AngioSeal Versus Radial Approach in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ARISE)
Primary Purpose
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Acute Coronary Syndrome focused on measuring Transradial Approach, Transfemoral Approach, Vascular Closure Device
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients [ischemic symptoms suspicious of non-ST-segment elevation ACS (unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation AMI) defined as clinical presentation compatible with a new manifestation of worsening of chest pain characteristic of ischemia, at rest or at minimum effort, lasting more than 10 minutes, and at least one of the following items: (a) ECG changes compatible with new ischemia (ST segment depression of at least 1 mm, or transient ST segment elevation, or ST segment elevation ≤ 1 mm, or T wave inversion > 2 mm in at least 2 contiguous shunts); (b) cardiac enzymes (CK-MB or troponin T or I) above the upper normality range limit; (c) patients > 60 years of age without ECG or myocardial necrosis markers changes, however with previous documentation of coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD), confirmed by previous hospitalization due to AMI, previous percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularization procedure, significant CAD confirmed by coronary angiography, or positive functional test for myocardial ischemia];
- Intention to submit patient to early invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography immediately followed by PCI, when applicable, in the first 72 hours after admission;
- Signed informed consent;
- Patient eligible for transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography and PCI, being pre-requisites: (a) palpable radial artery with normal Allen test or/and oximetry tests, (b) familiarity of the operator with the radial and femoral techniques using AngioSeal, (c) agreement of the operator to use the access route determined by the randomization process.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years of age;
- Pregnancy;
- Chronic use of vitamin K antagonists or direct thrombin inhibitors, or oral Xa-factor antagonists;
- Hypersensitivity to antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant drugs;
- Active bleeding or high bleeding risk (severe liver failure, active peptic ulcer, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, platelets count < 100.000 mm3);
- Uncontrolled systemic hypertension;
- Cardiogenic shock;
- Previous myocardial revascularization surgery with ≥ 1 internal mammary or radial artery graft;
- Documented chronic peripheral arterial disease preventing the use of the femoral technique;
- Severe concomitant disease with life expectancy below 12 months;
- Participation in drug or devices investigative clinical trials in the last 30 days;
- Indication of elective percutaneous coronary intervention to be performed in a moment different from immediately after coronary angiography;
- Medical, geographic or social conditions impairing the participation in the study or inability to understand and sign the informed consent term.
Sites / Locations
- Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Transradial approach
Transfemoral approach
Arm Description
Transradial approach percutaneous coronary intervention using the TR Band device to obtain hemostasis
Transfemoral approach percutaneous coronary intervention using the AngioSeal vascular closure device STS Plus Platform to obtain hemostasis
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
First Occurrence of Access Site Related Ischemic or Bleeding Complication
Vascular and systemic complications at arterial puncture site include major bleeding, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, compartment syndrome, hematoma ≥ 5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, infection, limb ischemia, asymptomatic arterial occlusion, adjacent nerve injury or need for vascular surgery repair.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Adverse Ischemic or Bleeding Events
Individual components of the primary objective, hematoma < 5 cm, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding unrelated to puncture site or to coronary artery bypass grafting, device success and crossover rate between techniques
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01653587
First Posted
July 26, 2012
Last Updated
November 8, 2018
Sponsor
Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01653587
Brief Title
AngioSeal Versus Radial Approach in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acronym
ARISE
Official Title
Randomized Trial Between the Transfemoral Approach With AngioSeal and the Transradial Approach to Prevent Vascular Access Complications in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Submitted To Early Invasive Strategy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients submitted to early invasive strategy and randomized for the transfemoral or transradial approach, the AngioSeal vascular closure device would decrease the prevalence of vascular complications at puncture site, reaching the non-inferiority criterion when compared to the radial access.
Detailed Description
Antithrombotic therapy and percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularization procedures are the basis of the treatment of patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. However, the desired reduction of the recurrence of ischemic events has as complication an increased incidence of bleeding. Since arterial puncture followed by the insertion of an introducer has become the standard method to perform invasive cardiovascular procedures, complications related to vascular access have become an important bleeding site.
Among the strategies to decrease vascular complications, the transradial approach is a well stablished alternative to the transfemoral approach. For its part, vascular closure devices were introduced to decrease vascular complications, homeostasis time and ambulation time of patients submitted to invasive procedures by the transfemoral access. Rapidly incorporated to the clinical practice, such devices to date have shown conflicting results with regard to their safety and efficacy. The inconsistency of data proving its safety limits its routine adoption as strategy to prevent vascular complications, requiring evidences through adequately designed randomized studies for this end.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Keywords
Transradial Approach, Transfemoral Approach, Vascular Closure Device
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Transradial approach
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transradial approach percutaneous coronary intervention using the TR Band device to obtain hemostasis
Arm Title
Transfemoral approach
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transfemoral approach percutaneous coronary intervention using the AngioSeal vascular closure device STS Plus Platform to obtain hemostasis
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Other Intervention Name(s)
AngioSeal vascular closure device, TR Band radial artery compression device
Intervention Description
Both transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography will be performed by the Judkins technique using arterial introducers with 6 French diameter and pre-molded catheters for selective catheterization of left and right coronary arteries.Percutaneous coronary intervention will be indicated when a culprit lesion is identified, with stenosis diameter severity ≥ 70%, with high probability of angiographic success, being ideally performed immediately after coronary angiography and left ventriculography. Patients with multiarterial coronary disease will be submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention after agreement among cardiologist, interventional cardiologist and thoracic surgeon. Procedures will be performed according to recommendations and provisions of current guidelines.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
First Occurrence of Access Site Related Ischemic or Bleeding Complication
Description
Vascular and systemic complications at arterial puncture site include major bleeding, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, compartment syndrome, hematoma ≥ 5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, infection, limb ischemia, asymptomatic arterial occlusion, adjacent nerve injury or need for vascular surgery repair.
Time Frame
30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse Ischemic or Bleeding Events
Description
Individual components of the primary objective, hematoma < 5 cm, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding unrelated to puncture site or to coronary artery bypass grafting, device success and crossover rate between techniques
Time Frame
30 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Cardiovascular Death, Myocardial Infarction or Stroke
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients [ischemic symptoms suspicious of non-ST-segment elevation ACS (unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation AMI) defined as clinical presentation compatible with a new manifestation of worsening of chest pain characteristic of ischemia, at rest or at minimum effort, lasting more than 10 minutes, and at least one of the following items: (a) ECG changes compatible with new ischemia (ST segment depression of at least 1 mm, or transient ST segment elevation, or ST segment elevation ≤ 1 mm, or T wave inversion > 2 mm in at least 2 contiguous shunts); (b) cardiac enzymes (CK-MB or troponin T or I) above the upper normality range limit; (c) patients > 60 years of age without ECG or myocardial necrosis markers changes, however with previous documentation of coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD), confirmed by previous hospitalization due to AMI, previous percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularization procedure, significant CAD confirmed by coronary angiography, or positive functional test for myocardial ischemia];
Intention to submit patient to early invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography immediately followed by PCI, when applicable, in the first 72 hours after admission;
Signed informed consent;
Patient eligible for transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography and PCI, being pre-requisites: (a) palpable radial artery with normal Allen test or/and oximetry tests, (b) familiarity of the operator with the radial and femoral techniques using AngioSeal, (c) agreement of the operator to use the access route determined by the randomization process.
Exclusion Criteria:
Less than 18 years of age;
Pregnancy;
Chronic use of vitamin K antagonists or direct thrombin inhibitors, or oral Xa-factor antagonists;
Hypersensitivity to antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant drugs;
Active bleeding or high bleeding risk (severe liver failure, active peptic ulcer, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, platelets count < 100.000 mm3);
Uncontrolled systemic hypertension;
Cardiogenic shock;
Previous myocardial revascularization surgery with ≥ 1 internal mammary or radial artery graft;
Documented chronic peripheral arterial disease preventing the use of the femoral technique;
Severe concomitant disease with life expectancy below 12 months;
Participation in drug or devices investigative clinical trials in the last 30 days;
Indication of elective percutaneous coronary intervention to be performed in a moment different from immediately after coronary angiography;
Medical, geographic or social conditions impairing the participation in the study or inability to understand and sign the informed consent term.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pedro B Andrade, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília
City
Marília
State/Province
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
17515900
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24345099
Citation
de Andrade PB, E Mattos LA, Tebet MA, Rinaldi FS, Esteves VC, Nogueira EF, Franca JI, de Andrade MV, Barbosa RA, Labrunie A, Abizaid AA, Sousa AG. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Trials. 2013 Dec 18;14:435. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-435.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27514319
Citation
Andrade PB, Mattos LA, Rinaldi FS, Bienert IC, Barbosa RA, Labrunie A, Tebet M, Esteves V, Abizaid A, Sousa AR. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):976-982. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26689. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
AngioSeal Versus Radial Approach in Acute Coronary Syndrome
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs