search
Back to results

Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in TKA

Primary Purpose

Total Knee Arthroplasty, Post-operative Pain Control

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection
Adductor canal block
Sponsored by
Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty for end stage osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.
  2. All adults > 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not cleared by PCP and appropriate specialists to undergo TKA (Check No if patient has been cleared.)
  2. Adults undergoing bilateral primary total knee arthroplasties.
  3. Women who are pregnant.
  4. Women who are breastfeeding.
  5. Inability to receive successful spinal anesthesia.
  6. Allergy to amide anesthetics.
  7. Inability to receive IV tranexamic acid.
  8. Patients who are unable to speak English.
  9. Patients who are less than 66kg.
  10. Patients who are opioid dependent. We define opioid dependency as patients who are on a long-acting narcotic or patients who are taking more than six tablets of hydrocodone 5mg or equivalent.

Sites / Locations

  • Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Adductor Canal Block Group

Liposomal Bupivacaine Group

Arm Description

Standard method for peri-operative pain control. Adductor canal block is performed by anesthesiologist prior to surgery.

Experimental method for peri-operative pain control. Liposomal bupivacaine peri-articular injection is performed by surgeon during surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Reported WOMAC Score ranges between 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Knee range of motion
Knee flexion and extension will be recorded during follow up visits
Ambulation distance after surgery
Distance walked in feet will be assessed and recorded by physical therapist
Hospital length of stay
Measured by number of nights patient stayed in hospital after surgery

Full Information

First Posted
March 13, 2019
Last Updated
September 9, 2019
Sponsor
Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04086186
Brief Title
Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in TKA
Official Title
Clinical Outcomes of an Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Randomized Prospective Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 22, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 25, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 18, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a randomized prospective study of 60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty evaluating the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injections (PAI) when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl.
Detailed Description
Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) is an effective solution for end stage arthritis of the knee; however, post-surgical pain can be difficult to manage and the optimal peri-operative pain management strategy has not been established. This study serves to evaluate the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine PAI when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing a TKA. The investigators hypothesized that peri-articular injection with liposomal bupivacaine would not be inferior to an adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl. A total of 60 patients were recruited. Thirty patients were randomized to receive intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injection, and another thirty patients randomized to receive a pre-operative adductor canal block using bupivacaine. Both groups otherwise received standard pain management strategies peri-operatively. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative pain, which was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary measures included changes in patient function which was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee range of motion, post-operative ambulation distance, and hospital length of stay.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Total Knee Arthroplasty, Post-operative Pain Control

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Adductor Canal Block Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard method for peri-operative pain control. Adductor canal block is performed by anesthesiologist prior to surgery.
Arm Title
Liposomal Bupivacaine Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental method for peri-operative pain control. Liposomal bupivacaine peri-articular injection is performed by surgeon during surgery.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Exparel peri-articular injection
Intervention Description
A 20mL solution of 266mg of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) was mixed with 40mL of normal saline, which was then infiltrated consistently in the posterior capsule, medial and lateral side of the arthrotomy, patella tendon, quadriceps tendon, quadriceps musculature, and subcutaneous soft tissue.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Adductor canal block
Intervention Description
Anesthesiologist performs preoperative adductor canal block using 15mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine HCl
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Time Frame
VAS pain score on post-operative day #1
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Time Frame
VAS pain score on post-operative day #2
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Time Frame
VAS pain score on post-operative day #4
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Time Frame
VAS pain score on post-operative day #7
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Description
Reported WOMAC Score ranges between 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time Frame
Outcome measure will be assessed up to 8 weeks
Title
Knee range of motion
Description
Knee flexion and extension will be recorded during follow up visits
Time Frame
Outcome measure will be assessed up to 8 weeks
Title
Ambulation distance after surgery
Description
Distance walked in feet will be assessed and recorded by physical therapist
Time Frame
Recorded on post-operative day #1
Title
Hospital length of stay
Description
Measured by number of nights patient stayed in hospital after surgery
Time Frame
Measure outcome will be assess through study completion, on average of 1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty for end stage osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. All adults > 18 years of age. Exclusion Criteria: Not cleared by PCP and appropriate specialists to undergo TKA (Check No if patient has been cleared.) Adults undergoing bilateral primary total knee arthroplasties. Women who are pregnant. Women who are breastfeeding. Inability to receive successful spinal anesthesia. Allergy to amide anesthetics. Inability to receive IV tranexamic acid. Patients who are unable to speak English. Patients who are less than 66kg. Patients who are opioid dependent. We define opioid dependency as patients who are on a long-acting narcotic or patients who are taking more than six tablets of hydrocodone 5mg or equivalent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Justin Than, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Samaritan Health Services
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center
City
Corvallis
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97330
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Individual participant data to be available up to 7 years.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17403800
Citation
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21561303
Citation
Affas F, Nygards EB, Stiller CO, Wretenberg P, Olofsson C. Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block. Acta Orthop. 2011 Aug;82(4):441-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.581264. Epub 2011 May 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16651569
Citation
Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24815964
Citation
Tong YC, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Liposomal bupivacaine and clinical outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Mar;28(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19214642
Citation
Maheshwari AV, Blum YC, Shekhar L, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29628196
Citation
Suarez JC, Al-Mansoori AA, Kanwar S, Semien GA, Villa JM, McNamara CA, Patel PD. Effectiveness of Novel Adjuncts in Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S136-S141. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.088. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29656977
Citation
Zlotnicki JP, Hamlin BR, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Rothenberger SD, Urish KL. Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Plain Bupivacaine in Periarticular Injection for Control of Pain and Early Motion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2460-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28326395
Citation
Snyder MA, Scheuerman CM, Gregg JL, Ruhnke CJ, Eten K. Improving total knee arthroplasty perioperative pain management using a periarticular injection with bupivacaine liposomal suspension. Arthroplast Today. 2016 Jan 11;2(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2015.05.005. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28816893
Citation
Smith EB, Kazarian GS, Maltenfort MG, Lonner JH, Sharkey PF, Good RP. Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection Versus Intra-Articular Bupivacaine Infusion Catheter for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 16;99(16):1337-1344. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00571.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26897490
Citation
Schwarzkopf R, Drexler M, Ma MW, Schultz VM, Le KT, Rutenberg TF, Rinehart JB. Is There a Benefit for Liposomal Bupivacaine Compared to a Traditional Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients With a History of Chronic Opioid Use? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1702-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27113945
Citation
Jain RK, Porat MD, Klingenstein GG, Reid JJ, Post RE, Schoifet SD. The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Liposomal Bupivacaine and Periarticular Injection Are Not Superior to Single-Shot Intra-articular Injection for Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22285545
Citation
Bramlett K, Onel E, Viscusi ER, Jones K. A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study comparing wound infiltration of DepoFoam bupivacaine, an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, to bupivacaine HCl for postsurgical analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26883652
Citation
Yu S, Szulc A, Walton S, Bosco J, Iorio R. Pain Control and Functional Milestones in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Femoral Nerve Block. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):110-117. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4740-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27326760
Citation
Kirkness CS, Asche CV, Ren J, Gordon K, Maurer P, Maurer B, Maurer BT. Assessment of liposome bupivacaine infiltration versus continuous femoral nerve block for postsurgical analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Oct;32(10):1727-1733. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1205007. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26618816
Citation
Horn BJ, Cien A, Reeves NP, Pathak P, Taunt CJ Jr. Femoral Nerve Block vs Periarticular Bupivacaine Liposome Injection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on Patient Outcomes. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Dec;115(12):714-9. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.146.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26731385
Citation
Cien AJ, Penny PC, Horn BJ, Popovich JM, Taunt CJ. Comparison Between Liposomal Bupivacaine and Femoral Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2015 Winter;24(4):225-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24938586
Citation
Broome CB, Burnikel B. Novel strategies to improve early outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a case control study of intra articular injection versus femoral nerve block. Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10):2087-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2392-0. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19916251
Citation
Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21697687
Citation
Saranteas T, Anagnostis G, Paraskeuopoulos T, Koulalis D, Kokkalis Z, Nakou M, Anagnostopoulou S, Kostopanagiotou G. Anatomy and clinical implications of the ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):399-402. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318220f172.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in TKA

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs