search
Back to results

Assessment of Nociceptive Processing Among Patients With Temporo-mandibular Disorders

Primary Purpose

Temporomandibular Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
High-frequency electrical stimulation
Sponsored by
Université Catholique de Louvain
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Temporomandibular Disorder focused on measuring central sensitization, high-frequency stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for healthy controls:

  • Females aged between 18 and 50 years.
  • BMI between 17 and 30.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria for healthy controls:

  • Evidence of psychiatric/inflammatory/neurological or metabolic comorbidities on direct questioning as this study is meant to focus on musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Evidence of skin alteration on the volar forearms that may interfere with HFS.
  • Any substance abuse, or the use of antidepressant or neuroleptic medication as these may interfere with the psychophysical examination.
  • Any painful musculoskeletal disorder.
  • Lack of dental check-ups during the last 12 months.

Inclusion Criteria for the TMD group:

  • Females aged between 18 and 50 years.
  • BMI between 17 and 30.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Chronic TMD (for at least 3 months) as a main complain (according to the DC/TMD), with an average of at least 3/10 on a pain numerical rating scale during the past month in the orofacial region.

Exclusion Criteria for the TMD group:

  • Evidence of psychiatric/inflammatory/neurological or metabolic comorbidities on direct questioning as this study is meant to focus on musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Evidence of skin alteration on the volar forearms that may interfere with HFS.
  • Any substance abuse, or the use of antidepressant or neuroleptic medication as these may interfere with the psychophysical examination.
  • Lack of dental check-ups during the last 12 months

Sites / Locations

  • Cliniques universitaires St-Luc

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Temporomandibular disorder

Healthy control

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The extent of secondary hyperalgesia on the forearm in the proximo-distal direction 45 minutes after HFS
The area of secondary hyperalgesia (cm square) will be assessed with a calibrated 128 millinewton pinprick probe. Pokes of 1-second duration will be provided at a frequency of 0.5 Hz, starting well outside and approaching the stimulation site with steps of 0,5 cm from 4 different directions towards the application site. Participants will be asked to keep their eyes closed during the entire mapping procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Age
Self-declared age of the subject
Weight
Self-declared weight of the subject
Height
Self-declared height of the subject
The TMD diagnosis according to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD)
TMD subgroup based on the DC/TMD: Myalgia, Arthralgia, Headache attributed to TMD, degenerative joint disease, disc displacement with reduction, disc displacement with reduction with intermittent locking, disc displacement with reduction with limited opening, disc displacement with reduction without limited opening, or subluxation.
Graded chronic pain scale
questionnaire assessing TMD-related pain intensity and disability: The score will range from grade 0 (no TMD pain in prior 6 months) to grade IV (High disability, severly limiting)
Jaw functional limitation scale
Questionnaire assessing limitations across mastication, jaw mobility, and verbal and emotional expression often accompanying TMD. The score will range from 0 (law functional limitation) to 10 (high functional limitation)
Generalized anxiety disorder-7
Questionnaire assessing anxiety. The score will range from 0 (no anxiety) to 27 (severe anxiety)
Patient health questionnaire-9
Questionnaire assessing depression symptoms. The score will range from 1 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression)
Patient health questionnaire-15
Questionnaire assessing overall physical symptoms commonly associated with TMD. The score will range from 0 (minimal physical symptoms) to 30 (high physical symptoms)
Oral Behaviors Checklist
Questionnaire assesses the frequency of oral parafunctional behaviors. The score will range from 0 (no oral parafunctional behaviors) to 84 (high oral parafunctional behavior frequency)
Central sensitization inventory
Questionnaire assessing symptoms and comorbidities that are presumed to be associated with central sensitization. The score will range from 0 (no symptoms and comorbidities presumed to be associated with central sensitization) to 100 (extreme symptoms and comorbidities presumed to be associated with central sensitization).
Symptom severity scale
Questionnaire assessing the severity of symptoms associated with fibromyalgia, a condition frequently associated with TMD. The score will range from 0 (low severity) to 12 (high severity).
The distribution of pain
Pain felt during the past 7 days drawn on a digital table
The Widespread pain index
Questionnaire assessing the extent of bodily pain. The score will range from 1 (no painful body region) to 19 (19 painful body regions)
Average pain during the last 24h before HFS
Pain during the last 24h on a numerical rating scale. The score will range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain)
Average pain at present time before HFS: score
Current pain on a numerical rating. The score will range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain)
Pressure pain thresholds on the temporalis muscle, trapezius muscle and tibialis anterior
Pressure pain will be assessed 3 times on each muscle, with a 30-second interstimulus interval, and the arithmetic mean of the 3 repeated measures will be used for analysis
Baseline pain resulting from pinprick stimulation in the area surrounding the electrode ("test area") and on the homologous site of the contralateral control arm
Participants will rate the pain induced by pin-prick stimulation in the area surrounding the electrode on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no perception) to 100 (maximal pain), with 50 representing the transition from nonpainful to painful domains of sensation
Allodynia in the area surrounding the electrode ("test area") and on the homologous site of the contralateral control arm
The investigators will assess allodynia with a Cotton wisp exerting a force of 3 millinewton, a cotton wool tip fixed to an elastic strip exerting a force of 100 millinewton when slightly bent, and a standardized brush exerting a force of 200-400 millinewton
The long term persistence of secondary hyperalgesia after HFS
Participants will assess the persistence of secondary hyperalgesia with calibrated neurological examination pins (Neuropen, Owen-Mumford Ltd, Oxford, UK). The score will range from 0 (no hyperalgesia) to 1 (hyperalgesia is present)
The intensity of pain resulting from pinprick stimulation 30 min after HFS
Participants will rate the pain induced by pin-prick stimulation in the area surrounding the electrode on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no perception) to 100 (maximal pain), with 50 representing the transition from nonpainful to painful domains of sensation

Full Information

First Posted
August 22, 2019
Last Updated
March 29, 2022
Sponsor
Université Catholique de Louvain
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04086732
Brief Title
Assessment of Nociceptive Processing Among Patients With Temporo-mandibular Disorders
Official Title
Assessment of Generalized Alterations in Nociceptive Processing Among Patients Presenting With Temporo-mandibular Disorders
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 11, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 29, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 29, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Université Catholique de Louvain

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This case control study will investigate the physiological effect of nociceptive input in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. To do so, the investigators will compare the development of secondary hyperalgesia following high frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of skin nociceptors in the forearms for up to 48 hours in individuals with chronic TMD (as a main complain) and in healthy controls. Furthermore, the investigators will evaluate the association between the response to HFS and various factors, such as demographic, psychosocial and pain-related clinical factors.
Detailed Description
This control study is designed to compare the development of secondary hyperalgesia following high frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of skin nociceptors in the forearms in individuals with chronic TMD (as a main complain) and in healthy controls. During the first part of the experiment (time1, day 1), all potential participants will fill a basic demographic questionnaire concerning their age, weight, height, and current medications (appendix 2). Participants with TMD will be diagnosed according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). The DC/TMD includes the following questionnaires: the Graded Chronic Pain Scale, the Jaw Functional Limitation scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and -15 and the Oral Behaviors Checklist. In addition, participants will be asked to fill the Central sensitization inventory questionnaire, as well as the symptom Severity Scale. Lastly, the investigators will evaluate the distribution of pain by asking participants to draw the pain that they felt during the past 7 days on a digital tablet. This will allow us to determine the total area of pain of each participant, as well as the Widespread Pain Index. Subjects will also be asked to provide a rating of their average pain for the last 24h The psychophysical evaluation will be conducted later on the same day (day1). Subjects will be asked to provide a rating of their average pain at present time (time 2). Then, participants will be familiarized with the different procedures involved in the experiment. Pressure pain thresholds will be assessed on the temporalis muscle, the trapezius muscle, and tibialis anterior (time 3). The intensity of pain resulting from pinprick stimulation and allodynia in the area surrounding the electrode ("test area") will be assessed, as well as on the homologous site of the contralateral control arm before HFS (time 4). Then HFS will be applied (time 5) on the left or right volar forearm (10 cm distal to the cubital fossa). HFS will consist in trains of transcutaneous electrical stimuli consisting of 42 Hz trains (pulse width: 2 ms) lasting 1 s each. The trains will be repeated 12 times. Each train will be separated by several 10 seconds of rest. The intensity of each stimulus will be set to 5 milliampere. The of pain resulting from pinprick stimulation and allodynia in the area surrounding the electrode ("test area") will be assessed 30 min after HFS (in a counterbalanced order) on the homologous site of the contralateral control arm (time 6). The extent of secondary hyperalgesia will be assessed approximately 45 min following HFS (time 7). Then, they will be asked assess the presence of secondary hyperalgesia in the test-site 24 (time 8, day 2) and 48 hours (time 9, day 3) following HFS with with calibrated neurological examination pins (Neuropen, Owen-Mumford Ltd, Oxford, UK). 6 months after their initial assessment (time 10, day 180), if they gave their consent for long-term follow-up, patients will be asked to fill the following questionnaires again

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Temporomandibular Disorder
Keywords
central sensitization, high-frequency stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Temporomandibular disorder
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Healthy control
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
High-frequency electrical stimulation
Intervention Description
High-frequency stimulation will be applied on the volar forearm (6-10 cm distal to the cubital fossa). To avoid any confounding effect of handedness, the arm onto which HFS will be applied twice (dominant vs nondominant) will be counterbalanced across participants. HFS will consist of 12 trains of 42 Hz electrical pulses lasting 1 s each. The time interval between each train will be 10 s. The intensity of stimulation will be milliampere. Electrical pulses will be delivered to the skin using a specifically-designed electrode designed: the cathode consists of 16 blunt stainless-steel pins with a diameter of 0.2 mm protruding 1 mm from the base. The 16 pins are placed in a circle with a diameter of 10 mm. The anode consists of a surrounding stainless-steel ring having an inner diameter of 22 mm and an outer diameter of 40 mm. This procedure induces secondary pinprick hyperalgesia (an increase in pinprick sensitivity in a large area of the skin).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The extent of secondary hyperalgesia on the forearm in the proximo-distal direction 45 minutes after HFS
Description
The area of secondary hyperalgesia (cm square) will be assessed with a calibrated 128 millinewton pinprick probe. Pokes of 1-second duration will be provided at a frequency of 0.5 Hz, starting well outside and approaching the stimulation site with steps of 0,5 cm from 4 different directions towards the application site. Participants will be asked to keep their eyes closed during the entire mapping procedure
Time Frame
After HFS and the assessment of pain resulting from pinprick stimulation and allodynia (time 7). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 7.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Age
Description
Self-declared age of the subject
Time Frame
During the initial evaluation (time 1). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1.
Title
Weight
Description
Self-declared weight of the subject
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1.
Title
Height
Description
Self-declared height of the subject
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1.
Title
The TMD diagnosis according to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD)
Description
TMD subgroup based on the DC/TMD: Myalgia, Arthralgia, Headache attributed to TMD, degenerative joint disease, disc displacement with reduction, disc displacement with reduction with intermittent locking, disc displacement with reduction with limited opening, disc displacement with reduction without limited opening, or subluxation.
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1.
Title
Graded chronic pain scale
Description
questionnaire assessing TMD-related pain intensity and disability: The score will range from grade 0 (no TMD pain in prior 6 months) to grade IV (High disability, severly limiting)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Jaw functional limitation scale
Description
Questionnaire assessing limitations across mastication, jaw mobility, and verbal and emotional expression often accompanying TMD. The score will range from 0 (law functional limitation) to 10 (high functional limitation)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Generalized anxiety disorder-7
Description
Questionnaire assessing anxiety. The score will range from 0 (no anxiety) to 27 (severe anxiety)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Patient health questionnaire-9
Description
Questionnaire assessing depression symptoms. The score will range from 1 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Patient health questionnaire-15
Description
Questionnaire assessing overall physical symptoms commonly associated with TMD. The score will range from 0 (minimal physical symptoms) to 30 (high physical symptoms)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Oral Behaviors Checklist
Description
Questionnaire assesses the frequency of oral parafunctional behaviors. The score will range from 0 (no oral parafunctional behaviors) to 84 (high oral parafunctional behavior frequency)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Central sensitization inventory
Description
Questionnaire assessing symptoms and comorbidities that are presumed to be associated with central sensitization. The score will range from 0 (no symptoms and comorbidities presumed to be associated with central sensitization) to 100 (extreme symptoms and comorbidities presumed to be associated with central sensitization).
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Symptom severity scale
Description
Questionnaire assessing the severity of symptoms associated with fibromyalgia, a condition frequently associated with TMD. The score will range from 0 (low severity) to 12 (high severity).
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
The distribution of pain
Description
Pain felt during the past 7 days drawn on a digital table
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
The Widespread pain index
Description
Questionnaire assessing the extent of bodily pain. The score will range from 1 (no painful body region) to 19 (19 painful body regions)
Time Frame
At baseline (time 1) and 6 months after the initial assessment (time 10). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1 and day 180 at time 10.
Title
Average pain during the last 24h before HFS
Description
Pain during the last 24h on a numerical rating scale. The score will range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain)
Time Frame
During the initial evaluation (time 1). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 1.
Title
Average pain at present time before HFS: score
Description
Current pain on a numerical rating. The score will range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain)
Time Frame
During the initial evaluation (time 2). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 2.
Title
Pressure pain thresholds on the temporalis muscle, trapezius muscle and tibialis anterior
Description
Pressure pain will be assessed 3 times on each muscle, with a 30-second interstimulus interval, and the arithmetic mean of the 3 repeated measures will be used for analysis
Time Frame
During the initial evaluation (time 3)]. This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 3.
Title
Baseline pain resulting from pinprick stimulation in the area surrounding the electrode ("test area") and on the homologous site of the contralateral control arm
Description
Participants will rate the pain induced by pin-prick stimulation in the area surrounding the electrode on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no perception) to 100 (maximal pain), with 50 representing the transition from nonpainful to painful domains of sensation
Time Frame
Just before HFS (time 4)]. This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 4.
Title
Allodynia in the area surrounding the electrode ("test area") and on the homologous site of the contralateral control arm
Description
The investigators will assess allodynia with a Cotton wisp exerting a force of 3 millinewton, a cotton wool tip fixed to an elastic strip exerting a force of 100 millinewton when slightly bent, and a standardized brush exerting a force of 200-400 millinewton
Time Frame
Just before HFS (time 4) and after HFS (time 6). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 4 and time 6.
Title
The long term persistence of secondary hyperalgesia after HFS
Description
Participants will assess the persistence of secondary hyperalgesia with calibrated neurological examination pins (Neuropen, Owen-Mumford Ltd, Oxford, UK). The score will range from 0 (no hyperalgesia) to 1 (hyperalgesia is present)
Time Frame
24 hours (time 8) and 48 hours after HFS (time 9). This outcome is taken at day 2 at time 8, and at day 3 at time 9.
Title
The intensity of pain resulting from pinprick stimulation 30 min after HFS
Description
Participants will rate the pain induced by pin-prick stimulation in the area surrounding the electrode on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no perception) to 100 (maximal pain), with 50 representing the transition from nonpainful to painful domains of sensation
Time Frame
Time Frame: At baseline (time 6). This outcome is taken at day 1 at time 6.

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for healthy controls: Females aged between 18 and 50 years. BMI between 17 and 30. Ability to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria for healthy controls: Evidence of psychiatric/inflammatory/neurological or metabolic comorbidities on direct questioning as this study is meant to focus on musculoskeletal disorders. Evidence of skin alteration on the volar forearms that may interfere with HFS. Any substance abuse, or the use of antidepressant or neuroleptic medication as these may interfere with the psychophysical examination. Any painful musculoskeletal disorder. Lack of dental check-ups during the last 12 months. Inclusion Criteria for the TMD group: Females aged between 18 and 50 years. BMI between 17 and 30. Ability to provide written informed consent. Chronic TMD (for at least 3 months) as a main complain (according to the DC/TMD), with an average of at least 3/10 on a pain numerical rating scale during the past month in the orofacial region. Exclusion Criteria for the TMD group: Evidence of psychiatric/inflammatory/neurological or metabolic comorbidities on direct questioning as this study is meant to focus on musculoskeletal disorders. Evidence of skin alteration on the volar forearms that may interfere with HFS. Any substance abuse, or the use of antidepressant or neuroleptic medication as these may interfere with the psychophysical examination. Lack of dental check-ups during the last 12 months
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cliniques universitaires St-Luc
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Assessment of Nociceptive Processing Among Patients With Temporo-mandibular Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs