search
Back to results

Ablation and Cementoplasty for Painful Bone Lesions

Primary Purpose

Bone Lesion, Bone Metastases, Spine Metastases

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ablation and Cementoplasty
Sponsored by
University of Calgary
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Lesion focused on measuring Ablation, Cementoplasty, Pain Palliation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patient with spinal, pelvic, or extraspinal bone lesion
  • pain clinically localized to a single region and tumor involvement confirmed with imaging
  • life expectancy greater than 3 months
  • provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-correctable coagulation disorder
  • systemic or localized infection
  • multiple painful lesions requiring different treatment approaches
  • neurological deficits or radicular neurological symptoms
  • rheumatic disease
  • pregnancy
  • previous ablation and/or cementoplasty treatment to same lesion

Sites / Locations

  • Foothills Medical Centre
  • South Health Campus

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Ablation and Cementoplasty

Arm Description

All patients undergoing thermal ablation and cementoplasty procedure for one or more painful bone lesion

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain Scale
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Pain Scale
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Pain Scale
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Pain Scale
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Pain Scale
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Quality of Life Questionnaire
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Quality of Life Questionnaire
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Quality of Life Questionnaire
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Quality of Life Questionnaire
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Quality of Life Questionnaire
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Analgesia
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Analgesia
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Analgesia
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Analgesia
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Analgesia
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disease Burden
Tumor burden as assessed by CT scan following procedure as compared to pre-procedure scan

Full Information

First Posted
November 9, 2020
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Sponsor
University of Calgary
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04635137
Brief Title
Ablation and Cementoplasty for Painful Bone Lesions
Official Title
Percutaneous Ablation and Cementoplasty for Painful Bone Lesions: A Canadian Single-Centre Experience
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 2021 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Calgary

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this research study is to assess the effectiveness of combined ablation and cementoplasty in the treatment of spinal, pelvic, and extraspinal lesions causing pain resistant to conventional treatment at our centre. In particular, the investigator seek to verify the safety and efficacy for multiple primary tumor types and benign lesions as well as encompass multiple measurements of outcome, including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, opioid and analgesic use, and overall performance scales, combined with cross-sectional imaging follow-up to assess tumor burden, to ascertain a comprehensive Canadian single-centre experience that has been lacking in previous studies.
Detailed Description
Research Question & Objectives To conduct a prospective, single-centre study of combined ablation and cementoplasty treatment for painful spinal and extraspinal osseous lesions. Report the technical outcome and safety of percutaneous ablation prior to image-guided cementoplasty in a single treatment session. Review the effectiveness and durability of pain control, local tumor control, and the impact on QoL using ablation and cementoplasty in treating spinal/extraspinal osseous tumors. Assess the feasibility and efficacy of ablation and cementoplasty treatment for different primary tumor types and benign lesions. Research Design The investigators will conduct a single-centre, single-arm, cohort analysis of all patients who undergo cementoplasty for osseous disease in the department of interventional radiology over a two-year period. This will be a prospective paired comparison study with patients serving as their own controls. Technical success and procedural complications will be monitored and recorded for all patients. All patients will be followed until death or 3 months post-procedure. The investigators aim to enroll a minimum of 40 patients referred for symptomatic osseous lesions. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (Osteocool RFA system, Medtronic) or cryoablation (Visual Ice Cryoablation, Boston Scientific) will be performed under CT, ultrasound, or fluoroscopic guidance at the discretion of the treating radiologist, and immediately followed by cement injection. Radiological outcomes, including local tumor control and disease progression, will be assessed by CT imaging immediately post-procedure as well as 3-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes will be evaluated by VAS, analgesic use, and QoL assessment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) prior to procedure and immediately post-procedure, as well at 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month intervals post-procedure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Lesion, Bone Metastases, Spine Metastases
Keywords
Ablation, Cementoplasty, Pain Palliation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Single-arm prospective study of pain and quality of life before and after ablation/cementoplasty procedure
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ablation and Cementoplasty
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All patients undergoing thermal ablation and cementoplasty procedure for one or more painful bone lesion
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ablation and Cementoplasty
Intervention Description
Percutaneous thermal ablation with subsequent cementoplasty in a single procedure
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Scale
Description
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Pre-procedure
Title
Pain Scale
Description
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
immediately post-procedure
Title
Pain Scale
Description
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
1 week post-procedure
Title
Pain Scale
Description
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
1 month post-procedure
Title
Pain Scale
Description
Visual Analog Scale; values 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
3 months post-procedure
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Description
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Time Frame
Pre-procedure
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Description
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Time Frame
immediately post-procedure
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Description
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Time Frame
1 week post-procedure
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Description
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Time Frame
1 month post-procedure
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Description
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The QLQ-C30 is composed of 3 multi-item scales including a functional scale, a global health status/quality of life scale, and a symptom scale. Each scale ranges in score from 0-100 with a higher scale score representing a high/healthy level of functioning, quality of life, and symptomatology/problems, respectively.
Time Frame
3 months post-procedure
Title
Analgesia
Description
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Time Frame
Pre-procedure
Title
Analgesia
Description
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Time Frame
immediately post-procedure
Title
Analgesia
Description
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Time Frame
1 week post-procedure
Title
Analgesia
Description
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Time Frame
1 month post-procedure
Title
Analgesia
Description
Opioid and non-opioid analgesia use
Time Frame
3 months post-procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease Burden
Description
Tumor burden as assessed by CT scan following procedure as compared to pre-procedure scan
Time Frame
3 months post-procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patient with spinal, pelvic, or extraspinal bone lesion pain clinically localized to a single region and tumor involvement confirmed with imaging life expectancy greater than 3 months provision of informed consent Exclusion Criteria: non-correctable coagulation disorder systemic or localized infection multiple painful lesions requiring different treatment approaches neurological deficits or radicular neurological symptoms rheumatic disease pregnancy previous ablation and/or cementoplasty treatment to same lesion
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jason K Wong
Phone
403-944-4634
Email
wongjk@ucalgary.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stefan Przybojewski
Phone
403-944-4634
Email
stefan.przybojewski@albertahealthservices.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jason K Wong
Organizational Affiliation
University of Calgary
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Foothills Medical Centre
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 2T9
Country
Canada
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefan Przybojewski, MD
Facility Name
South Health Campus
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T3M 1M4
Country
Canada
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefan Przybojewski, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Ablation and Cementoplasty for Painful Bone Lesions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs