search
Back to results

An Ascending Dose Comparison of MVT-100 to Definity in Healthy Volunteers

Primary Purpose

Heart Diseases

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Echocardiogram
MVT-100
Definity
Sponsored by
Microvascular Therapeutics, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Heart Diseases focused on measuring echo, echocardiogram, Healthy Volunteers, Definity

Eligibility Criteria

19 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult subjects 19 years of age or older, male or female
  • Female subjects must no longer have child-bearing potential (>1-year post menopause or surgically sterilized), or must

    • have a negative urine pregnancy test, and
    • be using and continue to use for 30 days after the study a medically effective method of contraception
  • Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, as defined by:
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
  • Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L
  • Plasma creatinine< 1.5 x ULN
  • Total bilirubin within normal limits (< 2.5 x ULN if Gilbert's syndrome)
  • Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 2.5 x ULN
  • Subject must be willing and able to understand the study and provide written Informed Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myocardial infarction within six months prior to enrollment
  • Unstable angina, NYHA Class II or greater congestive heart failure
  • EKG evidence of uncontrolled arrhythmia or history of clinically significant arrhythmia within the past six months
  • Clinically significant Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or other pulmonary condition that is not controlled by medication or requires oxygen frequently or continuously
  • A history of pulmonary emboli
  • Known hypersensitivity to perflutren, DEFINITY® or other echo contrast agent
  • Inability to remain supine for 60 minutes
  • Oxygen saturation < 95% on room air
  • History of allergic reaction attributed to compounds of similar chemical composition to MVT-100 or DEFINITY® or soy or egg allergies (see Investigator's Brochure)
  • Subject has received any investigational drug within thirty (30) days prior to enrollment into the study
  • Inability to comply with study procedures
  • Subjects with any medical condition deemed by the investigator to make the subject inappropriate for participation

Sites / Locations

  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CityRecruiting
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Definity

MVT-100

Arm Description

Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of DEFINITY® 100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.

Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of MVT-100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

QT Interval
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Blood Pressure
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Heart Rate
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Oxygen Saturation
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Other Symptoms
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO)
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®)
Cardiac Segment Visualization
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®)

Full Information

First Posted
February 15, 2019
Last Updated
March 30, 2023
Sponsor
Microvascular Therapeutics, LLC
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), University of Nebraska
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03882359
Brief Title
An Ascending Dose Comparison of MVT-100 to Definity in Healthy Volunteers
Official Title
MVT-100: Advancing the Clinical Use of Perflutren Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Suboptimal Echocardiograms
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 25, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Microvascular Therapeutics, LLC
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), University of Nebraska

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Definity (perflutren lipid microspheres, Lantheus Medical Imaging) is an ultrasound contrast indicated for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve the delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border. MVT-100 (the investigational pharmaceutical) is similar to Definity, with the exception of the removal of one lipid in the lipid blend and substitution of another lipid. This study is intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MVT-100 using a single ascending dose design in healthy volunteers. Patients are randomized to receive either MVT-100 or Definity and undergo echocardiograms after receiving either MVT-100 or Definity via bolus or IV infusion administration. The primary endpoints evaluated are safety and endocardial border delineation.
Detailed Description
Ultrasound is one of the most common imaging examinations and has advantages of absence of ionizing radiation, portability and relatively low cost. Ultrasound contrast agents are used to improve the accuracy of ultrasound and Definity (perflutren) is the world's leading ultrasound contrast agent but perflutren has to be refrigerated and has a side effect of back pain. The investigators have developed a new, improved perflutren, MVT-100, with potential for room temperature storage. Ultrasound contrast agents are used to increase the backscatter (signal intensity of blood vessels and tissues to improve diagnostic accuracy) of ultrasound imaging. In the US ultrasound contrast agents are FDA approved for echocardiography to improve endomyocardial border definition. MVT-100 reflects the ultrasound to provide strong back-scattering. MVT-100 microbubbles resonate with ultrasound to provide strong harmonic signals. MVT-100 microbubbles will cavitate with higher levels of ultrasound and cavitation may be stable or inertial depending upon acoustic parameters and other factors. The study is a multi centre ascending dose comparison of Definity and MVT-100 for use in echocardiography and will be performed in a sample of healthy volunteers who are randomized to receive either Definity or MVT-100. This trial will assess safety and evaluate the following imaging metrics: Determine the optimal dose of MVT-100 by comparing MVT-100 vs Definity in the change from baseline of quantitative left ventricular opacification Evaluation of qualitative left ventricular opacification (LVO) Evaluation of endocardial border delineation Evaluation of endocardial border length Evaluation of duration of useful contrast

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Diseases
Keywords
echo, echocardiogram, Healthy Volunteers, Definity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Ascending dose comparison in healthy volunteers
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The interpreter of echocardiograms in the trial is blinded to the drug which was administered, MVT-100 or Definity.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
16 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Definity
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of DEFINITY® 100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.
Arm Title
MVT-100
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of MVT-100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Echocardiogram
Intervention Description
Images will be recorded in parasternal long, short axis, apical four, two, and three chamber views according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 17 segment model. Each assessment will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2) in each of the pre-specified windows according to the 2014 ASE Sonographer Guidelines. A baseline echocardiogram will be performed prior to the administration of DEFINITY® or MVT-100. Assessments will be made three times, once from 0 - 1 ½ minutes following injection, once between 1 ½ minutes to 3 minutes following IV injection and once from 3 - 4 ½ minutes following IV injection. Assessments at each time point will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2). Each round will include the views in the following order: parasternal long, parasternal short, apical 4, apical 2 and apical 3.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
MVT-100
Intervention Description
After randomization, MVT-100, the experimental drug, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Definity
Intervention Description
After randomization, Definity, the active comparator, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
QT Interval
Description
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of study
Title
Blood Pressure
Description
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of study
Title
Heart Rate
Description
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of study
Title
Oxygen Saturation
Description
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of study
Title
Other Symptoms
Description
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of study
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO)
Description
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of Study
Title
Cardiac Segment Visualization
Description
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®)
Time Frame
Day of Study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult subjects 19 years of age or older, male or female Female subjects must no longer have child-bearing potential (>1-year post menopause or surgically sterilized), or must have a negative urine pregnancy test, and be using and continue to use for 30 days after the study a medically effective method of contraception Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, as defined by: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L Plasma creatinine< 1.5 x ULN Total bilirubin within normal limits (< 2.5 x ULN if Gilbert's syndrome) Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 2.5 x ULN Subject must be willing and able to understand the study and provide written Informed Consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: Myocardial infarction within six months prior to enrollment Unstable angina, NYHA Class II or greater congestive heart failure EKG evidence of uncontrolled arrhythmia or history of clinically significant arrhythmia within the past six months Clinically significant Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or other pulmonary condition that is not controlled by medication or requires oxygen frequently or continuously A history of pulmonary emboli Known hypersensitivity to perflutren, DEFINITY® or other echo contrast agent Inability to remain supine for 60 minutes Oxygen saturation < 95% on room air History of allergic reaction attributed to compounds of similar chemical composition to MVT-100 or DEFINITY® or soy or egg allergies (see Investigator's Brochure) Subject has received any investigational drug within thirty (30) days prior to enrollment into the study Inability to comply with study procedures Subjects with any medical condition deemed by the investigator to make the subject inappropriate for participation
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64111
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Main, MD
Phone
816-931-1883
Email
mmain@saint-lukes.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caroline W Murray, CCRC
Phone
816-932-2057
Email
cwmurray@saint-lukes.org
Facility Name
University of Nebraska Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68198
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sharon Mclean
Phone
402-559-7977
Email
smclean@unmc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom Porter, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22692172
Citation
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2400-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5960.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23764145
Citation
Platts DG, Luis SA, Roper D, Burstow D, Call T, Forshaw A, Pascoe R. The safety profile of perflutren microsphere contrast echocardiography during rest and stress imaging: results from an Australian multicentre cohort. Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Dec;22(12):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.637. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Weissman, Neil J., Warren J. Manning, and Brian C. Downey. Contrast echocardiography: clinical applications. Waltham, MA : UpToDate, 2013.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Lantheus Medical Imaging. Definity Package Insert. Definity Imaging. [Online] http://www.definityimaging.com/pdf/DEFINITY_US_PI_515987-0117.pdf.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17765820
Citation
Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Sep;20(9):1021-41. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.07.003. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25085408
Citation
Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

An Ascending Dose Comparison of MVT-100 to Definity in Healthy Volunteers

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs