the number of participants who are successful divided by the number of participants randomized to group.
Time Frame
Vaccination (Day 0)
Title
Local & Systemic Reactogenicity
Description
Maximum self-reported diameter of redness, induration, and swelling, and maximum intensity and duration of itchiness, fever, muscle ache, joint pain, headache, fatigue, feeling unwell, and injection site pain as reported on Day 8 after vaccination
Time Frame
Follow up (Day 8)
Title
Pain at Injection Site
Description
Self-perceived pain of injection will be recorded on an 11-point visual analogue scale immediately following vaccination (Day 0) and at follow-up (Day 8)
Time Frame
Follow up (Day 8

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
69 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Medically stable men or women 18 to 69 years of age (inclusive) Work in any capacity (including physicians and midwives with admitting privileges), volunteer, or student at participating hospital Able to read, understand, and respond to questionnaires Able to read, understand, and sign an informed consent form Available for follow-up for 8 days post-vaccination Participants in Part B (repeat administration) of the study must also have participated in the previous randomized control trial of self- versus nurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine and must have attempted to self-administer the vaccine Exclusion Criteria: Already received 2012-13 influenza vaccine History of a severe reaction following influenza vaccination Known allergy to components of study vaccines (Intanza® or Vaxigrip®) History of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) within 8 weeks following influenza vaccination Acute febrile illness (>37.9ºC orally) within the past 48 hours (participation may be deferred until recovery for these subjects)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brenda L Coleman, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melissa Barton
Organizational Affiliation
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine Moore
Organizational Affiliation
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shelly A McNeil, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Canadian Centre for Vaccinology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joanne M Langley, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Canadian Centre for Vaccinology
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Scott A Halperin, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Canadian Centre for Vaccinology
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allison J McGeer, MD, FRCPC
Organizational Affiliation
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Center for Vaccinology
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G1X5
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26529074
Citation
Coleman BL, McNeil SA, Langley JM, Halperin SA, McGeer AJ. Differences in efficiency, satisfaction and adverse events between self-administered intradermal and nurse-administered intramuscular influenza vaccines in hospital workers. Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33(48):6635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.095. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Time-motion Study Comparing Self- to Nurse-vaccination With Influenza Vaccine

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs