search
Back to results

Active Patient GDM

Primary Purpose

Gestational Diabetes

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Resource bank
ePlatform
Health coach
Sponsored by
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gestational Diabetes focused on measuring gestational weight gain, large for gestational age status, step counts, physical activity, health coaching, ePlatform, pedometer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Followed by a ACTIVE patient GDM collaborating doctor
  • Currently diagnosed with gestational diabetes
  • At 24 to 28 weeks during pregnancy
  • Conversant in either English or French
  • Have frequent access to a Smartphone (iPhone iOS 10.0 or Android version 5.0 or higher) with WIFI capabilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or diagnosis of diabetes type 1 or 2
  • Currently pregnant with more than one child
  • Planning to give birth at a place other than the hospital
  • Smokers
  • Conditions that are absolute contraindications for exercise during pregnancy (Restrictive lung disease, ruptured membranes, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, Premature labour during current pregnancy, persistent bleeding, incomplete cervix, placenta previa, Hemodynamically significant heart disease)

Sites / Locations

  • University of Calgary
  • University of Manitoba
  • IWK Helath Centre
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • McGill University Health Centre

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Resource bank

Resource bank and ePlatform

Resource bank and health coach

Resource bank with ePlatform and coach

Arm Description

The web-based resource bank includes information and perspectives about GDM, nutrition, and physical activity. The information is presented through video capsules, on-line text, printable pdfs, and podcasts. It is presented by health care professionals and patients.

In addition to resource bank access, participants will receive a digital scale, physical activity monitor (pedometer), and ePlatform log-in information. They will track daily weights and step counts. They will receive prompts to access educational and motivational tools based on the data that they enter and whether or not they enter data. The investigators will use the ePlatform developed by StepsCount, a Canadian pedometer company with a well-developed ePlatform for pedometer data upload, tracking, and automated messaging. The company is permitting us further customization for study purposes. Data will be uploaded onto a secure cloud-based platform controlled by the pedometer and digital scale companies.

In addition to resource bank access, the coach will contact the participant weekly (telephone, text, email) to discuss progress and challenges in terms of achieving physical activity goals, rate of GWG, and maintaining health eating patterns, as well as any concerns.Participants not randomized to a coaching strategy will be advised to consult with their treating healthcare team directly if they develop symptoms of concern. The coach will encourage participants to track their weight gain and physical activity (e.g., walks, classes, activity lists, etc.) and to share this information. However, they will not have access to the study ePlatform and will not be provided with pedometers or digital scales.

Participants will have resource bank access as well as ePlatform and coaching interventions.The health coach will have access to the data on the ePlatform. They will receive telephone calls from the research assistant/health coach if they are off target despite the platform tools and support. They will be encouraged to consult the resource bank and will brainstorm with the health coach to decide how to achieve their GWG and step count targets.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recruitment
Proportion of candidates with GDM who accept to participate in the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Use of resource bank
Log-ins per participant
Perceived utility of resource bank
Post intervention interview. a) What did the participant like about the website resources? b) What did the participant not like about the website? c) Prompts- Did the participant have difficulty logging on? Did the participant have difficulty navigating the site? Did the participant understand the information provided? Did the resource help to motivate the participant?
Step count data
Percent of days step count data uploaded in ePlatform arm
Digital weight data
Percent of days weight data uploaded in ePlatform arm
Perceived utility of step count monitoring with ePlatform support
Post intervention interview. a) Did the participant find it useful to track her step counts? What was useful about it? b) Did the participant find it burdensome to track her step counts? What was burdensome about it? e) Was it easy or was it difficult to use the ePlatform to upload data and review steps and weights? f) Did the participant like the messages from the ePlatform or were they an annoyance? g) Did the participant have any difficulties using a pedometer?
Perceived utility of weight monitoring with ePlatform support
Postintervention interview. c) Did the participant find it useful to track her weight? Why? d) Did the participant find it burdensome to track her weight? Why? e) Was it easy or was it difficult to use the ePlatform to upload data and review steps and weights? h) Did the participant have any difficulties using the digital scale?
Number of planned weekly conversations completed with health coach
Percent of weeks with health coach contact
Perceived utility of health coaching conversations
Postintervention interview. a) Did the participant find it useful to have a health coach? What was useful about it? b) Was it burdensome to have a health coach? What was burdensome? c) Prompts- Was it easy to find a time to speak with the coach? Were the conversations long enough? Were the conversations too long? What did the participant talk about? Was the information useful? Did the participant feel more motivated by having these conversations?
Completion of evaluation procedures
Evaluation metrics will be obtained through in-clinic assessments, on-line questionnaires, chart review, and telephone/Skype-based interviews.

Full Information

First Posted
January 10, 2019
Last Updated
October 17, 2023
Sponsor
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Collaborators
The Lawson Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03802877
Brief Title
Active Patient GDM
Official Title
ACTIVating and Engaging PAtients Through Clinical Interaction Redesign and Electronically- Integrated Novel Technologies Gestational Diabetes
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 29, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Collaborators
The Lawson Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Among women with GDM, the investigators will determine if a strategy of (1) a website-based information and motivational resource bank; (2) biosensor/ePlatform-based physical activity and GWG tracking; and/or (3) a health coach will lead to more favourably outcomes; namely, GWG closer to target, higher physical activity levels, better glycemic and blood pressure control, and lower incidence of LGA in offspring. The current project is designed to assess feasibility and usability to inform the development of a large randomized controlled trial. The investigators will monitor the implementation process and examine patient-oriented outcomes, including perceptions of utility, challenges, and burden. These will be assessed through telephone-based in-depth interview. Methodology / Study design This is a feasibility randomized controlled trial with a factorial design. The investigators will recruit women with a diagnosis of GDM between 20 and less than 32 weeks' pregnancy. All will receive access to a website resource bank with tips and resources to optimize physical activity and dietary intake a quality during pregnancy. In addition, they will be randomized to one of the four following groups: (1) No additional intervention; (2) ePlatform-based automated support combined with pedometer-based physical activity monitoring and digital scale-based weight monitoring; (3) weekly telephone calls with a health coach to discuss physical activity, eating, gestational weight gain; (4) combination of ePlatform and telephone calls from a health coach. The investigators will evaluate recruitment rates, drop-out rates, women's perceptions of the strengths and limitations of the strategy, and ease and feasibility of outcome assessment. Assessments will be through in-clinic assessments, on-line questionnaires, clinic-based measures, mailed-in pedometers, and telephone-based interviews. Assessments will be at study entry and two to three weeks before the expected date of delivery or date of scheduled C-section. There will be a telephone-based interview at 12 weeks postpartum.
Detailed Description
Our overarching aim is to determine, among women with gestational diabetes (GDM), if a strategy of (1) a website-based information and motivational resource bank; (2) biosensor/ePlatform-based physical activity and gestational weight gain (GWG) tracking; and/or (3) a health coach will lead to more favourable outcomes; namely, GWG closer to target, higher physical activity levels, better glycemic and blood pressure control, and lower incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) in offspring. The current project is designed to assess feasibility and usability to inform the development of a large randomized controlled trial. The specific aims of this feasibility study are: To determine the proportion of candidates with GDM who accept to participate in the study at each site (recruitment rates); a minimum overall average recruitment rate of 25/month would favour proceeding to a larger trial. To evaluate participant use (log ins) and perceived utility (interviews) of the website resource that the investigators are developing; a minimum average of 5 log-ins overall would favour proceeding to a larger trial To determine use (number of planned weekly conversations completed) and perceived utility (interviews) of the health coaching intervention; a minimum completion of 50% of the planned weekly conversations would favour retaining this treatment arm in a larger trial To determine use (data upload of step counts and weight data onto ePlatform) and perceived utility (interviews) of the ePlatform intervention ; a minimal upload of 30% of days overall of data would favour retaining this treatment arm in a larger trial To assess the proportion of participants in each intervention arm who complete final evaluation procedures (loss to follow-up rates); a minimum retention of 75% of participants enrolled would favour execution of a larger clinical trial DESIGN Lawson ACTIVE PATIENT has a 2X2 factorial design. All participants will have access to the information and motivational resource bank, housed on a dedicated study website. Each participant will be randomized (1) to an ePlatform yes/no strategy and (2) to a health coach yes/no strategy. Therefore, some participants will have access to the website only, others to the website & ePlatform, others to the website & coach, and some to the website, ePlatform & coach. By interviewing and surveying participants in each of these groups, the investigators will be able to ascertain if there are components that are redundant or synergistic. RESOURCE BANK The website sections include (1) 'About' with an overview about GDM, its management, and its complications; (2) 'Perspectives' with video and audio clips and interviews with mothers with a GDM history, physicians, dietitians, and kinesiologists, all describing their experiences living with or managing GDM and highlighting the importance of attending to this condition both during pregnancy and thereafter; (3) 'Nutrition' with descriptions and discussion of impact of eating on glucose control, illustration of the 'healthy plate' concepts, grocery shopping tips, links to healthy recipe banks, a photographic repository of health snack ideas, healthy lunches, and healthy breakfasts; (4) 'Activity' with explanations for pedometer use, step count targets, physical activity targets, step and physical activity monitoring, links to exercise video clips, precautions during pregnancy; and (5) 'Postpartum' which will include future diabetes risk facts relevant to mothers, fathers, and children; diabetes prevention approaches; and planning for future pregnancies. ePLATFORM WITH SENSORS Participants randomized to the ePlatform strategy (i.e., 50% of participants) will receive a digital scale, physical activity monitor (pedometer), and ePlatform log-in information. They will track daily weights and step counts. They will receive prompts to access educational and motivational tools based on the data that they enter and whether or not they enter data. The investigators will use the ePlatform developed by StepsCount, a Canadian pedometer company with a well-developed ePlatform for pedometer data upload, tracking, and automated messaging. The company is permitting us further customization for study purposes. Participants randomized to the use of an ePlatform in combination with a pedometer and digital scale will have data uploaded onto a secure cloud-based platform controlled by the pedometer and digital scale companies. HEALTH PROFESSIONAL COACH Participants randomized to the health coach strategy (i.e., 50% of participants) will work by telephone and email with a health coach. The coach will be a health professional hired through the study (dietitian/kinesiologist/nurse). On a weekly basis, She/he will contact the participant to discuss progress and challenges in terms of achieving physical activity goals, rate of GWG, and maintaining health eating patterns. She/he will respond to specific questions on strategies and interplay between health behaviours and parameters such as blood glucose and blood pressure levels. She/he may enquire about any problems associated with higher physical activity levels such as contractions or lower blood sugar levels, and will advise participants accordingly and consult with the treating physician. Participants not randomized to a coaching strategy will be advised to consult with their treating healthcare team directly if they develop symptoms of concern. Fifty percent of participants will be randomized to a health coach. In turn, half of these participants will also be randomized to the ePlatform with sensors strategy. The health coaching approach will slightly differ between those randomized to the health coach & ePlatform with biosensors strategy vs. those randomized to the health coach without ePlatform strategy. For those randomized to the health coach & ePlatform with biosensors strategy, the health coach will have access to the data on the ePlatform. This data transfer is termed facilitated relay, the exchange of patient collected health data between patients and providers outside of traditional clinic visits (i.e., electronic and web-based sharing). Participants randomized to both the ePlatform and the health coach will receive telephone calls from the research assistant/health coach if they are off target despite the platform tools and support. They will be encouraged to consult the resource bank and will brainstorm with the health coach to decide how to achieve their GWG and step count targets. Participants randomized to the health coach without the ePlatform will receive weekly calls from the health coach, encouraging them to engage in healthy eating practices and aim to achieve the GWG targets recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). They will be encouraged to track their weight gain and physical activity (e.g., walks, gym sessions, classes, activity lists, etc.) and to share this information with the health coach for discussion. However, they will not have access to the study ePlatform and will not be provided with pedometers or digital scales. At least one coach will be trained for each of the recruitment sites (5). The training will consist of completion of 5 30-minute on-line modules supplemented by teleconferences with our team of experts in health behaviour change (J Fowles, C Shields, C Chan, A-S Brazeau, D Da Costa, K Dasgupta). The on-line training modules for health coaches address motivational communication, key content areas (GDM, health behaviours, stress management), review the bank of resources, discusses the decision trees/algorithms that will create triggers and alerts, and demonstrates navigation of the ePlatform. SETTING GDM clinics in Montreal (McGill University Health Centre/MUHC with Dr Sara Meltzer, Dr Natasha Garfield, and Dr Rachel Bond; and Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal/CHUM with Dr Ariane Godbout and colleagues), Toronto (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre with Dr Illana Halparin, Dr Baiju Shah, and colleagues), Calgary (Rockyview General Hospital with Dr Sonia Butalia and colleagues), Winnipeg (Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg with Dr P Katz and colleagues), and Halifax (Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre with Dr Tom Ransom and colleagues). RECRUITMENT GDM clinic staff will invite potentially eligible patients to consider participation. With their permission, contact information will be forwarded to the local ACTIVE PATIENT GDM research assistant. She/he will communicate with the participant to review study procedures and obtain informed consent through an on-line form and telephone conversation. The investigators aim to recruit and enroll at least 5 participants per month per site. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA See relevant section RUN-IN PHASE AND RANDOMIZATION Participants will receive instructions to log onto an electronic platform. This will allow them to view a brief video on GDM-related complications. If the participant logs onto the system within a week of baseline assessment, web-based randomization will be performed. The participant will be encouraged to call or email the research assistant if there is difficulty logging on. DATA COLLECTION See outcomes for baseline and final data collected SAMPLE SIZE The investigators will recruit 225 participants across 5 cities, resulting in up to 45 participants per city over 9 months (to allow for 3 month intervention periods) or 5 participants per city per month. The present study is not designed to assess for between-arm differences in GWG or LGA status of the offspring. The intent is to gather experience with logistical procedures, participant perspectives, and estimates of indicators of feasibility. INCENTIVES On three occasions (completion of the questionnaire at the beginning of the study, completion of the questionnaire and interview before delivery, and completion of the questionnaire and interview 12 weeks after delivery), participants will receive a $20 gift card.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gestational Diabetes
Keywords
gestational weight gain, large for gestational age status, step counts, physical activity, health coaching, ePlatform, pedometer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Model Description
This is a feasibility (pilot) interventional study with a factorial design
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
This is a behavioural intervention study. The participant, care provider, and investigator cannot be masked. Outcomes being assessed are objective (weight, steps, etc.) or are participant perspectives that preclude masking. Allocation is concealed.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
227 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Resource bank
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The web-based resource bank includes information and perspectives about GDM, nutrition, and physical activity. The information is presented through video capsules, on-line text, printable pdfs, and podcasts. It is presented by health care professionals and patients.
Arm Title
Resource bank and ePlatform
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In addition to resource bank access, participants will receive a digital scale, physical activity monitor (pedometer), and ePlatform log-in information. They will track daily weights and step counts. They will receive prompts to access educational and motivational tools based on the data that they enter and whether or not they enter data. The investigators will use the ePlatform developed by StepsCount, a Canadian pedometer company with a well-developed ePlatform for pedometer data upload, tracking, and automated messaging. The company is permitting us further customization for study purposes. Data will be uploaded onto a secure cloud-based platform controlled by the pedometer and digital scale companies.
Arm Title
Resource bank and health coach
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In addition to resource bank access, the coach will contact the participant weekly (telephone, text, email) to discuss progress and challenges in terms of achieving physical activity goals, rate of GWG, and maintaining health eating patterns, as well as any concerns.Participants not randomized to a coaching strategy will be advised to consult with their treating healthcare team directly if they develop symptoms of concern. The coach will encourage participants to track their weight gain and physical activity (e.g., walks, classes, activity lists, etc.) and to share this information. However, they will not have access to the study ePlatform and will not be provided with pedometers or digital scales.
Arm Title
Resource bank with ePlatform and coach
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will have resource bank access as well as ePlatform and coaching interventions.The health coach will have access to the data on the ePlatform. They will receive telephone calls from the research assistant/health coach if they are off target despite the platform tools and support. They will be encouraged to consult the resource bank and will brainstorm with the health coach to decide how to achieve their GWG and step count targets.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Resource bank
Intervention Description
See intervention arm descriptions
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
ePlatform
Intervention Description
See intervention arm descriptions
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Health coach
Intervention Description
See intervention arm descriptions
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment
Description
Proportion of candidates with GDM who accept to participate in the study
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Use of resource bank
Description
Log-ins per participant
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Perceived utility of resource bank
Description
Post intervention interview. a) What did the participant like about the website resources? b) What did the participant not like about the website? c) Prompts- Did the participant have difficulty logging on? Did the participant have difficulty navigating the site? Did the participant understand the information provided? Did the resource help to motivate the participant?
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Step count data
Description
Percent of days step count data uploaded in ePlatform arm
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Digital weight data
Description
Percent of days weight data uploaded in ePlatform arm
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Perceived utility of step count monitoring with ePlatform support
Description
Post intervention interview. a) Did the participant find it useful to track her step counts? What was useful about it? b) Did the participant find it burdensome to track her step counts? What was burdensome about it? e) Was it easy or was it difficult to use the ePlatform to upload data and review steps and weights? f) Did the participant like the messages from the ePlatform or were they an annoyance? g) Did the participant have any difficulties using a pedometer?
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Perceived utility of weight monitoring with ePlatform support
Description
Postintervention interview. c) Did the participant find it useful to track her weight? Why? d) Did the participant find it burdensome to track her weight? Why? e) Was it easy or was it difficult to use the ePlatform to upload data and review steps and weights? h) Did the participant have any difficulties using the digital scale?
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Number of planned weekly conversations completed with health coach
Description
Percent of weeks with health coach contact
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Perceived utility of health coaching conversations
Description
Postintervention interview. a) Did the participant find it useful to have a health coach? What was useful about it? b) Was it burdensome to have a health coach? What was burdensome? c) Prompts- Was it easy to find a time to speak with the coach? Were the conversations long enough? Were the conversations too long? What did the participant talk about? Was the information useful? Did the participant feel more motivated by having these conversations?
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Completion of evaluation procedures
Description
Evaluation metrics will be obtained through in-clinic assessments, on-line questionnaires, chart review, and telephone/Skype-based interviews.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in physical activity
Description
Objective physical activity assessment. At baseline, all participants will be asked to wear a pedometer Piezo Rx(D) with concealed window for a 1-week period.The pedometer will be mailed to the site research assistant in the mailed and stamped envelope provided with an unused pedometer to correct for steps registered during mailing. At two to three weeks before the expected date of delivery or planned date of C-section or 36 weeks' gestation (whichever is first), the 1-week measurement procedure will be repeated. If the participant was in a group that was asked to use a pedometer during the study, she will not need to wear the pedometer with a tamper-proof seal. The participant will continue to use their usual pedometer.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Gestational weight gain (GWG)
Description
All prenatal visit weights will be recorded from the medical paper or electronic chart or entered directly onto our data collection forms by the research assistant or collaborating physician. Participants will be weighed at all clinic visits by the research assistant or collaborating physician. GWG per week will be calculated.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Blood pressure
Description
Blood pressure will be assessed at clinic visits by the research assistant or collaborating physician. From 6 automated measurements, the latter 5 systolic and diastolic measures will be separately averaged
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Glucose levels
Description
Mean glucose levels (before and after meals, at bedtime) will be abstracted at each clinic visit based on participant records
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Content of conversations with health coach
Description
Health coaches will maintain a log of communications with study participants to allow us to ascertain the frequency and nature of communications as well as the overall time required.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Offspring birthweight percentile
Description
Chart review. Offspring birthweight, length, sex. Will be used to classify as large, small, or appropriate for gestational age
Time Frame
at birth
Title
Gestational age at birth
Description
Chart review
Time Frame
at birth
Title
Delivery method
Description
Chart review.
Time Frame
at birth
Title
Apgar score
Description
Chart review
Time Frame
at birth
Title
Completion of postpartum screen for diabetes
Description
Completion of oral glucose tolerance testing. Ascertained by phone interview at 12 weeks' postpartum
Time Frame
12 weeks' postpartum
Title
Breastfeeding
Description
Ascertained by phone interview. Between the birth of the participant's baby and now, how have has the participant been feeding her baby? Breastfeeding alone: Specify number of weeks or days Formula feeding alone: Specify number of weeks or days Mix of the two: Specify number of weeks or days
Time Frame
12 weeks' postpartum

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
This study is looking at the effects of interventions on pregnant women with gestational diabetes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Followed by a ACTIVE patient GDM collaborating doctor Currently diagnosed with gestational diabetes At 20 to <32 weeks during pregnancy Conversant in either English or French Have frequent access to a Smartphone (iPhone iOS 10.0 or Android version 5.0 or higher) with WIFI capabilities Exclusion Criteria: History or diagnosis of diabetes type 1 or 2 Currently pregnant with more than one child Planning to give birth at a place other than the hospital Smokers Conditions that are absolute contraindications for exercise during pregnancy (Restrictive lung disease, ruptured membranes, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, Premature labour during current pregnancy, persistent bleeding, incomplete cervix, placenta previa, Hemodynamically significant heart disease)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kaberi Dasgupta, MD, MSC
Organizational Affiliation
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Calgary
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 1N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University of Manitoba
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 3P4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
IWK Helath Centre
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Jewish General Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University Health Centre
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Active Patient GDM

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs