search
Back to results

An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Neuropathy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
E2007 (2 mg)
E2007 (4 mg)
E2007 (6 mg)
E2007 (8 mg)
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Neuropathy focused on measuring Diabetic neuropathy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

To be included, patients must meet all of the following:

  1. Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures
  2. Male and female patients ≥18 years of age will be eligible for enrollment. Females should be either not of childbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device [IUD]) for at least 1 month before Screening (Visit 1) and for 1 month after the end of the study (Visit 8). They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) at Screening (Visit 1). Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD) starting with the Baseline Phase and continuing throughout the study period.
  3. Have Type I or Type II diabetes with painful, distal, symmetrical, sensory-motor neuropathy attributed to diabetes, of at least 12 months duration
  4. Have pain that has been stable over the past 6 months and, in the opinion of the investigator, not in an identifiably improving or worsening trend
  5. Have hemoglobin A1c ≤ 11%
  6. Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Screening (Visit 1) and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization)
  7. Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2)
  8. Have average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert-type numeric rating scale during the 7 days prior to Baseline (to be obtained from the patient diary)
  9. Be reliable, willing, and able to cooperate with all study procedures including the following:

    1. accurately fill out the diary on a daily basis
    2. return for study visits on the required dates
    3. accurately and reliably report symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms)
    4. take study drug as required by protocol
  10. Be on stable antidiabetic treatment (insulin, oral agents, or lifestyle) that is not anticipated to change during the course of the study, except if medically required
  11. Be on stable analgesic treatment (same medication and dose) or stable nonpharmacological pain treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening (Visit 1) and remain on this stable treatment throughout the study (unless otherwise directed by a physician). Nonpharmacologic pain treatment includes the following: relaxation/hypnosis, physical or occupational therapy, counseling, etc. Episodic or periodic treatments such as monthly injections for treatment of pain (e.g., local anesthetics) will not be permitted.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Patients with any one of the following will be excluded.

  1. Patients with any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study or confound efficacy evaluations including the following:

    1. Pain or neuropathy from another cause (including central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc.)
    2. Skin or soft-tissue lesions in the area affected by neuropathy that are painful or could alter sensation
    3. Amputation, other than toes
  2. Patients motivated by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional pain relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined by the patient's medical history.
  3. Patients with clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine (other than diabetes), or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories:

    1. Systemic infections (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis, tuberculosis [TB], syphilis)
    2. History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria
    3. History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months
    4. Active cancer within the previous 5 years
    5. Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years
    6. History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years
  4. Patients with any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2):

    1. Clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTc ≥ 450 msec)
    2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
    3. White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 2500/μL, absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1000/μL, platelet count < 100,000
    4. Positive urine drug screen for drugs of abuse, except those prescribed by a properly licensed practitioner (e.g., opioids such as codeine for neuropathic pain)
    5. Other clinically significant laboratory values
  5. Exposure to an investigational drug (including E2007) within the 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) or any prior exposure to E2007.

Sites / Locations

  • Dr. Richard Blonsky

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo

Perampanel 2mg

Perampanel 4mg

Perampanel 6mg

Perampanel 8mg

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline to Week 15/End of Treatment (EOT)
Average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF).
Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 30% Reduction in Pain Score
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.
Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 50% Reduction in Pain Score
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.
Mean Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline at Each Study Week
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Last on-treatment value refers to last 7 days of available diary data while subject was on double-blind study drug.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Average Sleep Interference Scores From Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for sleep interference (0=pain did not interfere with sleep, to 10=pain completely interfered with sleep [unable to sleep]). Based on modified BOCF.
Change in Short Form - McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) From Baseline to Week 15/EOT
SF-MPQ sensory score = sum of intensity scores for descriptors 1-11 (throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting). Each descriptor scored as 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, or 3=severe. Range of possible sensory scores, 0 to 33, with a score of 33 being the most severe intensity.
Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT
At the EOT (Visit 7) or Early Withdrawal Visit (as appropriate), the subject assessed his/her status compared to how they felt before entering the study. This assessment included an evaluation of pain frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and overall functional status using a 7-point scale where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. Using Modified BOCF.
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Scores
Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) measuring limitations in Physical Components including physical activities, usual role activities (due to physical problems), measuring bodily pain, general health perceptions, and Mental Components including social activities, usual role activities (due to emotional problems), vitality (energy and fatigue. Each of the 8 domains are described by a score ranging from 0 to 100, for a range of total possible scores of 0-400 for physical and 0-400 for mental. Higher scores reflect better subject status.
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety and Depression Subscale Scores
HADS anxiety subscale score=sum of scores for 7 anxiety items, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse anxiety. Range of possible HADS anxiety subscale scores, 0 to 21. HADS depression subscale score=sum of scores for 7 depression items, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse depression. Range of possible HADS depression subscale scores, 0 to 21.
Withdrawal Due to Treatment Failure During Double-Blind Dosing Period
Based on data reported on the End of Study case report form (CRF): If a subject terminated the study early during the Double-blind Dosing Period due to 'lack of therapeutic efficacy,' the subject was counted as a withdrawal due to treatment failure.
Presence or Absence of Allodynia at Week 15/EOT
Investigators rated subjects' allodynia as mild, moderate, severe, or not present. The presence of allodynia (yes/no) at Week 15/EOT was analyzed.
Analysis of Rescue Analgesic Medication Use (Acetaminophen) During Double-Blind Dosing Period
If acetaminophen was not reported on the Pain Therapy CRF or on the Concomitant Medication CRF, it was assumed that the subject did not use rescue analgesic medication.

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2007
Last Updated
June 26, 2014
Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Eisai Limited
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00505284
Brief Title
An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Eisai Limited

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Perampanel in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. This is a 5-arm, 21-week study comprised of up to a 2-week Screening period, a 15-week Dose-Escalation and Maintenance Phase using 4 doses of E2007 (2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, and 8 mg) or placebo, and a 4-week, single-blind placebo Follow-Up Phase. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the five treatment groups. Those patients assigned to receive either 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg E2007 will be escalated to the appropriate dose according to an escalation schedule. All patients will take four identical-looking tablets on a daily basis for the entire study duration for blinding purposes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Neuropathy
Keywords
Diabetic neuropathy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
352 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
Perampanel 2mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Perampanel 4mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Perampanel 6mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Perampanel 8mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo tablets, once daily, for 15 weeks (taken orally).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
E2007 (2 mg)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Perampanel
Intervention Description
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily, for 15 weeks (taken orally).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
E2007 (4 mg)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Perampanel
Intervention Description
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by 4 mg, once daily, for 12 weeks (taken orally).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
E2007 (6 mg)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Perampanel
Intervention Description
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by 4 mg once daily, for three weeks and 6 mg, once daily, for nine weeks (taken orally).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
E2007 (8 mg)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Perampanel
Intervention Description
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily, for three weeks, followed by 4 mg, once daily for three weeks, 6 mg once daily for three weeks and 8 mg, once daily, for six weeks (taken orally).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline to Week 15/End of Treatment (EOT)
Description
Average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF).
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Title
Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 30% Reduction in Pain Score
Description
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Title
Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 50% Reduction in Pain Score
Description
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Title
Mean Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline at Each Study Week
Description
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Last on-treatment value refers to last 7 days of available diary data while subject was on double-blind study drug.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1 to Week 17
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Average Sleep Interference Scores From Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Description
Average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for sleep interference (0=pain did not interfere with sleep, to 10=pain completely interfered with sleep [unable to sleep]). Based on modified BOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Title
Change in Short Form - McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) From Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Description
SF-MPQ sensory score = sum of intensity scores for descriptors 1-11 (throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting). Each descriptor scored as 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, or 3=severe. Range of possible sensory scores, 0 to 33, with a score of 33 being the most severe intensity.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15/EOT
Title
Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT
Description
At the EOT (Visit 7) or Early Withdrawal Visit (as appropriate), the subject assessed his/her status compared to how they felt before entering the study. This assessment included an evaluation of pain frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and overall functional status using a 7-point scale where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. Using Modified BOCF.
Time Frame
Week 15/EOT
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Scores
Description
Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) measuring limitations in Physical Components including physical activities, usual role activities (due to physical problems), measuring bodily pain, general health perceptions, and Mental Components including social activities, usual role activities (due to emotional problems), vitality (energy and fatigue. Each of the 8 domains are described by a score ranging from 0 to 100, for a range of total possible scores of 0-400 for physical and 0-400 for mental. Higher scores reflect better subject status.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15/EOT
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety and Depression Subscale Scores
Description
HADS anxiety subscale score=sum of scores for 7 anxiety items, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse anxiety. Range of possible HADS anxiety subscale scores, 0 to 21. HADS depression subscale score=sum of scores for 7 depression items, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse depression. Range of possible HADS depression subscale scores, 0 to 21.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15/EOT
Title
Withdrawal Due to Treatment Failure During Double-Blind Dosing Period
Description
Based on data reported on the End of Study case report form (CRF): If a subject terminated the study early during the Double-blind Dosing Period due to 'lack of therapeutic efficacy,' the subject was counted as a withdrawal due to treatment failure.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 15
Title
Presence or Absence of Allodynia at Week 15/EOT
Description
Investigators rated subjects' allodynia as mild, moderate, severe, or not present. The presence of allodynia (yes/no) at Week 15/EOT was analyzed.
Time Frame
Week 15/EOT
Title
Analysis of Rescue Analgesic Medication Use (Acetaminophen) During Double-Blind Dosing Period
Description
If acetaminophen was not reported on the Pain Therapy CRF or on the Concomitant Medication CRF, it was assumed that the subject did not use rescue analgesic medication.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 15

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA: To be included, patients must meet all of the following: Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures Male and female patients ≥18 years of age will be eligible for enrollment. Females should be either not of childbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device [IUD]) for at least 1 month before Screening (Visit 1) and for 1 month after the end of the study (Visit 8). They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) at Screening (Visit 1). Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD) starting with the Baseline Phase and continuing throughout the study period. Have Type I or Type II diabetes with painful, distal, symmetrical, sensory-motor neuropathy attributed to diabetes, of at least 12 months duration Have pain that has been stable over the past 6 months and, in the opinion of the investigator, not in an identifiably improving or worsening trend Have hemoglobin A1c ≤ 11% Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Screening (Visit 1) and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization) Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2) Have average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert-type numeric rating scale during the 7 days prior to Baseline (to be obtained from the patient diary) Be reliable, willing, and able to cooperate with all study procedures including the following: accurately fill out the diary on a daily basis return for study visits on the required dates accurately and reliably report symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms) take study drug as required by protocol Be on stable antidiabetic treatment (insulin, oral agents, or lifestyle) that is not anticipated to change during the course of the study, except if medically required Be on stable analgesic treatment (same medication and dose) or stable nonpharmacological pain treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening (Visit 1) and remain on this stable treatment throughout the study (unless otherwise directed by a physician). Nonpharmacologic pain treatment includes the following: relaxation/hypnosis, physical or occupational therapy, counseling, etc. Episodic or periodic treatments such as monthly injections for treatment of pain (e.g., local anesthetics) will not be permitted. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with any one of the following will be excluded. Patients with any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study or confound efficacy evaluations including the following: Pain or neuropathy from another cause (including central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc.) Skin or soft-tissue lesions in the area affected by neuropathy that are painful or could alter sensation Amputation, other than toes Patients motivated by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional pain relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined by the patient's medical history. Patients with clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine (other than diabetes), or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories: Systemic infections (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis, tuberculosis [TB], syphilis) History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months Active cancer within the previous 5 years Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years Patients with any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2): Clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTc ≥ 450 msec) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 2500/μL, absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1000/μL, platelet count < 100,000 Positive urine drug screen for drugs of abuse, except those prescribed by a properly licensed practitioner (e.g., opioids such as codeine for neuropathic pain) Other clinically significant laboratory values Exposure to an investigational drug (including E2007) within the 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) or any prior exposure to E2007.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antonio Laurenza, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Eisai Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dr. Richard Blonsky
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60610
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs