search
Back to results

Above-versus Below-elbow Casting for Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Primary Purpose

Distal Radius Fracture

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Below elbow immobilization
Above elbow immobilization
Sponsored by
Hospital Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Distal Radius Fracture focused on measuring conservative treatment, treatment outcome

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with growth plate closured, both gender, with closed acute displaced distal radius fracture (up to 1 week), associated or not with the ulnar styloid fractures with no other fractures, which may be closed reduced after intravenous anesthesia. No previous fractures to the ipsilateral or contralateral forearm.
  • Displaced and reducible fractures (after venous anesthesia) classified by AO as type A2, A3, C1, C2 and C3.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fractures.
  • Vascular ou neurological compromise

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Municipal Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Above elbow immobilization

Below elbow immobilization

Arm Description

Above elbow immobililization with short radial splint that will be performed with 20cm wide gypsum cut to fit the thumb. The splint will be applied to the radial aspect of the wrist covering the volar and dorsal portion of the radius to the elbow. Additional splint with a 15cm width splint on the ulnar aspect of the forearm that begins at the middle of the forearm and extends into the armpit.

Below elbow immobilization with exclusively short radial splint that will be performed with 20cm wide gypsum cut to fit the thumb. The splint will be applied to the radial aspect of the wrist covering the volar and dorsal portion of the radius to the elbow.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

maintenance of reduction by evaluation of radiographic parameters (wrist radiographs).
Posteroanterior and lateral x-rays of the wrist to measure radiographic parameters to determine maintenance of reduction will be done every follow up visit. Measurements of the alignment will be made on the radiographs with a marker, straight edge, and protractor. The radiographic measurement technique will be standardized, and repeatability testing demonstrated by a complete blinded assessor. All radiographs will be reviewed by one of the four authors.

Secondary Outcome Measures

DASH questionnaire
The DASH questionnaire was developed as an instrument for patients with upper-extremity injuries. The survey contains 37 questions related to the function of the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder.
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
The PRWE contains 15 items that are specific to determine the degree of musculoskeletal disability related to the wrist. Both are validated tools of upper extremity function.
Pain (VAS - "Visual Analogue Pain Scale").
Visual Analogue Pain Scale(VAS). It is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, which has been widely used in diverse adult populations. Pain in VAS is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line with 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale]). The participants are asked to report pain intensity in the last 24 hours. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 100mm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100.
Objective functional evaluation (goniometry and dynamometry)
The objective functional evaluation measurement will be made with protactor to measure wrist flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, radial deviation and pronosupination

Full Information

First Posted
April 17, 2017
Last Updated
December 9, 2019
Sponsor
Hospital Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha
Collaborators
Federal University of São Paulo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03126175
Brief Title
Above-versus Below-elbow Casting for Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures
Official Title
Above-versus Below-elbow Casting for Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial and Study Protocol.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 9, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 9, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha
Collaborators
Federal University of São Paulo

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
For the non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures in adults a variety cast options are available, including or not the elbow joint. The literature is inconclusive regarding the need to immobilize the elbow joint after reduction of the distal radius fracture.This study was undertaken to evaluate the best method of immobilization between the above and below-elbow cast groups at the end of 6 months of follow-up.
Detailed Description
To determine the best method of immobilization ( below elbow versus above elbow splint) in patients with distal radius fractures at the end of 6 months of follow-up: Type of study: Prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Patient recruitment: Adults attended in emergency room with closed acute displaced distal radius fracture will be reduced under general venous anesthesia with fluoroscopic control. Displaced and reducible fractures (after venous anesthesia) will be included if one of these conditions is present: Radial height - loss > 2 mm , radial Inclination- loss > 4°, dorsal tilt - > 10°, ulnar variance - loss > 3 mm, intra-articular step off or gap - > 2mm . The contralateral side will be used as a reference. The eligible participants will be informed about the nature and purpose of the study by reading the "Informed Consent Term" after ageeement, patients will included in the trial and randomized. Maintenace of reduction will be defined as the maintenance of the parameters listed above. Patients with above elbow immobilization will remain for 4 weeks with splint followed by 2 weeks of below elbow immobilization. The immobilization will be removed with 6 weeks. The primary outcome is: maintenance of reduction by evaluation of radiographic parameters (wrist radiographs) at one, two, three, four, six, eight, twelve and twenty four weeks after fracture reduction and self-reported function assessment Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire(DASH). Secondary outcomes:Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation- PRWE. Pain (VAS - "Visual Analogue Pain Scale"). Objective functional evaluation (goniometry and dynamometry) and rate of complications and failures. Sample Size calculation was calculated based on data derived from one recent randomized clinical trial on the subject. We considered as relevant differences on DASH scores (clinically relevant) when scores are greater than 10 points and standard deviation 15 points. To detect this difference (Student T-test) and statistical power of 95% resulted in a 58 patient sample size per group. We considered an extra 10% for balancing follow up losses. Thus, our inclusion target will be 64 patients per group. We considered the test as bicaudal. Benefits: Below elbow splinting is easier to apply, lower cost, more comfortable and permits better function for daily life activity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Distal Radius Fracture
Keywords
conservative treatment, treatment outcome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
open label
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
128 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Above elbow immobilization
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Above elbow immobililization with short radial splint that will be performed with 20cm wide gypsum cut to fit the thumb. The splint will be applied to the radial aspect of the wrist covering the volar and dorsal portion of the radius to the elbow. Additional splint with a 15cm width splint on the ulnar aspect of the forearm that begins at the middle of the forearm and extends into the armpit.
Arm Title
Below elbow immobilization
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Below elbow immobilization with exclusively short radial splint that will be performed with 20cm wide gypsum cut to fit the thumb. The splint will be applied to the radial aspect of the wrist covering the volar and dorsal portion of the radius to the elbow.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Below elbow immobilization
Other Intervention Name(s)
Plaster immobilization with elbow free (Below elbow)
Intervention Description
20cm wide gypsum in the forearm cut to fit the thumb.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Above elbow immobilization
Other Intervention Name(s)
Plater immobilization including elbow (Above elbow)
Intervention Description
20cm wide gypsum in the forearm cut to fit the thumb associated a elbow splint made with a 15cm width on the ulnar aspect of the forearm that begins at the middle of the forearm and extends into the armpit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
maintenance of reduction by evaluation of radiographic parameters (wrist radiographs).
Description
Posteroanterior and lateral x-rays of the wrist to measure radiographic parameters to determine maintenance of reduction will be done every follow up visit. Measurements of the alignment will be made on the radiographs with a marker, straight edge, and protractor. The radiographic measurement technique will be standardized, and repeatability testing demonstrated by a complete blinded assessor. All radiographs will be reviewed by one of the four authors.
Time Frame
One, two, three, four, six, eight, twelve and twenty four weeks after fracture reduction(radiographs).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
DASH questionnaire
Description
The DASH questionnaire was developed as an instrument for patients with upper-extremity injuries. The survey contains 37 questions related to the function of the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder.
Time Frame
Two, six , eight, twelve and twenty four weeks
Title
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
Description
The PRWE contains 15 items that are specific to determine the degree of musculoskeletal disability related to the wrist. Both are validated tools of upper extremity function.
Time Frame
Eight, twelve and twenty four weeks.
Title
Pain (VAS - "Visual Analogue Pain Scale").
Description
Visual Analogue Pain Scale(VAS). It is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, which has been widely used in diverse adult populations. Pain in VAS is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line with 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale]). The participants are asked to report pain intensity in the last 24 hours. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 100mm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100.
Time Frame
one, two, three, four, six, eight, twelve and twenty four weeks after fracture reduction
Title
Objective functional evaluation (goniometry and dynamometry)
Description
The objective functional evaluation measurement will be made with protactor to measure wrist flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, radial deviation and pronosupination
Time Frame
Six, eight, twelve and twenty four weeks follow up visit.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults with growth plate closured, both gender, with closed acute displaced distal radius fracture (up to 1 week), associated or not with the ulnar styloid fractures with no other fractures, which may be closed reduced after intravenous anesthesia. No previous fractures to the ipsilateral or contralateral forearm. Displaced and reducible fractures (after venous anesthesia) classified by AO as type A2, A3, C1, C2 and C3. Exclusion Criteria: Open fractures. Vascular ou neurological compromise
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
João Carlos Belloti, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Federal University of São Paulo
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Municipal Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha
City
São Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
05835-005
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The data will be made available through contact with the researcher.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data of study protocol is already available. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2007-9
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
open
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870077/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
6391415
Citation
Bunger C, Solund K, Rasmussen P. Early results after Colles' fracture: functional bracing in supination vs dorsal plaster immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1984;103(4):251-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00387330.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16713840
Citation
Bong MR, Egol KA, Leibman M, Koval KJ. A comparison of immediate postreduction splinting constructs for controlling initial displacement of fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized study of long-arm versus short-arm splinting. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 May-Jun;31(5):766-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6389558
Citation
Stewart HD, Innes AR, Burke FD. Functional cast-bracing for Colles' fractures. A comparison between cast-bracing and conventional plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984 Nov;66(5):749-53. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.66B5.6389558.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16391243
Citation
Bohm ER, Bubbar V, Yong Hing K, Dzus A. Above and below-the-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00320.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4125714
Citation
Pool C. Colles's fracture. A prospective study of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973 Aug;55(3):540-4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1123382
Citation
Sarmiento A, Pratt GW, Berry NC, Sinclair WF. Colles' fractures. Functional bracing in supination. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Apr;57(3):311-7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29587687
Citation
Okamura A, de Mendonca GM, Raduan Neto J, de Moraes VY, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Above-versus below-elbow casting for conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial and study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2007-9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Above-versus Below-elbow Casting for Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs