search
Back to results

A UK Interventional Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability (WAVE)

Primary Purpose

Apnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia Neonatal

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
WAVE device
Sponsored by
Inspiration Healthcare
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Apnea of Newborn focused on measuring cardio-respiratory stability, neonate, premature infant, proprioceptive stimulation, Apnoea of Prematurity, Medical Device

Eligibility Criteria

28 Weeks - 35 Weeks (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Gestational age > 27+6weeks, < 34+1 weeks
  • Diagnosis of apnoea of prematurity (AOP) on clinical observations (atleast 4 AoP episodes and atleast one ABD event (equal and less 85% SpO2)- define clearly).
  • Caffeine treatment will not be an exclusion. If babies are on caffeine they need on maintenance dose for atleats 48 hours. (72hours after first dose of caffeine (Infant must be on maintenance dose)
  • During screening baby must demonstrate >4 AoP/1 ABD events
  • Minimum 48 hours after extubation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inotropes
  • Infants with major congenital anomalies/malformations which will influence central nervous system and long-term outcomes in these infants, such as cardiac anomalies (except for Patent Ductus Arteriosus or Ventricular Septal Defect) or major neurological malformations, like meningoencephalocele, holoprosencephaly
  • Neonates who have apnoea from airway issues like laryngomalacia or tracheomalacia.
  • Neonates with a history of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or Grade IV intraventricular haemorrhage
  • Infants that are currently intubated and invasive ventilation
  • Congenital skin malformations, skin conditions due to recurrent illness (microcirculation concerns).
  • Patients being treated for sepsis.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    Treatment starting with an on ON cycle

    Treatment starting with an on OFF cycle

    Arm Description

    The treatment will start ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.

    The treatment will start OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Compare the cumulative burden of AoP with or without WAVE stimulation
    The primary objective is to compare the cumulative duration of breathing pauses related to Apnoea of Prematurity (AoP) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation as adjunct to standard care.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Compare the number of AoP events.
    To compare the number of AoP events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events
    To compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Compare the cumulative depth of desaturations.
    To compare the cumulative depth of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events.
    To compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Compare the number of bradycardia events.
    To compare the number of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events.
    To compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events.
    To compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Nursing assessment scores -NPASS scoring system (6).
    To compare NPASS scores (6) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 20, 2020
    Last Updated
    February 17, 2021
    Sponsor
    Inspiration Healthcare
    Collaborators
    Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04528030
    Brief Title
    A UK Interventional Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability
    Acronym
    WAVE
    Official Title
    WAVE Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    April 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 31, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    April 1, 2022 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Inspiration Healthcare
    Collaborators
    Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Purpose of Study: Apnoea of Prematurity (AOP) is common, affecting the majority of infants born <34 weeks gestational age (GA). Apnea is accompanied by intermittent hypoxia (IH), which contributes to multiple pathologies, including retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), sympathetic ganglia injury, impaired pancreatic islet cell and bone development, and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Standard of care for AOP/IH includes prone positioning, positive pressure ventilation, and caffeine therapy. The objective of this device is to provide an adjunct to current AoP treatment to support breathing in premature infants by using a simple, non-invasive vibratory device placed over limb proprioceptor fibers, an intervention using the principle that limb movements facilitate breathing. Methods Used: Premature infants (27+6 - 34+6 weeks GA) with clinical confirmed weeks with diagnosis of Apnoea of Prematurity. Caffeine therapy was not a reason for exclusion. Small vibration devices were placed on one hand and one foot and activated in a 6 hour ON/OFF sequence for a total of 24 hours. Heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and breathing pauses were continuously collected.
    Detailed Description
    Aim: To study the effect of (WAVE Device) limb proprioceptive stimulation using a vibratory device on AoP events, intermittent hypoxic episodes (SpO2≤85%) and bradycardias(≤100bpm) in a premature infant with confirmed clinical diagnosis of apnea of prematurity (AoP). The objective of the WAVE device is to provide an adjunct to current care to provide support in apnea of prematurity (AOP). Recurrent apnea and accompanying resultant intermittent hypoxic (IH) episodes are significant concerns commonly encountered in premature infants, and optimal management is a challenge to neonatologists. AoP is defined as >20s breathing pause OR breathing pause of 10-20sec with clinical signs of Bradycardia (≤100bpm) and/or desaturation (≤85% SpO2) in infants born less than 37 weeks of gestation. When these pauses are longer (> 20s), they are frequently prolonged by obstructed inspiratory efforts, most likely secondary to loss of upper airway tonic activity. In extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, the incidence of IH progressively increases over the first 4 weeks of postnatal life, followed by a plateau and subsequent decline between 6-8 weeks. The incidence of AOP correlates inversely with gestational age and birth weight. Nearly all infants born <29 weeks gestation or <1,000 g, 54% at 30 to 31 weeks, 15% at 32 to 33 weeks, and 7% at 34 to 35 weeks gestation exhibit AOP (2). Both animal and human evidence show that immature or impaired respiratory control and the resultant IH exposure contribute to a variety of pathophysiologic issues via pro-inflammatory and/or pro-oxidant cascade as well as cellular mechanisms, e.g., apoptosis, leading to acute and chronic morbidities (e.g. retinopathy of prematurity, altered growth and cardiovascular regulation, disrupting zinc homeostasis which hampers insulin production and there by predisposing to diabetes in later life, cerebellar injuries and neurodevelopmental disabilities). Current standard of care for AOP includes prone positioning, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to prevent pharyngeal collapse and alveolar atelectasis, and methylxanthine therapy (caffeine, theophylline), which is the mainstay of treatment of central apnea. Apart from prone positioning, none of these interventions are optimal for early development. CPAP masks will distort the bony facial structure in early development, and methylxanthine interventions pose serious questions of neural development interactions.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Apnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia Neonatal
    Keywords
    cardio-respiratory stability, neonate, premature infant, proprioceptive stimulation, Apnoea of Prematurity, Medical Device

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Sequential Assignment
    Model Description
    Sequential Assignment In the same subject there were 2 periods: OFF cycles (6 hours x 2): 'No intervention' period (no vibrations) - two 6 hour epochs - total of 12 hours of 'No intervention' ON cycles (6hours x 2). Experimental period (with vibrations) - two 6 hour epochs - total of 12 hours of 'vibration intervention' In the same subjects cardio-respiratory parameters will be continuously monitored through the 24 hour treatment period of 4 cycles- heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation were compared during the experimental period (vibration) and during the no intervention period (no vibration).
    Masking
    InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    The investigator analyzing the 4 cycles will not know whether it's an ON of OFF cycle during the 24 hour treatment period.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    17 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Treatment starting with an on ON cycle
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    The treatment will start ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.
    Arm Title
    Treatment starting with an on OFF cycle
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    The treatment will start OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    WAVE device
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    limb proprioceptive stimulation, kinesthetic stimulation
    Intervention Description
    WAVE applies a transcutaneous vibration to the soles of the foot and palms of the hand to elicit nerve signalling from pressure and other limb proprioceptor sensors to pontine, cerebellar, and medullary brain areas that coordinate limb movement and reflexively activate brain areas controlling breathing. The WAVE device is a battery-operated product to reduce the episodes of Apnoea of Prematurity by vibratory stimulation to the hand and foot.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Compare the cumulative burden of AoP with or without WAVE stimulation
    Description
    The primary objective is to compare the cumulative duration of breathing pauses related to Apnoea of Prematurity (AoP) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation as adjunct to standard care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Compare the number of AoP events.
    Description
    To compare the number of AoP events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events
    Description
    To compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Compare the cumulative depth of desaturations.
    Description
    To compare the cumulative depth of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events.
    Description
    To compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Compare the number of bradycardia events.
    Description
    To compare the number of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events.
    Description
    To compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events.
    Description
    To compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Title
    Nursing assessment scores -NPASS scoring system (6).
    Description
    To compare NPASS scores (6) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
    Time Frame
    24 hours
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Post trial feedback
    Description
    To conduct post-trial surveys to gather feedback from bedside nurses and parents/legal guardians.
    Time Frame
    up to 24 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    28 Weeks
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    35 Weeks
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Written informed consent Gestational age > 27+6weeks, < 34+1 weeks Diagnosis of apnoea of prematurity (AOP) on clinical observations (atleast 4 AoP episodes and atleast one ABD event (equal and less 85% SpO2)- define clearly). Caffeine treatment will not be an exclusion. If babies are on caffeine they need on maintenance dose for atleats 48 hours. (72hours after first dose of caffeine (Infant must be on maintenance dose) During screening baby must demonstrate >4 AoP/1 ABD events Minimum 48 hours after extubation. Exclusion Criteria: Inotropes Infants with major congenital anomalies/malformations which will influence central nervous system and long-term outcomes in these infants, such as cardiac anomalies (except for Patent Ductus Arteriosus or Ventricular Septal Defect) or major neurological malformations, like meningoencephalocele, holoprosencephaly Neonates who have apnoea from airway issues like laryngomalacia or tracheomalacia. Neonates with a history of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or Grade IV intraventricular haemorrhage Infants that are currently intubated and invasive ventilation Congenital skin malformations, skin conditions due to recurrent illness (microcirculation concerns). Patients being treated for sepsis.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Jacqueline van Druten, BScMedHons
    Phone
    07407614698
    Email
    jacqueline.vandruten@inspiration-healthcare.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    R, A
    Email
    CRR-WAVE@inspiration-healthcare.com
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Oana Dr Anton, MBBS MRCPCH
    Organizational Affiliation
    Brighton and Sussex University Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    Publication and conference presentation of results planned
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    27304988
    Citation
    Kesavan K, Frank P, Cordero DM, Benharash P, Harper RM. Neuromodulation of Limb Proprioceptive Afferents Decreases Apnea of Prematurity and Accompanying Intermittent Hypoxia and Bradycardia. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157349. eCollection 2016.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23080182
    Citation
    Martin RJ, Di Fiore JM, Macfarlane PM, Wilson CG. Physiologic basis for intermittent hypoxic episodes in preterm infants. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;758:351-8. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4584-1_47.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18458652
    Citation
    te Pas AB, Davis PG, Kamlin CO, Dawson J, O'Donnell CP, Morley CJ. Spontaneous breathing patterns of very preterm infants treated with continuous positive airway pressure at birth. Pediatr Res. 2008 Sep;64(3):281-5. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817d9c35.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19218032
    Citation
    Robertson CM, Watt MJ, Dinu IA. Outcomes for the extremely premature infant: what is new? And where are we going? Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Mar;40(3):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2008.09.017.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20091506
    Citation
    Henderson-Smart DJ, Steer PA. Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD000273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000273.pub2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30974433
    Citation
    Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Te Pas A, Plavka R, Roehr CC, Saugstad OD, Simeoni U, Speer CP, Vento M, Visser GHA, Halliday HL. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18165830
    Citation
    Hummel P, Puchalski M, Creech SD, Weiss MG. Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol. 2008 Jan;28(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211861. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27920092
    Citation
    Randerath W, Verbraecken J, Andreas S, Arzt M, Bloch KE, Brack T, Buyse B, De Backer W, Eckert DJ, Grote L, Hagmeyer L, Hedner J, Jennum P, La Rovere MT, Miltz C, McNicholas WT, Montserrat J, Naughton M, Pepin JL, Pevernagie D, Sanner B, Testelmans D, Tonia T, Vrijsen B, Wijkstra P, Levy P. Definition, discrimination, diagnosis and treatment of central breathing disturbances during sleep. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan 18;49(1):1600959. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00959-2016. Print 2017 Jan.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30971888
    Citation
    Shevtsova NA, Marchenko V, Bezdudnaya T. Modulation of Respiratory System by Limb Muscle Afferents in Intact and Injured Spinal Cord. Front Neurosci. 2019 Mar 26;13:289. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00289. eCollection 2019.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15728836
    Citation
    Potts JT, Rybak IA, Paton JF. Respiratory rhythm entrainment by somatic afferent stimulation. J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 23;25(8):1965-78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3881-04.2005.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28421171
    Citation
    Dekker J, Martherus T, Cramer SJE, van Zanten HA, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Tactile Stimulation to Stimulate Spontaneous Breathing during Stabilization of Preterm Infants at Birth: A Retrospective Analysis. Front Pediatr. 2017 Apr 3;5:61. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00061. eCollection 2017.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    1238237
    Citation
    Solkoff N, Matuszak D. Tactile stimulation and behavioral development among low-birthweight infants. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1975 Fall;6(1):33-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01434430.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10432764
    Citation
    Lovell JR, Eisenfeld L, Rosow E, Adam J, Lapin C, Bronzino JD. Vibrotactile stimulation for treatment of neonatal apnea: a preliminary study. Conn Med. 1999 Jun;63(6):323-5. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12613292
    Citation
    Pichardo R, Adam JS, Rosow E, Bronzino J, Eisenfeld L. Vibrotactile stimulation system to treat apnea of prematurity. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2003 Jan-Feb;37(1):34-40. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2003)37[34:VSSTTA]2.0.CO;2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30236090
    Citation
    Pietravalle A, Cavallin F, Opocher A, Madella S, Cavicchiolo ME, Pizzol D, Putoto G, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal tactile stimulation at birth in a low-resource setting. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1279-4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    4703399
    Citation
    Frank UA, Bordiuk JM, Borromeo-McGrail V, Saltzman MB, Keitel HG. Treatment of apnea in neonates with an automated monitor-actuated apnea arrestor. Pediatrics. 1973 May;51(5):878-83. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29552548
    Citation
    Cramer SJE, Dekker J, Dankelman J, Pauws SC, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review. Front Pediatr. 2018 Mar 2;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00045. eCollection 2018.
    Results Reference
    background
    Links:
    URL
    http://www.inspiration-healthcare.com
    Description
    Sponsor website

    Learn more about this trial

    A UK Interventional Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs