search
Back to results

An Efficacy and Safety Study for Tapentadol Extended Release (JNS024ER) in Chronic Pain Participants

Primary Purpose

Pain, Low Back Pain, Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tapentadol Hydrochloride
Placebo
Sponsored by
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring Pain, Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Tapentadol, Tapentadol Hydrochloride Extended Release

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of knee or low back pain continuing for at least 12 weeks before informed consent
  • Participants who did not achieve adequate analgesia (pain control) with routine treatment with an oral non-opioid analgesic (drug used to control pain) at its usual upper-limit dose or at an adequate fixed dose for at least 14 consecutive days during the 12 weeks before informed consent
  • Participants who have not experienced treatment with conventional opioids, except for short term use of opioid analgesics for treatment of post-operative acute pain more than 30 days before consent or temporary use of codeine phosphate or dihydrocodeine phosphate for purposes other than pain relief (e.g. for antitussive) more than 2 days before informed consent
  • Participants with average pain intensity score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during 48 hours before informed consent and are considered requiring opioid treatment by the Investigator
  • Participants who are able to visit the medical institutions throughout the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days before informed consent
  • Participants with current or a history of epilepsy or seizure disorders
  • Participants suspected with intracranial hypertension (e.g. traumatic encephalopathy)
  • Participants with uncontrolled or clinically significant arrhythmia (irregular heart rate)
  • Participants with moderate to severe liver dysfunction or severe renal dysfunction

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Tapentadol Hydrochloride

Placebo

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale. The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale. The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Percentage of participants with improvement in mean NRS score by greater than or equal to 30 percent or 50 percent in the last week from Baseline were considered as responders. Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale.
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale
The PGIC is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The response options are 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improve, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Physician's Global Assessment Scale assesses the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug for pain control on a 2-point scale of "effective" and "not effective".
Number of Participants With Presence of Pain Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Item 1 for presence of pain assesses the question: "Do you have any pain today other than everyday kinds of pain?" on a 2-point scale of "yes" or "no".
Number of Participants With 50 Percent Pain Relief Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Item 8 for efficacy of pain treatment assesses number of participants with at least 50 percent pain relief during the last 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 percent (no relief) to 100 percent (complete relief).
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Total Score at Week 12
BPI-sf consists of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Total score is defined as the mean scores from items 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 recorded on an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Negative change indicates an improvement in pain.
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Sleep Latency was addressed by the question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night?" and the change from Baseline in sleep latency was reported. Decrease in time indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Time Slept Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Time slept was addressed by the question: "How long did you sleep last night?" and the change from Baseline in time slept was reported.
Number of Participants With Awakenings Based on Sleep Questionnaire
Number of awakenings was addressed by the question: "How many times did you wake up during the night?'' and lesser number signified better sleep.
Number of Participants With Response Based on Overall Quality of Sleep Questionnaire
Overall quality of sleep was addressed by the question: "Please rate the overall quality of your sleep last night" and participants could choose one of the following options: excellent, good, fair or poor.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Scores at Week 12
SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Global Score at Week 12
WOMAC is a self administered 24-item questionnaire used to evaluate participants with osteoarthritis of the knee. It consists of 3 subscales: pain (5 items), joint stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Each item is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. The global score assesses pain, disability and joint stiffness and ranges from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate that a symptom is bothersome and physically disabling.
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score at Week 12
RDQ scale is used to assess the impact of low back pain on daily activities by participants. The scale consists of 24 item questionnaire with options as "Yes"/"No" where "Yes" is counted as 1 point. The total score ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

Full Information

First Posted
April 22, 2010
Last Updated
May 10, 2013
Sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01124604
Brief Title
An Efficacy and Safety Study for Tapentadol Extended Release (JNS024ER) in Chronic Pain Participants
Official Title
Phase II Study of JNS024ER in Japanese Subjects With Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Low Back Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and to explore the pharmacokinetics (how drugs are absorbed in the body, how they are distributed within the body and how they are removed from the body over time) of tapentadol hydrochloride extended release (ER) tablets in Japanese participants with moderate to severe chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (disorder in which the joints become painful and stiff) of knee or low back pain.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), multi-center (when more than one hospital or medical school team works on a medical research study), double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows the name of the assigned drug), placebo-control (participants are randomly assigned to a test treatment or to an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug), parallel-group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time) comparison study in participants with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of knee or low back pain. The study duration will be of 14 weeks, which consists of a screening period of 1 week during which the participants will be evaluated for study eligibility, a treatment period of 12 weeks and a follow-up period of 1 week. The treatment period will consist of titration period (from the initiation of the study treatment to determination of the individual's maintenance dose) and maintenance period (from completion of the titration period to the completion of the treatment period). An optimal dose (maintenance dose) will be determined for each participant during the titration period and the treatment will be continued at the maintenance dose to assess the efficacy and safety. Tapentadol hydrochloride ER tablets 25 to 250 milligram or placebo will be administered orally twice daily. Efficacy and safety of the participants will primarily be evaluated by change from baseline in average pain intensity score based on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS), respectively. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
Keywords
Pain, Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Tapentadol, Tapentadol Hydrochloride Extended Release

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
91 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tapentadol Hydrochloride
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tapentadol Hydrochloride
Intervention Description
Tapentadol hydrochloride extended release (ER) tablets 25 to 250 milligram (mg) will be administered orally twice daily for 12 weeks. Dose will be adjusted as per Investigator's discretion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo matched to tapentadol hydrochloride ER tablets 25 to 250 mg will be administered orally twice daily for 12 weeks. Dose will be adjusted as per Investigator's discretion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12
Description
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale. The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale. The mean pain intensity during the past 74 hours (3 days) was evaluated at Baseline and the mean pain intensity during the past 12 hours was evaluated at subsequent study visits.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Title
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
Percentage of participants with improvement in mean NRS score by greater than or equal to 30 percent or 50 percent in the last week from Baseline were considered as responders. Participants were asked to assess the average pain intensity on a 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable) by selecting a number applicable to their pain on the scale.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale
Description
The PGIC is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The response options are 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improve, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
Time Frame
Week 8, Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Description
Physician's Global Assessment Scale assesses the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug for pain control on a 2-point scale of "effective" and "not effective".
Time Frame
Week 8, Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Presence of Pain Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
Description
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Item 1 for presence of pain assesses the question: "Do you have any pain today other than everyday kinds of pain?" on a 2-point scale of "yes" or "no".
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With 50 Percent Pain Relief Based on Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Scale
Description
BPI-sf is a self-evaluated pain assessment form consisting of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Item 8 for efficacy of pain treatment assesses number of participants with at least 50 percent pain relief during the last 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 percent (no relief) to 100 percent (complete relief).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Total Score at Week 12
Description
BPI-sf consists of 15 items (item 1 - presence of pain, item 2 - pain location, items 3 to 6 - pain severity, item 7 - status of pain treatment, item 8 - efficacy of pain treatment, and items 9a to 9g - interference of pain with daily life). Total score is defined as the mean scores from items 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 recorded on an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Negative change indicates an improvement in pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Description
Sleep Latency was addressed by the question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night?" and the change from Baseline in sleep latency was reported. Decrease in time indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Time Slept Based on Sleep Questionnaire at Week 12
Description
Time slept was addressed by the question: "How long did you sleep last night?" and the change from Baseline in time slept was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Awakenings Based on Sleep Questionnaire
Description
Number of awakenings was addressed by the question: "How many times did you wake up during the night?'' and lesser number signified better sleep.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Response Based on Overall Quality of Sleep Questionnaire
Description
Overall quality of sleep was addressed by the question: "Please rate the overall quality of your sleep last night" and participants could choose one of the following options: excellent, good, fair or poor.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Scores at Week 12
Description
SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Global Score at Week 12
Description
WOMAC is a self administered 24-item questionnaire used to evaluate participants with osteoarthritis of the knee. It consists of 3 subscales: pain (5 items), joint stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Each item is assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. The global score assesses pain, disability and joint stiffness and ranges from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate that a symptom is bothersome and physically disabling.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score at Week 12
Description
RDQ scale is used to assess the impact of low back pain on daily activities by participants. The scale consists of 24 item questionnaire with options as "Yes"/"No" where "Yes" is counted as 1 point. The total score ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (COWS)
Description
COWS is an 11-item questionnaire for clinical assessment of withdrawal symptoms. Total score is calculated by adding the scores of all the 11-items. The severity of withdrawal symptoms is categorized using values of total score as: 0-4 = no withdrawal, 5-12 = mild, 13-24 = moderate, 25-36 = moderately severe, and 37-48 = severe withdrawal.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Serum Concentration of Tapentadol
Time Frame
Week 2, 4, 8, 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of knee or low back pain continuing for at least 12 weeks before informed consent Participants who did not achieve adequate analgesia (pain control) with routine treatment with an oral non-opioid analgesic (drug used to control pain) at its usual upper-limit dose or at an adequate fixed dose for at least 14 consecutive days during the 12 weeks before informed consent Participants who have not experienced treatment with conventional opioids, except for short term use of opioid analgesics for treatment of post-operative acute pain more than 30 days before consent or temporary use of codeine phosphate or dihydrocodeine phosphate for purposes other than pain relief (e.g. for antitussive) more than 2 days before informed consent Participants with average pain intensity score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during 48 hours before informed consent and are considered requiring opioid treatment by the Investigator Participants who are able to visit the medical institutions throughout the study period Exclusion Criteria: Participants who are taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days before informed consent Participants with current or a history of epilepsy or seizure disorders Participants suspected with intracranial hypertension (e.g. traumatic encephalopathy) Participants with uncontrolled or clinically significant arrhythmia (irregular heart rate) Participants with moderate to severe liver dysfunction or severe renal dysfunction
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Aichi
Country
Japan
City
Amagasaki
Country
Japan
City
Chiba N/A
Country
Japan
City
Chiba
Country
Japan
City
Chikushi
Country
Japan
City
Edogawa
Country
Japan
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
City
Fukushima
Country
Japan
City
Hiratsuka
Country
Japan
City
Kawasaki
Country
Japan
City
Koto
Country
Japan
City
Matsudo
Country
Japan
City
Meguro
Country
Japan
City
Minato-Ku
Country
Japan
City
Niigata N/A
Country
Japan
City
Niigata
Country
Japan
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
City
Sagamihara
Country
Japan
City
Shibuya
Country
Japan
City
Shinjuku-Ku
Country
Japan
City
Toshima-Ku
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

An Efficacy and Safety Study for Tapentadol Extended Release (JNS024ER) in Chronic Pain Participants

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs