search
Back to results

Assessments and Interventions for Hand Neuropathy in DM

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Neuropathy, Diabetic

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biofeedback training
Home-based tendon gliding and resistance training
Sponsored by
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Diabetes Mellitus

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:(for training groups)

  • with clinically-defined type II DM who were diagnosed based on the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria
  • impaired in terms of force modulation in precision pinch performance as detected using the PHUA test are referred from outpatients from the Department of Family Medicine in a medical center in southern Taiwan

Exclusion Criteria:(for training groups and healthy control group)

  • diagnosed neuro-musculoskeletal disorders
  • traumatic nerve injuries of the upper limbs
  • trauma to the hand or congenital anomalies of the wrist and hand
  • skin infections or disease of the hands
  • cognitive deficits
  • aged less than 20 years old

Sites / Locations

  • National Cheng-Kung University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Biofeedback training group

Home-based training group

Control group

Arm Description

The participants in the biofeedback training group attend a 30 minute biofeedback protocol per session, two times a week for six to eight weeks that is also combined with the regular diabetic care treatment in the Occupational Therapy Room.

The participants in this group receive similar doses of home-based tendon gliding exercises and resistance training with an anti-stress ball for 30 minutes at a frequency of 2 times a week for 6 to 8 weeks, also combined with the regular diabetic care treatment.

The participants in the control group receive only diabetes disease prevention consultation once and outcome assessments twice.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The pinch-holding-up activity (PHUA) test
For the PHUA test, the participants were asked to pinch and lift the pinch device, and the pinch force will be recorded during the task. The raw force value would be collected and transferred into specific parameters include: (1) FP_Peak: the maximum pinch force during the lifting phase in the PHUA test; (2) FL_Max: the maximum load force at the onset of maximum upward acceleration; (3) force ratio of FP_Peak to FL_Max; (4) percentage of maximal pinch strength: the FP_Peak divided by the maximal static pinch strength as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction are detected in the initial evaluation.
The pinch-holding-up activity (PHUA) test
For the PHUA test, the participants were asked to pinch and lift the pinch device, and the pinch force will be recorded during the task. The raw force value would be collected and transferred into specific parameters include: (1) FP_Peak: the maximum pinch force during the lifting phase in the PHUA test; (2) FL_Max: the maximum load force at the onset of maximum upward acceleration; (3) force ratio of FP_Peak to FL_Max; (4) percentage of maximal pinch strength: the FP_Peak divided by the maximal static pinch strength as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction are detected in the initial evaluation.
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM)
A touch-pressure threshold test with 20 nylon filaments with varying degrees of thickness is conducted. The examiner presses the filament at a 90° angle against the skin until it bows. When the patient indicates a response, the result is recorded. The filament is labeled with a numerical marking, which is a log to the base ten of the force in tenths of a milligram. The threshold value is the finest filament to which the subject correctly responds.
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM)
A touch-pressure threshold test with 20 nylon filaments with varying degrees of thickness is conducted. The examiner presses the filament at a 90° angle against the skin until it bows. When the patient indicates a response, the result is recorded. The filament is labeled with a numerical marking, which is a log to the base ten of the force in tenths of a milligram. The threshold value is the finest filament to which the subject correctly responds.
Purdue Pegboard test
The Purdue Pegboard test has high testing validity and reliability and has been broadly used to measure hand dexterity. The test comprises four subtests involving the ability of the subject to place pins in small holes with the dominant hand, non-dominant hand, and with both hands simultaneously, as well as performing an assembly task.
Purdue Pegboard test
The Purdue Pegboard test has high testing validity and reliability and has been broadly used to measure hand dexterity. The test comprises four subtests involving the ability of the subject to place pins in small holes with the dominant hand, non-dominant hand, and with both hands simultaneously, as well as performing an assembly task.
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), a hand-specific outcomes instrument, is sensitive to providing an understanding of clinical changes with patients' self-reports. The MHQ contains six dimensions with 37 hand-specific questions. Higher scores indicate better hand function, with the exception of the pain facet. The testing reliability of MHQ ranges from 0.81 to 0.97.
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), a hand-specific outcomes instrument, is sensitive to providing an understanding of clinical changes with patients' self-reports. The MHQ contains six dimensions with 37 hand-specific questions. Higher scores indicate better hand function, with the exception of the pain facet. The testing reliability of MHQ ranges from 0.81 to 0.97.
Diabetes-39 (D-39)
The Diabetes 39 (D-39) is a disease-specific questionnaire used to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with diabetes. It contains of 39 questions regarding five dimensions, including energy and mobility, diabetes control, anxiety and worry, social and peer burden, and sexual functioning. Higher scores on all dimensions reveal a better QoL. The reliability of the Chinese version of the tool ranges from 0.82 to 0.93, and it also has good convergent and discriminant validity.
Diabetes-39 (D-39)
The Diabetes 39 (D-39) is a disease-specific questionnaire used to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with diabetes. It contains of 39 questions regarding five dimensions, including energy and mobility, diabetes control, anxiety and worry, social and peer burden, and sexual functioning. Higher scores on all dimensions reveal a better QoL. The reliability of the Chinese version of the tool ranges from 0.82 to 0.93, and it also has good convergent and discriminant validity.
Moving two-point discrimination (M2PD) test
The Moving two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring. Also,it measures the innervation density of slowly and quickly adapting nerve fibers, respectively, and their corresponding mechanoreceptors as well.
Moving two-point discrimination (M2PD) test
The Moving two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring. Also,it measures the innervation density of slowly and quickly adapting nerve fibers, respectively, and their corresponding mechanoreceptors as well.
Static two-point discrimination (S2PD) test
The two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring.
Static two-point discrimination (S2PD) test
The two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2019
Last Updated
February 18, 2019
Sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03847129
Brief Title
Assessments and Interventions for Hand Neuropathy in DM
Official Title
Functional Measurements and Therapeutic Intervention for Hand Neuropathy in Diabetes Mellitus
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 20, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is to investigate the effects of task-based biofeedback training compared with home-based programs on sensorimotor function and quality of life for diabetic patients with neuropathic hands. The investigators hypothesize that the task-based biofeedback training might have significant effectiveness for restoration of sensory function, precision pinch performance, hand dexterity and life quality for patients with diabetic neuropathy.
Detailed Description
Hand tendon gliding exercises allow both the flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis tendons of hands to achieve the greatest range of motion. Thus, in conjunction with resistive exercises for diabetic hands, such exercises are considered an appropriate home-based training method that has positive effects on various diabetic hand problems in terms of regaining smooth tendon excursion, preventing joint contracture, and reducing intrinsic muscle tightness. Different from the biomechanical approach to deal with hand problems, a biofeedback system can be used to provide real-time information on improper movements during task-based training intended to enhance either performance quality or accuracy. This study aims to analyze the difference in treatment effects between a computerized evaluation and a re-education biofeedback system that provides interactive sensorimotor information to shape the optimized coordinated pinch pattern of a hand and a home-based tendon gliding exercise program in conjunction with resistive exercise with weekly supervision on sensorimotor function and quality of life for diabetic patients. The investigators hypothesize the task-based biofeedback training using the biofeedback training system could have significant effectiveness for restoration of sensory function, precision pinch performance, hand dexterity and life quality for patients with diabetic neuropathy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Neuropathy, Diabetic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
39 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Biofeedback training group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The participants in the biofeedback training group attend a 30 minute biofeedback protocol per session, two times a week for six to eight weeks that is also combined with the regular diabetic care treatment in the Occupational Therapy Room.
Arm Title
Home-based training group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The participants in this group receive similar doses of home-based tendon gliding exercises and resistance training with an anti-stress ball for 30 minutes at a frequency of 2 times a week for 6 to 8 weeks, also combined with the regular diabetic care treatment.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The participants in the control group receive only diabetes disease prevention consultation once and outcome assessments twice.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Biofeedback training
Intervention Description
Before the biofeedback training, the baseline pinch force detected from a pinch-holding-up activity is recorded to set the target level according to the baseline data. With the aim for improving the performance, a 94% peak force value detected at the baseline is set as the target threshold for the training. Each participant attends a 30-minute biofeedback protocol per session, two times a week for six to eight weeks. Once the pinch force value exceeds the target range, visual and auditory cues are provided to inform the subjects to modify the performance.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Home-based tendon gliding and resistance training
Intervention Description
The participants receive similar doses of home-based tendon gliding exercises and resistance training with an anti-stress ball for 30 minutes at a frequency of 2 times a week for 6 to 8 weeks, also combined with the regular diabetic care treatment. Six to eight telephone visits are carried out to remind the patients to comply with the exercise program during the training period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The pinch-holding-up activity (PHUA) test
Description
For the PHUA test, the participants were asked to pinch and lift the pinch device, and the pinch force will be recorded during the task. The raw force value would be collected and transferred into specific parameters include: (1) FP_Peak: the maximum pinch force during the lifting phase in the PHUA test; (2) FL_Max: the maximum load force at the onset of maximum upward acceleration; (3) force ratio of FP_Peak to FL_Max; (4) percentage of maximal pinch strength: the FP_Peak divided by the maximal static pinch strength as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction are detected in the initial evaluation.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
The pinch-holding-up activity (PHUA) test
Description
For the PHUA test, the participants were asked to pinch and lift the pinch device, and the pinch force will be recorded during the task. The raw force value would be collected and transferred into specific parameters include: (1) FP_Peak: the maximum pinch force during the lifting phase in the PHUA test; (2) FL_Max: the maximum load force at the onset of maximum upward acceleration; (3) force ratio of FP_Peak to FL_Max; (4) percentage of maximal pinch strength: the FP_Peak divided by the maximal static pinch strength as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction are detected in the initial evaluation.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention
Title
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM)
Description
A touch-pressure threshold test with 20 nylon filaments with varying degrees of thickness is conducted. The examiner presses the filament at a 90° angle against the skin until it bows. When the patient indicates a response, the result is recorded. The filament is labeled with a numerical marking, which is a log to the base ten of the force in tenths of a milligram. The threshold value is the finest filament to which the subject correctly responds.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM)
Description
A touch-pressure threshold test with 20 nylon filaments with varying degrees of thickness is conducted. The examiner presses the filament at a 90° angle against the skin until it bows. When the patient indicates a response, the result is recorded. The filament is labeled with a numerical marking, which is a log to the base ten of the force in tenths of a milligram. The threshold value is the finest filament to which the subject correctly responds.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention
Title
Purdue Pegboard test
Description
The Purdue Pegboard test has high testing validity and reliability and has been broadly used to measure hand dexterity. The test comprises four subtests involving the ability of the subject to place pins in small holes with the dominant hand, non-dominant hand, and with both hands simultaneously, as well as performing an assembly task.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Purdue Pegboard test
Description
The Purdue Pegboard test has high testing validity and reliability and has been broadly used to measure hand dexterity. The test comprises four subtests involving the ability of the subject to place pins in small holes with the dominant hand, non-dominant hand, and with both hands simultaneously, as well as performing an assembly task.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention
Title
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Description
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), a hand-specific outcomes instrument, is sensitive to providing an understanding of clinical changes with patients' self-reports. The MHQ contains six dimensions with 37 hand-specific questions. Higher scores indicate better hand function, with the exception of the pain facet. The testing reliability of MHQ ranges from 0.81 to 0.97.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Description
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), a hand-specific outcomes instrument, is sensitive to providing an understanding of clinical changes with patients' self-reports. The MHQ contains six dimensions with 37 hand-specific questions. Higher scores indicate better hand function, with the exception of the pain facet. The testing reliability of MHQ ranges from 0.81 to 0.97.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention
Title
Diabetes-39 (D-39)
Description
The Diabetes 39 (D-39) is a disease-specific questionnaire used to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with diabetes. It contains of 39 questions regarding five dimensions, including energy and mobility, diabetes control, anxiety and worry, social and peer burden, and sexual functioning. Higher scores on all dimensions reveal a better QoL. The reliability of the Chinese version of the tool ranges from 0.82 to 0.93, and it also has good convergent and discriminant validity.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Diabetes-39 (D-39)
Description
The Diabetes 39 (D-39) is a disease-specific questionnaire used to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with diabetes. It contains of 39 questions regarding five dimensions, including energy and mobility, diabetes control, anxiety and worry, social and peer burden, and sexual functioning. Higher scores on all dimensions reveal a better QoL. The reliability of the Chinese version of the tool ranges from 0.82 to 0.93, and it also has good convergent and discriminant validity.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention
Title
Moving two-point discrimination (M2PD) test
Description
The Moving two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring. Also,it measures the innervation density of slowly and quickly adapting nerve fibers, respectively, and their corresponding mechanoreceptors as well.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Moving two-point discrimination (M2PD) test
Description
The Moving two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring. Also,it measures the innervation density of slowly and quickly adapting nerve fibers, respectively, and their corresponding mechanoreceptors as well.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention
Title
Static two-point discrimination (S2PD) test
Description
The two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Static two-point discrimination (S2PD) test
Description
The two-point discrimination test which is used to detect the shortest distance between the points that the subjects can perceive are tools for tactile acuity measuring.
Time Frame
6~8 weeks after intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:(for training groups) with clinically-defined type II DM who were diagnosed based on the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria impaired in terms of force modulation in precision pinch performance as detected using the PHUA test are referred from outpatients from the Department of Family Medicine in a medical center in southern Taiwan Exclusion Criteria:(for training groups and healthy control group) diagnosed neuro-musculoskeletal disorders traumatic nerve injuries of the upper limbs trauma to the hand or congenital anomalies of the wrist and hand skin infections or disease of the hands cognitive deficits aged less than 20 years old
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Cheng-Kung University
City
Tainan
ZIP/Postal Code
701
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Assessments and Interventions for Hand Neuropathy in DM

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs