AMblyopia Treatment Through PErceptual Training in Children (AMPEL) (AMPEL)
Primary Purpose
Strabismic Amblyopia
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
crowded drawing task
uncrowded drawing task
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Strabismic Amblyopia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: children aged 4-8 years with
- strabismic amblyopia
- cycloplegic refraction corrected at least 3 months prior to enrolment
- Reliable test results for two previous examinations
- absence of ocular conditions other than strabismus, amblyopia and corrected refractive error
Exclusion Criteria:
- inability to perform reliably when examined
- inability to draw
- unstable visual results on 2 previous examinations
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
crowded drawing task
uncrowded drawing task
Arm Description
children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under crowded viewing conditions.
children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under uncrowded viewing conditions
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Crowding Ratio (CR)
CR= Ratio of crowded versus uncrowded visual acuity. This is compared pre to post treatment
Secondary Outcome Measures
hand-eye coordination
Outcome of a Beery test
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02555384
First Posted
September 16, 2015
Last Updated
June 21, 2023
Sponsor
University of Basel
Collaborators
University Medical Center Nijmegen
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02555384
Brief Title
AMblyopia Treatment Through PErceptual Training in Children (AMPEL)
Acronym
AMPEL
Official Title
Improving Visual Functions in Young Children With Amblyopia Through Perceptual Learning
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Inclusion and Exclusion criteria too stringent, no patient coluld be recruited
Study Start Date
January 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Basel
Collaborators
University Medical Center Nijmegen
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Amblyopia, affects 4% of the population. In the presence of a normal retina and optic nerve, the visual cortex does not develop normally secondary to the amblyopic eye being at a disadvantage in the sensitive period such as in strabismus. Amblyopia is associated with visuospatial disorders, and poor to absent stereopsis. Amblyopia is treated by occlusion of the non- amblyopic eye in childhood. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of perceptual learning (PL), that is a training of visual drawing tasks (12 sessions of 30 Minutes duration) with crowding (c) for children with amblyopia compared to an amblyopic control group with a placebo drawing task.
Arm 1: Crowded (PLc)- Training with small spacing Arm 2: Uncrowded (PLu)- Training with large spacing Prior to this, a small group will help optimize parameters such as contrast and distance of visual objects presented
Detailed Description
Outcome(s):
Primary endpoints: improvement of amblyopia,crowding ratio (CR) and visual acuity before and after training, at 7 weeks, at 6 months Secondary outcome: hand-eye coordination, evaluated with the Beery VMI test before and after training, at 7 weeks, at 6 months Tertiary outcome over 6 years of age: macular structure measured with the OCT before and after training, at 7 weeks, at 6 months
Study design:
Cohort study, randomised controlled trial, single blind, active control, parallel groups
Inclusion / Exclusion criteria:
20 Children included to optimize test criteria (high vs low contrast and spacing).
40 Children for 2-armed study.
Measurements and procedures:
12 sessions (2x per week for 6 weeks, 30 Minutes each) where drawing tasks are performed during their occlusion time.
Arm 1: Crowded - task with small spacing Arm 2: Uncrowded task with large spacing. Prior to this, a small group will help optimize parameters such as contrast and distance of visual objects presented The following parameters are evaluated at onset, at week 7 and at 6 months: visual acuity with and without crowding, the Berry Test and in children over 6 years of age, if possible: a reading task and OCT.
Statistical Considerations:
Patients will be randomized by letting a computer program perform the assignment of children in a certain training group. However, some restrictions will be inserted on the amount of randomization: equal number of children in our training groups, age- and acuity matched groups, equal patching times.
The analysis is aimed at answering the primary question: Can the training reduce crowding and improve visual acuity in children with amblyopia? In order to answer this question, a repeated measures ANOVA is conducted in which the crowding ratio (CR) before and after training will be entered as a within-subjects variable (2 levels: CR pre, and CR post/VA pre, VA post). Training group will be entered as a between subjects variable (2 levels: control and experimental). If there is an interaction effect, post hoc ANOVA's will be conducted to disentangle the effect of training on the CR within training groups.
A secondary question is: Can the training improve hand-eye coordination in children with amblyopia. To this regard the results of the Beery VMI test are being evaluated with a repeated measures ANOVA.
Sample size Calculation. As the crowding ratio (CR) is to be expected more important than VA, only this parameter will be powered.
Main parameter for the power calculation will be the difference (CRd) of the CR at the end of the intervention period compared to the CR at screening.
A CR decrease of 0.3 between "control" and "learning" group is assumed to be of clinical relevance.
The population standard deviation (SD) of CR is assumed to be 0.33. Assuming a moderate correlation coefficient of 0.5 between timepoints, the within subject SD is calculated as sqrt(0.33*0.33*0.5)=0.23. Therefore the SD of CRd is sqrt(2)*0.23=0.33. [Details are described in Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials,Steven A . Julious,Chapman and Hall/CRC 2009].
Based on a sample size of 20 subjects for each study group, there is a power of 88% to detect a CRd decrease of 0.3. This calculation is based on a one-sided T-test (alpha=5%).
GCP Statement: This study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP or ISO EN 14155 (as far as applicable) as well as all national legal and regulatory requirements.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Strabismic Amblyopia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
crowded drawing task
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under crowded viewing conditions.
Arm Title
uncrowded drawing task
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
children will be asked to draw on a pattern presented under uncrowded viewing conditions
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
crowded drawing task
Intervention Description
Marking inverted signs on a sheet where symbols are presented close to one another
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
uncrowded drawing task
Intervention Description
Marking inverted signs on a sheet where there is a larger distance between symbols
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Crowding Ratio (CR)
Description
CR= Ratio of crowded versus uncrowded visual acuity. This is compared pre to post treatment
Time Frame
7 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
hand-eye coordination
Description
Outcome of a Beery test
Time Frame
7 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
longterm effect on CR
Description
CR Follow up 6 months after end of drawing training
Time Frame
7 months
Title
macular structure
Description
comparison of macular optical coherence tomography scan pre and post training
Time Frame
7 weeks and 7 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: children aged 4-8 years with
strabismic amblyopia
cycloplegic refraction corrected at least 3 months prior to enrolment
Reliable test results for two previous examinations
absence of ocular conditions other than strabismus, amblyopia and corrected refractive error
Exclusion Criteria:
inability to perform reliably when examined
inability to draw
unstable visual results on 2 previous examinations
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe, Prof. med.
Organizational Affiliation
University Basel, Eye Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23950157
Citation
Huurneman B, Boonstra FN, Cox RF, van Rens G, Cillessen AH. Perceptual learning in children with visual impairment improves near visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep 17;54(9):6208-16. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12220.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
AMblyopia Treatment Through PErceptual Training in Children (AMPEL)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs