Acceptability and Tolerability of Magnetic Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Gastroscopy
Primary Purpose
Dyspepsia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
gastroscopy
magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Dyspepsia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 years and over and up to but not exceeding 80 years
- Patients presenting symptoms of dyspepsia whom require gastroscopy as per national guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients under the age of 18 years
- Patients over the age of 80 years
- Active vomiting
- Patients with a permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or REVEAL device
- Patients with any electronic/magnetic/mechanically controlled devices e.g. sacral nerve stimulators, bladder stimulators
- Patients with dysphagia, odynophagia or known swallowing disorder
- Patients with known Zenker's diverticulum
- Patients with suspected bowel obstruction or bowel perforation
- Patients with prior bowel obstruction
- Patients with gastroparesis or known gastric outlet obstruction
- Patients with known Crohn's disease
- Patients who are taking daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (excluding prophylactic doses of aspirin) for more than six months
- Patients who have received abdominopelvic radiotherapy treatment
- Patients with a history of GI tract surgery (Billroth I, Billroth II, Oesophagectomy, gastrectomy or bariatric procedure)
- Patients that are pregnant or lactating
- Patients with altered mental status that would limit their ability to swallow
- Patients with allergy to conscious sedation or metoclopramide
- Patients unwilling to swallow the capsule
- Patients with known dementia affecting ability to consent
- Patients who are unable to understand or speak English
- Patients unable to provide written informed consent
- Patients with head and neck cancers
- Patients who have had nasal surgery, eg. rhinnoplasty
- Patients allergic to lidocaine, pheylephirine or midazolam
- Patient with bleeding diathesis, on warfarin or have chronic liver disease
- Patients reluctant to have gastroscopy by both oral or transnasal route
Sites / Locations
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy
gastroscopy
Arm Description
All participants will undergo magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy at the sloan medical centre
All participants will undergo gastroscopy as standard of care at sheffield teaching hospitals
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Endoscopy Concerns Score
Differences in the Endoscopy Concerns Score (ECS) when patients have magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy (MACE) and when they have conventional gastroscopy
Secondary Outcome Measures
Clinician rating of visualization of upper GI Tract
Differences in visualization of the upper GI tract
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03420729
First Posted
January 29, 2018
Last Updated
October 20, 2020
Sponsor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03420729
Brief Title
Acceptability and Tolerability of Magnetic Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Gastroscopy
Official Title
Acceptability and Tolerability of Magnetic Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Gastroscopy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 7, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Dyspepsia is a common presenting complaint that doctors have to manage and this is true both in the primary and secondary care setting. OGD is a useful test for investigating a variety of suspected upper GI disorders including dyspepsia. However, it is uncomfortable for patients and incurs the risk of intubation and sedation. Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the investigation of choice for diseases of the small bowel. It is safe, non-invasive and well tolerated, the main risk being capsule retention occurring in up to 1-2% of procedures.
The investigators wish to undertake a prospective study comparing acceptability and tolerability of MACE and OGD in the investigation of dyspepsia. Patients presenting to general practice or the outpatients department with symptoms of dyspepsia who are referred for investigation are invited to take part in the study. Patients will undergo MACE prior to OGD performed by an endoscopist blinded to the MACE findings. . A comparison of tolerance and acceptance of both procedures will be measured by means of using structured and validated, qualitative questionnaires. The aim is to assess for whether there is a significant difference between the perception and experience of both modalities.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, single blinded, comparative trial of patient acceptability and tolerability of MACE and both transoral and transnasal gastroscopy in the investigation of dyspepsia.
The study will be conducted within Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. Recruitment will take place at the Sloan Medical Centre, the Royal Hallamshire Hospital or the Northern General Hospital during the consultation when patients present with dyspepsia requiring gastroscopy for investigation as per national guidelines. MACE will take place at the Sloan Medical Centre. Equipment for collecting demographics (height, weight etc) will be available. All the capsule equipment is stored and re-charged in this designated room. The case report files and computer data will be stored in this room that is secured by a locked door.
Gastroscopy will take place in the Endoscopy Departments, which are specially designed units for a variety of endoscopic tests, at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital and Northern General Hospital.
Patients are assessed in the Sloan Medical Centre or the Royal Hallamshire Hospital/Northern General Hospital outpatients department for their primary presenting complaints of dyspepsia. The study will be discussed with patients in those who satisfy the enrolment criteria and they will be provided by with the written study literature. If in agreement to enter the study, informed written consent will be obtained from the patient.
Prior to any investigation, the pre-MACE section of the questionnaire will be completed by the patient with the assistance of study team members. MACE will be performed at the Sloan Medical Centre; this will be in a dedicated room setup to accommodate the MACE procedure.The post-MACE section of the questionnaire will then be completed by the patient with the assistance of study team members. MACE will be preceded by obtaining measurements of height, weight and waist/hip circumference. The patient will then be given 500 to 1000mls of water with 6 drops of simethicone added to drink. This is to enable adequate distension of the stomach. Our previous study has shown excellent tolerance of this volume of water distension by patient.
The patient then swallows the capsule in the presence of the PI. MACE of the oesophagus and stomach will be carried out by the PI. Once the PI is satisfied that an adequate examination has been completed the capsule will be allowed to pass into and through the small bowel. Visibility of major locations of the stomach will be documented. Any pathology noted will be recorded according to the standard fashion described for gastroscopy reporting. A note of the procedure duration will be recorded. The patient will be given the option to complete their small bowel capsule endoscopy in the standard way and this will be reported in the usual fashion.
Patients referred for gastroscopy as part of the normal pathway for investigation of dyspepsia, will attend a designated list for their gastroscopy within 1 week and this will be performed by a JAG accredited endoscopist who has experience in endoscopic therapy. TOG will be performed using a standard 11mm Olympus or Pentax gastroscope and TNG will be performed using an ultra-thin 5.9mm Olympus or Fujinon gastroscope. The endoscopist performing the gastroscopy will be a member of the study team. The participant will be asked to complete the pre-gastroscopy section of the participant questionnaire before, and the post-gastroscopy section after the procedure.
Patients will have 80mg simethicone mixed in 100mls of water as an anti-foaming agent prior to the gastroscopy. Patients undergoing TNG will have their nasal passages prepared with a fine mist of 5% lidocaine and 0.5% phenylephrine (co-phenylephrine nasal spray) which are a local anaesthetic and nasal decongestant. Phenylephrine is a topical vasoconstrictor used as a nasal decongestant to reduce the risk of peri-procedure epistaxis. Five minutes following this, a 6mm diameter soft-sillicone catheter lubricated with 2% aqueous lidocaine gel is inserted into either or each nasal passage approximately 5-8cm passages to ensure the passage is wide enough to comfortably accommodate a nasal endoscopy. If neither passages accommodate the silicone catheter, the procedure will be converted to a transoral route. Patients undergoing TOG will have 10 sprays of 10% topical lidocaine administered to the oropharynx. Procedures will be performed in the left lateral decubitus position.
Gastroscopy will be performed in the standard fashion and reported to the PI to compose a written record for study purposes. This reporting system (InfoFlex) requires details to be entered regarding indication for examination, patient comfort, sedation and pathology. Pathology will be documented in a standardised way (for further details see section on Scientific Justification). An entry of the duration of procedure will be included. This denotes the end of the participants' involvement in the study. The patient will be managed thereafter according to the responsible clinician at the Sloan Medical Centre or Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
The primary outcome will be evaluated using the questionnaires to compare acceptability and tolerance of both procedures.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dyspepsia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care Provider
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
69 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All participants will undergo magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy at the sloan medical centre
Arm Title
gastroscopy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
All participants will undergo gastroscopy as standard of care at sheffield teaching hospitals
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
gastroscopy
Intervention Description
a thin, flexible tube called an end oscope is used to look inside the oesophagus (gullet), stomach and first part of the small intestine (duodenum)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy
Intervention Description
The patient will be given 500 to 1000mls of water with 6 drops of simethicone added to drink. This is to enable adequate distension of the stomach. The patient then swallows the capsule in the presence of the PI. MACE of the oesophagus and stomach will be carried out by the PI. Once the PI is satisfied that an adequate examination has been completed the capsule will be allowed to pass into and through the small bowel.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Endoscopy Concerns Score
Description
Differences in the Endoscopy Concerns Score (ECS) when patients have magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy (MACE) and when they have conventional gastroscopy
Time Frame
procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinician rating of visualization of upper GI Tract
Description
Differences in visualization of the upper GI tract
Time Frame
procedure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients aged 18 years and over and up to but not exceeding 80 years
Patients presenting symptoms of dyspepsia whom require gastroscopy as per national guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients under the age of 18 years
Patients over the age of 80 years
Active vomiting
Patients with a permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or REVEAL device
Patients with any electronic/magnetic/mechanically controlled devices e.g. sacral nerve stimulators, bladder stimulators
Patients with dysphagia, odynophagia or known swallowing disorder
Patients with known Zenker's diverticulum
Patients with suspected bowel obstruction or bowel perforation
Patients with prior bowel obstruction
Patients with gastroparesis or known gastric outlet obstruction
Patients with known Crohn's disease
Patients who are taking daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (excluding prophylactic doses of aspirin) for more than six months
Patients who have received abdominopelvic radiotherapy treatment
Patients with a history of GI tract surgery (Billroth I, Billroth II, Oesophagectomy, gastrectomy or bariatric procedure)
Patients that are pregnant or lactating
Patients with altered mental status that would limit their ability to swallow
Patients with allergy to conscious sedation or metoclopramide
Patients unwilling to swallow the capsule
Patients with known dementia affecting ability to consent
Patients who are unable to understand or speak English
Patients unable to provide written informed consent
Patients with head and neck cancers
Patients who have had nasal surgery, eg. rhinnoplasty
Patients allergic to lidocaine, pheylephirine or midazolam
Patient with bleeding diathesis, on warfarin or have chronic liver disease
Patients reluctant to have gastroscopy by both oral or transnasal route
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark McAlindon
Organizational Affiliation
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
City
Sheffield
State/Province
South Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2JF
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Acceptability and Tolerability of Magnetic Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Gastroscopy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs