search
Back to results

Alcohol Biosensor Monitoring for Alcoholic Liver Disease

Primary Purpose

Alcohol Use, Unspecified

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Feedback
Enhanced Usual Care
Sponsored by
University of Pittsburgh
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Alcohol Use, Unspecified

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with AALD followed at our liver disease clinic,
  • 18 years or older,
  • willing to accept randomization,
  • and agree to wear device for 3 months,
  • SOCRATES problem recognition subscale score >26 (scores <26 indicate very low recognition of an alcohol problem).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking,
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores <21 (moderate cognitive impairment) or neurologic diseases (e.g. Parkinson's),
  • patients with unresponsive acute alcoholic hepatitis, multi-organ failure, fulminant hepatic failure,
  • cancer/terminal illness;
  • those unable to wear a wrist monitor (e.g., edema);
  • lacking a residence, or unable to identify a contact person (if lost to follow-up).

Sites / Locations

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Feedback

Enhanced usual care

Arm Description

Participant will receive a brief feedback on data downloaded from the ABM and information about treatment resources

Participant will receive information about remaining abstinent and about treatment resources

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Alcohol Use
Average number of drinks per drinking episode per interval (month) of device wear. We analyzed the number of drinks per drinking episode and present the group average per month interval of assessment.
Percent of Days Drinking Per Interval of Device Wear
Percent of days drinking per interval of device wear: We analyzed the data by number of drinking episodes per individual per days of device wear and present the mean percent days drinking per assessment interval

Secondary Outcome Measures

Improved Readiness for Alcohol Abstinence and Initiation of Change
Stages of Change Readiness & Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) is a 19-item instrument that measures readiness for change assessing three areas; ambivalence, recognition, and taking steps with change scores assessing the impact of an intervention on these areas. Three subscale scores are produced with total scores ranging 19-95 and higher score indicating greater readiness: 7 items for recognition of an alcohol problem (scores range from low of 7 to highest of 35) 4 items for ambivalence (range from low of 4 to highest of 20) 8 items for taking steps to make a positive change in drinking (range from low of 8 to highest of 40)
Self Efficacy to Remain Abstinent
Alcohol Abstinence Self-efficacy (AASE) evaluates confidence in ability to abstain from drinking in situations that represent typical drinking cues. Four subscales with 5 specific situations each are rated on confidence not to drink in each situations on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=not at all confident to 5=extremely confident. Total scores range from 20-100 with higher scores reflecting greater self confidence not to drink. negative affect situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25) social/positive situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25) physical and other concerns situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25) cravings and urges situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25)
Medical Outcomes
AALD related hospitalizations and ER visits - total count of participants in each arm who experienced these outcomes
Qualitative Interviews
Qualitative interviews of participants will use a semi-structured script of open-ended stem questions with prompts. The qualitative assessment will cover such topics as patients' perceived need/psychologic barriers (e.g., beliefs in value of ABM in their clinical care and for their relationship with clinicians) and experience with ABM (e.g., wearability, satisfaction, and barriers to monitoring). Transcribed interviews will be thematically coded. The constant comparison method will be used, and subsequent interviews may be modified/informed by findings from previous interviews to explore emerging themes as the analysis proceeds.

Full Information

First Posted
April 13, 2018
Last Updated
November 4, 2022
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03533660
Brief Title
Alcohol Biosensor Monitoring for Alcoholic Liver Disease
Official Title
Alcohol Biosensor Monitoring for Alcoholic Liver Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 13, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 28, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Successful treatment of alcohol associated liver disease (AALD) depends primarily on abstinence from alcohol. The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial of alcohol biosensor monitoring for patients with alcohol associated liver disease to determine if monitoring with feedback on alcohol use patterns reduces alcohol consumption and improves outcomes.
Detailed Description
The investigators propose a 3 month randomized controlled trial (RCT) pilot of alcohol biosensor monitoring (ABM)(WrisTAS) for patients with Alcohol Associated Liver Disease (AALD) who intend to stop drinking. All participants will wear the ABM device but participants will be randomized to receive either personalized feedback on the data recorded on the device (n=30) or enhanced usual care without feedback on device data (n=30). The investigators will determine whether ABM plus feedback improves outcomes for AALD patients compared to enhanced usual care and hypothesize ABM feedback will reduce alcohol consumption, improve motivation and self-efficacy for abstinence and improve engagement in treatment. The investigators will also conduct research including qualitative data collected from participants who will provide opinions on ABM feasibility, acceptability, and usability. Qualitative methods are especially useful for understanding the perceived needs, barriers, and preferences for monitoring alcohol use and are especially required for future translation of this technology into clinical practice.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alcohol Use, Unspecified

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
RCT feedback vs. enhanced usual care
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
33 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Feedback
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participant will receive a brief feedback on data downloaded from the ABM and information about treatment resources
Arm Title
Enhanced usual care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participant will receive information about remaining abstinent and about treatment resources
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Feedback
Intervention Description
Participant will receive a brief feedback on alcohol use data downloaded from the ABM and information about treatment resources
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Enhanced Usual Care
Intervention Description
Participant will receive information on self reported alcohol use and information about remaining abstinent and about treatment resources
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Alcohol Use
Description
Average number of drinks per drinking episode per interval (month) of device wear. We analyzed the number of drinks per drinking episode and present the group average per month interval of assessment.
Time Frame
continuous for up to 3 months
Title
Percent of Days Drinking Per Interval of Device Wear
Description
Percent of days drinking per interval of device wear: We analyzed the data by number of drinking episodes per individual per days of device wear and present the mean percent days drinking per assessment interval
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improved Readiness for Alcohol Abstinence and Initiation of Change
Description
Stages of Change Readiness & Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) is a 19-item instrument that measures readiness for change assessing three areas; ambivalence, recognition, and taking steps with change scores assessing the impact of an intervention on these areas. Three subscale scores are produced with total scores ranging 19-95 and higher score indicating greater readiness: 7 items for recognition of an alcohol problem (scores range from low of 7 to highest of 35) 4 items for ambivalence (range from low of 4 to highest of 20) 8 items for taking steps to make a positive change in drinking (range from low of 8 to highest of 40)
Time Frame
Scores determined at initiation, 6 weeks and 3 months of participation
Title
Self Efficacy to Remain Abstinent
Description
Alcohol Abstinence Self-efficacy (AASE) evaluates confidence in ability to abstain from drinking in situations that represent typical drinking cues. Four subscales with 5 specific situations each are rated on confidence not to drink in each situations on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=not at all confident to 5=extremely confident. Total scores range from 20-100 with higher scores reflecting greater self confidence not to drink. negative affect situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25) social/positive situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25) physical and other concerns situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25) cravings and urges situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25)
Time Frame
Scores determined at initiation, 6 weeks and 3 months of participation
Title
Medical Outcomes
Description
AALD related hospitalizations and ER visits - total count of participants in each arm who experienced these outcomes
Time Frame
Counts determined at initiation, 6 weeks and 3 months of participation
Title
Qualitative Interviews
Description
Qualitative interviews of participants will use a semi-structured script of open-ended stem questions with prompts. The qualitative assessment will cover such topics as patients' perceived need/psychologic barriers (e.g., beliefs in value of ABM in their clinical care and for their relationship with clinicians) and experience with ABM (e.g., wearability, satisfaction, and barriers to monitoring). Transcribed interviews will be thematically coded. The constant comparison method will be used, and subsequent interviews may be modified/informed by findings from previous interviews to explore emerging themes as the analysis proceeds.
Time Frame
measured at three months (completion of the participants use of ABM)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with AALD followed at our liver disease clinic, 18 years or older, willing to accept randomization, and agree to wear device for 3 months, SOCRATES problem recognition subscale score >26 (scores <26 indicate very low recognition of an alcohol problem). Exclusion Criteria: Non-English speaking, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores <21 (moderate cognitive impairment) or neurologic diseases (e.g. Parkinson's), patients with unresponsive acute alcoholic hepatitis, multi-organ failure, fulminant hepatic failure, cancer/terminal illness; those unable to wear a wrist monitor (e.g., edema); lacking a residence, or unable to identify a contact person (if lost to follow-up).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrea DiMartini, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The study database will be reviewed to ensure that no identifying information of any type is contained therein. A downloadable, de-identified data set and data dictionary will be made available electronically from the PI after the request is reviewed by the research team for scientific merit and requestors provide evidence to the PI that (a) their plan for the use of such data has been approved by their institution's Institutional Review Board or its equivalent, and (b) they have completed NIH requirements for training in research integrity and human subjects protection.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
To provide the investigators adequate time to prepare and submit the majority of publications likely to result from the research, data obtained from the study will be made publicly available no sooner than 18 months after the conclusion of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access can be requested from PI following plan description and time frame noted above

Learn more about this trial

Alcohol Biosensor Monitoring for Alcoholic Liver Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs