Assessment of Surgical sTaging vs Endoscopic Ultrasound in Lung Cancer: a Randomized Clinical Trial (ASTER Study)
Primary Purpose
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic ultrasound staging
Surgical staging
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung focused on measuring (suspected) Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consecutive patients with NSCLC or with a clinical suspicion for lung cancer in whom mediastinal lymph node invasion (either N2 or N3) is suspected based on the available thoracic imaging
- Pending the results of the mediastinal staging, the patient is otherwise considered a candidate for a surgical treatment with the intention to cure (this is a resectable tumor)
- The patient is clinically fit for diagnostic surgery (this is an operable patient)
- No distant metastasis after routine clinical work up
- Provision of a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Former therapy (chemotherapy or radiotherapy or surgery) for lung cancer
- Reasons because of which the patient is unable to swallow the EUS-instrument (e.g. Zenker Divertikel, unexplained esophageal stenosis) or because of which the patient is unable to undergo a bronchoscopy
- Patients who, based on available thoracic imaging, are unlikely to be staged accurately by any surgical staging procedure (mediastinoscopy/ - tomy, VATS)
- Respiratory insufficiency or other contra-indications for bronchoscopy
- Concurrent other malignancies
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Study cannot be discussed with the patient (e.g. mental disorder)
Sites / Locations
- University Hospital Ghent
- Leuven University Hospital
- Leidens Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
- Papworth University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
Arm Description
Endoscopic ultrasound staging
Surgical staging
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
We hypothesize that the combination of EUS and EBUS in an out-patient one-session setting is more sensitive for the detection of locally advanced disease (N2/N3) compared to surgical staging (standard of care)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Assessment of mediastinal tumour invasion (T4)
Assessment of the rate of avoided surgical procedures (arm A)
Assessment of the negative predictive value
Assessment of the difference in the cost for lymph node staging
Assessment of the complication rates
Assessment of the rate of futile thoracotomies
Assessment of quality of life (EQ5D)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00432640
First Posted
February 7, 2007
Last Updated
December 15, 2010
Sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent
Collaborators
Leiden University Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00432640
Brief Title
Assessment of Surgical sTaging vs Endoscopic Ultrasound in Lung Cancer: a Randomized Clinical Trial (ASTER Study)
Official Title
Complete Echo-Endoscopic Staging of Lung Cancer vs Surgical Staging: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent
Collaborators
Leiden University Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers and has a very high mortality. Both treatment and prognosis depend on the staging. Surgical staging of the mediastinum mainly by means of a cervical mediastinoscopy is the gold standard. Mediastinal staging is however a field that undergoes a fast technological development. Transesophageal ultrasound guided fine-needled aspiration (EUS-FNA) and an endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial fine-needled aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are two complementary endoscopic ultrasound techniques which together allow cytological analysis of all mediastinal lymph nodes. This means that the combination of both techniques enables a complete (bilateral) mediastinal investigation (N2 and N3, except para-aortal station 6).
Hypothesis: complete endoscopic ultrasound staging identifies more patients with locally advanced disease compared to surgical staging (current standard of care).
Study design: A randomized controlled multi-center double arm diagnostic phase III trial, in which patients are randomly assigned to either surgical staging (arm B) or endoscopic ultrasound staging with both EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA (arm A).
Arm A: Examination by EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA. These techniques are performed in an outpatient one session setting under conscious sedation and take together about 30 to 60 minutes. If no metastasis are shown, the patient undergoes a surgical staging procedure (for confirmation). For reasons of convenience and patient-comfort, the EUS-FNA investigation is performed before the EBUS-TBNA.
Arm B: Surgical staging with either cervical mediastinoscopy, parasternal mediastinoscopy, thorascopic mediastinal exploration or exploratory thoracotomy, performed according to institutional practice.
Patients in whom no lymph node metastasis are found proceed to thoracotomy with systematic lymph node sampling to obtain an accurate intraoperative mediastinal staging.
Primary outcome: The assessment of N2-N3 lymph node metastases.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Keywords
(suspected) Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Endoscopic ultrasound staging
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Surgical staging
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic ultrasound staging
Intervention Description
Endoscopic ultrasound staging with both EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgical staging
Intervention Description
Surgical staging
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
We hypothesize that the combination of EUS and EBUS in an out-patient one-session setting is more sensitive for the detection of locally advanced disease (N2/N3) compared to surgical staging (standard of care)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of mediastinal tumour invasion (T4)
Title
Assessment of the rate of avoided surgical procedures (arm A)
Title
Assessment of the negative predictive value
Title
Assessment of the difference in the cost for lymph node staging
Title
Assessment of the complication rates
Title
Assessment of the rate of futile thoracotomies
Title
Assessment of quality of life (EQ5D)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Consecutive patients with NSCLC or with a clinical suspicion for lung cancer in whom mediastinal lymph node invasion (either N2 or N3) is suspected based on the available thoracic imaging
Pending the results of the mediastinal staging, the patient is otherwise considered a candidate for a surgical treatment with the intention to cure (this is a resectable tumor)
The patient is clinically fit for diagnostic surgery (this is an operable patient)
No distant metastasis after routine clinical work up
Provision of a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Former therapy (chemotherapy or radiotherapy or surgery) for lung cancer
Reasons because of which the patient is unable to swallow the EUS-instrument (e.g. Zenker Divertikel, unexplained esophageal stenosis) or because of which the patient is unable to undergo a bronchoscopy
Patients who, based on available thoracic imaging, are unlikely to be staged accurately by any surgical staging procedure (mediastinoscopy/ - tomy, VATS)
Respiratory insufficiency or other contra-indications for bronchoscopy
Concurrent other malignancies
Uncorrected coagulopathy
Study cannot be discussed with the patient (e.g. mental disorder)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kurt Tournoy, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Ghent
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jouke Annema, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Leidens Universitair Medisch Centrum
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Ghent
City
Ghent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Leuven University Hospital
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Leidens Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
City
Leiden
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Papworth University Hospital
City
Cambridge
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24064440
Citation
Rintoul RC, Glover MJ, Jackson C, Hughes V, Tournoy KG, Dooms C, Annema JT, Sharples LD. Cost effectiveness of endosonography versus surgical staging in potentially resectable lung cancer: a health economics analysis of the ASTER trial from a European perspective. Thorax. 2014 Jul;69(7):679-81. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204374. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21098770
Citation
Annema JT, van Meerbeeck JP, Rintoul RC, Dooms C, Deschepper E, Dekkers OM, De Leyn P, Braun J, Carroll NR, Praet M, de Ryck F, Vansteenkiste J, Vermassen F, Versteegh MI, Veselic M, Nicholson AG, Rabe KF, Tournoy KG. Mediastinoscopy vs endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010 Nov 24;304(20):2245-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1705.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.uzgent.be
Description
Website of the University Hospital Ghent
Learn more about this trial
Assessment of Surgical sTaging vs Endoscopic Ultrasound in Lung Cancer: a Randomized Clinical Trial (ASTER Study)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs