search
Back to results

Attention Training on Smartphones (ATS)

Primary Purpose

Attention, Substance Use

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Attentional Bias Retraining (ABR)
Control Training
Sponsored by
University of Florida
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Attention

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to read and write in English fluently and complete study evaluations
  • 6-week availability to participate in the study
  • Willing and able to answer questions on smartphones up to 4 times daily for about 10 minutes each time.
  • On Suboxone (or methadone if recruitment does not progress as planned) for at least one month (verified by urine drug test- unless using transdermal patch because 1/3 of patients using the patch will not show positive urine screen; and verified by opioid replacement therapy-provider)"
  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for opioid use disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use (outside of prescription) for drugs that negatively interact with one another
  • Meet severe DSM-5 criteria for current substance use disorders other than opioids, nicotine or cannabis (e.g., current stimulant use disorder) and have used that substance within the past 30 days based on self-report or a positive urine drug test
  • Severe psychiatric conditions
  • Color blindness and/or uncorrected defective vision

Sites / Locations

  • EDGE Laboratory

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Attentional Training Group

Control Training Group

Arm Description

Each condition involves use of a smartphone app. One smartphone app includes a task that targets attention directed to substance-related cues while the other app includes a similar task that does not target attention in this way. Neither participant nor the staff members working on the study will know which condition the participant has been randomly assigned to.

Each condition involves use of a smartphone app. One smartphone app includes a task that targets attention directed to substance-related cues while the other app includes a similar task that does not target attention in this way. Neither participant nor the staff members working on the study will know which condition the participant has been randomly assigned to.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Modified System Usability Scale scores overall and comparisons between study conditions
Seven-point Likert scale items regarding the usability and acceptability of the app (higher score indicates greater usability and acceptability). Higher scores indicate greater usability and acceptability. The attentional bias retraining and control training conditions will also be compared on usability and acceptability scores.
Completion of daily assessments and attendance at study appointments.
Completion of a high percentage of smartphone assessments and attendance at appointments will show feasibility. Completion of 75% of assessments and attendance at 75% of study appointments will indicate feasibility.
Change in attentional bias (AB)
Determine if attentional bias retraining reduces attentional bias for opioids compared to a control training condition. Reaction times from both the Visual probe (VP) task and the drug Stroop task will be examined to assess change in AB across time points.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in craving levels
Assess whether attentional bias retraining (ABR) reduces opioid craving to a greater extent than a control training condition based on self-report. Will be examined at each appointment and during the 2-week intervention on the smartphone app. The 14-item Heroin Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (HCQ-SF-14) will be used to measure current heroin/opioid urges at lab appointments, and two questions rated on 6-point Likert scales will be asked after every trial during the smartphone training period about participants current liking and wanting for opioids.
Change in opioid use
Assess whether attentional bias retraining is associated with less opioid use during the training period than a control training condition based on self-report and urinalysis
Change in pain levels
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) will be used to measure levels of self-reported pain pre- and post-intervention. Participants will be asked to report daily pain levels during the 2-week intervention period. Self reported pain with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-SF: Self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. There are 9 items asking participant to rate the worst, least, average, and current pain intensity. Participants are also asked to list current treatments and the perceived effectiveness, and asked to rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 10-point scale. The researchers will also ask participants to rate current pain levels, if participants have sought any relief from pain, and what was used to relieve the pain.
Durability of retraining effect on attentional bias
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on attentional bias compared to control training at 1-month follow-up. Reaction times from both the visual probe (VP) task and the drug Stroop task will be examined.
Durability of retraining effect on craving
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on self-reported craving compared to control training at 1-month follow-up. The 14-item Heroin Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (HCQ-SF-14) will be used to measure current heroin/opioid urges.
Durability of retraining effect on opioid use
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on opioid use compared to control training at 1-month follow-up based on self-report and urinalysis.
Durability of retraining effect on pain levels
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on self-reported pain compared to control training, measured with The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)

Full Information

First Posted
September 5, 2019
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Sponsor
University of Florida
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04097340
Brief Title
Attention Training on Smartphones
Acronym
ATS
Official Title
Attention Training on Smartphones (The ATS Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 4, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 17, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Florida

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate a new method that may influence attention, cravings and substance use called attention training, which will be delivered on a smartphone through an application (app). The study team would like to know what participants think of this new method and to determine if research involving this app is feasible. Eligible participants will use the app for a period of two weeks and attend a total of 4 appointments at our study location.
Detailed Description
The goal of this study is to evaluate a new method that may influence attention, cravings and substance use called attention training, which will be delivered on a smartphone through an application (app). The study team would like to know what participants think of this new method and to determine if research involving this app is feasible. Eligible participants will use the app for a period of two weeks and attend a total of 4 appointments at our study location. A primary aim of the study is to assess feasibility, usability and acceptability of mobile Attention Bias Retraining (ABR) by quantifying adherence (in lab and natural environment), self-reported ease of use, perceived value and likelihood of future use. Another primary aim of the study is to determine if ABR reduces attentional bias (AB) for opioids in those with Opioid Use Disorders (OUD) compared to a control training condition. A secondary aim of the study is to assess whether ABR reduces opioid craving to a greater extent than a control training condition based on self-report. Another secondary aim is to assess whether ABR is associated with less opioid use during the training period than a control training condition based on self-report and urinalysis. An exploratory aim of the study is to measure levels of self-reported pain pre- and post- ABR. Another exploratory aim is to examine the durability of ABR effect on AB/craving/ opioid use at 1-month follow-up. Interested individuals will first complete a in-person screening appointment including a medical and psychiatric screening and questionnaires covering topics including substance and alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and sexual behaviors. Eligible participants who enroll in the study will next complete an orientation appointment when study staff will teach participants how to use the study app and answer any questions that arise. Participants will then be randomly assigned (like a flip of a coin) to one of two conditions. Each condition involves use of a smartphone app. One smartphone app includes a task that targets attention directed to substance-related cues while the other app includes a similar task that does not target attention in this way. Neither the participants nor the staff members will know which condition the participant has been randomly assigned to. Participants will be informed of the assigned condition by study staff after the completion of the study. In most prior studies, attention training has been delivered on a desktop computer in a laboratory setting. Initial research has shown that attention training can be used in real-world settings using hand-held devices such as smartphones.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Attention, Substance Use

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Attentional Training Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each condition involves use of a smartphone app. One smartphone app includes a task that targets attention directed to substance-related cues while the other app includes a similar task that does not target attention in this way. Neither participant nor the staff members working on the study will know which condition the participant has been randomly assigned to.
Arm Title
Control Training Group
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Each condition involves use of a smartphone app. One smartphone app includes a task that targets attention directed to substance-related cues while the other app includes a similar task that does not target attention in this way. Neither participant nor the staff members working on the study will know which condition the participant has been randomly assigned to.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Attentional Bias Retraining (ABR)
Intervention Description
Participants randomized to this intervention will receive 2 weeks of ABR for opioids delivered via a mobile device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Control Training
Intervention Description
Participants randomized to this intervention will receive 2 weeks of training without ABR, delivered via a mobile device.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Modified System Usability Scale scores overall and comparisons between study conditions
Description
Seven-point Likert scale items regarding the usability and acceptability of the app (higher score indicates greater usability and acceptability). Higher scores indicate greater usability and acceptability. The attentional bias retraining and control training conditions will also be compared on usability and acceptability scores.
Time Frame
Post-two-week intervention period
Title
Completion of daily assessments and attendance at study appointments.
Description
Completion of a high percentage of smartphone assessments and attendance at appointments will show feasibility. Completion of 75% of assessments and attendance at 75% of study appointments will indicate feasibility.
Time Frame
Two-week intervention period
Title
Change in attentional bias (AB)
Description
Determine if attentional bias retraining reduces attentional bias for opioids compared to a control training condition. Reaction times from both the Visual probe (VP) task and the drug Stroop task will be examined to assess change in AB across time points.
Time Frame
Two-week intervention period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in craving levels
Description
Assess whether attentional bias retraining (ABR) reduces opioid craving to a greater extent than a control training condition based on self-report. Will be examined at each appointment and during the 2-week intervention on the smartphone app. The 14-item Heroin Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (HCQ-SF-14) will be used to measure current heroin/opioid urges at lab appointments, and two questions rated on 6-point Likert scales will be asked after every trial during the smartphone training period about participants current liking and wanting for opioids.
Time Frame
Two-week intervention period
Title
Change in opioid use
Description
Assess whether attentional bias retraining is associated with less opioid use during the training period than a control training condition based on self-report and urinalysis
Time Frame
Two-week intervention period
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) will be used to measure levels of self-reported pain pre- and post-intervention. Participants will be asked to report daily pain levels during the 2-week intervention period. Self reported pain with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-SF: Self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. There are 9 items asking participant to rate the worst, least, average, and current pain intensity. Participants are also asked to list current treatments and the perceived effectiveness, and asked to rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 10-point scale. The researchers will also ask participants to rate current pain levels, if participants have sought any relief from pain, and what was used to relieve the pain.
Time Frame
Two-week intervention period
Title
Durability of retraining effect on attentional bias
Description
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on attentional bias compared to control training at 1-month follow-up. Reaction times from both the visual probe (VP) task and the drug Stroop task will be examined.
Time Frame
1-month-follow-up
Title
Durability of retraining effect on craving
Description
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on self-reported craving compared to control training at 1-month follow-up. The 14-item Heroin Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (HCQ-SF-14) will be used to measure current heroin/opioid urges.
Time Frame
1-month-follow-up
Title
Durability of retraining effect on opioid use
Description
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on opioid use compared to control training at 1-month follow-up based on self-report and urinalysis.
Time Frame
1-month-follow-up
Title
Durability of retraining effect on pain levels
Description
Examine the durability of any retraining effects on self-reported pain compared to control training, measured with The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame
1-month-follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Able to read and write in English fluently and complete study evaluations 6-week availability to participate in the study Willing and able to answer questions on smartphones up to 4 times daily for about 10 minutes each time. On Suboxone (or methadone if recruitment does not progress as planned) for at least one month (verified by urine drug test- unless using transdermal patch because 1/3 of patients using the patch will not show positive urine screen; and verified by opioid replacement therapy-provider)" Meet DSM-5 criteria for opioid use disorder Exclusion Criteria: Use (outside of prescription) for drugs that negatively interact with one another Meet severe DSM-5 criteria for current substance use disorders other than opioids, nicotine or cannabis (e.g., current stimulant use disorder) and have used that substance within the past 30 days based on self-report or a positive urine drug test Severe psychiatric conditions Color blindness and/or uncorrected defective vision
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Leeman, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Florida
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
EDGE Laboratory
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32611
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Attention Training on Smartphones

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs