search
Back to results

Ablation of Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia

Primary Purpose

Barrett Esophagus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ablation System plus anti-secretory medication
Sham procedure plus anti-secretory medication
Sponsored by
Medtronic - MITG
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Barrett Esophagus focused on measuring Barrett's Esophagus, Dysplasia, Radiofrequency Ablation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:1.Subject is 18-80 years of age, inclusive. 2.Subject has documented diagnosis of IM, maximum endoscopic length of 8 cm (as measured endoscopically from the TGF to the most proximal extent of the IM; i.e. TGF-TIM containing dysplasia as follows: For LGD:i.LGD documented on biopsy within previous 12 months from enrollment while subject on PPI therapy. ii.Histology slides reviewed at central pathology service for trial confirm LGD on first confirmatory central pathology review or, if necessary, confirm LGD on a tie-breaker review by a second pathologist. For HGD:i.Regular, non-nodular, non-ulcerated mucosa. ii.HGD documented on biopsy within previous 6 months from enrollment. iii.Histology slides reviewed at central pathology service for Trial confirm HGD on first confirmatory review or, if necessary, confirm HGD on a tie-breaker review by a second pathologist. iv.Baseline EUS within previous 12 months; 1.Catheter-based EUS excludes suspicious thickened Barrett's areas or, if suspicious areas found, prompts stacked biopsies of thickened area, the results of which do not render subject ineligible for enrollment. 3.For subjects with EMR history,the documented diagnosis of IM with dysplasia meets criterion #2 from biopsies collected either after the EMR procedure or during the EMR procedure but not from the EMR site. 4.Subject able to take oral proton pump inhibitor medication. 5.Subject able to discontinue aspirin and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications 7 days before and after all ablation procedures. 6.For female subjects of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks of randomization. 7.Subject eligible for treatment and follow-up endoscopy and biopsy as required by the Protocol. 8.Subject willing to provide written, informed consent to participate in this clinical study and understands the responsibilities of trial participation. Exclusion Criteria:1.The subject is pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the study period. 2.Esophageal stricture preventing passage of endoscope or catheter. 3.Active esophagitis described as erosions or ulcerations encompassing more than 10% of distal esophagus. 4.Any history of malignancy of the esophagus. 5.Prior radiation therapy to the esophagus,except head and neck region radiation therapy. 6.Any previous ablative therapy within the esophagus (PDT, MPEC, APC, laser treatment, other). 7.History of EMR that meets any of the following criteria:a.EMR performed less than 8 weeks prior to the randomization endoscopy encounter b.EMR performed in a wide field manner (encompassing more than 90 degrees of any area of the esophagus. 8.Any previous esophageal surgery, including except fundoplication without complications (i.e. no slippage, dysphagia, etc). 9.Evidence of esophageal varices during treatment endoscopy. 10.Report of uncontrolled coagulopathy with international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.3 or platelet count <75,000 platelets per µL 11.Subject has a life-expectancy of less than two years due to an underlying medical condition. 12.Subject has a known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines. 13.Subject has an implantable pacing device (examples; AICD, neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker)and has not received clearance for enrollment in this study by specialist responsible for the pacing device. 14.The subject is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device trial that clinically interferes with the AIM Dysplasia Trial endpoints. 15.Subject suffers from psychiatric or other illness deemed by the investigator as an inability to comply with protocol. For the 5 year extension, patient must have:1. Enrolled in the B-204 protocol. 2. Completed 1 year follow-up. 3. Completed 2 year follow-up.

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
  • University of Arizona, VAMC
  • UC Irvine Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
  • Harvard, VA Boston Healthcare W Roxbury
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester
  • University of Kansas School of Medicine - Veterans Affairs Medical Center
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • UNC Center for Functional GI & Motility Disorders
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Oregon Health Sciences University
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Gastrointestinal Associates
  • VAMC Dallas
  • Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Sham Comparator

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

LGD Sham Procedure first then LGD Radiofrequency Ablation

LGD:Radiofrequency ablation

HGD Sham Procedure first then HGD Radiofrequency Ablation

HGD:Radiofrequency ablation

Arm Description

Sham procedure plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with Low Grade Dysplasia (LGD) receive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with dose of Esomeprazole 40 mg BID. At 12 month, subjects crossover to receive radiofrequency ablation.

Ablation System plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with Low Grade Dysplasia (LGD) undergo an upper endoscopy with sizing of the esophageal diameter followed by radiofrequency ablation plus standard anti-secretory therapy (proton pump inhibitor, PPI-dose: Esomeprazole 40 mg BID.)

Sham procedure plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with High Grade Dysplasia (HGD) with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dose: Esomeprazole 40 mg BID. At 12 month, subjects crossover to receive radiofrequency ablation.

Ablation System plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with High Grade Dysplasia (HGD) undergo an upper endoscopy with sizing of the esophageal diameter followed by radiofrequency ablation plus standard anti-secretory therapy (proton pump inhibitor, PPI-dose: Esomeprazole 40 mg BID.)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The % of Patients With Complete Eradication of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM) at 12 Month
% of patients with complete eradication of IM out of the number of participants analyzed at 12 month was calculated.
The % of Patients With Complete Eradication of Dysplasia at 12 Month
% of patients with complete eradication of Dysplasia out of the number of participants analyzed at 12 month was calculated.
The % of Patients With Complete Histological Clearance of Intestinal Metaplasia at 24 Months.
% of patients with complete eradication of IM out of the number of participants analyzed at 24 month was calculated.
5 Year Extension: % of All Patients Enrolled in the Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 5 Years
For patient who made it to the 5 year visit, % of patients demonstrating complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) was calculated.
Durability of Eradication With no Additional Treatments
5 Year Extension: % of All Patients Enrolled in the Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-D at 5 Years
For patient who made it to the 5 year visit, % of patients demonstrating complete eradication of dysplasia was calculated and all were free of dysplasia

Secondary Outcome Measures

The % of Patients With Complete Histological Clearance of IM at 12 Months, Comparing Treatment Versus Sham Control Groups Within a Specific Dysplasia Subgroup
Within the HGD Subgroup, the % of Patients With Complete Histological Clearance of HGD (CR-D) at 12 Months, Comparing Treatment Versus Sham Control Groups.
Histological Clearance of IM (% Biopsies)
% of patients with histological clearance of IM out of the number of participants analyzed at 12 month was calculated.
Progression of Dysplasia (i.e., HGD to Adenocarcinoma, or LGD to HGD or Adenocarcinoma)
Subject Discomfort : Chest Pain Score on Day 1
Chest pain score was measured on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of pain
Quality of Life Questionnaire (Baseline v. 12 and 24 Mos)
Adverse Event Incidence
Data reported in the adverse event section
For 5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension and Available for Analysis at 5 Years Demonstrating Any Adenocarcinoma in Any Biopsy Obtained From the Esophageal Body Since Primary RFA (0-5 Years)
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension and Available for Analysis at 5 Years Demonstrating Any Adenocarcinoma in Any Biopsy Obtained From the Esophageal Body After 2 Years and Inclusive of the 5 Year Visit
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 5 Year
5 Year Extension:Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-D at 5 Year
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 4 Year
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 3 Year
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-D at 4 Year
5 Year Extension: Serious Adverse Event Incidence
5 Year Extension: All Cause Mortality of the Group From 2 to 5 Years.

Full Information

First Posted
January 25, 2006
Last Updated
October 5, 2017
Sponsor
Medtronic - MITG
Collaborators
AstraZeneca
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00282672
Brief Title
Ablation of Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia
Official Title
Ablation of Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia (AIM Dysplasia Trial) A Multi-center, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial: Protocol Amendment to Extend Follow-up to 5 Years
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medtronic - MITG
Collaborators
AstraZeneca

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the intervention of a 510(k)-cleared endoscopically-guided (Halo Ablation systems), ablation system plus anti-secretory therapy is better than anti-secretory therapy alone in clearing Barrett's Esophagus.
Detailed Description
Barrett's esophagus or intestinal metaplasia (IM) is a change in the epithelial lining of the esophagus. Barrett's esophagus develops as a result of chronic exposure of the esophagus to refluxed stomach acid and enzymes, as well as bile, resulting in recurrent mucosal injury. Injury is accompanied by inflammation and, ultimately, a cellular change (metaplasia) to a specialized columnar epithelium (Spechler SJ. Barrett's Esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;346(11):836-842.) Patients who have a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus typically undergo surveillance endoscopy every 1-3 years with multiple biopsy specimens obtained to facilitate early detection of progression of IM to dysplasia (more severe precancerous changes) and adenocarcinoma. (Sampliner RE. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastro 2002;97:1888-1895.) Progression of IM to low-grade dysplasia (LGD) indicates that cells exhibit more "cancer-like" architecture, thus warranting an accelerated surveillance endoscopy and biopsy program every 6 months rather than every 1-3 years as indicated for non-dysplastic IM. Progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) indicates that the cells are even more "cancer-like", thus warranting an even higher frequency surveillance endoscopy and biopsy program (every 3 months). Many HGD patients may undergo photodynamic therapy (PDT) or surgical esophagectomy, rather than remain in a frequent surveillance program. This more aggressive therapy is warranted because of the high rate of progression of HGD to adenocarcinoma. Esophageal adenocarcinoma most commonly occurs after an insidious progression from IM to LGD to HGD. Therefore, surveillance is increased upon diagnosis of worsening grades of dysplasia. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is rapidly increasing as middle-aged and elderly demographic sub-groups expand (Peters JH, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR. Barrett's Esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8(1):1-17.) In 2004, the American Cancer Society reported that there were 14,250 new cases of esophageal cancer, and 13,300 deaths attributable to esophageal cancer (www.cancer.org). The U.S. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program reported that the increasing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma was greater than for any other cancer in the United States (www.cancer.gov). Elimination of the diseased epithelium containing IM with dysplasia is an intuitively favorable step for patients with this diagnosis. In other disease states, such as colon polyps or premalignant skin lesions, removal of the premalignant tissue results in a reduction in the risk of ultimately developing cancer. This is a logical conclusion when considering the premalignant lesion of Barrett's esophagus (particularly Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia), as the "tissue at risk" can be completely removed by ablation. This premise has been tested in the Barrett's dysplasia population in photoablative trials using PDT for patients with HGD, where PDT imparted a 50% reduction in risk over controls for the development of adenocarcinoma (Overholt BF, Panjehpour M, Haydek JM. Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49(1):1-7.) The AIM Dysplasia Trial primary endpoints are removal of all dysplasia and IM, rather than detection of a difference in progression to adenocarcinoma or higher grades of dysplasia.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Barrett Esophagus
Keywords
Barrett's Esophagus, Dysplasia, Radiofrequency Ablation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
127 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
LGD Sham Procedure first then LGD Radiofrequency Ablation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham procedure plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with Low Grade Dysplasia (LGD) receive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with dose of Esomeprazole 40 mg BID. At 12 month, subjects crossover to receive radiofrequency ablation.
Arm Title
LGD:Radiofrequency ablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ablation System plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with Low Grade Dysplasia (LGD) undergo an upper endoscopy with sizing of the esophageal diameter followed by radiofrequency ablation plus standard anti-secretory therapy (proton pump inhibitor, PPI-dose: Esomeprazole 40 mg BID.)
Arm Title
HGD Sham Procedure first then HGD Radiofrequency Ablation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham procedure plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with High Grade Dysplasia (HGD) with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dose: Esomeprazole 40 mg BID. At 12 month, subjects crossover to receive radiofrequency ablation.
Arm Title
HGD:Radiofrequency ablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ablation System plus anti-secretory medication. Subjects with High Grade Dysplasia (HGD) undergo an upper endoscopy with sizing of the esophageal diameter followed by radiofrequency ablation plus standard anti-secretory therapy (proton pump inhibitor, PPI-dose: Esomeprazole 40 mg BID.)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Ablation System plus anti-secretory medication
Other Intervention Name(s)
HALO 360, HALO 90
Intervention Description
Treatment group subjects undergo up to 4 ablation procedures (circumferential or focal) plus standard anti-secretory drug therapy (proton pump inhibitor, PPI).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham procedure plus anti-secretory medication
Intervention Description
The Sham Control group undergo an upper endoscopy procedure with sizing of the esophageal diameter (a component of the ablation procedure steps, deemed the sham procedure) plus standard anti-secretory drug therapy (Proton pump inhibitor, PPI)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The % of Patients With Complete Eradication of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM) at 12 Month
Description
% of patients with complete eradication of IM out of the number of participants analyzed at 12 month was calculated.
Time Frame
12 month
Title
The % of Patients With Complete Eradication of Dysplasia at 12 Month
Description
% of patients with complete eradication of Dysplasia out of the number of participants analyzed at 12 month was calculated.
Time Frame
12 month
Title
The % of Patients With Complete Histological Clearance of Intestinal Metaplasia at 24 Months.
Description
% of patients with complete eradication of IM out of the number of participants analyzed at 24 month was calculated.
Time Frame
24 Month
Title
5 Year Extension: % of All Patients Enrolled in the Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 5 Years
Description
For patient who made it to the 5 year visit, % of patients demonstrating complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) was calculated.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Durability of Eradication With no Additional Treatments
Time Frame
5 year
Title
5 Year Extension: % of All Patients Enrolled in the Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-D at 5 Years
Description
For patient who made it to the 5 year visit, % of patients demonstrating complete eradication of dysplasia was calculated and all were free of dysplasia
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The % of Patients With Complete Histological Clearance of IM at 12 Months, Comparing Treatment Versus Sham Control Groups Within a Specific Dysplasia Subgroup
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Within the HGD Subgroup, the % of Patients With Complete Histological Clearance of HGD (CR-D) at 12 Months, Comparing Treatment Versus Sham Control Groups.
Time Frame
12 Month
Title
Histological Clearance of IM (% Biopsies)
Description
% of patients with histological clearance of IM out of the number of participants analyzed at 12 month was calculated.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Progression of Dysplasia (i.e., HGD to Adenocarcinoma, or LGD to HGD or Adenocarcinoma)
Time Frame
5 year
Title
Subject Discomfort : Chest Pain Score on Day 1
Description
Chest pain score was measured on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of pain
Time Frame
Day 1 , if ablated
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire (Baseline v. 12 and 24 Mos)
Time Frame
0, 12, and 24 months
Title
Adverse Event Incidence
Description
Data reported in the adverse event section
Time Frame
12 months for Treatment and Sham Comparison
Title
For 5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension and Available for Analysis at 5 Years Demonstrating Any Adenocarcinoma in Any Biopsy Obtained From the Esophageal Body Since Primary RFA (0-5 Years)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension and Available for Analysis at 5 Years Demonstrating Any Adenocarcinoma in Any Biopsy Obtained From the Esophageal Body After 2 Years and Inclusive of the 5 Year Visit
Time Frame
5 years
Title
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 5 Year
Time Frame
5 years
Title
5 Year Extension:Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-D at 5 Year
Time Frame
5 years
Title
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 4 Year
Time Frame
4 years
Title
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-IM at 3 Year
Time Frame
3 years
Title
5 Year Extension: Proportion (%) of All Patients Enrolled in This Extension Protocol and Available for Analysis Demonstrating CR-D at 4 Year
Time Frame
4 years
Title
5 Year Extension: Serious Adverse Event Incidence
Time Frame
5 years
Title
5 Year Extension: All Cause Mortality of the Group From 2 to 5 Years.
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:1.Subject is 18-80 years of age, inclusive. 2.Subject has documented diagnosis of IM, maximum endoscopic length of 8 cm (as measured endoscopically from the TGF to the most proximal extent of the IM; i.e. TGF-TIM containing dysplasia as follows: For LGD:i.LGD documented on biopsy within previous 12 months from enrollment while subject on PPI therapy. ii.Histology slides reviewed at central pathology service for trial confirm LGD on first confirmatory central pathology review or, if necessary, confirm LGD on a tie-breaker review by a second pathologist. For HGD:i.Regular, non-nodular, non-ulcerated mucosa. ii.HGD documented on biopsy within previous 6 months from enrollment. iii.Histology slides reviewed at central pathology service for Trial confirm HGD on first confirmatory review or, if necessary, confirm HGD on a tie-breaker review by a second pathologist. iv.Baseline EUS within previous 12 months; 1.Catheter-based EUS excludes suspicious thickened Barrett's areas or, if suspicious areas found, prompts stacked biopsies of thickened area, the results of which do not render subject ineligible for enrollment. 3.For subjects with EMR history,the documented diagnosis of IM with dysplasia meets criterion #2 from biopsies collected either after the EMR procedure or during the EMR procedure but not from the EMR site. 4.Subject able to take oral proton pump inhibitor medication. 5.Subject able to discontinue aspirin and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications 7 days before and after all ablation procedures. 6.For female subjects of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks of randomization. 7.Subject eligible for treatment and follow-up endoscopy and biopsy as required by the Protocol. 8.Subject willing to provide written, informed consent to participate in this clinical study and understands the responsibilities of trial participation. Exclusion Criteria:1.The subject is pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the study period. 2.Esophageal stricture preventing passage of endoscope or catheter. 3.Active esophagitis described as erosions or ulcerations encompassing more than 10% of distal esophagus. 4.Any history of malignancy of the esophagus. 5.Prior radiation therapy to the esophagus,except head and neck region radiation therapy. 6.Any previous ablative therapy within the esophagus (PDT, MPEC, APC, laser treatment, other). 7.History of EMR that meets any of the following criteria:a.EMR performed less than 8 weeks prior to the randomization endoscopy encounter b.EMR performed in a wide field manner (encompassing more than 90 degrees of any area of the esophagus. 8.Any previous esophageal surgery, including except fundoplication without complications (i.e. no slippage, dysphagia, etc). 9.Evidence of esophageal varices during treatment endoscopy. 10.Report of uncontrolled coagulopathy with international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.3 or platelet count <75,000 platelets per µL 11.Subject has a life-expectancy of less than two years due to an underlying medical condition. 12.Subject has a known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines. 13.Subject has an implantable pacing device (examples; AICD, neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker)and has not received clearance for enrollment in this study by specialist responsible for the pacing device. 14.The subject is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device trial that clinically interferes with the AIM Dysplasia Trial endpoints. 15.Subject suffers from psychiatric or other illness deemed by the investigator as an inability to comply with protocol. For the 5 year extension, patient must have:1. Enrolled in the B-204 protocol. 2. Completed 1 year follow-up. 3. Completed 2 year follow-up.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicholas J Shaheen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85259
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Arizona, VAMC
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85723
Country
United States
Facility Name
UC Irvine Medical Center
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Harvard, VA Boston Healthcare W Roxbury
City
West Roxbury
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas School of Medicine - Veterans Affairs Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
UNC Center for Functional GI & Motility Disorders
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals of Cleveland
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health Sciences University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Thomas Jefferson University
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastrointestinal Associates
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909
Country
United States
Facility Name
VAMC Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Center
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16333533
Citation
Dunkin BJ, Martinez J, Bejarano PA, Smith CD, Chang K, Livingstone AS, Melvin WS. Thin-layer ablation of human esophageal epithelium using a bipolar radiofrequency balloon device. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-8279-9. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15605025
Citation
Ganz RA, Utley DS, Stern RA, Jackson J, Batts KP, Termin P. Complete ablation of esophageal epithelium with a balloon-based bipolar electrode: a phased evaluation in the porcine and in the human esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):1002-10. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02220-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19474425
Citation
Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, Wolfsen HC, Sampliner RE, Wang KK, Galanko JA, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Jobe BA, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Mashimo H, Chang KJ, Muthusamy VR, Edmundowicz SA, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Falk GW, Kimmey MB, Madanick RD, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28;360(22):2277-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808145.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21679712
Citation
Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE, Wolfsen HC, Wang KK, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Mashimo H, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Edmundowicz SA, Madanick RD, Peery AF, Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ, Kimmey MB, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Dumot JA, Falk GW, Galanko JA, Jobe BA, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Sharma P, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Aug;141(2):460-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.061. Epub 2011 May 6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20598302
Citation
Shaheen NJ, Peery AF, Overholt BF, Lightdale CJ, Chak A, Wang KK, Hawes RH, Fleischer DE, Goldblum JR; AIM Dysplasia Investigators. Biopsy depth after radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep;72(3):490-496.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Ablation of Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs