search
Back to results

Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique

Primary Purpose

Labor Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ultrasound guidance
palpation guidance
Sponsored by
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Labor Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 64 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy ASA I or II parturient
  • Will be receiving neuraxial placement for labor, having been consented for the procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA III or IV
  • Unable to participate in the study due to severe pain
  • Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia
  • Previous spinal surgery in the lumbar or sacral area (L1 through Sacrum)
  • BMI greater than 37
  • Height less than 60 inches
  • Significant scoliosis

Sites / Locations

  • Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

palpation guidance

ultrasound guidance

Arm Description

placement of spinal or combined spinal epidural needle using palpation to guide entry position

placement of spinal or combined spinal epidural using ultrasound to guide entry position

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Placement below L3 vertebra
Percentage of catheters placed below the target location

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to placement
Minutes from start of procedure to the end of the procedure
Success of the epidural catheter placement
Relief of labor pain defined by verbal pain score less than 4 after administration of medication

Full Information

First Posted
October 17, 2014
Last Updated
May 7, 2021
Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02271100
Brief Title
Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique
Official Title
Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 25, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is intended to determine whether ultrasound imaging can improve the ability to place a spinal or epidural needle in obstetric anesthesia. By evaluating the use of ultrasound for the placement of epidural catheters the investigators hope to answer two questions: 1. How does the traditional technique based on palpation compare to one using ultrasound to place an epidural catheter? 2. Does ultrasound reduce one potential risk in epidural placement?
Detailed Description
This study contains two phases: A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison of ultrasound imaging versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in laboring women. A prospective, single cohort, blinded trial to assess whether ultrasound imaging provides a reliable placement below the L3 vertebra. The initial phase of the investigation will be a randomized comparison of ultrasound versus palpation. Patients will be enrolled in early labor and will be randomized to have their epidural placed with either technique. The technique will be chosen by computer-generated randomization list maintained in opaque sequentially numbered envelopes. Description of the placement technique is below. The primary outcome will be the number of epidural catheters inserted above the intended insertion site. The investigators will also assess the total time required for epidural catheter placement, number of attempts for successful insertion, effectiveness of the epidural catheter for labor pain control. Following completion of enrollment of the first phase, the second phase of the investigation will enroll patients only into the single-cohort ultrasound arm. The study will use the same methodology as the initial phase, but without randomization due to a single cohort. The primary outcome will be the absolute number of epidural catheters inserted above the L3 vertebral body. The investigators will also assess the effectiveness of the ultrasound markings for guiding placement. Procedure placement technique After written, informed consent, and standard patient preparation, the epidural catheter will be placed with the patient in the sitting position by a junior resident. In the ultrasound arm, the patient will be first imaged using an appropriate probe, and the identified ultrasound landmarks marked on the skin. The skin will be prepped in the usual fashion, and the needle will be inserted at the identified site and direction determined by ultrasound. In the palpation arm, the skin will be prepped and the needle will be inserted using palpation-identified landmarks to guide the needle. All catheters will be intended to be placed at the L4-L5 interspace as the primary attempt. The L3-L4 interspace will be used as a secondary attempt. Assessment of final position After insertion of the epidural catheter and administration of the pain relief medication, patients in both groups will be examined by a blinded observer using ultrasound to determine the catheter insertion site and the likely insertion interspace. If, however, the investigators discover that the use of ultrasound for placement of the epidural catheter may present greater risk than previously anticipated to the pregnant woman or fetus, then the investigators will stop the study after phase 1 and not proceed with phase 2.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Labor Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
randomized blinded comparison of two methods to identify landmarks for a procedure
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
palpation guidance
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
placement of spinal or combined spinal epidural needle using palpation to guide entry position
Arm Title
ultrasound guidance
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
placement of spinal or combined spinal epidural using ultrasound to guide entry position
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ultrasound guidance
Intervention Description
use of ultrasound for entry position estimation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
palpation guidance
Intervention Description
use of palpation for position estimation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Placement below L3 vertebra
Description
Percentage of catheters placed below the target location
Time Frame
immediate
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to placement
Description
Minutes from start of procedure to the end of the procedure
Time Frame
immediate
Title
Success of the epidural catheter placement
Description
Relief of labor pain defined by verbal pain score less than 4 after administration of medication
Time Frame
immediate

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy ASA I or II parturient Will be receiving neuraxial placement for labor, having been consented for the procedure Exclusion Criteria: ASA III or IV Unable to participate in the study due to severe pain Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia Previous spinal surgery in the lumbar or sacral area (L1 through Sacrum) BMI greater than 37 Height less than 60 inches Significant scoliosis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philip E Hess, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs