search
Back to results

ACURATE Neo™ TA Delivery System in Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Primary Purpose

Aortic Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System
Sponsored by
Symetis SA
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Stenosis focused on measuring TAVI, Aortic Stenosis, transcatether Aortic Valve Implantation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject must be at least 18 years old
  2. Severe aortic stenosis defined as:

    • Mean aortic gradient > 40 mmHg or
    • Peak jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or
    • Aortic valve area of < 0.8 cm2
  3. High risk patient determined by a multidisciplinary heart team consensus (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) that patient is not a surgical candidate for conventional AVR due to risk factors such as STS Score (8% or higher) or other co-morbid conditions unrelated to aortic stenosis such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chest deformities and irradiated mediastinum
  4. NYHA Functional Class > II
  5. Multidisciplinary heart team (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) consensus that the transapical approach is the most suitable access route for TAVI due to the presence of the following anatomic conditions:

    • porcelain aorta or
    • severely calcified or highly tortuous peripheral vasculature not appropriate for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation or
    • vessels too small for retrograde approach or
    • other anatomical conditions making transapical approach more suitable
  6. Aortic annulus diameter from ≥ 21mm up to ≤ 27mm by CT or TEE
  7. Patient willing to participate in the study and provides signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve or non-calcified
  2. Extreme eccentricity of calcification
  3. Severe mitral regurgitation (> Grade 3)
  4. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position and / or prosthetic ring
  5. LV apex is not accessible via transapical access due to severe chest deformity
  6. Previous surgery of the LV using a patch, such as the Dor procedure
  7. Presence of apical LV thrombus
  8. Calcified pericardium
  9. Septal hypertrophy unacceptable for transapical procedure
  10. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is contraindicated
  11. ECHO evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  12. LVEF < 20% by ECHO
  13. Need for emergency intervention for any reason within 30 Days of scheduled procedure
  14. Any percutaneous intervention, except for balloon valvuloplasty (BAV) within 1 month prior to implant procedure
  15. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization within 30 days before or after the study procedure
  16. Acute myocardial infarction within 1 month prior to implant procedure
  17. Previous TIA or stroke within 6 months prior to implant procedure
  18. Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months prior to implant procedure
  19. Scheduled surgical or percutaneous procedure to be performed prior to 30 day visit
  20. History of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, refusal of blood transfusions or severe anemia (Hb<8 g/dL)
  21. Systolic pressure <80mmHg, cardiogenic shock, need for inotropic support or IABP
  22. Primary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
  23. Active infection or endocarditis
  24. Hepatic failure (> Child B)
  25. Chronic renal dysfunction with serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL or renal dialysis
  26. Neurological disease severely affecting ambulation, daily functioning, or dementia
  27. Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
  28. Intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast media, or porcine tissue and allergy to nickel
  29. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  30. For other severe illnesses of the patient (e.g. active carcinoma), the investigator shall decide on an individual basis whether the patient is not to be included in the study
  31. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study

Sites / Locations

  • Kerckhoff-Klinik
  • Krankenhausbetriebsgesellschaft
  • Deutsched Herzzentrum Berlin
  • Martin Luther University Halle Winttenberg
  • Universitätklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
  • Herzentrum Leipzig GmbH
  • University Hospital Regensburg

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System

Arm Description

Patients implanted with ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™ TA Transapical Delivery System

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Safety: freedom from all-cause mortality
freedom from all-cause mortality
Primary Device Performance:Procedure success in absence of MACCE
Procedure success in absence of MACCE

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rate of clinical endpoints according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC 2) guidelines
VARC 2 guidelines include different safety and efficacy endpoints like mortality, MI, stroke, etc.
Incidence of all cause mortality at 30 Days and 12 Months
Incidence of all cause mortality at 30 Days and 12 Months
Freedom from MACCE at 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Freedom from MACCE at 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Number of patients who have a Procedural success defined by a combination of criteria
Procedural success defined as ACURATE neo™ at intended location with
Rate of device success
Rate of device success
NYHA Functional Classification improvement
NYHA Functional Classification improvement
Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance (at 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months) using a combination of measures
Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance (at 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months) using a combination of measures

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2016
Last Updated
February 22, 2023
Sponsor
Symetis SA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02950428
Brief Title
ACURATE Neo™ TA Delivery System in Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Official Title
ACURATE Neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis for Implantation Using the ACURATE Neo™ TA Transapical Delivery System in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 18, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 17, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 3, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Symetis SA

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this investigation is to collect data pertaining to the safety and performance of the ACURATE neo (TM) Aortic Bioprosthesis as implanted with the ACURATE neo (TM) TA Transapical Delivery System. This device is intended for treatment of subjects with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who have high risk for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery. The ACURATE neo (TM) Aortic Bioprosthesis is intended for use via minimally-invasive transapical implantation in a well-defined population.
Detailed Description
This is a single arm, prospective, multicenter non randomised and open trial of the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open heart surgery is considered to be high risk. All patients will be followed up to 5 years after the intervention. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and performance of the study device in patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis considered to be high risk for surgery Secondary objective is to evaluate adverse events and study device performance.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Stenosis
Keywords
TAVI, Aortic Stenosis, transcatether Aortic Valve Implantation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients implanted with ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™ TA Transapical Delivery System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System
Intervention Description
ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™TA Transapical Delivery System on patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open-heart surgery is considered to be high risk
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Safety: freedom from all-cause mortality
Description
freedom from all-cause mortality
Time Frame
6 months post procedure
Title
Primary Device Performance:Procedure success in absence of MACCE
Description
Procedure success in absence of MACCE
Time Frame
30 days post procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of clinical endpoints according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC 2) guidelines
Description
VARC 2 guidelines include different safety and efficacy endpoints like mortality, MI, stroke, etc.
Time Frame
30 Days and month 12
Title
Incidence of all cause mortality at 30 Days and 12 Months
Description
Incidence of all cause mortality at 30 Days and 12 Months
Time Frame
30 days and 12 months
Title
Freedom from MACCE at 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Description
Freedom from MACCE at 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Time Frame
30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Title
Number of patients who have a Procedural success defined by a combination of criteria
Description
Procedural success defined as ACURATE neo™ at intended location with
Time Frame
procedure
Title
Rate of device success
Description
Rate of device success
Time Frame
7 days/ Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months and at 12 Months
Title
NYHA Functional Classification improvement
Description
NYHA Functional Classification improvement
Time Frame
30 Days, 6 Month and at 12 Months
Title
Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance (at 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months) using a combination of measures
Description
Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance (at 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months) using a combination of measures
Time Frame
7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject must be at least 18 years old Severe aortic stenosis defined as: Mean aortic gradient > 40 mmHg or Peak jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or Aortic valve area of < 0.8 cm2 High risk patient determined by a multidisciplinary heart team consensus (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) that patient is not a surgical candidate for conventional AVR due to risk factors such as STS Score (8% or higher) or other co-morbid conditions unrelated to aortic stenosis such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chest deformities and irradiated mediastinum NYHA Functional Class > II Multidisciplinary heart team (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) consensus that the transapical approach is the most suitable access route for TAVI due to the presence of the following anatomic conditions: porcelain aorta or severely calcified or highly tortuous peripheral vasculature not appropriate for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation or vessels too small for retrograde approach or other anatomical conditions making transapical approach more suitable Aortic annulus diameter from ≥ 21mm up to ≤ 27mm by CT or TEE Patient willing to participate in the study and provides signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve or non-calcified Extreme eccentricity of calcification Severe mitral regurgitation (> Grade 3) Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position and / or prosthetic ring LV apex is not accessible via transapical access due to severe chest deformity Previous surgery of the LV using a patch, such as the Dor procedure Presence of apical LV thrombus Calcified pericardium Septal hypertrophy unacceptable for transapical procedure Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is contraindicated ECHO evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation LVEF < 20% by ECHO Need for emergency intervention for any reason within 30 Days of scheduled procedure Any percutaneous intervention, except for balloon valvuloplasty (BAV) within 1 month prior to implant procedure Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization within 30 days before or after the study procedure Acute myocardial infarction within 1 month prior to implant procedure Previous TIA or stroke within 6 months prior to implant procedure Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months prior to implant procedure Scheduled surgical or percutaneous procedure to be performed prior to 30 day visit History of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, refusal of blood transfusions or severe anemia (Hb<8 g/dL) Systolic pressure <80mmHg, cardiogenic shock, need for inotropic support or IABP Primary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) Active infection or endocarditis Hepatic failure (> Child B) Chronic renal dysfunction with serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL or renal dialysis Neurological disease severely affecting ambulation, daily functioning, or dementia Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions Intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast media, or porcine tissue and allergy to nickel Pregnant or breast-feeding women For other severe illnesses of the patient (e.g. active carcinoma), the investigator shall decide on an individual basis whether the patient is not to be included in the study Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Markus Pr Schönburg, Prof.Dr.Med
Organizational Affiliation
Abteilung Herzchirurgie Kerckhoff-Klinik
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kerckhoff-Klinik
City
Bad Nauheim
ZIP/Postal Code
61231
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Krankenhausbetriebsgesellschaft
City
Bad Oeynhausen
ZIP/Postal Code
32545
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Deutsched Herzzentrum Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Martin Luther University Halle Winttenberg
City
Halle (Saale)
ZIP/Postal Code
06112
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Herzentrum Leipzig GmbH
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04289
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital Regensburg
City
Regensburg
ZIP/Postal Code
93053
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The data and study protocol for this clinical trial may be made available to other researchers in accordance with the Boston Scientific Data Sharing Policy (http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/data-sharing-requests.html).
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29554265
Citation
Conradi L, Hilker M, Kempfert J, Borgermann J, Treede H, Holzhey DM, Schrofel H, Kim WK, Schaefer U, Walther T. Prospective multicentre evaluation of a novel, low-profile transapical delivery system for self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 6-month outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):762-767. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy097.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

ACURATE Neo™ TA Delivery System in Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs