search
Back to results

Analgesic Effect of rTMS in Vasculitic Neuropathy

Primary Purpose

Vasculitic Neuropathy

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sponsored by
Jagiellonian University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Vasculitic Neuropathy focused on measuring vasculitis, neuropathy, pain, transcranial magnetic stimulation, analgesic effect

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy
  • Neuropathic pain of constant severity since not less than a month and requiring use of analgesics more than once a week
  • Score of 30 milimeter or more on the 100 milimeter visual analog scale of pain intensity at inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe depression
  • Personality disorders and other psychiatric conditions, which could disturb the participation in the study
  • Cognitive deficits, which could disturb the participation in the study
  • Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes

Sites / Locations

  • Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Arm Description

10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the primary motor area. Therapy will include 5 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 1500 magnetic pulses of 90% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.

Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Numeric Pain Severity Scale after rTMS
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Numeric Pain Severity Scale First Follow Up
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Numeric Pain Severity Scale Second Follow Up
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Visual Analog Scale of Pain Severity
An analog scale of the length of 100 milimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change through the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale after rTMS
Total score 64, with higher scores representing more severe depression. Change from baseline score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale First Follow Up
Total score 64, with higher scores representing more severe depression. Change from baseline score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Second Follow Up
Total score 64, with higher scores representing more severe depression. Change from baseline score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
36-Item Short Form Health Survey after rTMS
Total score, range 0 to 800, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
36-Item Short Form Health Survey First Follow Up
Total score, range 0 to 800, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
36-Item Short Form Health Survey Second Follow Up
Total score, range 0 to 800, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function after rTMS
Total score, range 0 to 100, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function First Follow Up
Total score, range 0 to 100, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function Second Follow Up
Total score, range 0 to 100, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to electric stimuli after rTMS
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports that the sensation has become painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of sensory threshold to electric stimuli after rTMS
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports the first nonpainful tactile sensation. Change from baseline sensory threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to electric stimuli First Follow Up
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports that the sensation has become painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of sensory threshold to electric stimuli First Follow Up
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports the first nonpainful tactile sensation. Change from baseline sensory threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to electric stimuli Second Follow Up
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports that the sensation has become painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of sensory threshold to electric stimuli Second Follow Up
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports the first nonpainful tactile sensation. Change from baseline sensory threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of cold sensation threshold to cold stimuli after rTMS
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels cold. Change from baseline cold sensation threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to cold temeprature stimuli after rTMS
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of cold sensation threshold to cold temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels cold. Change from baseline cold sensation threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to cold temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of cold sensation threshold to cold temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels cold. Change from baseline cold sensation threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to cold temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of warmth sensation threshold to warm temeprature stimuli after rTMS
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels warmth. Change from baseline warmth sensation threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to warm temeprature stimuli after rTMS
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of warmth sensation threshold to warm temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels warmth. Change from baseline warmth sensation threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to warm temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of warmth sensation threshold to warm temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels warmth. Change from baseline warmth sensation threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Assessment of pain threshold to warm temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the index finger flexion after rTMS
Change from baseline strength of the index finger flexion to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension after rTMS
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the index finger flexion First Follow Up
Change from baseline strength of the index finger flexion to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension flexion First Follow Up
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the index finger flexion Second Follow Up
Change from baseline strength of the index finger flexion to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension Second Follow Up
Change from baseline strength of the index foot extension to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.

Full Information

First Posted
January 16, 2021
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Sponsor
Jagiellonian University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04720196
Brief Title
Analgesic Effect of rTMS in Vasculitic Neuropathy
Official Title
Analgesic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Painful Vasculitic Neuropathy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Insufficient recruitment
Study Start Date
January 25, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 20, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 21, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jagiellonian University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Vasculitic neuropathy (VN) results from inflammation and destruction of the walls of predominantly small vessels with subsequent ischemic damage of peripheral nerves. VN is painful in vast majority of patients and the pain is intractable with pharmacotherapy in about 40% of cases. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity and is regarded as one of alternative methods to alleviate pain associated with various kind of neuropathies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of analgesic effect of rTMS in vasculitic neuropathy with sham stimulation.
Detailed Description
Vasculitic neuropathies (VN) are a group of disorders resulting from inflammation of predominantly small vessels with destruction of their walls and subsequent ischemic damage of peripheral nerves. Neural damage may or may not coexist with the damage of other organs. Examples of conditions associated with VN include diabetes, microscopic polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's), rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and others. VN is painful in about 80% of patients of whom 40% suffer from the pain intractable with pharmacological therapy. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity. In this method, series of magnetic stimuli are delivered to the cerebral cortex, where they turn to electric current and depolarize repetitively the targeted neurons. If the stimulation is repeated during subsequent days it is capable to modify the activity of targeted cortical area for weeks or even months and by this way to achieve therapeutic effect. rTMS is widely regarded as one of alternative methods to alleviate pain associated with various kind of neuropathies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of analgesic effect of rTMS in vasculitic neuropathy with sham stimulation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Vasculitic Neuropathy
Keywords
vasculitis, neuropathy, pain, transcranial magnetic stimulation, analgesic effect

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomly assigned to active and then sham stimulation or to sham and then active stimulation.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
3 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the primary motor area. Therapy will include 5 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 1500 magnetic pulses of 90% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.
Arm Title
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Intervention Description
High frequency rTMS over the primary motor area to induce the long term potentiation of primary motor areas for the muscles of upper extremity.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Intervention Description
Sham stimulation to mimic the high frequency rTMS over the primary motor area.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric Pain Severity Scale after rTMS
Description
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Numeric Pain Severity Scale First Follow Up
Description
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Numeric Pain Severity Scale Second Follow Up
Description
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Visual Analog Scale of Pain Severity
Description
An analog scale of the length of 100 milimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change through the study.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale after rTMS
Description
Total score 64, with higher scores representing more severe depression. Change from baseline score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale First Follow Up
Description
Total score 64, with higher scores representing more severe depression. Change from baseline score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Second Follow Up
Description
Total score 64, with higher scores representing more severe depression. Change from baseline score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
36-Item Short Form Health Survey after rTMS
Description
Total score, range 0 to 800, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
36-Item Short Form Health Survey First Follow Up
Description
Total score, range 0 to 800, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
36-Item Short Form Health Survey Second Follow Up
Description
Total score, range 0 to 800, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function after rTMS
Description
Total score, range 0 to 100, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function First Follow Up
Description
Total score, range 0 to 100, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Upper Extremity Function Second Follow Up
Description
Total score, range 0 to 100, with lower values representing a worse outcome. Change from baseline score in Neuro-Qol Upper Extremity Function to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to electric stimuli after rTMS
Description
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports that the sensation has become painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Assessment of sensory threshold to electric stimuli after rTMS
Description
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports the first nonpainful tactile sensation. Change from baseline sensory threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to electric stimuli First Follow Up
Description
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports that the sensation has become painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of sensory threshold to electric stimuli First Follow Up
Description
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports the first nonpainful tactile sensation. Change from baseline sensory threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to electric stimuli Second Follow Up
Description
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports that the sensation has become painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of sensory threshold to electric stimuli Second Follow Up
Description
Electrocutaneus stimulation with gradually increasing intensity from 0mA until a patient reports the first nonpainful tactile sensation. Change from baseline sensory threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of cold sensation threshold to cold stimuli after rTMS
Description
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels cold. Change from baseline cold sensation threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to cold temeprature stimuli after rTMS
Description
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Assessment of cold sensation threshold to cold temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels cold. Change from baseline cold sensation threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to cold temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of cold sensation threshold to cold temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels cold. Change from baseline cold sensation threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to cold temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with cold temperature stimuli, gradually colder, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of warmth sensation threshold to warm temeprature stimuli after rTMS
Description
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels warmth. Change from baseline warmth sensation threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to warm temeprature stimuli after rTMS
Description
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Assessment of warmth sensation threshold to warm temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels warmth. Change from baseline warmth sensation threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to warm temeprature stimuli First Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of warmth sensation threshold to warm temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from from 32 degree Celcius until patient will report that he feels warmth. Change from baseline warmth sensation threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Assessment of pain threshold to warm temeprature stimuli Second Follow Up
Description
Stimulation with warm temperature stimuli, gradually warmer, starting from 32 degree Celcius until patient starts to perceive stimuli as painful. Change from baseline pain threshold to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the index finger flexion after rTMS
Description
Change from baseline strength of the index finger flexion to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension after rTMS
Description
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, immediately after (on same day) finishing rTMS.
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the index finger flexion First Follow Up
Description
Change from baseline strength of the index finger flexion to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension flexion First Follow Up
Description
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the index finger flexion Second Follow Up
Description
Change from baseline strength of the index finger flexion to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension Second Follow Up
Description
Change from baseline strength of the index foot extension to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy Neuropathic pain of constant severity since not less than a month and requiring use of analgesics more than once a week Score of 30 milimeter or more on the 100 milimeter visual analog scale of pain intensity at inclusion Exclusion Criteria: Severe depression Personality disorders and other psychiatric conditions, which could disturb the participation in the study Cognitive deficits, which could disturb the participation in the study Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Justyna Brączyk, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Jagiellonian University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
31503
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After completing the study, the age and gender of participants as well as the scores and results of all outcome measurements made at baseline, after rTMS, at the first and at the second follow up will be made available to other researchers on request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will become available after the study results will be published.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
On request send by e-mail: jakub.antczak@uj.edu.pl
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19833552
Citation
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Analgesic Effect of rTMS in Vasculitic Neuropathy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs