search
Back to results

Addition of Rituximab to Leflunomide in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rituximab
Placebo
Sponsored by
Frank Behrens
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring Active rheumatoid arthritis, leflunomide, rituximab, inadequate clinical response to leflunomide

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Male and female patients, 18 to 75 years of age, with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, not more than 3 non-biological DMARDs including leflunomide, and not more than one inadequate response to anti-TNF-therapy, and currently have active disease despite at least 3-month treatment with leflunomide. Active disease is defined as DAS 28 >3.2 and at least swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 3 and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 3 included in the 28 joint count.

  • Male and female patients with rheumatoid arthritis for at least 3 months diagnosed according to the revised 1987 ACR criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Willingness and capability to give written informed consent, and willingness to participate and to comply with the study protocol.
  • Not more than 2 non-biological DMARDs other than leflunomide in history, which are washed out at least 4 weeks prior to first rituximab infusion
  • Previous use of anti-TNF therapy is allowed. Patient will only be allowed to be pre-treated with a maximum of two anti-TNF therapies and only one stopped due to inadequate response. The second anti-TNF could be stopped for instance due to intolerance, e.g. injection site reactions. Anti-TNF treatment must be discontinued prior to baseline considering the different characteristics of the specific compound: Use of infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab within 8 weeks of baseline, use of etanercept within 4 weeks of baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • RA functional class IV: limited in ability to perform usual self-care, work, and other activities
  • Male and female patients with other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic autoimmune disease
  • Any active infection, a history of recurrent clinically significant infection, a history of recurrent bacterial infections with encapsulated organisms (Hepatitis B, C and HIV (human immune deficiency virus) - will be tested at screening)
  • Chronic, latent and acute infections of the lung
  • Positive result of a Tuberculosis specific Interferon gamma release assay (will be tested at screening)
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency
  • History of cancer with curative treatment not longer than 5 years ago except basal-cell carcinoma of the skin that had been excised
  • Evidence of significant uncontrolled concomitant diseases or serious and / or uncontrolled diseases that are likely to interfere with the evaluation of the patient's safety and of the study outcome
  • Neuropathy that can interfere with filling out the patient's questionnaires
  • History of a severe psychological illness or condition
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the product or to murine proteins
  • Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III and IV) or severe,uncontrolled cardiac disease.
  • Women lactating, pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test or planned pregnancy.
  • Women of childbearing potential without adequate contraception (medically acceptable methods (pearl Index < 1) are contraceptive implant, contraceptive injection, intrauterine device (IUD), or oral contraceptives taken for at least 3 months,which the patient agrees to continue using during the study, or a double-barrier method which must consist of a combination of any of the following: diaphragma,cervical cap, condom, or spermicide)
  • History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse (defined as impaired / questionable reliability) as well as neurotic personality.
  • Participation in another investigational study within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
  • Previous treatment with any B-cell depleting agents including rituximab
  • Intolerance to ingredients of rituximab or murine proteins
  • Pre-treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab or other anti-TNF biologicals.
  • Inadequate response to more than one anti-TNF-therapy
  • Pre-treatment of more than two anti-TNF, only one is allowed to be stopped due to inadequate response. The second anti-TNF could be stopped due to intolerance, e.g. injection site reactions
  • Corticosteroids at doses exceeding 10 mg per day of prednisolone or equivalents within the last 2 weeks or corticosteroids at instable doses within the last 2 weeks
  • Intolerance or contraindication to drugs required for the treatment of the side effects of rituximab
  • Previous treatment with any investigational medicinal product within last 3 months prior to baseline
  • Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to treatment
  • Intra- articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening visit
  • Haemoglobin < 8.5 g / dl (equivalent to < 5,28 mmol/l Haemoglobin)
  • Neutrophil counts < 1.500 / μl (equivalent to 1,5 / nl)
  • Platelet count < 75.000 / μl (equivalent to 75 / nl)
  • Lower than 500 / μl (equivalent to 0,5 / nl) lymphocytes
  • Serum creatinine > 1.4 mg / dl for women or 1.6 mg / dl for men
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 times upper limit of normal
  • IgG (immunoglobulin G) level < 5g/l

Sites / Locations

  • Schwerpunktpraxis
  • Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH Abtlg. Rheumatologie und Klin. Immunologie
  • Rheumazentrum Baden-Baden
  • Praxis Remstedt
  • Rheumaklinik Berlin-Buch Immanuel Krankenhaus
  • Schlosspark-Klinik
  • Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Campus Charité
  • Krankenhaus Friedrichstadt
  • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
  • Department of Medicine II / Rheumatology Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
  • Rheumatologie Endokrinologikum Frankfurt
  • Universität Freiburg Innere Medizin - Abtlg. Rheumatologie
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis für Innere Medizin
  • Praxis, Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
  • Klinik u. Poliklinik f. Innere Medizin A, Nephrologie u. Rheumatolog Uniklinik Greifswald
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Georg-August-Universität Abtlg. Nephrologie u. Rheumatologie
  • Uniklinik Halle - Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Klinik f. Immunologie u. Rheumatologie
  • Rheumapraxis Heidelberg
  • Praxis, Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
  • Internistisch - Rheumatologische Praxis
  • Klinik für Innere Medizin I Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
  • Rheumapraxis Karlsruhe
  • Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein
  • Universitätsklinikum Köln Med I
  • Universität Leipzig
  • Praxis Kaufmann
  • Medizinsche Klinik A, Rheumatologie, Nephrologie Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen,
  • Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, St. Vincenz und Elisabeth Hospital
  • Praxis Prof. Dr. Kellner
  • Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius
  • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
  • Klinikum Offenbach GmbH
  • Praxis. Gauler und Fliedner
  • Praxis Gräßler
  • Rheumatologie Praxis
  • Evangelisches Fachkrankenhaus
  • Uni Klinik Regensburg
  • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier
  • Abt. II Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm Klinik f. Innere Medizin III
  • Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
  • Rheumatologische Praxis Dr. Wörth
  • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
  • Med. Klinik und Poliklinik III, Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Rituximab 1000 mg

Placebo

Arm Description

Administration of 1000 mg Rituximab in Part I, followed by either re-treatment with 1000 mg Rituximab or with 500 mg Rituximab in Part II of the study

Administration of Placebo in Part I followed by re-treatment with either 1000 mg Rituximab or with 500 mg Rituximab in Part II of the study

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

ACR 50 - Part I of the Study - 50% improvement of ACR defined disease activity
Proportion of patients with an ACR 50 response at week 24
DAS28 - Part II of the study - evaluation of Disease activity score (DAS)28
Mean of DAS28 at week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Evaluation of 50 % improvement of ACR defined disease activity (ACR 50)
To determine the efficacy and safety at week 24 of rituximab treatment of 2x1000 mg i.v. vs. placebo and the efficacy and safety at week 52 of rituximab 2x1000 mg i.v. vs 2x500 mg
EULAR response - response to therapy defined by European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)
EULAR response rates at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Assessment of ACR core set consisting of SJC, TJC, HAQ, patient's and physician's global assessments - Visual analog scales (VAS), Subject's pain-scale, CRP, ESR
Change in ACR core set (Swollen Joint count (SJC), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), patient's and physician's global assessments visual analog Scale (VAS), subject's pain scale, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR))compared to baseline at all follow-up visits
Assessment of SF-36 scores (Health survey)
Change in SF-36 scores compared to baseline at all followup visits
Assessment of FACIT (Functional assessment of chronical illness therapy)-fatigue- Questionnaire
Change in FACIT-fatigue assessment compared to baseline at all follow-up visits at week 16, 24, 40 and 48
HAQ (health assessment questionnaire)- assessment
Change in HAQ assessment compared to baseline at follow-up visits at week 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, (36), 40, 48, 52
proportion of DAS28-ESR remission - remission using DAS28 based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) defined as DAS28 < 2.6
Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Proportion of patient with disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (DAS28-ESR) - low disease is defined DAS28 < 3.2
Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR low disease (DAS28 < 3.2) at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Assessment of changes in c-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values
Change of CRP and ESR compared to baseline at all follow-up visits at week 2, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, (36), 40, 48, 52
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Performance of standardized ultrasound synovitis score (US7)in subgroup of patients
Change in ultrasound synovitis score (if possible 3rd party blind observer, imaging subgroup only) performed at baseline and week 16, 24, 40, 48
Assessment of changes of rheumatoid nodules (number and diameter of target nodule) during therapy
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Assessment of main safety parameters as SAE, deaths, duration of B-cell depletion and rate of infections + malignancies
Safety parameters: Number of deaths, drop-out rates, causes of drop-outs, summary of SAEs per treatment group and severity of adverse events Extent and duration of B cell depletion Rates of infections, malignancies
Documentation of used standard care treatment by patients that are non-responder to therapy
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Assessment of changes of rheumatoid nodules (number and diameter of target nodule) during therapy
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Assessment of changes of rheumatoid nodules (number and diameter of target nodule) during therapy
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Documentation of used standard care treatment by patients that are non-responder to therapy
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Documentation of used standard care treatment by patients that are non-responder to therapy
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively

Full Information

First Posted
September 28, 2010
Last Updated
March 23, 2016
Sponsor
Frank Behrens
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01244958
Brief Title
Addition of Rituximab to Leflunomide in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
Addition of Rituximab to Leflunomide in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis - a Multicenter Randomised Double-blind Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Frank Behrens

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Combination of rituximab (RTX) with several different chemotherapeutic regimes has proven synergistic effects in patients with either lymphoma or autoimmune diseases. First data of uncontrolled trials with the combination of RTX and leflunomide (LEF) are available.
Detailed Description
Rituximab provides lasting improvement in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after two infusions per treatment course in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor inadequate responder (IR) patients. Importantly, MabThera® has been shown to inhibit radiographic progression in this highly pre-treated patient population. Rituximab is licensed for adult patients with severe active RA in combination with methotrexate after inadequate response to previous treatment, including TNF alpha- Inhibitors. In daily practice the combination with methotrexate is often limited to side effects or contraindications to Methotrexate (MTX). Therefore there is an unmet medical need for evidence for the combination of RTX with other Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)than MTX. Leflunomide is a DMARD that selectively inhibits de novo pyrimidine synthesis by blocking the enzyme dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase, thereby preventing DNA synthesis. The efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with active RA have been demonstrated in three phase III studies. Leflunomide was shown to be better than placebo and at least as effective as methotrexate in improving individual signs and symptoms of RA; these responses were seen as early as 4 weeks and were maintained for up to 2 years. Leflunomide was also effective in slowing disease progression as assessed by radiographic analysis of joint damage, and in improving functional activity as measured by the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disease Activity Index. An open label extension study of patients treated with leflunomide demonstrated that these improvements are maintained for up to 5 years in a subset of patients, with no new or unexpected adverse events emerging compared with the initial phase III studies. In Europe leflunomide is often used in daily clinical practice as an alterative to MTX in patients with active RA. Recently published data of a small open label trial (Vital et al. 2008) and data of a German non-interventional study (NIS) (Wendler et al. 2009) demonstrated the effectiveness of the addition of RTX to leflunomide in patients with active RA. The proportion of patients achieving EULAR (European League against Rheumatism) moderate to good response was 61% for RTX alone, 65 % for RTX plus MTX and 79% for RTX plus leflunomide in the German NIS. In the Leeds study of Vital et al. 33% of the patients achieved ACR (American College of Rheumatology)50 response (ACR 20: 68%, ACR 70: 20%) despite multiple pre-treatments, including patients with inadequate response to three TNF-Inhibitors. The low rate of serious adverse drug reactions in the different groups of the German NIS demonstrated the safety of the combination of RTX and leflunomide (n=90) (1.6 / 1.1 / 0,5% for RTX+MTX / RTX+LEF / RTX Mono, 5.1 / 6,7 / 3,8% experienced infusion reactions)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
Active rheumatoid arthritis, leflunomide, rituximab, inadequate clinical response to leflunomide

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
156 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Rituximab 1000 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Administration of 1000 mg Rituximab in Part I, followed by either re-treatment with 1000 mg Rituximab or with 500 mg Rituximab in Part II of the study
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Administration of Placebo in Part I followed by re-treatment with either 1000 mg Rituximab or with 500 mg Rituximab in Part II of the study
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Rituximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mab Thera
Intervention Description
1000 mg Rituximab infusion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
infusion of Sodium citrate, Polysorbate, Sodium chloride
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ACR 50 - Part I of the Study - 50% improvement of ACR defined disease activity
Description
Proportion of patients with an ACR 50 response at week 24
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
DAS28 - Part II of the study - evaluation of Disease activity score (DAS)28
Description
Mean of DAS28 at week 52
Time Frame
week 52
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evaluation of 50 % improvement of ACR defined disease activity (ACR 50)
Description
To determine the efficacy and safety at week 24 of rituximab treatment of 2x1000 mg i.v. vs. placebo and the efficacy and safety at week 52 of rituximab 2x1000 mg i.v. vs 2x500 mg
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
EULAR response - response to therapy defined by European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)
Description
EULAR response rates at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
Assessment of ACR core set consisting of SJC, TJC, HAQ, patient's and physician's global assessments - Visual analog scales (VAS), Subject's pain-scale, CRP, ESR
Description
Change in ACR core set (Swollen Joint count (SJC), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), patient's and physician's global assessments visual analog Scale (VAS), subject's pain scale, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR))compared to baseline at all follow-up visits
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
Assessment of SF-36 scores (Health survey)
Description
Change in SF-36 scores compared to baseline at all followup visits
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
Assessment of FACIT (Functional assessment of chronical illness therapy)-fatigue- Questionnaire
Description
Change in FACIT-fatigue assessment compared to baseline at all follow-up visits at week 16, 24, 40 and 48
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
HAQ (health assessment questionnaire)- assessment
Description
Change in HAQ assessment compared to baseline at follow-up visits at week 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, (36), 40, 48, 52
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
proportion of DAS28-ESR remission - remission using DAS28 based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) defined as DAS28 < 2.6
Description
Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time Frame
from week 16 until 48 weeks
Title
Proportion of patient with disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (DAS28-ESR) - low disease is defined DAS28 < 3.2
Description
Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR low disease (DAS28 < 3.2) at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time Frame
from week 16 until 48 weeks
Title
Assessment of changes in c-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values
Description
Change of CRP and ESR compared to baseline at all follow-up visits at week 2, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, (36), 40, 48, 52
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Title
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Description
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time Frame
At Screening
Title
Performance of standardized ultrasound synovitis score (US7)in subgroup of patients
Description
Change in ultrasound synovitis score (if possible 3rd party blind observer, imaging subgroup only) performed at baseline and week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 48 weeks
Title
Assessment of changes of rheumatoid nodules (number and diameter of target nodule) during therapy
Description
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Time Frame
From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 48 weeks
Title
Assessment of main safety parameters as SAE, deaths, duration of B-cell depletion and rate of infections + malignancies
Description
Safety parameters: Number of deaths, drop-out rates, causes of drop-outs, summary of SAEs per treatment group and severity of adverse events Extent and duration of B cell depletion Rates of infections, malignancies
Time Frame
From week 2 until up to 52 weeks
Title
Documentation of used standard care treatment by patients that are non-responder to therapy
Description
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Description
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time Frame
At Screening
Title
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Description
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time Frame
week 16
Title
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Description
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time Frame
week 24
Title
Assessment of changes in rheumatoid factor (RF) and Antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (aCCP) values
Description
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time Frame
week 48
Title
Assessment of changes of rheumatoid nodules (number and diameter of target nodule) during therapy
Description
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Time Frame
week 24
Title
Assessment of changes of rheumatoid nodules (number and diameter of target nodule) during therapy
Description
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Time Frame
week 48
Title
Documentation of used standard care treatment by patients that are non-responder to therapy
Description
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Time Frame
Week 36
Title
Documentation of used standard care treatment by patients that are non-responder to therapy
Description
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Description
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time Frame
week 16
Title
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Description
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time Frame
week 24
Title
Descriptive analysis of outcome measures in patients differentiated by presence of rheumatoid factor (RF-positive) or absence of rheumatoid factor(RF-negative)
Description
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time Frame
week 48

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male and female patients, 18 to 75 years of age, with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, not more than 3 non-biological DMARDs including leflunomide, and not more than one inadequate response to anti-TNF-therapy, and currently have active disease despite at least 3-month treatment with leflunomide. Active disease is defined as DAS 28 >3.2 and at least swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 3 and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 3 included in the 28 joint count. Male and female patients with rheumatoid arthritis for at least 3 months diagnosed according to the revised 1987 ACR criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Willingness and capability to give written informed consent, and willingness to participate and to comply with the study protocol. Not more than 2 non-biological DMARDs other than leflunomide in history, which are washed out at least 4 weeks prior to first rituximab infusion Previous use of anti-TNF therapy is allowed. Patient will only be allowed to be pre-treated with a maximum of two anti-TNF therapies and only one stopped due to inadequate response. The second anti-TNF could be stopped for instance due to intolerance, e.g. injection site reactions. Anti-TNF treatment must be discontinued prior to baseline considering the different characteristics of the specific compound: Use of infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab within 8 weeks of baseline, use of etanercept within 4 weeks of baseline. Exclusion Criteria: RA functional class IV: limited in ability to perform usual self-care, work, and other activities Male and female patients with other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic autoimmune disease Any active infection, a history of recurrent clinically significant infection, a history of recurrent bacterial infections with encapsulated organisms (Hepatitis B, C and HIV (human immune deficiency virus) - will be tested at screening) Chronic, latent and acute infections of the lung Positive result of a Tuberculosis specific Interferon gamma release assay (will be tested at screening) Primary or secondary immunodeficiency History of cancer with curative treatment not longer than 5 years ago except basal-cell carcinoma of the skin that had been excised Evidence of significant uncontrolled concomitant diseases or serious and / or uncontrolled diseases that are likely to interfere with the evaluation of the patient's safety and of the study outcome Neuropathy that can interfere with filling out the patient's questionnaires History of a severe psychological illness or condition Known hypersensitivity to any component of the product or to murine proteins Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III and IV) or severe,uncontrolled cardiac disease. Women lactating, pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test or planned pregnancy. Women of childbearing potential without adequate contraception (medically acceptable methods (pearl Index < 1) are contraceptive implant, contraceptive injection, intrauterine device (IUD), or oral contraceptives taken for at least 3 months,which the patient agrees to continue using during the study, or a double-barrier method which must consist of a combination of any of the following: diaphragma,cervical cap, condom, or spermicide) History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse (defined as impaired / questionable reliability) as well as neurotic personality. Participation in another investigational study within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. Previous treatment with any B-cell depleting agents including rituximab Intolerance to ingredients of rituximab or murine proteins Pre-treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab or other anti-TNF biologicals. Inadequate response to more than one anti-TNF-therapy Pre-treatment of more than two anti-TNF, only one is allowed to be stopped due to inadequate response. The second anti-TNF could be stopped due to intolerance, e.g. injection site reactions Corticosteroids at doses exceeding 10 mg per day of prednisolone or equivalents within the last 2 weeks or corticosteroids at instable doses within the last 2 weeks Intolerance or contraindication to drugs required for the treatment of the side effects of rituximab Previous treatment with any investigational medicinal product within last 3 months prior to baseline Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to treatment Intra- articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening visit Haemoglobin < 8.5 g / dl (equivalent to < 5,28 mmol/l Haemoglobin) Neutrophil counts < 1.500 / μl (equivalent to 1,5 / nl) Platelet count < 75.000 / μl (equivalent to 75 / nl) Lower than 500 / μl (equivalent to 0,5 / nl) lymphocytes Serum creatinine > 1.4 mg / dl for women or 1.6 mg / dl for men Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 times upper limit of normal IgG (immunoglobulin G) level < 5g/l
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frank Behrens, Dr. med.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Medicine II / Rheumatology Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Schwerpunktpraxis
City
Bad Kösen
State/Province
Sachsen-Anhalt
ZIP/Postal Code
06628
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH Abtlg. Rheumatologie und Klin. Immunologie
City
Bad Nauheim
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumazentrum Baden-Baden
City
Baden-Baden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Remstedt
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumaklinik Berlin-Buch Immanuel Krankenhaus
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Schlosspark-Klinik
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Campus Charité
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Krankenhaus Friedrichstadt
City
Dresden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
City
Erlangen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Department of Medicine II / Rheumatology Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
City
Frankfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
60528
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumatologie Endokrinologikum Frankfurt
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universität Freiburg Innere Medizin - Abtlg. Rheumatologie
City
Freiburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Gemeinschaftspraxis für Innere Medizin
City
Gießen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis, Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
City
Goslar
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinik u. Poliklinik f. Innere Medizin A, Nephrologie u. Rheumatolog Uniklinik Greifswald
City
Greifswald
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Georg-August-Universität Abtlg. Nephrologie u. Rheumatologie
City
Göttingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Uniklinik Halle - Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I
City
Halle
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Klinik f. Immunologie u. Rheumatologie
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumapraxis Heidelberg
City
Heidelberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis, Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
City
Hildesheim
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Internistisch - Rheumatologische Praxis
City
Hofheim
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinik für Innere Medizin I Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
City
Homburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumapraxis Karlsruhe
City
Karlsruhe
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein
City
Köln
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Köln Med I
City
Köln
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universität Leipzig
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Kaufmann
City
Ludwigsfelde
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinsche Klinik A, Rheumatologie, Nephrologie Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen,
City
Ludwigshafen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, St. Vincenz und Elisabeth Hospital
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Prof. Dr. Kellner
City
München
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius
City
München
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
City
Neuss
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH
City
Offenbach
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis. Gauler und Fliedner
City
Osnabrück
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Gräßler
City
Pirna
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumatologie Praxis
City
Planegg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Evangelisches Fachkrankenhaus
City
Ratingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Uni Klinik Regensburg
City
Regensburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier
City
Trier
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Abt. II Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik
City
Tübingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Ulm Klinik f. Innere Medizin III
City
Ulm
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Innere Medizin und Rheumatologie
City
Villingen-Schwenningen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumatologische Praxis Dr. Wörth
City
Wiesbaden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
City
Wuppertal
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Med. Klinik und Poliklinik III, Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie
City
Würzburg
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33738492
Citation
Behrens F, Koehm M, Rossmanith T, Alten R, Aringer M, Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Feist E, Herrmann E, Kellner H, Krueger K, Lehn A, Muller-Ladner U, Rubbert-Roth A, Tony HP, Wassenberg S, Burkhardt H. Rituximab plus leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated clinical trial (AMARA study). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Nov 3;60(11):5318-5328. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab153.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Addition of Rituximab to Leflunomide in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs