search
Back to results

Asthma Symptom Management Through Mindfulness Training

Primary Purpose

Asthma

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
Healthy Living Course (HLC)
Sponsored by
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Asthma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 and older
  • Documented diagnosis of asthma from a physician for greater than 12 months that includes an objective indicator of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (positive methacholine challenge test or > 12% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) in response to bronchodilator);
  • Meets criteria for mild, moderate or severe asthma
  • Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids for at least 12 weeks with stable dosing for greater than 4 weeks;
  • Able to read and understand English, and complete informed consent process and study data collection procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current smoker or greater than 10 pack-year smoking history
  • Diagnosis of asthma of intermittent severity
  • Other lung diseases besides asthma
  • Cancer, except non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • Currently receiving treatment for symptomatic cardiovascular disease within past 6 months
  • Current or recent (within the past 3 months) severe exacerbation of asthma requiring hospitalization or oral glucocorticoids;
  • Currently pregnant
  • Major psychiatric disorders or psychiatric hospitalization in the last 2 years;
  • Has taken the MBSR program in the past, and/or currently practicing meditation or yoga on a regular basis.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Massachusetts Medical School

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction

Healthy Living Course (HLC)

Arm Description

Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program consists of 8 weekly classes plus an all-day class to train participants in mindfulness and its application, including addressing challenges arising from chronic diseases and life stresses.

The Healthy Living Course (HLC) consists of 8 weekly classes plus an all-day class providing lectures and discussions about health-related topics. The purpose of the HLC is to match the MBSR for time, attention and group support

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control at 18 Months
Asthma control will be assessed using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The ACQ is a 7-item validated measure that assesses the 5 asthma symptoms considered most important and most used by clinicians for evaluating asthma control, along with use of short-acting beta-agonist and FEV1 percent predicted. Patients recall their symptoms and short-acting beta-agonist use during the previous week; FEV1 is obtained from spirometry. All seven questions are scored on a 7-point scale (0=good control, 6=poor control), and the overall score (range 0-6) is the mean of the seven responses. Lower scores indicate better outcome. Minimum = 0, Maximum = 6. Changes of 0.5 or greater in the score are considered important differences.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Asthma-related Quality of Life at 18 Months
Asthma-related quality of life will be assessed using the Asthma-related QoL (AQoL) measure.The AQoL has 30 items assessing impairment in 4 areas of function shown to be important to the QoL of adult patients with asthma (activity limitations, asthma symptoms, emotional function and environmental exposure). Overall QoL is computed by averaging scores on the 4 domains. Items assess the degree to which important activities have been limited by asthma during the last 2 weeks on a 7-point scale (1= maximal impairment, 7= no impairment). Shown to be valid, reliable and sufficiently sensitive to changes in asthma symptoms to capture the effects of an intervention in a clinical trial. Higher scores = better outcome, minimum score = 30, maximum score 210. Changes in scores of 0.5 or above represent clinically meaningful improvement in QoL.
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Interoceptive Accuracy at 18-months
Respiratory interoceptive accuracy will be measured using the Breath Perception Discrimination Test (BPDT). The BPDT measures ability to detect small changes in resistive load. This test will be done in the Pulmonary Diagnostic Laboratory at each site. During the test period, the presentation of the resistor will be announced at the onset of a new inspiration for the duration of one full breath cycle. At the conclusion of the breath cycle, participants pause for 5 normal breaths, at which point the next resistor in the block is presented. The test will be divided into 6 blocks during which there is a random presentation of each resistor so that participants carry out 30 ratings (6 for each condition) over the course of the test. Higher score is better outcome, lower score is worse outcome. Lowest score is zero percent, highest score is 100% Time to complete: 30 minutes.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Expiratory Volume at 18-months.
Lung function will be assessed via spirometry. Spirometry assesses the level of air flow limitation according to the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The unit of measure is not a score on a scale but rather "percent predicted expiratory volume" to assess air flow limitation. Measurement will be done in the site Pulmonary Diagnostic Laboratories according to American Thoracic Society guidelines before and after inhalation of bronchodilator. This includes instructing participants to not take a bronchodilator at least 4 hours prior to their spirometry, and assessing lung function both before, and then 30 minutes after bronchodilator to assess best lung function and responsiveness to bronchodilator therapy. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Cost Per Change in Quality of Life (QOL)
This outcome is the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The ICER estimates how much the MBSR intervention costs, relative to the HLC intervention, to improve the outcome measure by 1 unit. The ICER is calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental outcome. The Incremental cost is difference in total costs (sum of program costs and healthcare costs over 18 months, in U.S. dollars) between the MBSR and HLC groups. The Incremental outcome is the difference between the groups in the chosen measure of health outcome at 18 months (here, mean Asthma-related QoL (AQoL) questionnaire scores).
Cost in Change of Percent Predicted FEV
This outcome is the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The ICER estimates how much the MBSR intervention costs, relative to the HL intervention, to improve the outcome measure by 1 unit. The ICER is calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental outcome. The incremental cost is the difference in total costs (sum of program costs and healthcare costs over 18 months, in U.S. dollars) between the MBSR and HLC groups. The incremental outcome is the difference between the groups at 18 months in the chosen measure of health outcome (here, mean Predicted FEV1 scores). This is not a scale.
Cost in Change of Asthma Control
This outcome is the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The ICER estimates how much the MBSR intervention costs, relative to the HL intervention, to improve the outcome measure by 1 unit. The ICER is calculated by dividing the Incremental cost by the incremental outcome. The incremental cost is the difference in total costs (sum of program costs and healthcare costs over 18 months, in U.S. dollars) between the MBSR and HLC groups. The incremental outcome is the difference between the groups in the chosen measure of health outcome 18 months (here, mean Asthma Control Score). This is not a scale.

Full Information

First Posted
October 6, 2014
Last Updated
May 20, 2022
Sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Collaborators
The Miriam Hospital, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02275559
Brief Title
Asthma Symptom Management Through Mindfulness Training
Official Title
Asthma Symptom Management Through Mindfulness Training
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Collaborators
The Miriam Hospital, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Asthma is one of the four most common adult chronic disorders. Supporting asthma patients in improving their asthma control and symptoms as well as their quality of life are important goals in clinical management. This study will test the effect of a widely-available mindfulness training program in improving asthma control and symptoms and quality of life among patients with asthma, and explore the relationship between asthma control and a number of factors, including how well patients perceive their respiratory symptoms.
Detailed Description
Asthma is one of the four most common adult chronic disorders. It affects 7.3% (16.4 million) U.S. adults and costs $18 billion in direct healthcare costs and lost productivity. Control of symptoms and improving patient's quality of life (QOL) are the goals in asthma management and require patients to accurately identify their symptoms. But the low congruence between patients' symptom reports and their pulmonary function leads to disease management errors. The accuracy with which asthma patients recognize their symptoms is affected by emotional factors, and because high negative affectivity is related to low interoceptive accuracy and worse asthma symptoms and asthma physical health, the frequent mental distress prevalent among asthmatics is thought to result in difficulty in distinguishing symptoms of stress/distress from those of asthma. Mindfulness training teaches people to recognize and distinguish among the components of experience (thoughts, feelings, sensations/symptoms) and is associated with increased perceptual accuracy of respiratory resistance, and reduced affective negativity. It thus has the potential to improve patient's discrimination between asthma symptoms and stress/distress, resulting in improved asthma management, control and QOL. A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) (N=84) of a widely-available mindfulness training program (Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)) to explore this hypothesis in adults with mild, moderate or severe persistent asthma. Intent to treat analyses comparing MBSR to an active control program showed clinically significant improvements in overall QOL (p=0.01), as well as important improvements in asthma symptoms (p=0.009), reduced use of asthma rescue medication (p=0.001), anxiety (p=0.05), perceived stress (p=0.01), and mindfulness (p=0.01). Promising improvements in the percentage of patients with well-controlled asthma also were found. All improvements were sustained 10 months post-intervention. Widespread adoption of this promising adjunct intervention will require sharper evidence regarding asthma control and symptoms. The primary aim is to test MBSR against an active control on the key clinical outcomes of asthma control and symptoms using gold standard measures with 256 adults with mild, moderate or severe asthma. And to evaluate the program's effect on asthma QOL, lung function, cost-effectiveness, and the mediating effect of respiratory interoceptive accuracy on asthma control, QOL, and medication use. Assessments are at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. MBSR is available nationwide and covered by many third-party payers. If sustained and credible improvements in asthma control and symptoms are found, MBSR could be a useful adjunct to traditional medical treatment and would have the potential for improving the lives of people with asthma. By examining the mediating effects of psychosocial variables on asthma control, the study also generates new knowledge on mechanisms of change and maintenance in mind-body and behavioral programs in medicine.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Asthma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
233 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program consists of 8 weekly classes plus an all-day class to train participants in mindfulness and its application, including addressing challenges arising from chronic diseases and life stresses.
Arm Title
Healthy Living Course (HLC)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The Healthy Living Course (HLC) consists of 8 weekly classes plus an all-day class providing lectures and discussions about health-related topics. The purpose of the HLC is to match the MBSR for time, attention and group support
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
Intervention Description
Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program consists of 8 weekly classes plus an all-day class to train participants in mindfulness and its application, including addressing challenges arising from chronic diseases and life stresses.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Healthy Living Course (HLC)
Intervention Description
The Healthy Living Course (HLC) consists of 8 weekly classes plus an all-day class providing lectures and discussions about health-related topics. The purpose of the HLC is to match the MBSR for time, attention and group support
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control at 18 Months
Description
Asthma control will be assessed using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The ACQ is a 7-item validated measure that assesses the 5 asthma symptoms considered most important and most used by clinicians for evaluating asthma control, along with use of short-acting beta-agonist and FEV1 percent predicted. Patients recall their symptoms and short-acting beta-agonist use during the previous week; FEV1 is obtained from spirometry. All seven questions are scored on a 7-point scale (0=good control, 6=poor control), and the overall score (range 0-6) is the mean of the seven responses. Lower scores indicate better outcome. Minimum = 0, Maximum = 6. Changes of 0.5 or greater in the score are considered important differences.
Time Frame
Baseline and 18 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Asthma-related Quality of Life at 18 Months
Description
Asthma-related quality of life will be assessed using the Asthma-related QoL (AQoL) measure.The AQoL has 30 items assessing impairment in 4 areas of function shown to be important to the QoL of adult patients with asthma (activity limitations, asthma symptoms, emotional function and environmental exposure). Overall QoL is computed by averaging scores on the 4 domains. Items assess the degree to which important activities have been limited by asthma during the last 2 weeks on a 7-point scale (1= maximal impairment, 7= no impairment). Shown to be valid, reliable and sufficiently sensitive to changes in asthma symptoms to capture the effects of an intervention in a clinical trial. Higher scores = better outcome, minimum score = 30, maximum score 210. Changes in scores of 0.5 or above represent clinically meaningful improvement in QoL.
Time Frame
Baseline and 18 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Interoceptive Accuracy at 18-months
Description
Respiratory interoceptive accuracy will be measured using the Breath Perception Discrimination Test (BPDT). The BPDT measures ability to detect small changes in resistive load. This test will be done in the Pulmonary Diagnostic Laboratory at each site. During the test period, the presentation of the resistor will be announced at the onset of a new inspiration for the duration of one full breath cycle. At the conclusion of the breath cycle, participants pause for 5 normal breaths, at which point the next resistor in the block is presented. The test will be divided into 6 blocks during which there is a random presentation of each resistor so that participants carry out 30 ratings (6 for each condition) over the course of the test. Higher score is better outcome, lower score is worse outcome. Lowest score is zero percent, highest score is 100% Time to complete: 30 minutes.
Time Frame
Baseline and 18-months
Title
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Expiratory Volume at 18-months.
Description
Lung function will be assessed via spirometry. Spirometry assesses the level of air flow limitation according to the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The unit of measure is not a score on a scale but rather "percent predicted expiratory volume" to assess air flow limitation. Measurement will be done in the site Pulmonary Diagnostic Laboratories according to American Thoracic Society guidelines before and after inhalation of bronchodilator. This includes instructing participants to not take a bronchodilator at least 4 hours prior to their spirometry, and assessing lung function both before, and then 30 minutes after bronchodilator to assess best lung function and responsiveness to bronchodilator therapy. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and 18-months
Title
Cost Per Change in Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
This outcome is the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The ICER estimates how much the MBSR intervention costs, relative to the HLC intervention, to improve the outcome measure by 1 unit. The ICER is calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental outcome. The Incremental cost is difference in total costs (sum of program costs and healthcare costs over 18 months, in U.S. dollars) between the MBSR and HLC groups. The Incremental outcome is the difference between the groups in the chosen measure of health outcome at 18 months (here, mean Asthma-related QoL (AQoL) questionnaire scores).
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Cost in Change of Percent Predicted FEV
Description
This outcome is the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The ICER estimates how much the MBSR intervention costs, relative to the HL intervention, to improve the outcome measure by 1 unit. The ICER is calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental outcome. The incremental cost is the difference in total costs (sum of program costs and healthcare costs over 18 months, in U.S. dollars) between the MBSR and HLC groups. The incremental outcome is the difference between the groups at 18 months in the chosen measure of health outcome (here, mean Predicted FEV1 scores). This is not a scale.
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Cost in Change of Asthma Control
Description
This outcome is the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The ICER estimates how much the MBSR intervention costs, relative to the HL intervention, to improve the outcome measure by 1 unit. The ICER is calculated by dividing the Incremental cost by the incremental outcome. The incremental cost is the difference in total costs (sum of program costs and healthcare costs over 18 months, in U.S. dollars) between the MBSR and HLC groups. The incremental outcome is the difference between the groups in the chosen measure of health outcome 18 months (here, mean Asthma Control Score). This is not a scale.
Time Frame
18 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 and older Documented diagnosis of asthma from a physician for greater than 12 months that includes an objective indicator of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (positive methacholine challenge test or > 12% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) in response to bronchodilator); Meets criteria for mild, moderate or severe asthma Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids for at least 12 weeks with stable dosing for greater than 4 weeks; Able to read and understand English, and complete informed consent process and study data collection procedures. Exclusion Criteria: Current smoker or greater than 10 pack-year smoking history Diagnosis of asthma of intermittent severity Other lung diseases besides asthma Cancer, except non-melanoma skin cancer; Currently receiving treatment for symptomatic cardiovascular disease within past 6 months Current or recent (within the past 3 months) severe exacerbation of asthma requiring hospitalization or oral glucocorticoids; Currently pregnant Major psychiatric disorders or psychiatric hospitalization in the last 2 years; Has taken the MBSR program in the past, and/or currently practicing meditation or yoga on a regular basis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Carmody, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lori Pbert, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Massachusetts Medical School
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01655
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Asthma Symptom Management Through Mindfulness Training

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs