Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of a New Wound Dressing in the Local Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Primary Purpose
Diabetic Foot Ulcer(s)
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Urgo 310 3113
Placebo URGO 310 3113 dressing
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Foot Ulcer(s) focused on measuring Patient
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female over 18 years old who has provided his/her written informed consent
- Patient covered by the French national insurance system
- Patient with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycated hemoglobi(HbA1c) levels ≤ 10% (assayed in the previous 3 months. If not available, this assay must be performed during the run-in period)
- Inpatient or outpatient who can be monitored by the same investigating team throughout the duration of the study
- Patient who agrees to wear the prescribed off-loading system every day, associated with the test dressing
- DFU with adequate arterial blood supply in the target limb DFU grade I-C or II-C as defined by the University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification
- Neuropathy confirmed by loss of protective sensation to monofilament test (Semmes-Weinstein 5.07 monofilament)
- DFU located on the toe or on the lateral, dorsal or plantar side of the foot
- Target DFU surface area between 1 cm² and 30 cm², following debridement DFU duration between 1 and 24 months
- No local clinical infection (as defined by IDSA/IWGDF criteria) for any wound (target DFU or not) on lower limbs
- DFU adequately debrided
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breast-feeding woman or woman of childbearing potential not using effective means of contraception
- Patient who took part in another clinical trial in the previous month or who is to take part in another clinical trial in the 20 weeks following inclusion
- Patient with any known intolerance or allergy or reported adverse reaction to one of the components of the trial dressings
- Patient who has undergone surgery or surgical revascularization (vascular reconstruction or angioplasty) in the previous 2 months
- Patient who has presented an acute ischemic event (Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) or stroke) in the 3 months before inclusion
- Patient with Severe kidney failure, defined as requirement for dialysis
- Patient with a systemic infection not controlled by suitable antibiotic treatment
- Patient with known osteomyelitis
- Patient with leg ulcer(s), regardless of limb
- Patient with wounds other than the target DFU located on the heel or on the interdigital part of the foot
- Patient with an active neoplastic condition, treated by radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy or immunosuppressant agents
- Patient treated for a chronic disease requiring high doses of systemic corticosteroids (≥ 40 mg.d-1 of prednisolone or equivalent)
- Patient with a severe illness that might lead to premature withdrawal from the trial
- DFU for which surgery or surgical revascularization is planned at any time during the study
- Deep DFU defined as stage III or IV (University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification)
- DFU clinically infected as defined by IDSA/IWGDF criteria
- DFU with more than 20% of its surface area covered by black necrotic tissue following debridement
- DFU located on an amputation stump
- DFU with neoplastic component
Sites / Locations
- Recruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
URGO 310 3113 dressing - new
URGO 310 3113 dressing
Arm Description
flexible, conformable, non-adhesive and non-occlusive lipido-colloid matrix that does not adhere to the wound.
flexible, conformable, non-adhesive and non-occlusive lipido-colloid matrix that does not adhere to the wound.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of complete wound closure
Secondary Outcome Measures
Time to complete wound closure
Change in wound surface area
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01717183
Brief Title
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of a New Wound Dressing in the Local Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Official Title
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of a New Wound Dressing in the Local Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: a Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, Double-blind, European Multicentre Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Laboratoires URGO
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this trial is to demonstrate that the new dressing is more effective than the current dressing in the local treatment of chronic foot ulcers in diabetic patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Foot Ulcer(s)
Keywords
Patient
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Double
Allocation
Randomized
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
URGO 310 3113 dressing - new
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
flexible, conformable, non-adhesive and non-occlusive lipido-colloid matrix that does not adhere to the wound.
Arm Title
URGO 310 3113 dressing
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
flexible, conformable, non-adhesive and non-occlusive lipido-colloid matrix that does not adhere to the wound.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Urgo 310 3113
Intervention Description
URGO 310 3113 dressing may be changed every 2 to 4 days, and left in place for up to 7 days, depending on the level of exudate and the wound condition
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo URGO 310 3113 dressing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of complete wound closure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to complete wound closure
Title
Change in wound surface area
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female over 18 years old who has provided his/her written informed consent
Patient covered by the French national insurance system
Patient with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycated hemoglobi(HbA1c) levels ≤ 10% (assayed in the previous 3 months. If not available, this assay must be performed during the run-in period)
Inpatient or outpatient who can be monitored by the same investigating team throughout the duration of the study
Patient who agrees to wear the prescribed off-loading system every day, associated with the test dressing
DFU with adequate arterial blood supply in the target limb DFU grade I-C or II-C as defined by the University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification
Neuropathy confirmed by loss of protective sensation to monofilament test (Semmes-Weinstein 5.07 monofilament)
DFU located on the toe or on the lateral, dorsal or plantar side of the foot
Target DFU surface area between 1 cm² and 30 cm², following debridement DFU duration between 1 and 24 months
No local clinical infection (as defined by IDSA/IWGDF criteria) for any wound (target DFU or not) on lower limbs
DFU adequately debrided
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant or breast-feeding woman or woman of childbearing potential not using effective means of contraception
Patient who took part in another clinical trial in the previous month or who is to take part in another clinical trial in the 20 weeks following inclusion
Patient with any known intolerance or allergy or reported adverse reaction to one of the components of the trial dressings
Patient who has undergone surgery or surgical revascularization (vascular reconstruction or angioplasty) in the previous 2 months
Patient who has presented an acute ischemic event (Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) or stroke) in the 3 months before inclusion
Patient with Severe kidney failure, defined as requirement for dialysis
Patient with a systemic infection not controlled by suitable antibiotic treatment
Patient with known osteomyelitis
Patient with leg ulcer(s), regardless of limb
Patient with wounds other than the target DFU located on the heel or on the interdigital part of the foot
Patient with an active neoplastic condition, treated by radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy or immunosuppressant agents
Patient treated for a chronic disease requiring high doses of systemic corticosteroids (≥ 40 mg.d-1 of prednisolone or equivalent)
Patient with a severe illness that might lead to premature withdrawal from the trial
DFU for which surgery or surgical revascularization is planned at any time during the study
Deep DFU defined as stage III or IV (University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification)
DFU clinically infected as defined by IDSA/IWGDF criteria
DFU with more than 20% of its surface area covered by black necrotic tissue following debridement
DFU located on an amputation stump
DFU with neoplastic component
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jacques MARTINI, MD
Phone
00 33 5 61 32 32 89
Facility Information:
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jacques MARTINI, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33481840
Citation
Maunoury F, Oury A, Fortin S, Thomassin L, Bohbot S; Explorer Study. Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245652. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29275068
Citation
Edmonds M, Lazaro-Martinez JL, Alfayate-Garcia JM, Martini J, Petit JM, Rayman G, Lobmann R, Uccioli L, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S, Kerihuel JC, Piaggesi A. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;6(3):186-196. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30438-2. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Erratum In: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar 6;:
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of a New Wound Dressing in the Local Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs