search
Back to results

A Trial to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide Taken as Monotherapy in Adults With Partial-onset Seizures

Primary Purpose

Epilepsy, Partial-onset Seizures

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lacosamide
Sponsored by
UCB Japan Co. Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Epilepsy focused on measuring Lacosamide, Epilepsy, Focal, Partial-Onset Seizures with or without secondary generalization, Monotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is male or female and ≥16 years of age
  • Subject has a diagnosis of epilepsy, having experienced unprovoked partial-onset seizures (IA, IB, or IC with clear focal origin) that are classifiable according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981
  • Subject experiences partial-onset seizures despite appropriately chosen and adequately tried treatment with 1 antiepileptic drug (AED)
  • Subject has been treated for epilepsy with a stable dose of 1 marketed AED The use of benzodiazepines is permitted as rescue therapy for epilepsy. Benzodiazepines may have been used as needed but not more frequently than once per week.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a history or presence of seizures of other types than partial onset (IA, IB, or IC with clear focal origin)
  • Subject is taking benzodiazepines for a nonepilepsy indication (Exception: Concomitant use of benzodiazepines is allowed if the subject is taking them on a regular basis, has been on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to Visit 1, and does not require changes in the dosage and administration throughout the study period. However, concomitant use of benzodiazepines on an as needed basis is not permitted.)
  • Female subject who is pregnant or nursing, and/or a woman of childbearing potential who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception, unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study
  • Female subject of childbearing potential taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs: CBZ, phenytoin, barbiturates, primidone, topiramate) who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception according to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation (ie, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enantate, intrauterine devices, combined injectables, and progestogen implants) with administration of EI-AEDs or does not practice 2 combined methods of contraception (ie, combined hormonal contraception plus barrier method with spermicidal agent), unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study
  • Subject has sick sinus syndrome without a pacemaker, or a second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block, or subject has any other clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities
  • Subject has a history of convulsive status epilepticus within the last 12 months prior to Visit 1

Sites / Locations

  • 5
  • 1
  • 11
  • 6
  • 7
  • 10
  • 12
  • 8
  • 13
  • 4
  • 9

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Lacosamide

Arm Description

Open-label, single-arm

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Subjects With at Least One Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Number of Subjects Who Withdraw Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Study
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Number of Subjects With at Least One Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death Is life-threatening Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect Is as infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Subjects Remaining Seizure Free for 6 Consecutive Months During the Monotherapy Period
Subjects were considered seizure free if their seizure counts for every day over the entire Treatment Period was zero and if they completed the Treatment Period. A subject was considered seizure free, if no seizure occurred during the 6 consecutive months in the Evaluation Period. If one of the following occurred, the subject was not considered seizure free: A documented seizure during 6 consecutive months of the Evaluation Analysis Period Subject discontinued the study prematurely during the Evaluation Analysis Period Missing Seizure Count Case Report Forms (CRFs) prior to completing the Evaluation Analysis Period
Number of Subjects Remaining Seizure Free for 12 Consecutive Months During the Monotherapy Period
Subjects were considered seizure free if their seizure counts for every day over the entire Treatment Period was zero and if they completed the Treatment Period. A subject was considered seizure free, if no seizure occurred during the 12 consecutive months in the Evaluation Period. If one of the following occurred, the subject was not considered seizure free: A documented seizure during 6 consecutive months of the Evaluation Analysis Period Subject discontinued the study prematurely during the Evaluation Analysis Period Missing Seizure Count Case Report Forms (CRFs) prior to completing the Evaluation Analysis Period. Subjects who discontinued before the end date of 6 consecutive months were included in this analysis.
Percentage of Participants in the Monotherapy Period Without Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AE) or Lack of Efficacy (LOE)
For Time to discontinuation (event), Retention rate and 95% CI was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Retention rate is indicated in Percent and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with respect to the Time to discontinuation.
Plasma Concentrations of Lacosamide Versus Time Postdose
Dose-normalized lacosamide Plasma Concentration (µg/mL) by Visit and Dose during the Evaluation Period.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2014
Last Updated
October 24, 2019
Sponsor
UCB Japan Co. Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02124564
Brief Title
A Trial to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide Taken as Monotherapy in Adults With Partial-onset Seizures
Official Title
Multicenter, Open-Label, Long-Term Study to Investigate the Safety of Conversion to Lacosamide at Doses up to 600 mg/Day as Monotherapy in Japanese Adults With Partial-Onset Seizures With or Without Secondary Generalization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 21, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 21, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
UCB Japan Co. Ltd.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of Lacosamide (LCM) 200 mg/day to LCM 600 mg/day taken in monotherapy in Japanese subjects who currently have partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization and who are treated with a single Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) with marketing approval in Japan.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Epilepsy, Partial-onset Seizures
Keywords
Lacosamide, Epilepsy, Focal, Partial-Onset Seizures with or without secondary generalization, Monotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
19 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lacosamide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Open-label, single-arm
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lacosamide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vimpat
Intervention Description
Lacosamide (LCM) immediate-release, film-coated tablets at a strength of 50 mg orally administered twice daily in two equally divided doses. 4-week Titration Period: Starting on LCM 100 mg/day increased by 100 mg/day each week until 400 mg/day dose reached at the beginning of Week 4 . The AED Withdrawal Period and Monotherapy Period (52- week Evaluation Period plus a Follow Up Period): During the AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Period, the investigator may increase or decrease the dose of LCM to optimize tolerability and seizure control. The LCM dose may be decreased no lower than 200 mg/day or increased, no faster than 100 mg/day per week, up to 600 mg/day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Subjects With at Least One Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
Description
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Time Frame
From the Titration Period (investigational product is taken) to the End of Study Visit (up to 3.5 years)
Title
Number of Subjects Who Withdraw Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Study
Description
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Time Frame
From the Titration Period (investigational product is taken) to the End of Study Visit (up to 3.5 years)
Title
Number of Subjects With at Least One Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
Description
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death Is life-threatening Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect Is as infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above
Time Frame
From the Titration Period (investigational product is taken) to the End of Study Visit (up to 3.5 years)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Subjects Remaining Seizure Free for 6 Consecutive Months During the Monotherapy Period
Description
Subjects were considered seizure free if their seizure counts for every day over the entire Treatment Period was zero and if they completed the Treatment Period. A subject was considered seizure free, if no seizure occurred during the 6 consecutive months in the Evaluation Period. If one of the following occurred, the subject was not considered seizure free: A documented seizure during 6 consecutive months of the Evaluation Analysis Period Subject discontinued the study prematurely during the Evaluation Analysis Period Missing Seizure Count Case Report Forms (CRFs) prior to completing the Evaluation Analysis Period
Time Frame
From the beginning of the Monotherapy Period to the end of the Follow-Up Period (up to 3.1 years until the time of approval granted)
Title
Number of Subjects Remaining Seizure Free for 12 Consecutive Months During the Monotherapy Period
Description
Subjects were considered seizure free if their seizure counts for every day over the entire Treatment Period was zero and if they completed the Treatment Period. A subject was considered seizure free, if no seizure occurred during the 12 consecutive months in the Evaluation Period. If one of the following occurred, the subject was not considered seizure free: A documented seizure during 6 consecutive months of the Evaluation Analysis Period Subject discontinued the study prematurely during the Evaluation Analysis Period Missing Seizure Count Case Report Forms (CRFs) prior to completing the Evaluation Analysis Period. Subjects who discontinued before the end date of 6 consecutive months were included in this analysis.
Time Frame
From the beginning of the Monotherapy Period to the end of the Follow-Up Period (up to 3.1 years until the time of approval granted)
Title
Percentage of Participants in the Monotherapy Period Without Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AE) or Lack of Efficacy (LOE)
Description
For Time to discontinuation (event), Retention rate and 95% CI was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Retention rate is indicated in Percent and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with respect to the Time to discontinuation.
Time Frame
From the beginning of the Monotherapy Period to the end of the Follow-Up Period (up to 3.1 years until the time of approval granted)
Title
Plasma Concentrations of Lacosamide Versus Time Postdose
Description
Dose-normalized lacosamide Plasma Concentration (µg/mL) by Visit and Dose during the Evaluation Period.
Time Frame
From Titration Period up to Week 94

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is male or female and ≥16 years of age Subject has a diagnosis of epilepsy, having experienced unprovoked partial-onset seizures (IA, IB, or IC with clear focal origin) that are classifiable according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981 Subject experiences partial-onset seizures despite appropriately chosen and adequately tried treatment with 1 antiepileptic drug (AED) Subject has been treated for epilepsy with a stable dose of 1 marketed AED The use of benzodiazepines is permitted as rescue therapy for epilepsy. Benzodiazepines may have been used as needed but not more frequently than once per week. Exclusion Criteria: Subject has a history or presence of seizures of other types than partial onset (IA, IB, or IC with clear focal origin) Subject is taking benzodiazepines for a nonepilepsy indication (Exception: Concomitant use of benzodiazepines is allowed if the subject is taking them on a regular basis, has been on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to Visit 1, and does not require changes in the dosage and administration throughout the study period. However, concomitant use of benzodiazepines on an as needed basis is not permitted.) Female subject who is pregnant or nursing, and/or a woman of childbearing potential who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception, unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study Female subject of childbearing potential taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs: CBZ, phenytoin, barbiturates, primidone, topiramate) who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception according to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation (ie, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enantate, intrauterine devices, combined injectables, and progestogen implants) with administration of EI-AEDs or does not practice 2 combined methods of contraception (ie, combined hormonal contraception plus barrier method with spermicidal agent), unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study Subject has sick sinus syndrome without a pacemaker, or a second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block, or subject has any other clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities Subject has a history of convulsive status epilepticus within the last 12 months prior to Visit 1
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
UCB Cares
Organizational Affiliation
+1 844 599 2273 (UCB)
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
5
City
Asaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
1
City
Hamamatsu
Country
Japan
Facility Name
11
City
Itami
Country
Japan
Facility Name
6
City
Kagoshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
7
City
Kamakura
Country
Japan
Facility Name
10
City
Nagoya
Country
Japan
Facility Name
12
City
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
8
City
Sapporo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
13
City
Shinagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
4
City
Shizuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
9
City
Toyonaka
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Trial to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide Taken as Monotherapy in Adults With Partial-onset Seizures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs