Assessment of Treatment With Laparoscopic Fenestration or Aspiration Sclerotherapy for Large Symptomatic Hepatic Cysts (ATLAS)
Primary Purpose
Liver Cyst, Polycystic Liver Disease, Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
aspiration sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic fenestration
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Liver Cyst focused on measuring polycystic liver disease, aspiration sclerotherapy, fenestration
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
Hepatic cyst characteristics:
- Large (>5 cm),
- Symptomatic (PLD-Q score ≥20),
- Non-parasitic on imaging (US/CT/MRI)
- Non-neoplastic on imaging (US/CT/MRI)
- Providing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical indication of a complicated hepatic cyst (cyst rupture or active cyst infection)
- Cyst is not laparoscopically accessible for surgery
- Cyst is not percutaneously (ultrasound-guided) accessible for aspiration
- More than 20 cysts of >1.5 cm
- Age above 75 years
- ASA IV
- ECOG score >1
- Aspiration sclerotherapy or laparoscopic fenestration of hepatic cysts was performed in the last 6 months.
- Severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2)
- Coagulopathy (spontaneous INR >2 or platelet count < 80 x 109/l)
- Radiologic contrast allergy
- Pregnancy
- Any current or prior medical condition that may interfere with the conduct of the study or the evaluation of its results in the opinion of the investigator (e.g. inability to fill out questionnaires).
Sites / Locations
- Radboudumc University Medical CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Aspiration sclerotherapy
Laparoscopic Fenestration
Arm Description
Aspiration sclerotherapy is a percutaneous procedure that evacuates fluid from the liver cyst and subsequently exposes cyst lining to a sclerosing agent (e.g. ethanol, minocycline) for a limited period of time.
Laparoscopic fenestration exposes the liver through laparoscopic surgery. During this procedure the cyst is punctured and drained followed by resection of the extra-hepatic cyst wall
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
PLD-Q 4 weeks
Comparison of PLD-Q scores 4 weeks after the procedure, adjusted for baseline PLD-Q score.
Secondary Outcome Measures
PLD-Q score 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention
PLD-Q score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline
PLD-Q invididual symptoms
PLD-Q individual symptom scores at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, compared to baseline
SF-36 MCS
SF-36 Mental Component Score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline
SF 36 PCS
SF-36 Physical Component Score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline
EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline
Liver and cyst volume
Liver and cyst volume with CT before and 12 months after the intervention
Liver and cyst volume at recurrence
Liver and cyst volume in cases of recurrence of symptoms
Cyst volume with US
Cyst volume with ultrasound, at baseline and 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention.
Adverse events
Adverse events (according to Clavien-Dindo)
Technical success
Technical success
Hospital stay
Hospital stay in days
Re-intervention rates
Re-intervention rates during 12 months follow-up.
Cost-effectiveness iPCQ
Cost-effectiveness of both procedures iPCQ 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline
Cost-effectiveness iMCQ
Cost-effectiveness of both procedures iMCQ 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05500157
First Posted
May 6, 2022
Last Updated
April 2, 2023
Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05500157
Brief Title
Assessment of Treatment With Laparoscopic Fenestration or Aspiration Sclerotherapy for Large Symptomatic Hepatic Cysts
Acronym
ATLAS
Official Title
Assessment of Treatment With Laparoscopic Fenestration or Aspiration Sclerotherapy for Large Symptomatic Hepatic Cysts (ATLAS): a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients with large hepatic cysts (> 5cm) may develop symptoms. These can be captured with the polycystic liver disease questionnaire (PLD-Q). Treatment of large hepatic cysts consists of aspiration sclerotherapy or laparoscopic fenestration.
The safety and efficacy of both procedures has been explored in two recent systematic reviews yet no evident conclusion regarding superiority of either procedure could be drawn.
The main objective of the ATLAS trial is to compare laparoscopic fenestration and aspiration sclerotherapy in patients with large symptomatic hepatic cysts on patient-reported outcomes.
Detailed Description
Rationale: Patients with large hepatic cysts(>5cm) may develop symptoms due to distention of Glisson's capsule and/or compression on other abdominal organs. Frequently reported symptoms include abdominal pain, early satiety, nausea, and dyspnea. These symptoms can be captured in the disease-specific Polycystic Liver Disease Questionnaire (PLD-Q), a validated instrument. The treatment of symptomatic liver cysts is aimed to improve symptoms and quality of life by reducing cyst volume. There are two procedures available to treat symptomatic liver cysts: percutaneous aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration.
In aspiration sclerotherapy, fluid is evacuated from the liver cyst and subsequently the cyst lining is exposed to a sclerosing agent for a limited period of time. Sclerotherapy causes temporary recurrence of cyst fluid after drainage, but subsequently results in a steady decrease of cyst volume in the majority of patients.
In laparoscopic fenestration the liver is exposed through laparoscopic surgery. In this procedure the cyst is punctured and drained followed by resection of extra-hepatic cyst wall.
The safety and efficacy of aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration have been explored in two recent systematic reviews. No evident conclusion could be drawn because of the retrospective study design in the vast majority of the studies and the heterogeneity among these. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to identify the possible differences in safety and efficacy in aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration.
Hypothesis: The investigators expect patients treated with laparoscopic fenestration to have better clinical outcome; i.e. a lower PLD-Q score, compared to aspiration sclerotherapy, when measured 4 weeks after the procedure. The investigators expect this difference to become smaller over time (after 6 and 12 months), with loss of statistical significance.
Objective: The main objective is to compare laparoscopic fenestration and aspiration sclerotherapy in patients with large symptomatic hepatic cysts on patient-reported outcomes. This information can be used to assess cost-effectiveness in both treatments.
Study design: A prospective, randomized clinical superiority trial in which patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of the treatment arms. Patients will be followed for 1 year.
Study population: All patients ≥18 years who are diagnosed with a dominant, simple hepatic cyst (>5 cm in diameter), that are symptomatic (PLD-Q score ≥20) and have an indication for treatment (both aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration) are suitable for inclusion in this study. Only patients that are eligible for both treatments can be included in this study. In particular, patients with multiple cysts (>20 cysts of >1.5 cm) will be excluded as surgery leads to more complications in these patients.
Intervention: Patients will be randomly allocated to either aspiration sclerotherapy or laparoscopic fenestration. Both procedures are performed according to the standard Radboudumc protocols. Aspiration sclerotherapy consists of ultrasound-guided, percutaneous drainage of the cyst with subsequent sclerosation with ethanol. Laparoscopic fenestration consists of standard abdominal laparoscopy in which the large cyst(s) are drained and deroofed.
Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the PLD-Q score at 4 weeks after treatment. Secondary parameters are among others: PLD-Q score at baseline, 6 months and 12 months; liver volume (CT) at baseline and 4 weeks; cyst volume (ultrasound) at baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months; complications according to Clavien-Dindo; admission duration, recurrence and re-intervention rates.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Cyst, Polycystic Liver Disease, Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Liver Disease
Keywords
polycystic liver disease, aspiration sclerotherapy, fenestration
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Aspiration sclerotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Aspiration sclerotherapy is a percutaneous procedure that evacuates fluid from the liver cyst and subsequently exposes cyst lining to a sclerosing agent (e.g. ethanol, minocycline) for a limited period of time.
Arm Title
Laparoscopic Fenestration
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic fenestration exposes the liver through laparoscopic surgery. During this procedure the cyst is punctured and drained followed by resection of the extra-hepatic cyst wall
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
aspiration sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic fenestration
Intervention Description
See arm description
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PLD-Q 4 weeks
Description
Comparison of PLD-Q scores 4 weeks after the procedure, adjusted for baseline PLD-Q score.
Time Frame
4 weeks after the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PLD-Q score 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention
Description
PLD-Q score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
PLD-Q invididual symptoms
Description
PLD-Q individual symptom scores at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, compared to baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
SF-36 MCS
Description
SF-36 Mental Component Score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
SF 36 PCS
Description
SF-36 Physical Component Score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
EQ-5D-5L
Description
EQ-5D-5L score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Liver and cyst volume
Description
Liver and cyst volume with CT before and 12 months after the intervention
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Liver and cyst volume at recurrence
Description
Liver and cyst volume in cases of recurrence of symptoms
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Cyst volume with US
Description
Cyst volume with ultrasound, at baseline and 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention.
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Adverse events
Description
Adverse events (according to Clavien-Dindo)
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Technical success
Description
Technical success
Time Frame
periprocedural
Title
Hospital stay
Description
Hospital stay in days
Time Frame
periprocedural
Title
Re-intervention rates
Description
Re-intervention rates during 12 months follow-up.
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Cost-effectiveness iPCQ
Description
Cost-effectiveness of both procedures iPCQ 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Title
Cost-effectiveness iMCQ
Description
Cost-effectiveness of both procedures iMCQ 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline
Time Frame
up to 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years
Hepatic cyst characteristics:
Large (>5 cm),
Symptomatic (PLD-Q score ≥20),
Non-parasitic on imaging (US/CT/MRI)
Non-neoplastic on imaging (US/CT/MRI)
Providing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Clinical indication of a complicated hepatic cyst (cyst rupture or active cyst infection)
Cyst is not laparoscopically accessible for surgery
Cyst is not percutaneously (ultrasound-guided) accessible for aspiration
More than 20 cysts of >1.5 cm
Age above 75 years
ASA IV
ECOG score >1
Aspiration sclerotherapy or laparoscopic fenestration of hepatic cysts was performed in the last 6 months.
Severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2)
Coagulopathy (spontaneous INR >2 or platelet count < 80 x 109/l)
Radiologic contrast allergy
Pregnancy
Any current or prior medical condition that may interfere with the conduct of the study or the evaluation of its results in the opinion of the investigator (e.g. inability to fill out questionnaires).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Joost P.H. Drenth
Phone
+31 24 3619190
Email
joostphdrenth@cs.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Thijs Barten
Phone
+31 24 8186542
Email
thijs.rm.barten@radboudumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joost P.H. Drenth
Organizational Affiliation
Radboud University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Radboudumc University Medical Center
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6500 HB
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Radboudumc University M Center
Phone
+31644107787
Email
joost.drenth@radboudumc.nl
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual participant data are available to other researchers for clinical research purposes upon reasonable request to the principal investigator
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Study data will be provided upon reasonable request with the principal investigator
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Study data will be provided upon reasonable request with the principal investigator
Learn more about this trial
Assessment of Treatment With Laparoscopic Fenestration or Aspiration Sclerotherapy for Large Symptomatic Hepatic Cysts
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs