A UK Interventional Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability (WAVE)
Primary Purpose
Apnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia Neonatal
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
WAVE device
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Apnea of Newborn focused on measuring cardio-respiratory stability, neonate, premature infant, proprioceptive stimulation, Apnoea of Prematurity, Medical Device
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written informed consent
- Gestational age > 27+6weeks, < 34+1 weeks
- Diagnosis of apnoea of prematurity (AOP) on clinical observations (atleast 4 AoP episodes and atleast one ABD event (equal and less 85% SpO2)- define clearly).
- Caffeine treatment will not be an exclusion. If babies are on caffeine they need on maintenance dose for atleats 48 hours. (72hours after first dose of caffeine (Infant must be on maintenance dose)
- During screening baby must demonstrate >4 AoP/1 ABD events
- Minimum 48 hours after extubation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inotropes
- Infants with major congenital anomalies/malformations which will influence central nervous system and long-term outcomes in these infants, such as cardiac anomalies (except for Patent Ductus Arteriosus or Ventricular Septal Defect) or major neurological malformations, like meningoencephalocele, holoprosencephaly
- Neonates who have apnoea from airway issues like laryngomalacia or tracheomalacia.
- Neonates with a history of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or Grade IV intraventricular haemorrhage
- Infants that are currently intubated and invasive ventilation
- Congenital skin malformations, skin conditions due to recurrent illness (microcirculation concerns).
- Patients being treated for sepsis.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Other
Arm Label
Treatment starting with an on ON cycle
Treatment starting with an on OFF cycle
Arm Description
The treatment will start ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.
The treatment will start OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Compare the cumulative burden of AoP with or without WAVE stimulation
The primary objective is to compare the cumulative duration of breathing pauses related to Apnoea of Prematurity (AoP) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation as adjunct to standard care.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Compare the number of AoP events.
To compare the number of AoP events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events
To compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Compare the cumulative depth of desaturations.
To compare the cumulative depth of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events.
To compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Compare the number of bradycardia events.
To compare the number of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events.
To compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events.
To compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Nursing assessment scores -NPASS scoring system (6).
To compare NPASS scores (6) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04528030
First Posted
August 20, 2020
Last Updated
February 17, 2021
Sponsor
Inspiration Healthcare
Collaborators
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04528030
Brief Title
A UK Interventional Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability
Acronym
WAVE
Official Title
WAVE Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Inspiration Healthcare
Collaborators
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Purpose of Study: Apnoea of Prematurity (AOP) is common, affecting the majority of infants born <34 weeks gestational age (GA). Apnea is accompanied by intermittent hypoxia (IH), which contributes to multiple pathologies, including retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), sympathetic ganglia injury, impaired pancreatic islet cell and bone development, and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Standard of care for AOP/IH includes prone positioning, positive pressure ventilation, and caffeine therapy. The objective of this device is to provide an adjunct to current AoP treatment to support breathing in premature infants by using a simple, non-invasive vibratory device placed over limb proprioceptor fibers, an intervention using the principle that limb movements facilitate breathing.
Methods Used: Premature infants (27+6 - 34+6 weeks GA) with clinical confirmed weeks with diagnosis of Apnoea of Prematurity. Caffeine therapy was not a reason for exclusion. Small vibration devices were placed on one hand and one foot and activated in a 6 hour ON/OFF sequence for a total of 24 hours. Heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and breathing pauses were continuously collected.
Detailed Description
Aim: To study the effect of (WAVE Device) limb proprioceptive stimulation using a vibratory device on AoP events, intermittent hypoxic episodes (SpO2≤85%) and bradycardias(≤100bpm) in a premature infant with confirmed clinical diagnosis of apnea of prematurity (AoP).
The objective of the WAVE device is to provide an adjunct to current care to provide support in apnea of prematurity (AOP). Recurrent apnea and accompanying resultant intermittent hypoxic (IH) episodes are significant concerns commonly encountered in premature infants, and optimal management is a challenge to neonatologists. AoP is defined as >20s breathing pause OR breathing pause of 10-20sec with clinical signs of Bradycardia (≤100bpm) and/or desaturation (≤85% SpO2) in infants born less than 37 weeks of gestation. When these pauses are longer (> 20s), they are frequently prolonged by obstructed inspiratory efforts, most likely secondary to loss of upper airway tonic activity. In extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, the incidence of IH progressively increases over the first 4 weeks of postnatal life, followed by a plateau and subsequent decline between 6-8 weeks.
The incidence of AOP correlates inversely with gestational age and birth weight. Nearly all infants born <29 weeks gestation or <1,000 g, 54% at 30 to 31 weeks, 15% at 32 to 33 weeks, and 7% at 34 to 35 weeks gestation exhibit AOP (2). Both animal and human evidence show that immature or impaired respiratory control and the resultant IH exposure contribute to a variety of pathophysiologic issues via pro-inflammatory and/or pro-oxidant cascade as well as cellular mechanisms, e.g., apoptosis, leading to acute and chronic morbidities (e.g. retinopathy of prematurity, altered growth and cardiovascular regulation, disrupting zinc homeostasis which hampers insulin production and there by predisposing to diabetes in later life, cerebellar injuries and neurodevelopmental disabilities).
Current standard of care for AOP includes prone positioning, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to prevent pharyngeal collapse and alveolar atelectasis, and methylxanthine therapy (caffeine, theophylline), which is the mainstay of treatment of central apnea. Apart from prone positioning, none of these interventions are optimal for early development. CPAP masks will distort the bony facial structure in early development, and methylxanthine interventions pose serious questions of neural development interactions.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Apnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia Neonatal
Keywords
cardio-respiratory stability, neonate, premature infant, proprioceptive stimulation, Apnoea of Prematurity, Medical Device
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
Sequential Assignment
In the same subject there were 2 periods:
OFF cycles (6 hours x 2): 'No intervention' period (no vibrations) - two 6 hour epochs - total of 12 hours of 'No intervention' ON cycles (6hours x 2). Experimental period (with vibrations) - two 6 hour epochs - total of 12 hours of 'vibration intervention'
In the same subjects cardio-respiratory parameters will be continuously monitored through the 24 hour treatment period of 4 cycles- heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation were compared during the experimental period (vibration) and during the no intervention period (no vibration).
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The investigator analyzing the 4 cycles will not know whether it's an ON of OFF cycle during the 24 hour treatment period.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
17 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Treatment starting with an on ON cycle
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The treatment will start ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.
Arm Title
Treatment starting with an on OFF cycle
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The treatment will start OFF cycle for 6 hours, followed by ON cycle for 6 hours, followed by OFF cycle for 6 hours and finished with ON cycle for 6 hours.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
WAVE device
Other Intervention Name(s)
limb proprioceptive stimulation, kinesthetic stimulation
Intervention Description
WAVE applies a transcutaneous vibration to the soles of the foot and palms of the hand to elicit nerve signalling from pressure and other limb proprioceptor sensors to pontine, cerebellar, and medullary brain areas that coordinate limb movement and reflexively activate brain areas controlling breathing. The WAVE device is a battery-operated product to reduce the episodes of Apnoea of Prematurity by vibratory stimulation to the hand and foot.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare the cumulative burden of AoP with or without WAVE stimulation
Description
The primary objective is to compare the cumulative duration of breathing pauses related to Apnoea of Prematurity (AoP) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation as adjunct to standard care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare the number of AoP events.
Description
To compare the number of AoP events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events
Description
To compare the number of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Compare the cumulative depth of desaturations.
Description
To compare the cumulative depth of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) events.
Description
To compare the cumulative duration of desaturations (SpO2<86%) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Compare the number of bradycardia events.
Description
To compare the number of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events.
Description
To compare the cumulative depth of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events.
Description
To compare the cumulative duration of bradycardia events between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Nursing assessment scores -NPASS scoring system (6).
Description
To compare NPASS scores (6) between periods of presence and absence of tactile vibratory device stimulation adjunct to standard of care.
Time Frame
24 hours
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Post trial feedback
Description
To conduct post-trial surveys to gather feedback from bedside nurses and parents/legal guardians.
Time Frame
up to 24 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
28 Weeks
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Weeks
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Written informed consent
Gestational age > 27+6weeks, < 34+1 weeks
Diagnosis of apnoea of prematurity (AOP) on clinical observations (atleast 4 AoP episodes and atleast one ABD event (equal and less 85% SpO2)- define clearly).
Caffeine treatment will not be an exclusion. If babies are on caffeine they need on maintenance dose for atleats 48 hours. (72hours after first dose of caffeine (Infant must be on maintenance dose)
During screening baby must demonstrate >4 AoP/1 ABD events
Minimum 48 hours after extubation.
Exclusion Criteria:
Inotropes
Infants with major congenital anomalies/malformations which will influence central nervous system and long-term outcomes in these infants, such as cardiac anomalies (except for Patent Ductus Arteriosus or Ventricular Septal Defect) or major neurological malformations, like meningoencephalocele, holoprosencephaly
Neonates who have apnoea from airway issues like laryngomalacia or tracheomalacia.
Neonates with a history of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy or Grade IV intraventricular haemorrhage
Infants that are currently intubated and invasive ventilation
Congenital skin malformations, skin conditions due to recurrent illness (microcirculation concerns).
Patients being treated for sepsis.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jacqueline van Druten, BScMedHons
Phone
07407614698
Email
jacqueline.vandruten@inspiration-healthcare.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
R, A
Email
CRR-WAVE@inspiration-healthcare.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oana Dr Anton, MBBS MRCPCH
Organizational Affiliation
Brighton and Sussex University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Publication and conference presentation of results planned
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27304988
Citation
Kesavan K, Frank P, Cordero DM, Benharash P, Harper RM. Neuromodulation of Limb Proprioceptive Afferents Decreases Apnea of Prematurity and Accompanying Intermittent Hypoxia and Bradycardia. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157349. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23080182
Citation
Martin RJ, Di Fiore JM, Macfarlane PM, Wilson CG. Physiologic basis for intermittent hypoxic episodes in preterm infants. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;758:351-8. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4584-1_47.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18458652
Citation
te Pas AB, Davis PG, Kamlin CO, Dawson J, O'Donnell CP, Morley CJ. Spontaneous breathing patterns of very preterm infants treated with continuous positive airway pressure at birth. Pediatr Res. 2008 Sep;64(3):281-5. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817d9c35.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19218032
Citation
Robertson CM, Watt MJ, Dinu IA. Outcomes for the extremely premature infant: what is new? And where are we going? Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Mar;40(3):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2008.09.017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20091506
Citation
Henderson-Smart DJ, Steer PA. Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD000273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000273.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30974433
Citation
Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Te Pas A, Plavka R, Roehr CC, Saugstad OD, Simeoni U, Speer CP, Vento M, Visser GHA, Halliday HL. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18165830
Citation
Hummel P, Puchalski M, Creech SD, Weiss MG. Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol. 2008 Jan;28(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211861. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27920092
Citation
Randerath W, Verbraecken J, Andreas S, Arzt M, Bloch KE, Brack T, Buyse B, De Backer W, Eckert DJ, Grote L, Hagmeyer L, Hedner J, Jennum P, La Rovere MT, Miltz C, McNicholas WT, Montserrat J, Naughton M, Pepin JL, Pevernagie D, Sanner B, Testelmans D, Tonia T, Vrijsen B, Wijkstra P, Levy P. Definition, discrimination, diagnosis and treatment of central breathing disturbances during sleep. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan 18;49(1):1600959. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00959-2016. Print 2017 Jan.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30971888
Citation
Shevtsova NA, Marchenko V, Bezdudnaya T. Modulation of Respiratory System by Limb Muscle Afferents in Intact and Injured Spinal Cord. Front Neurosci. 2019 Mar 26;13:289. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00289. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15728836
Citation
Potts JT, Rybak IA, Paton JF. Respiratory rhythm entrainment by somatic afferent stimulation. J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 23;25(8):1965-78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3881-04.2005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28421171
Citation
Dekker J, Martherus T, Cramer SJE, van Zanten HA, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Tactile Stimulation to Stimulate Spontaneous Breathing during Stabilization of Preterm Infants at Birth: A Retrospective Analysis. Front Pediatr. 2017 Apr 3;5:61. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00061. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1238237
Citation
Solkoff N, Matuszak D. Tactile stimulation and behavioral development among low-birthweight infants. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1975 Fall;6(1):33-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01434430.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10432764
Citation
Lovell JR, Eisenfeld L, Rosow E, Adam J, Lapin C, Bronzino JD. Vibrotactile stimulation for treatment of neonatal apnea: a preliminary study. Conn Med. 1999 Jun;63(6):323-5. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12613292
Citation
Pichardo R, Adam JS, Rosow E, Bronzino J, Eisenfeld L. Vibrotactile stimulation system to treat apnea of prematurity. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2003 Jan-Feb;37(1):34-40. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2003)37[34:VSSTTA]2.0.CO;2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30236090
Citation
Pietravalle A, Cavallin F, Opocher A, Madella S, Cavicchiolo ME, Pizzol D, Putoto G, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal tactile stimulation at birth in a low-resource setting. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1279-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4703399
Citation
Frank UA, Bordiuk JM, Borromeo-McGrail V, Saltzman MB, Keitel HG. Treatment of apnea in neonates with an automated monitor-actuated apnea arrestor. Pediatrics. 1973 May;51(5):878-83. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29552548
Citation
Cramer SJE, Dekker J, Dankelman J, Pauws SC, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review. Front Pediatr. 2018 Mar 2;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00045. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.inspiration-healthcare.com
Description
Sponsor website
Learn more about this trial
A UK Interventional Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs