search
Back to results

An Extension Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Efficacy and Long-term Treatment Effect of Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS) in Adults and Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) (ORBIT2)

Primary Purpose

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS)
Placebo
Sponsored by
Shire
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

Eligibility Criteria

11 Years - 55 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject completed SHP621-301 induction study.
  2. Subject is able to provide written informed consent (subject, parent or legal guardian and, as appropriate, subject assent) to participate in the study before completing any study-related procedures.
  3. Subject is male or female aged 11-55 years, inclusive, at time of consent for SHP621-301 study.
  4. Subject is willing and able to continue any dietary therapy, environmental therapy, and/or medical regimens (including gastric acid suppression; see exclusions below) in effect at the screening visit (Visit 0). There should be no changes to these regimens during study participation.
  5. All female subjects must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG]) prior to enrollment into the study. Females of childbearing potential must agree to continue acceptable birth control measures (eg, abstinence, stable oral contraceptives, or double-barrier methods) throughout study participation and for 30 days following the last dose of investigational product.
  6. Subject is willing and has an understanding and ability to fully comply with study procedures including DSQ compliance (completed the DSQ on ≥70% of days in any 2 consecutive weeks of the screening period)and restrictions defined in this protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has changes in medications that could affect the study or diet in the weeks since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study.
  2. Subject using immunomodulatory therapy since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated use of immunomodulatory therapy during the treatment period (except for any ongoing regimen of allergy shots); any temporary use (≤7 days) or initiation of new steroid treatment during the study should be documented and discussed with the medical monitor prospectively but cannot occur within 4 weeks of scheduled EGDs.
  3. Subject using swallowed topical corticosteroid for EoE or systemic corticosteroid for any condition since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated use during the treatment period; any temporary use (≤7 days) or initiation of new steroid treatment during the study should be documented and discussed with medical monitor prospectively but cannot occur within the 4 weeks of the scheduled EGDs.
  4. Subject on inhaled or intranasal steroids and not on a stable dose between the baseline visit (Visit 1) of the SHP621-301 study and the screening EGD of this study.
  5. Subject has initiated, discontinued, or changed dosage regimen of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), H2 antagonists, antacids, antihistamines, or leukotriene inhibitors for any condition (such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, asthma or allergic rhinitis) since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated changes in the use of such medications during the treatment period.
  6. Subject using Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (eg, ketoconazole, grapefruit juice) since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated use of such medications during the treatment period.
  7. Subject has an appearance on screening EGD of an esophageal stricture (high grade), as defined by the presence of a lesion that does not allow passage of a diagnostic adult upper endoscope (eg, with an insertion tube diameter of >9mm).
  8. Subject is on a pure liquid diet or the six-food elimination diet.
  9. Subject has presence of esophageal varices at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study.
  10. Subject has any current disease of the gastrointestinal tract, aside from EoE, including eosinophilic gastritis, enteritis, colitis, or proctitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or celiac disease.
  11. Subject has other diseases causing or associated with esophageal eosinophilia, including hypereosinophilic syndrome, collagen vascular disease, vasculitis, achalasia, or parasitic infection.
  12. Subject has oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis that failed to respond to previous treatment.

    Diagnosis with oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis at or since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study is not an exclusion as long as the subject received treatment for candidiasis and is expected to respond to treatment.

  13. Subject has acute or chronic infection or immunodeficiency condition, including tuberculosis, fungal, bacterial, viral/parasite infection, ocular herpes simplex, or chicken pox/measles.
  14. Subject has upper gastrointestinal bleeding identified in the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study.
  15. Subject has evidence of active infection with Helicobacter pylori.
  16. Subject has evidence of unstable asthma since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study.
  17. Subject is female and pregnant or nursing.
  18. Subject has a history of intolerance, hypersensitivity, or idiosyncratic reaction to budesonide (or any other corticosteroids), or to any other ingredients of the study medication.
  19. Subject has a history or high risk of noncompliance with treatment or regular clinic visits.
  20. Subject is on sucralfate or anticipates using sucralfate during the treatment period.

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital
  • Phoenix Childrens Hospital
  • Del Sol Research Management
  • Adobe Clinical Research LLC
  • Arkansas Gastroenterology
  • GW Research, Inc.
  • Rady Children's Hospital San Diego
  • Colorado Children's Hospital
  • Asthma and Allergy Associates PC
  • Rocky Mountain Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Connecticut Clinical Research Foundation
  • Connecticut GI, PC - Research Division
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center
  • Nature Coast Clinical Research LLC
  • Arnold Palmer Hospital For Children
  • Children's Center for Digestive Health Care
  • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC
  • Grand Teton Research Group, PLLC
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Pediatric Subspecialty Clinic
  • Indiana University
  • Aquiant Research
  • Gastroenterology of Southern Indiana
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
  • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center
  • Gastroenterology Associates LLC
  • Clinical Trials Management LLC
  • Louisiana Research Center LLC
  • Clinical Trials of America LA LLC - PPDS
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • Brigham and Womens Hospital
  • University of Michigan
  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan
  • Minnesota Gastroenterology PA
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital
  • Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group LLP
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
  • Asheville Gastroenterology Associates PA
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Clinical Research of Charlotte
  • Clinical Trials of America-NC, LLC - PPDS
  • Consultants For Clinical Research Inc
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Consultants PC
  • Great Lakes Gastroenterology
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Greenville Hospital System
  • Gastro One
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • San Antonio Military Medical Center
  • Houston Endoscopy and Research Center
  • Digestive Health Center
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants
  • Primary Children's Hospital
  • Advanced Research Institute
  • Emeritas Research Group
  • Blue Ridge Medical Research
  • Carilion Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Arms A OBS Completers/ Responders

Arm B OBS Completers/ Responders

Arm C OBS Completers/ Non-Responders

Arm D Placebo Completers

Arm Description

Arm A Oral Budesonide Suspension Completers/ Responders

Arm B Oral Budesonide Suspension Completers/ Responders. 1:1 randomization for Arms A and B

Arm C Oral Budesonide Suspension Completers/ Non-Responders

Arm D Placebo Completers

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Participants Who Had Relapse During the Entire Week 36 Period
Relapse (Yes/No) was defined as meeting both the eosinophil histology relapse criterion and the dysphagia symptom relapse criterion. Eosinophil histology relapse was defined as an eosinophil count of greater than or equal to(> or =) 15 per high-power field (eos/hpf) from at least 2 of 3 levels of the esophagus. Dysphagia symptom relapse was defined as having at least 4 days of dysphagia (with answer 'Yes' for question 2 in DSQ [Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire]) in the 2-week period prior to the scheduled visit, as determined by the DSQ.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Participants With Long-term Treatment Response From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Long-term response from SHP621-301 baseline defined: histologic response,defined as peak eosinophil count of less than or equal to(< or =)6/HPF across all available esophageal levels at Week 36 and Dysphagia symptom response 1,defined as >or= 30 percent(%) reduction in DSQ combined score(Questions [Q] 2+3) from baseline of SHP621-301 to Week 36.DSQcontain 4 questions,all participants used diary,responded to Q1(didyoueatsolid food),Q2(did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was No,diary ended for day. If participant answered Yes,he/she advanced to Q3(didyouhavetodoanything to make food go downorget relief), Q4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing).DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data.Scale range was0-2 forQ2 and 0-4 forQ 3.Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84.Highervaluesrepresentingworseoutcome.Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants With Long-term Treatment Response From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Long-term response from baseline defined: histologic response, defined as peak eosinophil count of less than or equal to(< or =) 6/HPF across all available esophageal levels at Week 36 and Dysphagia symptom response 1,defined as >or= 30 percent(%) reduction in DSQ combined score (Questions [Q] 2+3) from baseline of SHP621-301 to Week 36.DSQcontain 4 questions,all participants used diary,responded to Q1(did you eat solid food),Q2(did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was No,diary ended for day. If participant answered Yes,he/she advanced to Q3(didyouhavetodoanything to make food go downorget relief), Q4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing).DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data.Scale range was0-2 forQ2 and 0-4 forQ 3.Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing worse outcome.Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had a Histologic Response (Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (<or=6)/High-Powered Field [HPF]) at Week 12 and Week 36
Histology response was defined as a peak eosinophil count of <or=6/HPF across all available levels at Week 12 and Week 36.
Proportion of Participants Who Had at Least a 30 Percent (%) Change in DSQ Combined Score From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Dysphagia symptom response with respect to the baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) was defined as 30% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions 2+3) at Week 12 and Week 36 of current study from baseline of the induction study. DSQ contain 4 questions, all participants used a diary and responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was No, then diary ended for that day. If participant answered Yes,he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing worse outcome. Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had at Least a 30 Percent (%) Change in DSQ Combined Score From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Dysphagia symptom response with respect to the baseline of current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) was defined as 30% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions 2+3) at Week 12 and Week 36 from baseline of the current study. DSQ contain 4 questions, all participants used diary and responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was "No", then diary ended for that day. If participant answered "Yes",he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q 3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing a worse outcome. A Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in Total Endoscopy Score at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Endoscopic findings with separate evaluations of the proximal and distal esophagus were recorded with respect to 5 categories: 1) exudates or plaques (grade 0-2); 2) fixed esophageal rings (grade 0-3); 3) edema (grade 0-2); 4) furrows (grade 0-2); and 5) strictures (grade 0-1). An endoscopy score for each category was calculated and summed for each anatomic location (proximal and distal). The minimum and maximum endoscopy score was 0 and 10 points respectively for each location (proximal and distal) and the total endoscopy score was the sum of the scores for the proximal and distal locations (maximum total score of 20 points respectively). The higher score indicated worse appearance. A negative change from baseline indicates that appearance improved.
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in Total Endoscopy Score at Week 12 and Week 36
Endoscopic findings with separate evaluations of the proximal and distal esophagus were recorded with respect to 5 categories: 1) exudates or plaques (grade 0-2); 2) fixed esophageal rings (grade 0-3); 3) edema (grade 0-2); 4) furrows (grade 0-2); and 5) strictures (grade 0-1). An endoscopy score for each category was calculated and summed for each anatomic location (proximal and distal). The minimum and maximum endoscopy score was 0 and 10 points respectively for each location (proximal and distal) and the total endoscopy score was the sum of the scores for the proximal and distal locations (maximum total score of 20 points respectively). The higher score indicated worse appearance. A negative change from baseline indicates that appearance improved.
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Change from induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) baseline in peak eosinophil count at Week 12 and Week 36 of current study was reported.
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count at Week 12 and Week 36
Change from current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) baseline in peak eosinophil count at Week 12 and Week 36 was reported.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Peak Eosinophil Count Less Than (<) 15/High-Powered Field (HPF) at Week 12 and Week 36
Proportion of participants who had Peak Eosinophil Count less than (<) 15/HPF at Week 12 and Week 36 were reported.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Peak Eosinophil Count Less Than or Equal to (< or =) 1/High-Powered Field (HPF) at Week 12 and Week 36
Proportion of participants who had Peak Eosinophil Count less than or equal to (< or =) 1/High-Powered Field (HPF) at Week 12 and Week 36 were reported.
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count for Each Available Esophageal Level (Proximal, Mid, and Distal) at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Change from induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) baseline in peak eosinophil count for each available esophageal level (proximal, mid, distal) at Week 12 and Week 36 of current study were reported.
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count for Each Available Esophageal Level (Proximal, Mid, and Distal) at Week 12 and Week 36
Change from current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) baseline in peak eosinophil count for each available esophageal level (proximal, mid, distal) at Week 12 and Week 36 were reported.
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in the Histopathologic Epithelial Features Combined Total Score (Grade and Stage) at Week 12 an Week 36 of Current Study
Eight histopathologic epithelial features (basal layer hyperplasia, eosinophil peak, abscesses, surface layering, dilated intercellular spaces, surface alteration, dyskeratotic epithelial cells, lamina propria fibrosis) are scored on a 4-point scale (0=normal, 3=worst) for both the severity of the abnormality (i.e., grade) and the amount of tissue affected by the abnormality (i.e. stage). Thus each of the 3 levels had a minimum score of 0 and maximum possible score of 24, and a possible total grade or stage score of 72 for a maximum combined score of 144. Combined total score ratio (TSR) =(proximal TSR + mid TSR + distal TSR)/N, where N is the number of non missing sections for TSR. A negative change from baseline indicates that epithelial inflammation decreased.
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in the Histopathologic Epithelial Features Combined Total Score (Grade and Stage) at Week 12 and Week 36
Eight histopathologic epithelial features (basal layer hyperplasia, eosinophil peak, abscesses, surface layering, dilated intercellular spaces, surface alteration, dyskeratotic epithelial cells, lamina propria fibrosis) are scored on a 4-point scale (0=normal, 3=worst) for both the severity of the abnormality (i.e., grade) and the amount of tissue affected by the abnormality (i.e. stage). Thus each of the 3 levels had a minimum score of 0 and maximum possible score of 24, and a possible total grade or stage score of 72 for a maximum combined score of 144. Combined total score ratio (TSR) =(proximal TSR + mid TSR + distal TSR)/N, where N is the number of non missing sections for TSR. A negative change from baseline indicates that epithelial inflammation decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Greater Than or Equal to (>or=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in DSQ Combined Score From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Dysphagia symptom response from the baseline of SHP621-301, was defined as >or=50% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions [Q] 2+3) from baseline of the induction study at Week 12 and 36 of current study. DSQ contained 4Q, all participants used diary, and responded to Q1(did you eat solid food) and Q2(didfood passslowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3(did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and 4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Anegative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Greater Than or Equal to (>or=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in DSQ Combined Score From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Dysphagia symptom response from the baseline of SHP621-302, was defined as >or=50% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions 2+3) from baseline of the induction study at Week 36 of current study. DSQ contained 4Q, all participants used diary, and responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food) and Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and 4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
DSQ contain 4 questions (Q), all participants used a diary, responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief), Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing a worse outcome. A Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
DSQ contain 4 questions, all participants used a diary, responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief), Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing a worse outcome. A Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased. Change in DSQ combined score (Questions 2+3) from baseline of current study at Week 36 was reported.
Percent Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Percent change in DSQ combined score from Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) baseline to current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) final treatment period (Week 36) was reported.
Percent Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Percent change in DSQ combined score from baseline to final treatment period (Week 36) of current study was reported.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response I From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Overall binary response I was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 30% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline of the induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response I From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Overall binary response I was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 30% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response II From Induction Study SHP621-301 (NCT02605837) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Overall binary response II was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 50% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline of the SHP621-301 study at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response II From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Overall binary response II was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 30% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Change in the DSQ + Pain Score (Questions 2+3+4) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Question 2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Questions 3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ + pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to questions 2, 3, and 4 by using following formula: DSQ + pain score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3+4 in the daily DSQ] ×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2, 0 - 4 for question 3 and 0 - 4 for question 4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ + pain score was 0 - 140, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Change in the DSQ+ Pain Score (Questions 2+3+4) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions (Q) 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ + pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to Questions 2, 3, and 4. Question 1 was excluded from the DSQ + pain score. DSQ + pain score=(Sum of points from questions 2+3+4 in the daily DSQ)*14 Days/Number of dairies reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for Q2, 0 - 4 for Q3 and 0 - 4 for Q4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ + pain score was 0 - 140, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Change in the DSQ Pain Score (Question 4) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Question 2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Questions 3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to Question 4 only. DSQ pain score=(sum of points from questions 4 in the daily DSQ)*14 days/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 4 for question 4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ pain score was 0 - 56, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Change in the DSQ Pain Score (Question 4) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Question 2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Questions 3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to Question 4 only. DSQ pain score=(sum of points from questions 4 in the daily DSQ)*14 days/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 4 for question 4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ pain score was 0 - 56, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE's)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that started or deteriorated on or after the date of the first dose of double-blind IP in SHP621-302 and through the safety follow-up contact, or 31 days after the last dose of IP for participants who did not have a safety follow-up contact.
Change in DXA (Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) Imaging Results (Location: Lumbar Spine [L1-L4]) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Baseline of SHP621-301 is determined at Week 0 in the SHP621-301 study. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of L1-L4 were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Change in DXA Imaging Results (Location: Lumbar Spine [L1-L4]) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of L1-L4 were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Change in DXA Imaging Results (Location: Whole Body) From Baseline of Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) at Week 36 of Current Study
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Baseline of SHP621-301 is determined at Week 0 in the SHP621-301 study. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of whole body (except head) were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Change in DXA Imaging Results (Location: Whole Body) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of whole body (except head) were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.

Full Information

First Posted
March 22, 2016
Last Updated
December 18, 2020
Sponsor
Shire
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02736409
Brief Title
An Extension Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Efficacy and Long-term Treatment Effect of Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS) in Adults and Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Acronym
ORBIT2
Official Title
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind Extension Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Efficacy of Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS) and Long-term Treatment Effect of OBS in Adolescent and Adult Subjects (11 to 55 Years of Age, Inclusive) With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 12, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 12, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Shire

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, double- blind extension study of Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS) in adults and adolescents (11 to 55 years of age, inclusive) with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) who have completed participation in the SHP621-301 induction study (NCT02605837). The primary objective is to evaluate the maintenance of efficacy of OBS over 36 weeks. Maintenance of efficacy will be measured by the peak eosinophilic count and Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) score.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
219 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arms A OBS Completers/ Responders
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Arm A Oral Budesonide Suspension Completers/ Responders
Arm Title
Arm B OBS Completers/ Responders
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Arm B Oral Budesonide Suspension Completers/ Responders. 1:1 randomization for Arms A and B
Arm Title
Arm C OBS Completers/ Non-Responders
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Arm C Oral Budesonide Suspension Completers/ Non-Responders
Arm Title
Arm D Placebo Completers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Arm D Placebo Completers
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS)
Intervention Description
OBS 2mg twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching Placebo dose
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Relapse During the Entire Week 36 Period
Description
Relapse (Yes/No) was defined as meeting both the eosinophil histology relapse criterion and the dysphagia symptom relapse criterion. Eosinophil histology relapse was defined as an eosinophil count of greater than or equal to(> or =) 15 per high-power field (eos/hpf) from at least 2 of 3 levels of the esophagus. Dysphagia symptom relapse was defined as having at least 4 days of dysphagia (with answer 'Yes' for question 2 in DSQ [Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire]) in the 2-week period prior to the scheduled visit, as determined by the DSQ.
Time Frame
Week 36
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Participants With Long-term Treatment Response From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Long-term response from SHP621-301 baseline defined: histologic response,defined as peak eosinophil count of less than or equal to(< or =)6/HPF across all available esophageal levels at Week 36 and Dysphagia symptom response 1,defined as >or= 30 percent(%) reduction in DSQ combined score(Questions [Q] 2+3) from baseline of SHP621-301 to Week 36.DSQcontain 4 questions,all participants used diary,responded to Q1(didyoueatsolid food),Q2(did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was No,diary ended for day. If participant answered Yes,he/she advanced to Q3(didyouhavetodoanything to make food go downorget relief), Q4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing).DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data.Scale range was0-2 forQ2 and 0-4 forQ 3.Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84.Highervaluesrepresentingworseoutcome.Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants With Long-term Treatment Response From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
Long-term response from baseline defined: histologic response, defined as peak eosinophil count of less than or equal to(< or =) 6/HPF across all available esophageal levels at Week 36 and Dysphagia symptom response 1,defined as >or= 30 percent(%) reduction in DSQ combined score (Questions [Q] 2+3) from baseline of SHP621-301 to Week 36.DSQcontain 4 questions,all participants used diary,responded to Q1(did you eat solid food),Q2(did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was No,diary ended for day. If participant answered Yes,he/she advanced to Q3(didyouhavetodoanything to make food go downorget relief), Q4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing).DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data.Scale range was0-2 forQ2 and 0-4 forQ 3.Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing worse outcome.Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had a Histologic Response (Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (<or=6)/High-Powered Field [HPF]) at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Histology response was defined as a peak eosinophil count of <or=6/HPF across all available levels at Week 12 and Week 36.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had at Least a 30 Percent (%) Change in DSQ Combined Score From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Dysphagia symptom response with respect to the baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) was defined as 30% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions 2+3) at Week 12 and Week 36 of current study from baseline of the induction study. DSQ contain 4 questions, all participants used a diary and responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was No, then diary ended for that day. If participant answered Yes,he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing worse outcome. Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of SHP621-301 (NCT02605837), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had at Least a 30 Percent (%) Change in DSQ Combined Score From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Dysphagia symptom response with respect to the baseline of current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) was defined as 30% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions 2+3) at Week 12 and Week 36 from baseline of the current study. DSQ contain 4 questions, all participants used diary and responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was "No", then diary ended for that day. If participant answered "Yes",he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q 3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing a worse outcome. A Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in Total Endoscopy Score at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Endoscopic findings with separate evaluations of the proximal and distal esophagus were recorded with respect to 5 categories: 1) exudates or plaques (grade 0-2); 2) fixed esophageal rings (grade 0-3); 3) edema (grade 0-2); 4) furrows (grade 0-2); and 5) strictures (grade 0-1). An endoscopy score for each category was calculated and summed for each anatomic location (proximal and distal). The minimum and maximum endoscopy score was 0 and 10 points respectively for each location (proximal and distal) and the total endoscopy score was the sum of the scores for the proximal and distal locations (maximum total score of 20 points respectively). The higher score indicated worse appearance. A negative change from baseline indicates that appearance improved.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in Total Endoscopy Score at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Endoscopic findings with separate evaluations of the proximal and distal esophagus were recorded with respect to 5 categories: 1) exudates or plaques (grade 0-2); 2) fixed esophageal rings (grade 0-3); 3) edema (grade 0-2); 4) furrows (grade 0-2); and 5) strictures (grade 0-1). An endoscopy score for each category was calculated and summed for each anatomic location (proximal and distal). The minimum and maximum endoscopy score was 0 and 10 points respectively for each location (proximal and distal) and the total endoscopy score was the sum of the scores for the proximal and distal locations (maximum total score of 20 points respectively). The higher score indicated worse appearance. A negative change from baseline indicates that appearance improved.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Change from induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) baseline in peak eosinophil count at Week 12 and Week 36 of current study was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Change from current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) baseline in peak eosinophil count at Week 12 and Week 36 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Peak Eosinophil Count Less Than (<) 15/High-Powered Field (HPF) at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Proportion of participants who had Peak Eosinophil Count less than (<) 15/HPF at Week 12 and Week 36 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Peak Eosinophil Count Less Than or Equal to (< or =) 1/High-Powered Field (HPF) at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Proportion of participants who had Peak Eosinophil Count less than or equal to (< or =) 1/High-Powered Field (HPF) at Week 12 and Week 36 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count for Each Available Esophageal Level (Proximal, Mid, and Distal) at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Change from induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) baseline in peak eosinophil count for each available esophageal level (proximal, mid, distal) at Week 12 and Week 36 of current study were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count for Each Available Esophageal Level (Proximal, Mid, and Distal) at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Change from current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) baseline in peak eosinophil count for each available esophageal level (proximal, mid, distal) at Week 12 and Week 36 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline in the Histopathologic Epithelial Features Combined Total Score (Grade and Stage) at Week 12 an Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Eight histopathologic epithelial features (basal layer hyperplasia, eosinophil peak, abscesses, surface layering, dilated intercellular spaces, surface alteration, dyskeratotic epithelial cells, lamina propria fibrosis) are scored on a 4-point scale (0=normal, 3=worst) for both the severity of the abnormality (i.e., grade) and the amount of tissue affected by the abnormality (i.e. stage). Thus each of the 3 levels had a minimum score of 0 and maximum possible score of 24, and a possible total grade or stage score of 72 for a maximum combined score of 144. Combined total score ratio (TSR) =(proximal TSR + mid TSR + distal TSR)/N, where N is the number of non missing sections for TSR. A negative change from baseline indicates that epithelial inflammation decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline in the Histopathologic Epithelial Features Combined Total Score (Grade and Stage) at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Eight histopathologic epithelial features (basal layer hyperplasia, eosinophil peak, abscesses, surface layering, dilated intercellular spaces, surface alteration, dyskeratotic epithelial cells, lamina propria fibrosis) are scored on a 4-point scale (0=normal, 3=worst) for both the severity of the abnormality (i.e., grade) and the amount of tissue affected by the abnormality (i.e. stage). Thus each of the 3 levels had a minimum score of 0 and maximum possible score of 24, and a possible total grade or stage score of 72 for a maximum combined score of 144. Combined total score ratio (TSR) =(proximal TSR + mid TSR + distal TSR)/N, where N is the number of non missing sections for TSR. A negative change from baseline indicates that epithelial inflammation decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Greater Than or Equal to (>or=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in DSQ Combined Score From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Dysphagia symptom response from the baseline of SHP621-301, was defined as >or=50% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions [Q] 2+3) from baseline of the induction study at Week 12 and 36 of current study. DSQ contained 4Q, all participants used diary, and responded to Q1(did you eat solid food) and Q2(didfood passslowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3(did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and 4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Anegative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Greater Than or Equal to (>or=) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in DSQ Combined Score From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Dysphagia symptom response from the baseline of SHP621-302, was defined as >or=50% reduction in DSQ combined score (questions 2+3) from baseline of the induction study at Week 36 of current study. DSQ contained 4Q, all participants used diary, and responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food) and Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief) and 4(extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
DSQ contain 4 questions (Q), all participants used a diary, responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief), Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing a worse outcome. A Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 36
Title
Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
DSQ contain 4 questions, all participants used a diary, responded to Q1 (did you eat solid food), Q2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', then diary ended for that day. If participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make food go down or get relief), Q4 (extent to which participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from Q2+3 in daily DSQ] × 14)/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0-2 for Q2 and 0-4 for Q3. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0-84. Higher values representing a worse outcome. A Negative change from baseline indicates symptoms decreased. Change in DSQ combined score (Questions 2+3) from baseline of current study at Week 36 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 36
Title
Percent Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Percent change in DSQ combined score from Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) baseline to current study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) final treatment period (Week 36) was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 36
Title
Percent Change in the DSQ Combined Score (Questions 2+3) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
Percent change in DSQ combined score from baseline to final treatment period (Week 36) of current study was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response I From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Overall binary response I was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 30% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline of the induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response I From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Overall binary response I was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 30% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response II From Induction Study SHP621-301 (NCT02605837) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36 of Current Study
Description
Overall binary response II was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 50% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline of the SHP621-301 study at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had Overall Binary Response II From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 12 and Week 36
Description
Overall binary response II was defined as if participant had peak eosinophil count of <=6/HPF across all esophagus levels and achieved a minimum of 30% reduction in DSQ combined score from baseline at Week 12 and Week 36. DSQ combined score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3 in the daily DSQ]×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2 and 0 - 4 for question 3, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ combined score was 0 - 84, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36
Title
Change in the DSQ + Pain Score (Questions 2+3+4) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Question 2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Questions 3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ + pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to questions 2, 3, and 4 by using following formula: DSQ + pain score= ([sum of points from questions 2+3+4 in the daily DSQ] ×14)/ Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for question 2, 0 - 4 for question 3 and 0 - 4 for question 4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ + pain score was 0 - 140, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 36
Title
Change in the DSQ+ Pain Score (Questions 2+3+4) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions (Q) 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Q2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Q3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ + pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to Questions 2, 3, and 4. Question 1 was excluded from the DSQ + pain score. DSQ + pain score=(Sum of points from questions 2+3+4 in the daily DSQ)*14 Days/Number of dairies reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 2 for Q2, 0 - 4 for Q3 and 0 - 4 for Q4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ + pain score was 0 - 140, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 36
Title
Change in the DSQ Pain Score (Question 4) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Question 2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Questions 3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to Question 4 only. DSQ pain score=(sum of points from questions 4 in the daily DSQ)*14 days/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 4 for question 4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ pain score was 0 - 56, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 36
Title
Change in the DSQ Pain Score (Question 4) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
DSQ contained 4 questions, all participants used a diary, and responded to Questions 1 (did you eat solid food) and 2 (did food pass slowly or get stuck). If the participant's answer to Question 2 was 'No', the diary ended for that day. If a participant answered 'Yes', he/she advanced to Questions 3 (did you have to do anything to make the food go down or get relief) and 4 (extent to which the participant experienced pain while swallowing). DSQ pain score was calculated by summing the scores of responses to Question 4 only. DSQ pain score=(sum of points from questions 4 in the daily DSQ)*14 days/Number of diaries reported with non-missing data. Scale range was 0 - 4 for question 4, with higher values representing a worse outcome. Scale range for DSQ pain score was 0 - 56, with higher values representing a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 36
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE's)
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that started or deteriorated on or after the date of the first dose of double-blind IP in SHP621-302 and through the safety follow-up contact, or 31 days after the last dose of IP for participants who did not have a safety follow-up contact.
Time Frame
From start of the study drug administration up to follow up (Week 40)
Title
Change in DXA (Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) Imaging Results (Location: Lumbar Spine [L1-L4]) From Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) Baseline at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Baseline of SHP621-301 is determined at Week 0 in the SHP621-301 study. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of L1-L4 were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 36
Title
Change in DXA Imaging Results (Location: Lumbar Spine [L1-L4]) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of L1-L4 were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 36
Title
Change in DXA Imaging Results (Location: Whole Body) From Baseline of Induction Study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]) at Week 36 of Current Study
Description
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Baseline of SHP621-301 is determined at Week 0 in the SHP621-301 study. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of whole body (except head) were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Time Frame
Baseline of induction study (SHP621-301 [NCT02605837]), Week 36
Title
Change in DXA Imaging Results (Location: Whole Body) From Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]) Baseline at Week 36
Description
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumber spine (L1-L4 preferred) and total body less head. DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measurements were done only for adolescent participants aged 11-17 years based on the age group in the SHP621-301 study and were completed throughout the SHP621-302 study even if participants turned 18 years. Here in this outcome measure DXA measurement of whole body (except head) were reported. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicate values higher than the mean.
Time Frame
Baseline of Current Study (SHP621-302 [NCT02736409]), Week 36
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Had a Histologic Response (Eosinophil Count of Greater Than or Equal to (>or=15)/High-Powered Field [HPF]) Before or at Week 12 and Before or at Week 36
Description
Eosinophil histology relapse was defined as an eosinophil count of >or=15 eos/HPF from at least 2 of 3 levels of the esophagus.
Time Frame
Week 12 and Week 36

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
11 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject completed SHP621-301 induction study. Subject is able to provide written informed consent (subject, parent or legal guardian and, as appropriate, subject assent) to participate in the study before completing any study-related procedures. Subject is male or female aged 11-55 years, inclusive, at time of consent for SHP621-301 study. Subject is willing and able to continue any dietary therapy, environmental therapy, and/or medical regimens (including gastric acid suppression; see exclusions below) in effect at the screening visit (Visit 0). There should be no changes to these regimens during study participation. All female subjects must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG]) prior to enrollment into the study. Females of childbearing potential must agree to continue acceptable birth control measures (eg, abstinence, stable oral contraceptives, or double-barrier methods) throughout study participation and for 30 days following the last dose of investigational product. Subject is willing and has an understanding and ability to fully comply with study procedures including DSQ compliance (completed the DSQ on ≥70% of days in any 2 consecutive weeks of the screening period)and restrictions defined in this protocol Exclusion Criteria: Subject has changes in medications that could affect the study or diet in the weeks since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study. Subject using immunomodulatory therapy since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated use of immunomodulatory therapy during the treatment period (except for any ongoing regimen of allergy shots); any temporary use (≤7 days) or initiation of new steroid treatment during the study should be documented and discussed with the medical monitor prospectively but cannot occur within 4 weeks of scheduled EGDs. Subject using swallowed topical corticosteroid for EoE or systemic corticosteroid for any condition since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated use during the treatment period; any temporary use (≤7 days) or initiation of new steroid treatment during the study should be documented and discussed with medical monitor prospectively but cannot occur within the 4 weeks of the scheduled EGDs. Subject on inhaled or intranasal steroids and not on a stable dose between the baseline visit (Visit 1) of the SHP621-301 study and the screening EGD of this study. Subject has initiated, discontinued, or changed dosage regimen of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), H2 antagonists, antacids, antihistamines, or leukotriene inhibitors for any condition (such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, asthma or allergic rhinitis) since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated changes in the use of such medications during the treatment period. Subject using Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (eg, ketoconazole, grapefruit juice) since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or anticipated use of such medications during the treatment period. Subject has an appearance on screening EGD of an esophageal stricture (high grade), as defined by the presence of a lesion that does not allow passage of a diagnostic adult upper endoscope (eg, with an insertion tube diameter of >9mm). Subject is on a pure liquid diet or the six-food elimination diet. Subject has presence of esophageal varices at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study. Subject has any current disease of the gastrointestinal tract, aside from EoE, including eosinophilic gastritis, enteritis, colitis, or proctitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or celiac disease. Subject has other diseases causing or associated with esophageal eosinophilia, including hypereosinophilic syndrome, collagen vascular disease, vasculitis, achalasia, or parasitic infection. Subject has oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis that failed to respond to previous treatment. Diagnosis with oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis at or since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study is not an exclusion as long as the subject received treatment for candidiasis and is expected to respond to treatment. Subject has acute or chronic infection or immunodeficiency condition, including tuberculosis, fungal, bacterial, viral/parasite infection, ocular herpes simplex, or chicken pox/measles. Subject has upper gastrointestinal bleeding identified in the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study or since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study. Subject has evidence of active infection with Helicobacter pylori. Subject has evidence of unstable asthma since the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 4) of the SHP621-301 study. Subject is female and pregnant or nursing. Subject has a history of intolerance, hypersensitivity, or idiosyncratic reaction to budesonide (or any other corticosteroids), or to any other ingredients of the study medication. Subject has a history or high risk of noncompliance with treatment or regular clinic visits. Subject is on sucralfate or anticipates using sucralfate during the treatment period.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Shire
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Del Sol Research Management
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Adobe Clinical Research LLC
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arkansas Gastroenterology
City
North Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72117
Country
United States
Facility Name
GW Research, Inc.
City
Chula Vista
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91910
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Colorado Children's Hospital
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Asthma and Allergy Associates PC
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80907
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rocky Mountain Pediatric Gastroenterology
City
Lone Tree
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80124
Country
United States
Facility Name
Connecticut Clinical Research Foundation
City
Bristol
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Connecticut GI, PC - Research Division
City
Farmington
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nature Coast Clinical Research LLC
City
Inverness
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34452
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arnold Palmer Hospital For Children
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Center for Digestive Health Care
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Grand Teton Research Group, PLLC
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Pediatric Subspecialty Clinic
City
Peoria
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aquiant Research
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastroenterology of Southern Indiana
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center
City
Topeka
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastroenterology Associates LLC
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70809
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials Management LLC
City
Metairie
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Louisiana Research Center LLC
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of America LA LLC - PPDS
City
West Monroe
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71291
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Womens Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan
City
Chesterfield
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48047
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minnesota Gastroenterology PA
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55446
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital
City
Bozeman
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group LLP
City
Great Neck
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11023
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Asheville Gastroenterology Associates PA
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28801
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27514
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of Charlotte
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28277
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of America-NC, LLC - PPDS
City
Mount Airy
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Consultants For Clinical Research Inc
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Cincinnati
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45267
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Consultants PC
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45415
Country
United States
Facility Name
Great Lakes Gastroenterology
City
Mentor
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Hospital System
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29615
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gastro One
City
Germantown
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38138
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37212
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Antonio Military Medical Center
City
Fort Sam Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78234
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Endoscopy and Research Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77079
Country
United States
Facility Name
Digestive Health Center
City
Pasadena
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77505
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Digestive Disease Consultants
City
Southlake
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76092
Country
United States
Facility Name
Primary Children's Hospital
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Research Institute
City
Sandy
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84092
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emeritas Research Group
City
Lansdowne Town Center
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
20176
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blue Ridge Medical Research
City
Lynchburg
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carilion Clinic
City
Roanoke
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24013
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34182150
Citation
Dellon ES, Collins MH, Katzka DA, Mukkada VA, Falk GW, Morey R, Goodwin B, Eisner JD, Lan L, Desai NK, Williams J, Hirano I; ORBIT2/SHP621-302 Investigators. Long-Term Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Budesonide Oral Suspension. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul;20(7):1488-1498.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

An Extension Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Efficacy and Long-term Treatment Effect of Oral Budesonide Suspension (OBS) in Adults and Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs