search
Back to results

AN-PEP on Gluten Exposure in Celiacs

Primary Purpose

Celiac Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Argentina
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Prolyl Endopeptidase
Placebo
Sponsored by
Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Celiac Disease focused on measuring celiac disease, endopeptidases, gliadin immunogenic peptides

Eligibility Criteria

17 Years - 75 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years
  • Diagnosis of celiac disease
  • Completion of Gluten-free Diet for at least two years without evidence of voluntary violations.
  • Patients who do not report symptoms of constipation or illnesses or medications (cathartics, antidiarrheals, etc.) that alter the bowel movement rhythm (accepted rhythm: between 2 times / day to 1 every other day) and diuresis (diuretics). Proton-pump inhibitor.
  • Signature of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not interested or unable to collaborate with the questionnaires and collection of fecal matter.
  • Place of residence of the participant more than 4 hours from the hospital, which interferes with the viability of the sample.
  • Complicated CD (refractory CD type II, ulcerative jejunoileitis, lymphoma).
  • Concomitant pathologies that are decompensated or untreated at study entry (type I or II diabetes mellitus; hyperthyroidism; hypothyroidism; kidney failure,).

Sites / Locations

  • Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Prolyl Endopeptidase

Placebo

Arm Description

Patients blinded-receive active AN-PEP at a dose of 2 capsules/breakfast, lunch and dinner during 8 weeks (study arm)

Patients blinded-receive 2 capsules of a placebo (specially designed and prepared for the study) at breakfast, lunch and dinner during 8 weeks (Placebo arm).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Frequency of GIP excretion in stool
To establish the effect of daily administration of AN-PEP compared to placebo in terms of frequency of GIP excretion in stool episodes in 4 weeks.
Weekly concentration of GIP excretion in stool
To determine weekly concentration of GIP excretion in stool (µg/g of GIP) for both patients randomized to AN-PEP or placebo.
Proportion of patients excreting GIP
To establish the proportion of patients excreting GIP above the theoretical threshold for mucosal damage (>1.6 µg/g of GIP in stool or >12 ng/mL in urine)
Frequency of GIP excretion in urine
To establish the effect of daily administration of AN-PEP compared to placebo in terms of frequency of GIP excretion in urine epidodes in 4 weeks
Weekly concentration of GIP excretion in urine
To determine weekly concentration of GIP excretion in urine (ng/mL) for both patients randomized to AN-PEP or placebo.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical effect of AN-PEP vs placebo
2.1- To establish differences in the clinical effect of AN-PEP vs. placebo in symptomatic celiac patients in terms of the Celiac Clinical Score comparing baseline scores vs. those from the end of the study period. Celiac Clinical Score is made up of sixteen items, 11 of which evaluate "specific symptoms" and 5 evaluate "general health". Each question is answered on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. Overall symptom scores were calculated through simple addition, with higher scores denoting more severe symptoms. Scores of 45 or higher are associated with a relatively poor quality of life and worse GFD adherence. Score less than 45 are associated with better quality of life and gluten adherence
Differences in quality of life scores
To determine differences in quality of life according to the Short Form 36 questionnaire in the study period in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. To score this questionnaire scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.
Major symptoms
To explore changes in the daily report of major symptoms (abdominal pain, discomfort, borborygmi, distension, diarrhea) (Likert scale of seven points) in symptomatic patients by using a daily report in a telephonic APP.
Biochemical effect of AN-PEP vs. placebo
to evaluate changes that occur during the study period in concentrations of CD-specific antibodies (IgA TG2 and DGP antibodies -AU/mL-) comparing consumption of AN-PEP vs. placebo.

Full Information

First Posted
February 3, 2021
Last Updated
February 22, 2023
Sponsor
Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04788797
Brief Title
AN-PEP on Gluten Exposure in Celiacs
Official Title
Effect of the Endopeptidase AN-PEP on Gluten Exposure in Real Life in Celiac Disease Patients Treated With a Long-term Gluten-free Diet. Exploratory, Interventional, Prospective, Controlled and Double Blind Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 17, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The AN-PEP, an Aspergillus niger derived endopeptidase, has been developed aiming to produce a complete luminal detoxification of gluten. If AN-PEP is able to produce a complete luminal digestion of gluten in the context of the real life of celiac disease (CeD) patients is unknown. Hypothetically, AN-PEP effect could be detected by the reduction in the excretion of GIP in stool and urine. The objective of this study is to establish the effect of the daily administration of AN-PEP compared to placebo on GIP excretion in an interventional, prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blind study in conditions mimicking the real-life of CeD treated patients. The study consists in a four-week GFD stabilization period followed by a four-week study period with patients randomized to receive active AN-PEP or placebo in a blindly manner.
Detailed Description
Background: The strict gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only accepted treatment for celiac disease (CeD). However, performing a strict diet is still a non solved problem affecting the future of patients. In a real-life study it was recently shown that 89% of treated CeD patients performing a strict diet have contact with dietary gluten at least one week per 4 weeks of testing and averaging 3 weeks per month. Furthermore, 40% of patients excreted gliadin immunogenic peptides (GIP) (surrogated markers of gluten exposure) in the range for immunological activation and intestinal mucosal damage. Endopeptidases to produce a complete intraluminal proteolysis of gluten avoiding antigenic stimulation were produced to avoid damage of continuous gluten exposure. AN-PEP is an Aspergillus niger derived endopeptidase has been produced aiming to luminal detoxification of gluten have been explored for its clinical effect. However, whether AN-PEP is able to completely destroy gluten in the context of the real life of CeD patients is still unknown. Hypothesis: The investigators estimate that AN-PEP is an effective therapy for proteolysis for gluten exposure in the real-life of CeD patients and that the effect could be detected by the reduction in the excretion of GIP in stool and urine based on a clinical research model that we developed. AIMS: to establish the effect of daily administration of AN-PEP compared to placebo in terms of: (1) frequency of GIP excretion in stool and urine episodes in 4 weeks; (2) concentration of GIP excretion for both arms; and (3) differences in proportion of patients excreting GIP above the threshold for mucosal damage (>2 µg/g of GIP in stool or >12 ng/mL in urine). Study design: Interventional, prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blind study. Components: 1- four-week GFD stabilization period; 2-Randomization. 3- four4-week study period: Patients blinded-receive active AN-PEP (GliadinX®) at a dose of 2 capsules/breakfast, lunch and dinner (study arm), or 2 capsules at same time points of placebo (specially designed and prepared for the study) (Placebo arm).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Celiac Disease
Keywords
celiac disease, endopeptidases, gliadin immunogenic peptides

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Prolyl Endopeptidase
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients blinded-receive active AN-PEP at a dose of 2 capsules/breakfast, lunch and dinner during 8 weeks (study arm)
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients blinded-receive 2 capsules of a placebo (specially designed and prepared for the study) at breakfast, lunch and dinner during 8 weeks (Placebo arm).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prolyl Endopeptidase
Other Intervention Name(s)
GliadinX
Intervention Description
Two capsules three times a day.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Two capsules three times a day
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency of GIP excretion in stool
Description
To establish the effect of daily administration of AN-PEP compared to placebo in terms of frequency of GIP excretion in stool episodes in 4 weeks.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Weekly concentration of GIP excretion in stool
Description
To determine weekly concentration of GIP excretion in stool (µg/g of GIP) for both patients randomized to AN-PEP or placebo.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Proportion of patients excreting GIP
Description
To establish the proportion of patients excreting GIP above the theoretical threshold for mucosal damage (>1.6 µg/g of GIP in stool or >12 ng/mL in urine)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Frequency of GIP excretion in urine
Description
To establish the effect of daily administration of AN-PEP compared to placebo in terms of frequency of GIP excretion in urine epidodes in 4 weeks
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Weekly concentration of GIP excretion in urine
Description
To determine weekly concentration of GIP excretion in urine (ng/mL) for both patients randomized to AN-PEP or placebo.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical effect of AN-PEP vs placebo
Description
2.1- To establish differences in the clinical effect of AN-PEP vs. placebo in symptomatic celiac patients in terms of the Celiac Clinical Score comparing baseline scores vs. those from the end of the study period. Celiac Clinical Score is made up of sixteen items, 11 of which evaluate "specific symptoms" and 5 evaluate "general health". Each question is answered on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. Overall symptom scores were calculated through simple addition, with higher scores denoting more severe symptoms. Scores of 45 or higher are associated with a relatively poor quality of life and worse GFD adherence. Score less than 45 are associated with better quality of life and gluten adherence
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Differences in quality of life scores
Description
To determine differences in quality of life according to the Short Form 36 questionnaire in the study period in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. To score this questionnaire scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Major symptoms
Description
To explore changes in the daily report of major symptoms (abdominal pain, discomfort, borborygmi, distension, diarrhea) (Likert scale of seven points) in symptomatic patients by using a daily report in a telephonic APP.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Biochemical effect of AN-PEP vs. placebo
Description
to evaluate changes that occur during the study period in concentrations of CD-specific antibodies (IgA TG2 and DGP antibodies -AU/mL-) comparing consumption of AN-PEP vs. placebo.
Time Frame
4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Over 18 years Diagnosis of celiac disease Completion of Gluten-free Diet for at least two years without evidence of voluntary violations. Patients who do not report symptoms of constipation or illnesses or medications (cathartics, antidiarrheals, etc.) that alter the bowel movement rhythm (accepted rhythm: between 2 times / day to 1 every other day) and diuresis (diuretics). Proton-pump inhibitor. Signature of the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients not interested or unable to collaborate with the questionnaires and collection of fecal matter. Place of residence of the participant more than 4 hours from the hospital, which interferes with the viability of the sample. Complicated CD (refractory CD type II, ulcerative jejunoileitis, lymphoma). Concomitant pathologies that are decompensated or untreated at study entry (type I or II diabetes mellitus; hyperthyroidism; hypothyroidism; kidney failure,).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edgardo G Smecuol
Organizational Affiliation
Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital
City
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
1602
Country
Argentina

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28483500
Citation
Pinto-Sanchez MI, Hall GB, Ghajar K, Nardelli A, Bolino C, Lau JT, Martin FP, Cominetti O, Welsh C, Rieder A, Traynor J, Gregory C, De Palma G, Pigrau M, Ford AC, Macri J, Berger B, Bergonzelli G, Surette MG, Collins SM, Moayyedi P, Bercik P. Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 Reduces Depression Scores and Alters Brain Activity: A Pilot Study in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):448-459.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27070376
Citation
Castellano E, Attanasio R, Gianotti L, Cesario F, Tassone F, Borretta G. Forearm DXA Increases the Rate of Patients With Asymptomatic Primary Hyperparathyroidism Meeting Surgical Criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jul;101(7):2728-32. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-1513. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31591516
Citation
Ricano-Ponce I, Gutierrez-Achury J, Costa AF, Deelen P, Kurilshikov A, Zorro MM, Platteel M, van der Graaf A; Consortium for the study of genetic associations of celiac disease in Latin-America; Sanna S, Daffra O, Zhernakova A, Fu J, Trynka G, Smecuol E, Niveloni SI, Bai JC, Kumar V, Wijmenga C. Immunochip meta-analysis in European and Argentinian populations identifies two novel genetic loci associated with celiac disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Mar;28(3):313-323. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0520-4. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31632977
Citation
Pinto-Sanchez MI, Bai JC. Toward New Paradigms in the Follow Up of Adult Patients With Celiac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet. Front Nutr. 2019 Oct 1;6:153. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00153. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33139268
Citation
Penny HA, Raju SA, Lau MS, Marks LJ, Baggus EM, Bai JC, Bassotti G, Bontkes HJ, Carroccio A, Danciu M, Derakhshan MH, Ensari A, Ganji A, Green PHR, Johnson MW, Ishaq S, Lebwohl B, Levene A, Maxim R, Mohaghegh Shalmani H, Rostami-Nejad M, Rowlands D, Spiridon IA, Srivastava A, Volta U, Villanacci V, Wild G, Cross SS, Rostami K, Sanders DS. Accuracy of a no-biopsy approach for the diagnosis of coeliac disease across different adult cohorts. Gut. 2021 May;70(5):876-883. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320913. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32740074
Citation
Seiler CL, Kiflen M, Stefanolo JP, Bai JC, Bercik P, Kelly CP, Verdu EF, Moayyedi P, Pinto-Sanchez MI. Probiotics for Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;115(10):1584-1595. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000749. Erratum In: Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 1;116(9):1968.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32217152
Citation
Stefanolo JP, Talamo M, Dodds S, de la Paz Temprano M, Costa AF, Moreno ML, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Smecuol E, Vazquez H, Gonzalez A, Niveloni SI, Maurino E, Verdu EF, Bai JC. Real-World Gluten Exposure in Patients With Celiac Disease on Gluten-Free Diets, Determined From Gliadin Immunogenic Peptides in Urine and Fecal Samples. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;19(3):484-491.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.038. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33032471
Citation
Smecuol E, Constante M, Temprano MP, Costa AF, Moreno ML, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Vazquez H, Stefanolo JP, Gonzalez AF, D'Adamo CR, Niveloni SI, Maurino E, Verdu EF, Bai JC. Effect of Bifidobacterium infantis NLS super strain in symptomatic coeliac disease patients on long-term gluten-free diet - an exploratory study. Benef Microbes. 2020 Oct 12;11(6):527-534. doi: 10.3920/BM2020.0016. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

AN-PEP on Gluten Exposure in Celiacs

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs