search
Back to results

AngelMed for Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI (ALERTS)

Primary Purpose

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Coronary Occlusion, Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Guardian System
Sponsored by
Angel Medical Systems
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) focused on measuring Acute Myocardial Infarction (MI), ST Shift, Coronary Occlusion, Acute Coronary Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has at least one of the following conditions:

    1. Diabetes (Type I or Type II)
    2. Compromised renal function (Cr > 1.2 mg/dl or creatinine clearance less than 50)
    3. TIMI Risk Score ≥ 3
  • Presents (within past 6 months) with a high-risk acute coronary syndrome (e.g., Unstable Angina, STEMI or NSTEMI) or has undergone or is scheduled for CABG within 6 months of implantation.
  • Has already undergone coronary angiography and revascularization, unless the physician determines it is appropriate to implant before or during the planned procedure.
  • Lives in a geographic area in close proximity (within 60 minutes by EMS) to any hospital that can treat AMI.
  • Subjects (men or women) at least 21 years of age. Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test or confirmation of one of the following:

    1. Post-menopause or amenorrheic during the past year
    2. Surgical sterilization
    3. Use of effective contraceptive method

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In the investigator's opinion, subject lacks ability to respond appropriately to alarms, e.g., illiteracy, poor memory or cognitive function, dementia or other condition affecting memory function, etc.
  • There is known compromised tissue at the site of lead implantation in the apex of the right ventricle, e.g., prior infarct affecting the RV apex location.
  • A permanent pacemaker or ICD is already in place or the patient is indicated for ICD or pacemaker implantation based on the guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology as Class I and IIa recommendations. Class IIb recommendations are at the investigator's discretion.
  • Subject cannot feel the IMD vibration when placed on top of the skin on the left pectoral side of the chest.
  • Subject has recurrent or persistent atrial fibrillation.
  • Subject has recurrent or persistent non-sinus cardiac rhythm, second or third degree atrioventricular blocks, QRS duration greater than 120 ms, Benign Early Repolarization (BER), or Brugada Syndrome.
  • Subject has left ventricular hypertrophy evidenced by EKG criteria.
  • Subject has any condition preventing the subcutaneous implantation of the Guardian System in a left pectoral pouch, such as: superior vena cava thrombosis, subcutaneous tissue deemed inappropriate for the procedure or prior central venous access via portacath, Hickman, Groshong, or similar placed in a left pectoral location or left side PICC line.
  • Subject has extremely heavy alcohol consumption (participates in binge drinking that leads to alcohol intoxication) or has history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse within past 5 years.
  • There is evidence of unresolved infection (fever > 38° C and/or leukocytosis > 15,000).
  • Subject has history of bleeding disorders or severe coagulopathy (platelets < 100,000 plts/ml; APTT or PT > 1.3 x reference range).
  • Subject has had a hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the past 6 months.
  • Subject has other severe diseases, such as cancer or refractory congestive heart failure, associated with limitation of life expectancy (less than 1 year), which may lead to inadequate compliance to the protocol or confusing data interpretation.
  • Subject has clinical conditions such as heart diseases, difficult-to-control blood pressure, difficult-to-control insulin-dependent diabetes or serious prior infections attributed to the diabetes, or others that, at the investigator's discretion, could seriously affect the subject's current clinical condition during study procedures.
  • Subject has previous participation in the DETECT Study, current participation or previous participation in another drug or device study in the past 30 days that conflicts with this study as determined by the study sponsor.
  • Subject has experienced gastro-intestinal hemorrhage in the past 6 months.
  • Subject has any situation in which the use of aspirin is contraindicated for at least 6 months.
  • Subject has epilepsy.
  • Subject has known severe allergies, e.g., peanut, bee sting, etc.

Sites / Locations

  • Cardiology, P.C.
  • Heart Center Research/Huntsville Hospital
  • Banner Heart Hospital
  • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • Southwest Heart Group
  • John Muir Clinical Research Center
  • California Clinical Research Foundation
  • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
  • Mission Internal Medical Group
  • Orange County Heart Institute and Research Center Hospital
  • Huntington Memorial Hospital
  • University of California Davis Medical Center
  • Sutter Memorial Hospital
  • Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital
  • Radiant Research
  • Washington Hospital Center
  • Bay Pines VA Healthcare System
  • Daytona Heart Group
  • Holy Cross Hospital
  • NorthFL/South GA VA Health System
  • New Phase Clinical Trials
  • Mercy Research Institute
  • University of Miami
  • Complete Cardiology Care
  • East Coast Institute for Research
  • Univeristy of South Florida
  • Florida Hospital - Pepin Heart Institute
  • The Medical Center of Central Georgia
  • Northwestern University
  • Advocate Medical Group
  • Premier Healthcare
  • Northern Indiana Research Alliance
  • Heart Center of Lake County
  • Medical Consultants, PC
  • Central Baptist Hospital
  • Innovative Medical Research
  • Heart Clinic of Hammond
  • Louisiana Heart Center
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
  • MedStar Health Research Institute
  • Suburban Hospital - Johns Hopkins Medicine
  • Woodholme Cardiovacular Associates
  • Washington Adventist Hospital
  • McLaren Bay Region
  • DMC Cardiovascular Institute at Harper-Hutzel Hospital
  • Detroit Clinical Research Center
  • Cardiology Consultants of East Michigan
  • Genesys Regional Medical Center
  • Spectrum Health
  • Borgess Medical Center
  • Sparrow Clinical Research Institute
  • McLaren Macomb
  • Cardiac & Vascular Research Center of Northern Michigan
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Jersey Shore University Medical Center
  • University of Medicine & Dentistry NJ
  • St. Michael's Medical Center
  • Lourdes Cardiology Services
  • Albany Associates in Cardiology
  • SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Buffalo Heart Group - Mercy Hospital of Buffalo
  • Buffalo Heart Group - Millard Fillmore Gates Circle Hospital
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • Stony Brook University Medical Center
  • Cardiology Group of Western New York
  • REX Healthcare
  • Good Samaritan Hospital
  • Cardiovascular Research Center
  • University of Toledo
  • South Oklahoma Heart Research
  • Geisinger Medical Center
  • Penn State Hershey Medical Center
  • Lancaster General Hospital
  • St. Mary Medical Center Research Institute
  • Drexel University College of Medicine
  • Allegheny-Singer Research Institute
  • Donald Guthrie Foundation for Education & Research
  • Geisinger Wyoming Valley Heart Hospital
  • Cardiac Diagnostic Associates/York Hospital
  • AnMed Health
  • Greenville Hospital System
  • Stern Cardiovascular Center
  • Turkey Creek Medical Center
  • St. Thomas Research Institute
  • Cardiology Center of Amarillo
  • West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants
  • West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants
  • Scott and White Healthcare
  • Tyler Cardiovascular Consultants
  • Cardiology Associates of Fredericksburg
  • Virginia Cardiovascular Associates
  • Riverside Regional Medical Center
  • Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute
  • Cardiovascular Associates, Ltd
  • Swedish Medical Center/Cardiovascular Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Treatment

Control

Arm Description

The Treatment arm has alerting enabled in their device during the 6-month randomization period. Treatment arm patients also have alerting enabled in the post-randomization period. Once a patient arrives at the ER, the standard of care triage process for MI is followed and that is outside of the ALERTS Study protocol. With Amendment the Treatment arm was re-defined as an ALARMS_ON group which included A) Control patients after the randomization period and until database lock (4/1/2014); and, b) Treatment patients both during the randomization period and after the randomization period until database lock (4/1/2014).

The Control arm has alerting disabled in their device during the 6-month randomization period. Control arm patients also have alerting enabled in the post-randomization period. Once a patient arrives at the ER, the standard of care triage process for MI is followed and that is outside of the ALERTS Study protocol. With Amendment the Control arm was re-defined as an ALARMS_OFF group which included A) Control patients during the randomization period when the Guardian did not have alarms enabled.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary efficacy objective is to determine that the Guardian System reduces the composite of Cardiac or unexplained death, new Q-wave MI and time to door for a confirmed occlusive event at a medical facility >2 hours.
With Amendment the primary efficacy objective was amended to be a co-primary endpoint which included A) a hypothesis test of superiority for positive predictive value of ER visits in the ALARMS_ON group due to Guardian alerting (with or without concurrent symptoms) compared to ER visits in the ALARMS_OFF group due to symptoms only; AND B) a hypothesis test of non-inferiority for rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_ON group due to Guardian alerting (with or without concurrent symptoms) compared to rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_OFF group due to symptoms only.

Secondary Outcome Measures

- Reduction of the incidence of cardiac death or unexplained death during follow-up - Reduction of the incidence of "New" Q-wave myocardial infarction in one or more distributions during follow-up- Reduction of the time to door for confirmed STEMI.
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #1) a hypothesis test of superiority for rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_ON group due to Guardian alerting (with or without concurrent symptoms) compared to rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_OFF group due to symptoms only.
Secondary Endpoint #2
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #2) The number of Silent MIs, the percentage in relation to total MIs in the ALARMS ON group, and the percentage of subjects experiencing Silent MIs will be reported (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint)
Secondary Endpoint #3
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #3) Descriptive statistics for the median, average and distribution of symptom-to-door and alarm-to-door times for STEMI events and the number and percentage of subjects with time-to-door times of < 2 hours will be reported for both the ALARMS ON and ALARMS OFF groups (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint).
Secondary Endpoint #4
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #4) The time that elapses between the initial patient prompt (alarm or symptom) and arrival at a medical facility will be calculated for all subjects who suffered a STEMI or NSTEMI, and had an associated Guardian alarm (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint).
Secondary Endpoint #5
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #5: The time that elapses between the initial patient prompt (Alarm or Symptom) and arrival at a medical facility will be calculated for all subjects who suffered an ACS event (STEMI, NSTEMI, or Unstable Angina), and had an associated Guardian System alarm (with or without symptoms) (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint).

Full Information

First Posted
October 24, 2008
Last Updated
March 9, 2018
Sponsor
Angel Medical Systems
Collaborators
Symbios Clinical
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00781118
Brief Title
AngelMed for Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI
Acronym
ALERTS
Official Title
AngelMed for Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 17, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Angel Medical Systems
Collaborators
Symbios Clinical

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A prospective, randomized multicenter study of subjects with a high-risk of having a myocardial infarction (MI) due to acute coronary syndrome or bypass surgery. There is no differential intervention administered to the two arms of the ALERTS Study. The study evaluates whether or not a patient alarm from the Guardian System will provide benefit (e.g. shorten pre-hospital delay) compared to symptoms-only ER presentation in the event of a heart attack. An amendment to the data analysis protocol was collaboratively created by AngelMed and FDA, and was adopted by AngelMed on 4/22/2017.
Detailed Description
There are over one million acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) each year in the United States with more than 400,000 of these resulting in death. Early identification of AMI, and prompt treatment has been shown to significantly improve clinical outcomes. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that most of the irreversible damage to the myocardium occurs during the first two hours after coronary occlusion. Milavetz et al. demonstrated that successful reperfusion therapy within two hours was associated with the greatest degree of myocardial salvage. According to Boersma, et al., restoration of flow, regardless of the method used, can abort infarction within the first 30 minutes after coronary occlusion, and the benefit of fibrinolytic therapy compared with placebo is considerably higher in patients treated within 2 hours after symptom onset than in those treated later.2 Further, evidence exists that expeditious restoration of flow in the obstructed infarct artery after the onset of symptoms in patients with the most severe type of MI, ST elevation MI (STEMI) is a key determinant of short and long-term outcomes regardless of whether reperfusion is accomplished by fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, the early arrival at the hospital for a reliable diagnosis and initiation of treatment is paramount to improve the outcomes of myocardial infarction. However, despite efforts at educating the public over the past decade, the mean time from AMI symptom onset to arrival at a hospital for treatment has remained, disappointingly, at 2.5-3.0 hours. The largest proportion of the total pre-hospital delay is the interval between the onset of symptoms and the decision to seek medical treatment. Finnegan et al. described that the reasons for delay in seeking medical evaluation generally stem from patient misconceptions about symptom experience, expectations, and attribution. In many cases, patients expect the type of heart attack that they often see in movies or on television: the kind of crushing chest pain that drops a person to the ground. The reality is that many heart attacks are much "quieter," causing only mild chest pain or discomfort or other symptoms such as shortness of breath or diaphoresis. If patients would take action during the first hour following symptom onset, many lives and significant cost could be saved. It is technically possible to monitor EKGs and detect an acute infarction, even if the patient is unaware that he or she is experiencing a heart attack. However, currently available systems have limitations in the home environment. Twelve lead EKG systems require a clinically trained individual to place them. Holter monitors suffer from limitations in the ability to detect ST deviation due to low compliance and are limited in practice to 24 to 72 hours of monitoring. Systems using surface leads are all subject to noise and other artifacts from patient movement and body orientation, particularly if the patient is ambulatory. A potentially ideal solution is to implant a device that measures heart signals from inside the heart and will alert the patient when it detects electrogram characteristics set by the physician as worthy of medical evaluation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Coronary Occlusion, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Keywords
Acute Myocardial Infarction (MI), ST Shift, Coronary Occlusion, Acute Coronary Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1020 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Treatment arm has alerting enabled in their device during the 6-month randomization period. Treatment arm patients also have alerting enabled in the post-randomization period. Once a patient arrives at the ER, the standard of care triage process for MI is followed and that is outside of the ALERTS Study protocol. With Amendment the Treatment arm was re-defined as an ALARMS_ON group which included A) Control patients after the randomization period and until database lock (4/1/2014); and, b) Treatment patients both during the randomization period and after the randomization period until database lock (4/1/2014).
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The Control arm has alerting disabled in their device during the 6-month randomization period. Control arm patients also have alerting enabled in the post-randomization period. Once a patient arrives at the ER, the standard of care triage process for MI is followed and that is outside of the ALERTS Study protocol. With Amendment the Control arm was re-defined as an ALARMS_OFF group which included A) Control patients during the randomization period when the Guardian did not have alarms enabled.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Guardian System
Intervention Description
There is no intervention in this study. The device is a diagnostic only.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary efficacy objective is to determine that the Guardian System reduces the composite of Cardiac or unexplained death, new Q-wave MI and time to door for a confirmed occlusive event at a medical facility >2 hours.
Description
With Amendment the primary efficacy objective was amended to be a co-primary endpoint which included A) a hypothesis test of superiority for positive predictive value of ER visits in the ALARMS_ON group due to Guardian alerting (with or without concurrent symptoms) compared to ER visits in the ALARMS_OFF group due to symptoms only; AND B) a hypothesis test of non-inferiority for rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_ON group due to Guardian alerting (with or without concurrent symptoms) compared to rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_OFF group due to symptoms only.
Time Frame
Due to Bayesian statistical analysis, the study data will be analyzed after subject enrollment reaches 600, 900, 1200, etc. With amendment the study period spanned from December 2008 until database lock April 1, 2014.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
- Reduction of the incidence of cardiac death or unexplained death during follow-up - Reduction of the incidence of "New" Q-wave myocardial infarction in one or more distributions during follow-up- Reduction of the time to door for confirmed STEMI.
Description
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #1) a hypothesis test of superiority for rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_ON group due to Guardian alerting (with or without concurrent symptoms) compared to rate of false positive ER visits in the ALARMS_OFF group due to symptoms only.
Time Frame
Due to Bayesian statistical analysis, the study data will be analyzed after subject enrollment reaches 600, 900, 1200, etc With amendment the study period spanned from December 2008 until database lock April 1, 2014.
Title
Secondary Endpoint #2
Description
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #2) The number of Silent MIs, the percentage in relation to total MIs in the ALARMS ON group, and the percentage of subjects experiencing Silent MIs will be reported (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint)
Time Frame
With amendment the study period spanned from December 2008 until database lock April 1, 2014.
Title
Secondary Endpoint #3
Description
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #3) Descriptive statistics for the median, average and distribution of symptom-to-door and alarm-to-door times for STEMI events and the number and percentage of subjects with time-to-door times of < 2 hours will be reported for both the ALARMS ON and ALARMS OFF groups (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint).
Time Frame
With amendment the study period spanned from December 2008 until database lock April 1, 2014.
Title
Secondary Endpoint #4
Description
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #4) The time that elapses between the initial patient prompt (alarm or symptom) and arrival at a medical facility will be calculated for all subjects who suffered a STEMI or NSTEMI, and had an associated Guardian alarm (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint).
Time Frame
With amendment the study period spanned from December 2008 until database lock April 1, 2014.
Title
Secondary Endpoint #5
Description
With Amendment the secondary efficacy endpoint measures were amended to include Endpoint #5: The time that elapses between the initial patient prompt (Alarm or Symptom) and arrival at a medical facility will be calculated for all subjects who suffered an ACS event (STEMI, NSTEMI, or Unstable Angina), and had an associated Guardian System alarm (with or without symptoms) (no hypotheses existed for this endpoint).
Time Frame
With amendment the study period spanned from December 2008 until database lock April 1, 2014.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject has at least one of the following conditions: Diabetes (Type I or Type II) Compromised renal function (Cr > 1.2 mg/dl or creatinine clearance less than 50) TIMI Risk Score ≥ 3 Presents (within past 6 months) with a high-risk acute coronary syndrome (e.g., Unstable Angina, STEMI or NSTEMI) or has undergone or is scheduled for CABG within 6 months of implantation. Has already undergone coronary angiography and revascularization, unless the physician determines it is appropriate to implant before or during the planned procedure. Lives in a geographic area in close proximity (within 60 minutes by EMS) to any hospital that can treat AMI. Subjects (men or women) at least 21 years of age. Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test or confirmation of one of the following: Post-menopause or amenorrheic during the past year Surgical sterilization Use of effective contraceptive method Exclusion Criteria: In the investigator's opinion, subject lacks ability to respond appropriately to alarms, e.g., illiteracy, poor memory or cognitive function, dementia or other condition affecting memory function, etc. There is known compromised tissue at the site of lead implantation in the apex of the right ventricle, e.g., prior infarct affecting the RV apex location. A permanent pacemaker or ICD is already in place or the patient is indicated for ICD or pacemaker implantation based on the guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology as Class I and IIa recommendations. Class IIb recommendations are at the investigator's discretion. Subject cannot feel the IMD vibration when placed on top of the skin on the left pectoral side of the chest. Subject has recurrent or persistent atrial fibrillation. Subject has recurrent or persistent non-sinus cardiac rhythm, second or third degree atrioventricular blocks, QRS duration greater than 120 ms, Benign Early Repolarization (BER), or Brugada Syndrome. Subject has left ventricular hypertrophy evidenced by EKG criteria. Subject has any condition preventing the subcutaneous implantation of the Guardian System in a left pectoral pouch, such as: superior vena cava thrombosis, subcutaneous tissue deemed inappropriate for the procedure or prior central venous access via portacath, Hickman, Groshong, or similar placed in a left pectoral location or left side PICC line. Subject has extremely heavy alcohol consumption (participates in binge drinking that leads to alcohol intoxication) or has history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse within past 5 years. There is evidence of unresolved infection (fever > 38° C and/or leukocytosis > 15,000). Subject has history of bleeding disorders or severe coagulopathy (platelets < 100,000 plts/ml; APTT or PT > 1.3 x reference range). Subject has had a hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the past 6 months. Subject has other severe diseases, such as cancer or refractory congestive heart failure, associated with limitation of life expectancy (less than 1 year), which may lead to inadequate compliance to the protocol or confusing data interpretation. Subject has clinical conditions such as heart diseases, difficult-to-control blood pressure, difficult-to-control insulin-dependent diabetes or serious prior infections attributed to the diabetes, or others that, at the investigator's discretion, could seriously affect the subject's current clinical condition during study procedures. Subject has previous participation in the DETECT Study, current participation or previous participation in another drug or device study in the past 30 days that conflicts with this study as determined by the study sponsor. Subject has experienced gastro-intestinal hemorrhage in the past 6 months. Subject has any situation in which the use of aspirin is contraindicated for at least 6 months. Subject has epilepsy. Subject has known severe allergies, e.g., peanut, bee sting, etc.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cardiology, P.C.
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heart Center Research/Huntsville Hospital
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Banner Heart Hospital
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Heart Group
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
John Muir Clinical Research Center
City
Concord
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94520
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Clinical Research Foundation
City
Glendale
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mission Internal Medical Group
City
Mission Viejo
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92691
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orange County Heart Institute and Research Center Hospital
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Huntington Memorial Hospital
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91105
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California Davis Medical Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sutter Memorial Hospital
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95819
Country
United States
Facility Name
Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital
City
Salinas
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93901
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research
City
Santa Rosa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington Hospital Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay Pines VA Healthcare System
City
Bay Pines
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33744
Country
United States
Facility Name
Daytona Heart Group
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Holy Cross Hospital
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33308
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthFL/South GA VA Health System
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Phase Clinical Trials
City
Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33140
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mercy Research Institute
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33133
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Complete Cardiology Care
City
New Smyrna Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32169
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Coast Institute for Research
City
Saint Augustine
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32086
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univeristy of South Florida
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Hospital - Pepin Heart Institute
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Medical Center of Central Georgia
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201-2102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advocate Medical Group
City
Park Ridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60068
Country
United States
Facility Name
Premier Healthcare
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northern Indiana Research Alliance
City
Fort Wayne
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46804
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heart Center of Lake County
City
Merrillville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical Consultants, PC
City
Muncie
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Baptist Hospital
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innovative Medical Research
City
Covington
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70433
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heart Clinic of Hammond
City
Hammond
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Louisiana Heart Center
City
Slidell
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70433
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
MedStar Health Research Institute
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Suburban Hospital - Johns Hopkins Medicine
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20814
Country
United States
Facility Name
Woodholme Cardiovacular Associates
City
Pikesville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington Adventist Hospital
City
Takoma Park
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20912
Country
United States
Facility Name
McLaren Bay Region
City
Bay City
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48708
Country
United States
Facility Name
DMC Cardiovascular Institute at Harper-Hutzel Hospital
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Detroit Clinical Research Center
City
Farmington Hills
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Consultants of East Michigan
City
Flint
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48532
Country
United States
Facility Name
Genesys Regional Medical Center
City
Grand Blanc
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48439
Country
United States
Facility Name
Spectrum Health
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Borgess Medical Center
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sparrow Clinical Research Institute
City
Lansing
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48912
Country
United States
Facility Name
McLaren Macomb
City
Mount Clemens
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiac & Vascular Research Center of Northern Michigan
City
Petoskey
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49770
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
City
Neptune
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07754
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Medicine & Dentistry NJ
City
New Brunswick
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08901
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Michael's Medical Center
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lourdes Cardiology Services
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Albany Associates in Cardiology
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12205
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Buffalo Heart Group - Mercy Hospital of Buffalo
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Buffalo Heart Group - Millard Fillmore Gates Circle Hospital
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stony Brook University Medical Center
City
Stony Brook
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11794
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Group of Western New York
City
Williamsville
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14221
Country
United States
Facility Name
REX Healthcare
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Good Samaritan Hospital
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Research Center
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43608
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Toledo
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43614
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Oklahoma Heart Research
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Geisinger Medical Center
City
Danville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17822
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lancaster General Hospital
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17602
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Mary Medical Center Research Institute
City
Langhorne
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19047
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drexel University College of Medicine
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Allegheny-Singer Research Institute
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Donald Guthrie Foundation for Education & Research
City
Sayre
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18840
Country
United States
Facility Name
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Heart Hospital
City
Wilkes-Barre
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18711
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiac Diagnostic Associates/York Hospital
City
York
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17405
Country
United States
Facility Name
AnMed Health
City
Anderson
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29621
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Hospital System
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stern Cardiovascular Center
City
Germantown
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38138
Country
United States
Facility Name
Turkey Creek Medical Center
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37934
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Thomas Research Institute
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Center of Amarillo
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77008
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77094
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scott and White Healthcare
City
Temple
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tyler Cardiovascular Consultants
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Associates of Fredericksburg
City
Fredericksburg
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22408
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Cardiovascular Associates
City
Manassas
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
20109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Riverside Regional Medical Center
City
Newport News
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Associates, Ltd
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23462
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Medical Center/Cardiovascular Research
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
When we have completed review with the FDA, the IPD will will be made available.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31623762
Citation
Holmes DR Jr, Krucoff MW, Mullin C, Mikdadi G, Presser D, Wohns D, Kaplan A, Ciuffo A, Eberly AL 3rd, Iteld B, Fischell DR, Fischell T, Keenan D, John MS, Gibson CM. Implanted Monitor Alerting to Reduce Treatment Delay in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 22;74(16):2047-2055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.084.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30842028
Citation
Gibson CM, Holmes D, Mikdadi G, Presser D, Wohns D, Yee MK, Kaplan A, Ciuffo A, Eberly AL 3rd, Iteld B, Krucoff MW. Implantable Cardiac Alert System for Early Recognition of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1919-1927. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27436882
Citation
Rogers T, Steinvil A, Torguson R, Waksman R. Overview of the 2016 US Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting on the AngelMed Guardian System. Circulation. 2016 Jul 19;134(3):262-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023081. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25066555
Citation
Gibson MC, Krucoff M, Fischell D, Fischell TA, Keenan D, Abueg C, Patel C, Holmes D. Rationale and design of the AngeLmed for Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI trial: a randomized, prospective clinical investigation. Am Heart J. 2014 Aug;168(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 24.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

AngelMed for Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs