search
Back to results

At Home Study of a Zone-Model Predictive Control (MPC) Controller and a Health Monitoring System (HMS) With the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) System and Run-to-Run Adaptation

Primary Purpose

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CGM and Insulin Pump
Closed-Loop Control System
Sponsored by
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus focused on measuring Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Artificial Pancreas, Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year and an insulin pump for at least 6 months
  • Willing to wear the study CGM device for the duration of the study
  • Age ≥21 to <65 years
  • HbA1c <10.0%; if HbA1c <6.0% then total daily insulin must be ≥0.5 U/kg
  • For females, not currently known to be pregnant. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study.
  • Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study
  • Currently using insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio to calculate meal bolus sizes
  • Hypoglycemia awareness as demonstrated by a Clarke Hypoglycemia Unawareness score of 2 or lower
  • Access to internet and cell phone service at home, and a computer for downloading device data
  • Availability of care partner committed to participating in training activities, knowledgeable at all times of the participant's location, and being available to provide assistance when system is being used at night
  • Commitment to maintaining uninterrupted availability via cell phone and avoiding any overnight travel for the duration the period using the closed-loop system
  • An understanding of and willingness to follow the protocol and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in the 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 12 months prior to enrollment
  • History of a seizure disorder (except hypoglycemic seizure), unless written clearance is received from a neurologist
  • Coronary artery disease or heart failure, unless written clearance is received from a cardiologist
  • History of cardiac arrhythmia (except for benign premature atrial contractions and benign premature ventricular contractions which are permitted)
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples:

    1. Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months for either the subject or the subject's primary care giver (i.e., parent or guardian)
    2. Presence of a known adrenal disorder
    3. Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase >2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function
    4. Abnormal renal function test results (calculated GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2); testing required for subjects with diabetes duration of greater than 5 years post onset of puberty
    5. Active gastroparesis
    6. If on antihypertensive, thyroid, anti-depressant or lipid lowering medication, lack of stability on the medication for the past 2 months prior to enrollment in the study
    7. Uncontrolled thyroid disease (TSH undetectable or >10 mlU/L); testing required within three months prior to admission for subjects with a goiter or who are on thyroid hormone replacement, and within one year otherwise
    8. Abuse of alcohol or recreational drugs
    9. Infectious process not anticipated to resolve prior to study procedures (e.g. meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis)
  • A recent injury to body or limb, muscular disorder, use of any medication, any carcinogenic disease, or other significant medical disorder if that injury, medication or disease in the judgment of the investigator will affect the completion of the protocol
  • Current use of the following drugs and supplements:

    1. Acetaminophen
    2. Beta blockers
    3. Oral or injectable glucocorticoids
    4. Any other medication that the investigator believes is a contraindication to the subject's participation

Sites / Locations

  • William Sansum Diabetes Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Virginia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care (Week 2)

Closed-Loop Control System with Zone MPC and HMS

Arm Description

The subjects' Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care for the second week of the study before any adjustments to pump settings, using a CGM and Insulin Pump.

The artificial pancreas system will be allowed to employ its Model Predictive Control algorithm to make decisions about insulin delivery based on CGM glucose levels. The Health Monitoring System algorithm uses the same CGM data as the MPC control algorithm but utilizes a separate algorithm for trending and predictions of future glucose values. Using a redundant and independent algorithm is an important safety feature of the overall AP device. Algorithmic adjustment of carbohydrate ratios prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued basal rate and carbohydrate ratio algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use will occur.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) from baseline (week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study), with A1c measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well for repeated measures.
The primary endpoint is change in HbA1c from baseline (end of week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study). HbA1c will be measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well following each adaptation period, so the overall design of the study includes 4 repeated measures and a baseline-end of study contrast.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall
Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use. These markers include LBGI (Low blood glucose index) and HBGI (High blood glucose index.
Insulin Doses Given
Change in insulin doses given, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Treatments for hypoglycemia
Treatments for hypoglycemia between the open and closed-loop phases of the study, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia during closed-Loop control.
Outside interventions needed.
Outside interventions needed to aid with treatment during closed-Loop control.
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur (# disconnects and device restarts).
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur during closed-Loop control. This includes number of CGM communication losses with 3 or more missed points, and number of times the entire system required a restart
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, overall
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.

Full Information

First Posted
February 25, 2016
Last Updated
October 12, 2016
Sponsor
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Collaborators
Harvard University, University of California, Santa Barbara, Mayo Clinic, University of Virginia, University of Padova
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02705053
Brief Title
At Home Study of a Zone-Model Predictive Control (MPC) Controller and a Health Monitoring System (HMS) With the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) System and Run-to-Run Adaptation
Official Title
At Home Study of a Zone-Model Predictive Control (MPC) Controller and a Health Monitoring System (HMS) With the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) System and Run-to-Run Adaptation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Collaborators
Harvard University, University of California, Santa Barbara, Mayo Clinic, University of Virginia, University of Padova

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Specifically, the investigators will test zone model predictive control AP that will be enhanced by run-to-run optimizations of basal rates (BR) and insulin to carbohydrate ratios (CR).
Detailed Description
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Specifically, the investigators will test zone model predictive control AP that will be enhanced by run-to-run optimizations of basal rates (BR) and insulin to carbohydrate ratios (CR). This protocol builds on the investigators previously validated Zone-MPC and Health Monitoring System (HMS) algorithms (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01929798) integrated into the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) system (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02463682). The same AP system used in NCT02463682 will now be used with algorithmic adjustment of CR's prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued BR and CR algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use for a longer duration. The system will be evaluated on up to 12 subjects per site (n=36 subjects) for 15 weeks at 3 different sites (William Sansum Diabetes Center, University of Virginia, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Keywords
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Artificial Pancreas, Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care (Week 2)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The subjects' Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care for the second week of the study before any adjustments to pump settings, using a CGM and Insulin Pump.
Arm Title
Closed-Loop Control System with Zone MPC and HMS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The artificial pancreas system will be allowed to employ its Model Predictive Control algorithm to make decisions about insulin delivery based on CGM glucose levels. The Health Monitoring System algorithm uses the same CGM data as the MPC control algorithm but utilizes a separate algorithm for trending and predictions of future glucose values. Using a redundant and independent algorithm is an important safety feature of the overall AP device. Algorithmic adjustment of carbohydrate ratios prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued basal rate and carbohydrate ratio algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use will occur.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CGM and Insulin Pump
Intervention Description
Dexcom G4 Platinum CGM with Share AP Receiver Roche Accu-Chek insulin pump.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Closed-Loop Control System
Intervention Description
The devices that will be used in the Closed-Loop Control System include the following components: DiAs - a smart-phone medical platform; Dexcom G4 Platinum connected to DiAs via Bluetooth CGM receiver; Roche Accu-Chek insulin pump connected to DiAs via wireless Bluetooth; Remote Monitoring Server connected to DiAs via 3G or local Wi-Fi network, and Zone-MPC and HMS algorithms running on DiAs (MPC and HMS)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) from baseline (week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study), with A1c measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well for repeated measures.
Description
The primary endpoint is change in HbA1c from baseline (end of week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study). HbA1c will be measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well following each adaptation period, so the overall design of the study includes 4 repeated measures and a baseline-end of study contrast.
Time Frame
13 Weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall
Description
Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight
Description
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals
Description
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia
Description
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use. These markers include LBGI (Low blood glucose index) and HBGI (High blood glucose index.
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Insulin Doses Given
Description
Change in insulin doses given, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Treatments for hypoglycemia
Description
Treatments for hypoglycemia between the open and closed-loop phases of the study, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia
Description
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia during closed-Loop control.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Outside interventions needed.
Description
Outside interventions needed to aid with treatment during closed-Loop control.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur (# disconnects and device restarts).
Description
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur during closed-Loop control. This includes number of CGM communication losses with 3 or more missed points, and number of times the entire system required a restart
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, overall
Description
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Time Frame
1 week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year and an insulin pump for at least 6 months Willing to wear the study CGM device for the duration of the study Age ≥21 to <65 years HbA1c <10.0%; if HbA1c <6.0% then total daily insulin must be ≥0.5 U/kg For females, not currently known to be pregnant. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study Currently using insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio to calculate meal bolus sizes Hypoglycemia awareness as demonstrated by a Clarke Hypoglycemia Unawareness score of 2 or lower Access to internet and cell phone service at home, and a computer for downloading device data Availability of care partner committed to participating in training activities, knowledgeable at all times of the participant's location, and being available to provide assistance when system is being used at night Commitment to maintaining uninterrupted availability via cell phone and avoiding any overnight travel for the duration the period using the closed-loop system An understanding of and willingness to follow the protocol and sign the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in the 12 months prior to enrollment Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 12 months prior to enrollment History of a seizure disorder (except hypoglycemic seizure), unless written clearance is received from a neurologist Coronary artery disease or heart failure, unless written clearance is received from a cardiologist History of cardiac arrhythmia (except for benign premature atrial contractions and benign premature ventricular contractions which are permitted) Cystic fibrosis A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples: Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months for either the subject or the subject's primary care giver (i.e., parent or guardian) Presence of a known adrenal disorder Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase >2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function Abnormal renal function test results (calculated GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2); testing required for subjects with diabetes duration of greater than 5 years post onset of puberty Active gastroparesis If on antihypertensive, thyroid, anti-depressant or lipid lowering medication, lack of stability on the medication for the past 2 months prior to enrollment in the study Uncontrolled thyroid disease (TSH undetectable or >10 mlU/L); testing required within three months prior to admission for subjects with a goiter or who are on thyroid hormone replacement, and within one year otherwise Abuse of alcohol or recreational drugs Infectious process not anticipated to resolve prior to study procedures (e.g. meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis) A recent injury to body or limb, muscular disorder, use of any medication, any carcinogenic disease, or other significant medical disorder if that injury, medication or disease in the judgment of the investigator will affect the completion of the protocol Current use of the following drugs and supplements: Acetaminophen Beta blockers Oral or injectable glucocorticoids Any other medication that the investigator believes is a contraindication to the subject's participation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Francis J Doyle III, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Harvard University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eyal Dassau, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Harvard University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jordan E Pinsker, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ananda Basu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yogish Kudva, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Boris Kovatchev, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Virginia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sue Brown, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Virginia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Patek, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Virginia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudio Cobelli, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Padova
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
William Sansum Diabetes Center
City
Santa Barbara
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22903
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29030383
Citation
Dassau E, Pinsker JE, Kudva YC, Brown SA, Gondhalekar R, Dalla Man C, Patek S, Schiavon M, Dadlani V, Dasanayake I, Church MM, Carter RE, Bevier WC, Huyett LM, Hughes J, Anderson S, Lv D, Schertz E, Emory E, McCrady-Spitzer SK, Jean T, Bradley PK, Hinshaw L, Laguna Sanz AJ, Basu A, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C, Doyle FJ 3rd. Twelve-Week 24/7 Ambulatory Artificial Pancreas With Weekly Adaptation of Insulin Delivery Settings: Effect on Hemoglobin A1c and Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1719-1726. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1188. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

At Home Study of a Zone-Model Predictive Control (MPC) Controller and a Health Monitoring System (HMS) With the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) System and Run-to-Run Adaptation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs