search
Back to results

Acquisition of Objective Data During Transapical Neochordae Implantation (TENSCHORD)

Primary Purpose

Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Mitral Regurgitation

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Chordal tension measurement
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Sponsored by
Hospices Civils de Lyon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Mitral Valve Insufficiency focused on measuring Primary Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve repair, Heart Surgery, Neochord DS1000, Intraoperative Chordal Tension, Tension Measurement, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Postoperative echocardiographic evaluation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥ 18 years old)
  • Patient candidate for NeoChord procedure after validation by the local Heart-Team

    • severe symptomatic MR due to a posterior prolapses, involving mainly the P2 segment (with a variable extension on P1 or P3, but never involving the commissures or the anterior leaflet). Also, a LAI (leaflet to annulus index) >1,25 will be required.
    • and considered as high-risk for conventional surgery (mainly because of frailty) after selection by our heart team.
  • Patient who has provided his written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patient affiliated to a social health insurance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with contraindication for NeoChord technic including:

    • Patient with secondary MR
    • LV dilatation with initial tethering
    • Central component to regurgitant jet
    • Calcified leaflets segments.
  • Patient with contraindication for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging:

    • Patients without sinus rhythm
    • Regular MRI contraindications (e.g. a pacemaker, defibrillator or metallic (ferromagnetic) body, a known allergy to gadolinium)
    • Contraindication for Gadolinium infusion : glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml / min
  • Patient unable to understand the purpose of the study
  • Patient participating in another trial that would interfere with this study
  • Female patient who is pregnant or lactating
  • Patients under judicial protection

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Chordal tension measurement and cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Arm Description

    All patient candidates for NeoChord implantation according to the standard of care will be considered for inclusion in this clinical study. Chordal tension measurement will be performed during Neochord implantation. Moreover, all patients will undergo cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exam before the surgery, as well as at 3 months follow-up.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Duration of procedure in minutes
    Intraoperative safety is assessed by procedure duration in minutes (defined as skin incision to skin closure)
    Number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
    Post-operative safety is assessed by occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) at each of the follow-up times
    Duration of hospitalization
    Post-operative safety is assessed by duration of hospitalization
    Number of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > 2+
    Mitral regurgitation is assessed by echocardiographic exam
    Number of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > 2+
    Mitral regurgitation is assessed by echocardiographic exam
    Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
    Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
    Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
    Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
    Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
    Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Number of left ventricular tissue fibrosis
    Left ventricular tissue fibrosis are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Number of left ventricular tissue fibrosis
    Left ventricular tissue fibrosis are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 11, 2021
    Last Updated
    March 9, 2022
    Sponsor
    Hospices Civils de Lyon
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04709042
    Brief Title
    Acquisition of Objective Data During Transapical Neochordae Implantation
    Acronym
    TENSCHORD
    Official Title
    Acquisition of Objective Data During Transapical Neochordae Implantation
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    no more medical device implantation
    Study Start Date
    May 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    May 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hospices Civils de Lyon

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Mitral Valve repair (MVr) is the gold standard treatment for primary Mitral Regurgitation. Implantation of artificial Gore-Tex chordae (or neochordae implantation) is often used for MVr. The NeoChord DS1000 (NeoChord Inc., Minneapolis, USA) is a device designed to deploy neochordae through transapical access in a beating heart and without cardiopulmonary bypass. NeoChord System is CE marked and therefore authorized for use in Europe. Procedure is conducted under 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. The device is introduced through the apex of the left ventricular (LV) and the prolapsed leaflet is grabbed and harpooned. The neochordae are thus stretched between the valve and the LV apex. Neochordae length can be precisely adapted to restore a normal coaptation, to treat the regurgitation. Recently, the principal investigator's teams (heart surgery department at Hospices Civils de Lyon and Laboratoire de Génie Electrique et Ferromagnétique lab at Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA) de Lyon, France) created a platform allowing the measurement of the tension applied on neochordae during a NeoChord procedure. A dedicated protocol was designed and approved by the ethical committee of the French Society of Cardiology. The measurement was performed in 7 patients. This preliminary study shows that the technic is safe. It also suggests that chordal tension might be correlated to the quality of MVr: the sub-valvular apparatus appears to be in a low stress state when the structure and the function of the valve are restored. These first findings raise new questions: The mechanism involved in the changes in tensions during chordal length adjustment cannot be understood with current standard medical imaging tools. Numerical simulation technologies could bring physical data in order to approach physical phenomenon underlying these findings. Novel chordal tension measurement tools could lead to a change in current paradigm enabling a MVr based on objective data measurement, instead of sole morphological analysis. Prognostic value of chordal tension must be studied through a larger clinical study and a systematic protocol. A large consortium involving physicians and scientists has been created to address those questions, and a large national funding has been raised to fulfil our objectives over a 4 years period (SIMR project). The present clinical study is the core of this large project.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Mitral Regurgitation
    Keywords
    Primary Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve repair, Heart Surgery, Neochord DS1000, Intraoperative Chordal Tension, Tension Measurement, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Postoperative echocardiographic evaluation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Chordal tension measurement and cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    All patient candidates for NeoChord implantation according to the standard of care will be considered for inclusion in this clinical study. Chordal tension measurement will be performed during Neochord implantation. Moreover, all patients will undergo cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exam before the surgery, as well as at 3 months follow-up.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Chordal tension measurement
    Intervention Description
    The chordal tension measurement will be performed during surgery. The neochordae are connected to the measuring device through "crocodile" clips (e.g. machine-patient interface).We start to apply traction on the chordae that is in the center of the flailing area thanks to a millimeter screw and under TEE control. After obtaining a stable tension (plateau value), the other chordae are then tracked, one at a time, with an individual screw. When we achieve an equivalent tension on all chordae, a traction on all chordae is applied thanks to the principal screw under TEE control until obtaining a perfect coaptation. When the correction is optimal (good echocardiographic result, chordal tension low and equally spread on each chordae), the measurements are then stopped, and the chordae are fixed at the apex of the left ventricle at the optimal length.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Intervention Description
    Patients will undergo 2 MRI exams: 1 MRI before surgical intervention (maximum 21 days before) and 1 MRI three months after surgery (+/- 14 days), with intravenous administration of gadolinium.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Description
    Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Time Frame
    Day 0
    Title
    Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Description
    Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Time Frame
    1 month after surgery
    Title
    Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Description
    Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Duration of procedure in minutes
    Description
    Intraoperative safety is assessed by procedure duration in minutes (defined as skin incision to skin closure)
    Time Frame
    Day 0
    Title
    Number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
    Description
    Post-operative safety is assessed by occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) at each of the follow-up times
    Time Frame
    12 months
    Title
    Duration of hospitalization
    Description
    Post-operative safety is assessed by duration of hospitalization
    Time Frame
    From the end of surgery (Day 0) to discharge from hospital (Day 15)
    Title
    Number of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > 2+
    Description
    Mitral regurgitation is assessed by echocardiographic exam
    Time Frame
    1 month after surgery
    Title
    Number of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > 2+
    Description
    Mitral regurgitation is assessed by echocardiographic exam
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Title
    Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
    Description
    Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
    Time Frame
    1 month after surgery
    Title
    Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
    Description
    Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
    Time Frame
    3 months after surgery
    Title
    Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
    Description
    Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Title
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Description
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    Time Frame
    Inclusion
    Title
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Description
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    Time Frame
    Discharge from hospital (Day 15)
    Title
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Description
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    Time Frame
    1 month after surgery
    Title
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Description
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    Time Frame
    3 months after surgery
    Title
    New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
    Description
    Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure. It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms. NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Title
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    Description
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    Time Frame
    Inclusion
    Title
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    Description
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    Time Frame
    Discharge from hospital (Day 15)
    Title
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    Description
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    Time Frame
    1 month after surgery
    Title
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    Description
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    Time Frame
    3 months after surgery
    Title
    The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
    Description
    The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
    Time Frame
    12 months after surgery
    Title
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification
    Description
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Time Frame
    Inclusion
    Title
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification
    Description
    Left ventricular volumes and function quantification are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Time Frame
    3 months after surgery
    Title
    Number of left ventricular tissue fibrosis
    Description
    Left ventricular tissue fibrosis are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Time Frame
    Inclusion
    Title
    Number of left ventricular tissue fibrosis
    Description
    Left ventricular tissue fibrosis are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    Time Frame
    3 months after surgery

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Adults (≥ 18 years old) Patient candidate for NeoChord procedure after validation by the local Heart-Team severe symptomatic MR due to a posterior prolapses, involving mainly the P2 segment (with a variable extension on P1 or P3, but never involving the commissures or the anterior leaflet). Also, a LAI (leaflet to annulus index) >1,25 will be required. and considered as high-risk for conventional surgery (mainly because of frailty) after selection by our heart team. Patient who has provided his written informed consent to participate in the study Patient affiliated to a social health insurance. Exclusion Criteria: Patient with contraindication for NeoChord technic including: Patient with secondary MR LV dilatation with initial tethering Central component to regurgitant jet Calcified leaflets segments. Patient with contraindication for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging: Patients without sinus rhythm Regular MRI contraindications (e.g. a pacemaker, defibrillator or metallic (ferromagnetic) body, a known allergy to gadolinium) Contraindication for Gadolinium infusion : glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml / min Patient unable to understand the purpose of the study Patient participating in another trial that would interfere with this study Female patient who is pregnant or lactating Patients under judicial protection
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Daniel GRINBERG, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Hôpital Pneumologique et Cardiovasculaire Louis Pradel
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    30454983
    Citation
    Grinberg D, Cottinet PJ, Thivolet S, Audigier D, Capsal JF, Le MQ, Obadia JF. Measuring chordae tension during transapical neochordae implantation: Toward understanding objective consequences of mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):746-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Acquisition of Objective Data During Transapical Neochordae Implantation

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs