search
Back to results

Acceptability and Safety of 3D Printed Wrist-based Splints (3D-splinting)

Primary Purpose

Distal Radius Fracture, Scaphoid Fracture

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Swibrace 3D-splint
Plaster cast
Sponsored by
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Distal Radius Fracture focused on measuring 3D-splinting, Plaster cast, Patient satisfaction, Distal radius fracture, Scaphoid fracture

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent as documented by signature
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • Understanding of German language (written and oral)
  • Showing up at the Inselspital Bern emergency department with a stable, nondisplaced distal radius or scaphoid fracture that classifies a conservative immobilization treatment (as decided by the present surgeon on duty)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected non-compliance
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • < 18 years old
  • Vulnerable persons

Sites / Locations

  • Inselspital Bern, Hand therapy research unitRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

3D-splint group

Plaster cast group

Arm Description

Patients wear the Swibrace 3D splint for 6 weeks of immobilization of the wrist for distal radius fractures, including the basis of the thumb for scaphoid fractures. X-rays after week 1, 3 and 6 are planned to document bone healing, together with weekly visits at the hand therapy unit to measure patient satisfaction and hand function. This results in 2-3 surgeon and 6 hand therapy visits at the Inselspital Bern, where regular check-ups on the patient's comfort in the splint are made.

The control intervention is the same as the study intervention, but the participants wear the "gold-standard" plaster cast instead of the newly designed Swibrace 3D-splint.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in "Patient Reported Splint Evaluation Questionnaire (PRSEQ)"
The investigators designed this questionnaire to the best of their knowledge due to lack of pre-existing orthosis satisfaction questionnaires suitable for the study purposes. The PRSEQ will be completed by the participating patients. It consists of two parts: Part 1 consist of 5 main topics: (1) pain because of the splint, (2) personal experiences with the splint, (3) personal safety, (4) specific and (5) usual activities in the splint. Pictures from the splint are given to allow ticking pressure marks and skin irritations where they appeared. Part 2 consists of 3 main topics: (6) satisfaction with the splint, (7) personal attitude and (8) satisfaction with the scanning procedure. Each main topic includes several sub-questions, where the patient rates his/her answers on a 11-point-Likert scale (0-10).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Hand therapy evaluation - applying the "assessment of patient satisfaction"
The assessment of patient satisfaction consists of 4 domains (patient comfort, patient compliance, cast odor and smell, skin itchiness) being rated on a 0-3 Likert Scale (0 = poor, 3 = excellent) by specialized hand therapists.
Hand therapy evaluation - finger range of motion as assessed by a hand-held goniometer
The hand-held goniometer will be used to measure the distances between the finger tips and the palm of the hand in centimeters. A touch-down (finger tips touch the palm) will be judged with "yes/no". Both finger range of motion measurements will be assessed by specialized hand therapists.
Hand therapy evaluation - sensibility as measured by the "Ten Test"
Specialized hand therapists will assess sensibility by applying the quantitative sensory test "Ten Test". The patient reports his/her light touch perception of the skin area being tested compared to the reference normal area when the examiner (hand therapist) gives a simultaneous stimulus by stroking a normal area and the area under examination. The response from the patient rating the sensibility of the test area is recorded as a fraction out of 10 between 1/10 and 10/10 (10 = normal sensory perception).
Hand therapy evaluation - pain as measured by the "Numeric Rating Scale"
Specialized hand therapists will assess pain using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain. It requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Patients are asked to circle their current pain in their hand on this scale.
Bone position - x-ray evaluation by specialized hand surgeons and orthopedists
Bone healing process is closely monitored by specialized hand surgeons and orthopedists by taking an x-ray on several time points: - one week after the accident to check if the bone is not displaced to guarantee that a conservative treatment may be continued. in case of any uncertainties, another x-ray will take place during week 2 after the accident to check on the bone's position again. - after 6 weeks, the last x-ray will be made to decide removal of the plaster cast / 3D splint
Questionnaire "assessment of clinical effectiveness" as rated by specialized hand surgeons and orthopedists
The "assessment of clinical effectiveness" is an assessment where 4 domains are judged by specialized hand surgeons or orthopedists on a 0-3 Likert Scale (0 = poor, 3 = excellent). These are: stability of immobilization, blood circulation, wear pressure-related pain and pressure sores.
Composite endpoint "adherence" assessed as the "number of clinical visits that were missed" / "number of drop-outs" and "number of patients crossing over to the plaster cast group"
Adherence will be documented by clinicians (hand therapists and physicians) in terms of counts of: clinical visits that have taken place (or being missed), drop-out or cross-over rates to the plaster cast group.

Full Information

First Posted
September 14, 2021
Last Updated
January 23, 2023
Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05075135
Brief Title
Acceptability and Safety of 3D Printed Wrist-based Splints
Acronym
3D-splinting
Official Title
Acceptability and Safety of 3D Printed Wrist-based Splints Compared to Plaster Casts for the Treatment of Non-surgical Distal Radius- and Scaphoid Fractures: a Randomized Feasibility Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 9, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Non-invasiveness, avoidance of complications and comfort are important issues in the clinical management of conservatively treated distal radius and scaphoid fractures. To date, applying a plaster cast for approximately 6 weeks of immobilization is the gold standard. However, new 3D-technologies such as the design of Patient Specific Anatomical Braces (PSAB) will lead to a new paradigm of treatment. Swibrace has developed such anatomical, light, elegant and yet resistant braces. First, the fractured limb is scanned, the data then sent to a specifically designed software, printed in a 3D-printer and finally sent to the hospital for the patient's fitting. As these PSAB have not yet been tested on patients, the primary purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patient satisfaction with a 3D-printed PSAB differs from the one of traditionally treated patients in a plaster cast. (A pre-clinical study will be conducted with 10 healthy volunteers testing the 3D splint for 72h. Only if splint satisfaction will be ≥ 70% as measured by the self-designed "Adult Rated Splint Evaluation Questionnaire" (ARSEQ), the 3D splint will be tested in patients. Otherwise, adjustments to the splint will be made based on the healthy volunteers' feedback prior to its testing in patients.)
Detailed Description
A criteria sample of 10 adult patients per group (Swibrace 3D splint and plaster cast) will be recruited in one University hospital in Switzerland and randomly assigned to either the 3D-splint or plaster cast group. (For the pre-clinical study, the investigators aim to recruit 10 healthy volunteers testing one of the two 3D splint models (radius or scaphoid fracture splint).) Study intervention: Patients wear the Swibrace 3D splint for 6 weeks of immobilization of the wrist for distal radius fractures, including the basis of the thumb for scaphoid fractures. X-rays after week 1, 3 and 6 are planned to document bone healing, together with weekly visits at the hand therapy unit to measure patient satisfaction and hand function. This results in 2-3 surgeon and 6 hand therapy visits at the Inselspital Bern, where regular check-ups on the patient's comfort in the splint are made. The control intervention is the same as the study intervention, but the participants wear the "gold-standard" plaster cast instead of the newly designed Swibrace 3D-splint. For the pre-clinical study, there is no control intervention. (Healthy volunteers wear the Swibrace 3D splint for 72 hours. During this time, they are allowed to use their splinted hand for their usual daily activities, except for driving a car. They note their activities in a diary. At the end of the splint wearing time, they complete the ARSEQ. The scanning procedure will take at a place convenient for the volunteers.) Study objectives: The primary objective of this study is to assess if the patients' personal experiences and perceptions of safety and satisfaction (as defined by the self-designed "Patient rated splint evaluation questionnaire" (PRSEQ)) are superior in the Swibrace PSAB compared to a custom-made plaster cast. Secondary objectives are: To examine if there is a significant difference in self-perceived hand function and pain between the two groups (as assessed by the self-designed "Patient rated splint evaluation questionnaire" (PRSEQ)) To assess if radiological parameters between groups are similar at the end of the splint wearing period. (To evaluate satisfaction with the 3D splint in healthy volunteers before testing the 3D splint in patients.) The safety objectives are: To document the attrition rate and - if applicable - reasons for drop-out in the Swibrace PSAB group (drop-out means that the participants make a cross-over to the control group until bone healing is assured) during the splint wearing time. The X-ray appointments at Inselspital Bern, checking for the bone's correct healing position The patients' safety perception (as assessed by the self-designed PRSEQ)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Distal Radius Fracture, Scaphoid Fracture
Keywords
3D-splinting, Plaster cast, Patient satisfaction, Distal radius fracture, Scaphoid fracture

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomization is based on a single allocation ratio of 1:1 In order to generate an unpredictable allocation sequence and concealment of that sequence until assignment occurs, sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes will be prepared.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Masking is not feasible in this feasibility study, as the participants are not allowed to take off their splint (3D or plaster cast) during the bone healing time of 6 weeks. Care providers will take care of the patients prior to splint removal. Both the patients and the care providers are outcome assessors in this study.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
3D-splint group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients wear the Swibrace 3D splint for 6 weeks of immobilization of the wrist for distal radius fractures, including the basis of the thumb for scaphoid fractures. X-rays after week 1, 3 and 6 are planned to document bone healing, together with weekly visits at the hand therapy unit to measure patient satisfaction and hand function. This results in 2-3 surgeon and 6 hand therapy visits at the Inselspital Bern, where regular check-ups on the patient's comfort in the splint are made.
Arm Title
Plaster cast group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control intervention is the same as the study intervention, but the participants wear the "gold-standard" plaster cast instead of the newly designed Swibrace 3D-splint.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Swibrace 3D-splint
Intervention Description
The Swibrace 3D splint is a custom-made splint. For scanning of the forearms, the investigators will use the scanner "HandySCAN300" and the therewith delivered software "VXElements", the latter being necessary to create an accurate scan on the computer. Printing of the splint will be done by "Materialise", Belgium.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Plaster cast
Intervention Description
The conservative gold standard treatment of distal radius and scaphoid fractures is applying a plaster cast. Therefore, patients in the control group follow standard therapy procedures.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in "Patient Reported Splint Evaluation Questionnaire (PRSEQ)"
Description
The investigators designed this questionnaire to the best of their knowledge due to lack of pre-existing orthosis satisfaction questionnaires suitable for the study purposes. The PRSEQ will be completed by the participating patients. It consists of two parts: Part 1 consist of 5 main topics: (1) pain because of the splint, (2) personal experiences with the splint, (3) personal safety, (4) specific and (5) usual activities in the splint. Pictures from the splint are given to allow ticking pressure marks and skin irritations where they appeared. Part 2 consists of 3 main topics: (6) satisfaction with the splint, (7) personal attitude and (8) satisfaction with the scanning procedure. Each main topic includes several sub-questions, where the patient rates his/her answers on a 11-point-Likert scale (0-10).
Time Frame
Part 1 will be filled out during (at week 2, 4, 6) and Part 2 after the splint wearing time (week 6).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hand therapy evaluation - applying the "assessment of patient satisfaction"
Description
The assessment of patient satisfaction consists of 4 domains (patient comfort, patient compliance, cast odor and smell, skin itchiness) being rated on a 0-3 Likert Scale (0 = poor, 3 = excellent) by specialized hand therapists.
Time Frame
Assessed during 6 hand therapy visits on a weekly basis until week 6, starting in week 1
Title
Hand therapy evaluation - finger range of motion as assessed by a hand-held goniometer
Description
The hand-held goniometer will be used to measure the distances between the finger tips and the palm of the hand in centimeters. A touch-down (finger tips touch the palm) will be judged with "yes/no". Both finger range of motion measurements will be assessed by specialized hand therapists.
Time Frame
Assessed during 6 hand therapy visits on a weekly basis until week 6, starting in week 1
Title
Hand therapy evaluation - sensibility as measured by the "Ten Test"
Description
Specialized hand therapists will assess sensibility by applying the quantitative sensory test "Ten Test". The patient reports his/her light touch perception of the skin area being tested compared to the reference normal area when the examiner (hand therapist) gives a simultaneous stimulus by stroking a normal area and the area under examination. The response from the patient rating the sensibility of the test area is recorded as a fraction out of 10 between 1/10 and 10/10 (10 = normal sensory perception).
Time Frame
Assessed during 6 hand therapy visits on a weekly basis until week 6, starting in week 1
Title
Hand therapy evaluation - pain as measured by the "Numeric Rating Scale"
Description
Specialized hand therapists will assess pain using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain. It requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Patients are asked to circle their current pain in their hand on this scale.
Time Frame
Assessed during 6 hand therapy visits on a weekly basis until week 6, starting in week 1
Title
Bone position - x-ray evaluation by specialized hand surgeons and orthopedists
Description
Bone healing process is closely monitored by specialized hand surgeons and orthopedists by taking an x-ray on several time points: - one week after the accident to check if the bone is not displaced to guarantee that a conservative treatment may be continued. in case of any uncertainties, another x-ray will take place during week 2 after the accident to check on the bone's position again. - after 6 weeks, the last x-ray will be made to decide removal of the plaster cast / 3D splint
Time Frame
2-3 regular x-rays will take place during the bone healing phase after 1 week of splint wearing, if necessary in week 2 and after 6 weeks as assessed by physicians
Title
Questionnaire "assessment of clinical effectiveness" as rated by specialized hand surgeons and orthopedists
Description
The "assessment of clinical effectiveness" is an assessment where 4 domains are judged by specialized hand surgeons or orthopedists on a 0-3 Likert Scale (0 = poor, 3 = excellent). These are: stability of immobilization, blood circulation, wear pressure-related pain and pressure sores.
Time Frame
Administered once at the end of the study after 6 weeks
Title
Composite endpoint "adherence" assessed as the "number of clinical visits that were missed" / "number of drop-outs" and "number of patients crossing over to the plaster cast group"
Description
Adherence will be documented by clinicians (hand therapists and physicians) in terms of counts of: clinical visits that have taken place (or being missed), drop-out or cross-over rates to the plaster cast group.
Time Frame
Ongoing during the whole study period of 6 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent as documented by signature ≥ 18 years old Understanding of German language (written and oral) Showing up at the Inselspital Bern emergency department with a stable, nondisplaced distal radius or scaphoid fracture that classifies a conservative immobilization treatment (as decided by the present surgeon on duty) Exclusion Criteria: Known or suspected non-compliance Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant < 18 years old Vulnerable persons
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Bernadette Ch Tobler-Ammann, PhD
Phone
+41 31 632 83 19
Email
bernadette.tobler@insel.ch
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Patricia Kammermann, MAS
Phone
+41 31 632 85 58
Email
patricia.kammermann2@insel.ch
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Esther Vögelin, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH)
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Inselspital Bern, Hand therapy research unit
City
Bern
ZIP/Postal Code
3010
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernadette Ch Tobler-Ammann, PhD
Phone
+41 31 632 83 19
Email
bernadette.tobler@insel.ch
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patricia Kammermann, MAS
Phone
+41 31 632 85 58
Email
patricia.kammermann2@insel.ch
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tamara Hauri, MSc
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernadette Ch Tobler-Ammann, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patricia Kammermann, MAS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Esther Vögelin, Prof

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Links:
URL
http://servicenow.insel.ch/studien?id=ins_studien_form&table=u_contract_management&sys_id=e8ae7960ec6d741046e96abb57855137
Description
Study description at Inselspital Bern, Switzerland
URL
http://www.swibrace.com/
Description
collaboration partner, 3D-technology, Fribourg, Switzerland
URL
https://www.materialise.com/en/about
Description
3D printing company, Belgium

Learn more about this trial

Acceptability and Safety of 3D Printed Wrist-based Splints

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs