search
Back to results

Air-polishing in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis

Primary Purpose

Peri-Implantitis

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Air-polishing
Mechanical decontamination
Sponsored by
Göteborg University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peri-Implantitis focused on measuring Non-surgical therapy, Surgical therapy, Air abrasives, Air polishing

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Probing pocket depth of ≥6 mm
  • Bleeding and/or suppuration on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant
  • Documented radiographic bone loss of ≥2 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implants with bone loss ≥80% of implant length will not be considered.
  • No medical conditions prohibiting non-surgical/surgical treatment of peri-implantitis
  • Implant(s) in function ≥1 year

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Control - Mechanical instrumentation of implant surface

Test - Mechanical instrumentation and air-polishing of implant surface

Arm Description

The control group will be subjected to non-surgical decontamination including the use of hand instruments and polishing cups aiming at the removal of all supra-mucosal soft and hard deposits from the implant surfaces.

In the test group the mechanical instrumentation will be supplemented by the use of an air-polishing device during non-surgical therapy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of participants/implants displaying pocket closure
Pocket closure: Probing pocket depth of ≤5 mm and absence of bleeding on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant and absence of suppuration on probing
Proportion of participants/implants displaying pocket closure
Pocket closure: Probing pocket depth of ≤5 mm and absence of bleeding on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant and absence of suppuration on probing
Proportion of participants/implants displaying pocket closure
Pocket closure: Probing pocket depth of ≤5 mm and absence of bleeding on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant and absence of suppuration on probing
Patient satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale
Patient satisfaction as assessed on a 100 mm VAS
Patient satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale
Patient satisfaction as assessed on a 100 mm VAS
Patient satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale
Patient satisfaction as assessed on a 100 mm VAS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Changes in probing pocket depth
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Changes in probing pocket depth
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Changes in probing pocket depth
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Changes in probing pocket depth
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Changes in probing pocket depth
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Changes in probing pocket depth
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Changes in bleeding on probing
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Changes in bleeding on probing
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Changes in bleeding on probing
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Changes in bleeding on probing
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Changes in bleeding on probing
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Changes in bleeding on probing
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Rate of adverse events
Emphysema
Rate of adverse events
Emphysema
Rate of adverse events
Emphysema
Patient discomfort as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Patient discomfort 2 weeks after non-surgical treatment as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Patient discomfort as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Patient discomfort 2 weeks after surgical treatment as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a 100 mm VAS

Full Information

First Posted
April 7, 2021
Last Updated
February 21, 2023
Sponsor
Göteborg University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04847648
Brief Title
Air-polishing in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis
Official Title
Air-polishing in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Start Date
October 14, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Göteborg University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the potential benefit of the adjunctive use of an air-polishing device in the treatment of peri-implantitis as compared to mechanical infection control alone. Following establishment of adequate patient-performed infection control, 80 patients diagnosed with moderate/severe peri-implantitis at ≥1 implant will be randomized to one of two groups. Non-surgical and, if required, surgical therapy will be carried out by experienced operators in three clinical centers and the mechanical instrumentation (control group) will be supplemented by the use of air-polishing with erythritol powder (AirFlow Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) in the test group. The primary outcome assessed is "pocket closure" (ie probing pocket depth ≤5 mm & absence of profuse bleeding on probing) after non-surgical (6 months) and surgical therapy (18 months). Secondary outcomes include changes of clinical signs of soft tissue inflammation, adverse events and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes of non-surgical therapy will be evaluated at 3 and 6 months. Sites with remaining pathology at 6 months will be subjected to surgical therapy.
Detailed Description
The project will be conducted as a two-armed randomized controlled clinical trial of 5-year duration in three clinical centers. 80 systemically healthy patients diagnosed with moderate/severe peri-implantitis at ≥1 implant will be enrolled. Upon enrolment, all patients will receive instructions in oral hygiene measures until adequate plaque control has been established (Plaque Index ≤20%). If required, supraconstructions will be adjusted to facilitate adequate oral hygiene measures. Thereafter, study participants will be randomized into two groups, stratified for smoking (yes/no) and number of implants in need of treatment (single/multiple). The control group will be subjected to professionally administered mechanical infection control including the use of hand instruments and polishing cups aiming at the removal of all supra-mucosal soft and hard deposits from the target sites. In the test group the aforementioned treatment will be supplemented by the use of an air-polishing device (AirFlow Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) with a specially designed nozzle for sub-mucosal application (PerioFlow Handpiece, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). Following local anesthesia, the instrument will be used sub-mucosally at all aspects (ie mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) of the affected implant(s) at a power setting reduced to 60% and with a erythritol powder (14 mikrometer, AirFlow Plus Powder, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland). The handpiece will be guided in a circular motion in a corono-apical direction not in contact with the implant surface. Instrumentation time will be limited to 5 seconds at each aspect. Implant-supported supraconstructions will not be removed for the non-surgical treatment. Patients are recalled two weeks later for assessment of patient-experienced outcomes, professional supramucosal cleaning and reinforcement of oral hygiene. Peri-implant soft tissues will be evaluated at three months. Implant sites with remaining signs of pathology (PPD ≥6 mm and presence of BOP at ≥3 aspects per implant will be subjected to re-treatment according to the initial allocation. The clinical evaluation will be repeated at 6 months. In case of residual signs of pathology, affected sites will be subjected to surgical therapy of peri-implantitis within the subsequent 4 weeks. Full thickness flaps will be elevated and inflamed tissues will be removed. Mineralized deposits on the implant surfaces will be removed with titanium-coated curettes. Surface decontamination will be performed using a rotating titanium brush under irrigation with saline. No bone recontouring of bony walls is intended. Flaps will be sutured to the level of the bone and sutures will be removed after 2 weeks. Implant-supported supraconstructions will be removed for the surgical intervention, if possible. Maintenance therapy will be provided at 9 and 12 months and based on individual needs during the subsequent follow-up. A renewed evaluation will be performed at 12 and 18 months. Long-term assessments will be carried out annually from years 3 to 5. Should any implant site present with signs of disease progression (increase of PPD >2 mm and additional bone loss >1 mm compared to baseline) at any of the follow-up examinations, the implant will be exited from the study and appropriate additional therapy will be provided.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peri-Implantitis
Keywords
Non-surgical therapy, Surgical therapy, Air abrasives, Air polishing

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The project will be conducted as a two-armed randomized controlled clinical trial of 5-year duration in three clinical centers.
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Clinical assessments will be performed by assessors unaware of group allocation. Bone level changes over time will be assessed on radiographs and expressed in mm by examiners blinded to group allocation.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control - Mechanical instrumentation of implant surface
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will be subjected to non-surgical decontamination including the use of hand instruments and polishing cups aiming at the removal of all supra-mucosal soft and hard deposits from the implant surfaces.
Arm Title
Test - Mechanical instrumentation and air-polishing of implant surface
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In the test group the mechanical instrumentation will be supplemented by the use of an air-polishing device during non-surgical therapy.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Air-polishing
Intervention Description
Air-polishing with erythritol powder during non-surgical therapy (at baseline, 5 seconds per surface, and, if necessary, at 3 months).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Mechanical decontamination
Intervention Description
Mechanical instrumentation of implant surfaces during non-surgical therapy (at baseline and, if necesarry at 3 months) including the use of hand instruments and polishing cups aiming at the removal of all soft and hard deposits from the target implant.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of participants/implants displaying pocket closure
Description
Pocket closure: Probing pocket depth of ≤5 mm and absence of bleeding on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant and absence of suppuration on probing
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Proportion of participants/implants displaying pocket closure
Description
Pocket closure: Probing pocket depth of ≤5 mm and absence of bleeding on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant and absence of suppuration on probing
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of participants/implants displaying pocket closure
Description
Pocket closure: Probing pocket depth of ≤5 mm and absence of bleeding on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant and absence of suppuration on probing
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Patient satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale
Description
Patient satisfaction as assessed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Patient satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale
Description
Patient satisfaction as assessed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Patient satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale
Description
Patient satisfaction as assessed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
18 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in probing pocket depth
Description
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Changes in probing pocket depth
Description
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in probing pocket depth
Description
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Changes in probing pocket depth
Description
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Changes in probing pocket depth
Description
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Changes in probing pocket depth
Description
Reductions in PPD relative to baseline
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Changes in bleeding on probing
Description
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Changes in bleeding on probing
Description
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in bleeding on probing
Description
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Changes in bleeding on probing
Description
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Changes in bleeding on probing
Description
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Changes in bleeding on probing
Description
Reductions in BOP relative to baseline
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Description
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Description
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Description
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Description
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Description
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels
Description
Changes in marginal soft soft tissue levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Description
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Description
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Description
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Changes in radiographic bone levels
Description
Changes in radiographic bone levels relative to baseline
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Rate of adverse events
Description
Emphysema
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Rate of adverse events
Description
Emphysema
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Rate of adverse events
Description
Emphysema
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Patient discomfort as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Description
Patient discomfort 2 weeks after non-surgical treatment as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
3.5 months
Title
Patient discomfort as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Description
Patient discomfort 2 weeks after surgical treatment as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
6.5 months
Title
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Description
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Description
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a visual analogue scale
Description
Esthetic appreciation as expressed on a 100 mm VAS
Time Frame
18 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Probing pocket depth of ≥6 mm Bleeding and/or suppuration on probing at ≥3 aspects per implant Documented radiographic bone loss of ≥2 mm. Exclusion Criteria: Implants with bone loss ≥80% of implant length will not be considered. No medical conditions prohibiting non-surgical/surgical treatment of peri-implantitis Implant(s) in function ≥1 year
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kostas Bougas, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Göteborg University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology
City
Göteborg
ZIP/Postal Code
40530
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Air-polishing in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs