search
Back to results

Accelerated Versus Standard CXL in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Primary Purpose

Refractive Surgery

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cross linking
Sponsored by
Menoufia University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Refractive Surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible patients were:
  • adults aged above 18 years.
  • They have been diagnosed clinically with progressive corneal ectasia following refractive surgery procedure (LASIK, PRK, ReLex smile), or penetrating keratoplasty
  • CCT above 400µ.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria involved:
  • history of herpetic ocular diseases (including herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus) in the study eye
  • active or recurrent ocular disease in either eye (e.g., uveitis, chronic moderate to severe blepharitis or severe dry eye) or sight-threatening diseases (e.g., previous retinal or optic nerve diseases) that would interfere with the interpretation of the study data.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Accelerated Cross Linking

    Standard Cross linking

    Arm Description

    Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 18mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 5 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.

    Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 3mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 30 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    K-max changes
    The main outcomes for comparison were the change in; Maximum-K reading (K-max), Patients were followed up clinically on the first day, first week, one month, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE) in Diopter power
    The secondary outcomes for comparison were the change in, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE). Patients were followed up clinically on the first day, first week, one month, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 24, 2018
    Last Updated
    January 2, 2019
    Sponsor
    Menoufia University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03791684
    Brief Title
    Accelerated Versus Standard CXL in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
    Official Title
    Accelerated Versus Standard Corneal Cross Linking in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Long Term Randomized Trial.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 16, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 16, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 26, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Menoufia University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    WHAT WAS KNOWN *Standard CXL is the common procedure for treating progressive corneal ectasia. Modifications of the standard protocol were introduces to reduce its complications especially long exposure to ultraviolet rays. The Accelerated protocol, while believed to overcome this issue with comparable outcomes, has not been studied fully in patients with ectasia following corneal refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Accelerated CXL is as safe and effective as the Standard CXL in halting the progression of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty with the benefit of: reduced ultraviolet exposure, reduced operation time, and reduced patient discomfort.
    Detailed Description
    Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the Standard CXL and the AC CXL in patients with progressive corneal ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty. Setting: Menoufia University Hospital, Egypt Design: Prospective, randomised comparison. Methods: Patients scheduled to receive either Standard CXL (3mW/cm2 for a period of 30 min) or Accelerated CXL (18mW/cm2 for a period of 5 min).The main outcomes for comparison were the change in; Maximum-K reading (K-max), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT), and the best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Refractive Surgery

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    111 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Accelerated Cross Linking
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 18mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 5 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.
    Arm Title
    Standard Cross linking
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Ultraviolet A radiation of 365 nm wavelength (CCL-365 vario, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Switzerland), and an irradiance of 3mW/cm2 (spot size 7mm), at a distance of 45 mm from the cornea, was applied for a period of 30 min, delivering a dose of 5.4 J/cm2.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Cross linking
    Intervention Description
    Cross linking strategy either standard or accelerated
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    K-max changes
    Description
    The main outcomes for comparison were the change in; Maximum-K reading (K-max), Patients were followed up clinically on the first day, first week, one month, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
    Time Frame
    12 post treatment
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE) in Diopter power
    Description
    The secondary outcomes for comparison were the change in, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE). Patients were followed up clinically on the first day, first week, one month, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
    Time Frame
    12 months postoperatively

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Eligible patients were: adults aged above 18 years. They have been diagnosed clinically with progressive corneal ectasia following refractive surgery procedure (LASIK, PRK, ReLex smile), or penetrating keratoplasty CCT above 400µ. Exclusion Criteria: The exclusion criteria involved: history of herpetic ocular diseases (including herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus) in the study eye active or recurrent ocular disease in either eye (e.g., uveitis, chronic moderate to severe blepharitis or severe dry eye) or sight-threatening diseases (e.g., previous retinal or optic nerve diseases) that would interfere with the interpretation of the study data.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    The data used to support the findings of this study are restricted by the Ophthalmic Ethics Committee at Menoufia University Hospital, in order to protect patient privacy. Data are available from Mr Hany Khairy (khairyhany@hotmail.com), for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
    IPD Sharing Time Frame
    The data used to support the findings of this study are restricted by the Ophthalmic Ethics Committee at Menoufia University Hospital, in order to protect patient privacy. Data are available from Mr Hany Khairy (khairyhany@hotmail.com), for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data after study publcation
    IPD Sharing Access Criteria
    Data are available for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data as specified by the Ophthalmic Committee of Menoufia University Hospital

    Learn more about this trial

    Accelerated Versus Standard CXL in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs