search
Back to results

Audiological Benefit and Improved Quality of Life With Two Bone Conduction Systems: ADHEAR vs. Bonebridge in Experienced Users

Primary Purpose

Bone Conduction Deafness, Hearing Loss, Conductive

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adhesive bone conduction hearing aid (ADHEAR - Med El)
Sponsored by
Dominik Riss
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Conduction Deafness focused on measuring Hearing aid

Eligibility Criteria

13 Years - 99 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients implanted with a Bonebridge device and are active users
  • Unilateral and/or bilateral conductive hearing loss (CHL)
  • Subjects aged 13 years or older
  • Capable of the German language
  • Willingness and ability to perform all tests required for the study
  • Signed, and dated informed consent before the start of any study specific procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Patient is intolerant of the materials as described by Manufacturer's IFU
  • Patient presents with a skin or scalp condition that may preclude the attachment of the adhesive adapter.
  • Patient cannot perform the audiological tests or is unable to fill out the questionnaires.
  • Patient presents with retrocochlear, or central auditory disorder.
  • any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures

Sites / Locations

  • MUW, AKH

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Adhear

Arm Description

Patients will be fitted with an adhesive bone conduction device for three weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Average functional hearing gain
The primary endpoint of the study is the average functional hearing gain evaluated by the free field audiometry (at 4 different frequencies) using the bone conduction device compared to the unaided situation. To compare the two hearing devices the following primary endpoint measure will be calculated: Δmean= {(Average functional hearing gain with Bonebridge - Average functional hearing gain with ADHEAR at timepoint T1 (=Δ1)) + (Average functional hearing gain with Bonebridge - Average functional hearing gain with ADHEAR at timepoint T2 (=Δ2))} divided by two. Measuring both hearing devices at both timepoints and using the mean difference (Δmean) enables adjustment for a possible underlying customization effect.

Secondary Outcome Measures

AQoL-8D (quality of life)
Will be measured by comparing Quality of Life as assessed with AQoL - 8D at the beginning of the study and the end of the study (The result of the AQoL-8D is a number)
Quality of hearing
Quality of hearing as assessed with the SSQ 12 questionnaire will be compared at the beginning of the study to the results after the three weeks with the adhesive device. The results of the SSQ-12 is a number
Word recognition score
Further secondary outcomes will be assessed by comparing the results of the word recognition test in the aided condition once with the implanted device (Bonebridge) in comparison to the adhesive device (ADHEAR). Word recognition is measured in percent at two different noise levels
Sentence test
Further secondary outcomes will be assessed by comparing the results of the sentence test in the aided condition once with the implanted device (Bonebridge) in comparison to the adhesive device (ADHEAR). Sentence test results are measured as percent at a certain volume level (dB).

Full Information

First Posted
November 16, 2018
Last Updated
December 28, 2019
Sponsor
Dominik Riss
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03766152
Brief Title
Audiological Benefit and Improved Quality of Life With Two Bone Conduction Systems: ADHEAR vs. Bonebridge in Experienced Users
Official Title
Audiological Benefit and Improved Quality of Life With Two Bone Conduction Systems: ADHEAR vs. Bonebridge in Experienced Users
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 13, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dominik Riss

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients implanted with a Bonebridge will be asked to be part of the study. The study subjects are enrolled into the study according to inclusion criteria. Patients will be asked to wear an adhesive bone conduction device an adapt to it for 30-60 min. After this time period patients will be asked to use the adhesive device instead of the Bonebridge for 3 weeks. Audiologic Tests and quality of life questionnaires will be assessed at the beginning of the study and at the end of three weeks.
Detailed Description
Phase 1 Patients will be fitted with an adhesive bone conduction device and asked to fill out two questionnaires. They will then wear the device for 30-60 minutes and decide if they want to wear the device for the remaining study time of three weeks. Patients who do not have sufficient benefit from the device or do not feel comfortable with it do not enter the second study period of wearing the device for three weeks. Patients will be asked to comment on their experiences after 30 to 60 minutes explaining why they do not want to enter the second part of the study if they feel comfortable sharing this information. Phase 2 Patients, in the second study period, will be asked to wear the hearing device as long as comfortable to them every day and mark time of device usage, battery life, changes of the adhesive adapter, sound quality and comfort related remarks in a diary. After three weeks patients will return to the outpatient ́s department for an audiological assessment and a second set of quality of hearing and quality of life questionnaire. No patients will be implanted with a Bonebridge as part of the study. Audiologic testing consists of sound field audiometry, Freiburg monosyllables test and Oldenburg sentence test. Questionnaires consist of the AQol-8D and the SSQ-12

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Conduction Deafness, Hearing Loss, Conductive
Keywords
Hearing aid

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
19 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Adhear
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients will be fitted with an adhesive bone conduction device for three weeks
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Adhesive bone conduction hearing aid (ADHEAR - Med El)
Intervention Description
Patients are asked to wear an adhesive bone conduction hearing device which is attached to the mastoid with an adhesive adapter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average functional hearing gain
Description
The primary endpoint of the study is the average functional hearing gain evaluated by the free field audiometry (at 4 different frequencies) using the bone conduction device compared to the unaided situation. To compare the two hearing devices the following primary endpoint measure will be calculated: Δmean= {(Average functional hearing gain with Bonebridge - Average functional hearing gain with ADHEAR at timepoint T1 (=Δ1)) + (Average functional hearing gain with Bonebridge - Average functional hearing gain with ADHEAR at timepoint T2 (=Δ2))} divided by two. Measuring both hearing devices at both timepoints and using the mean difference (Δmean) enables adjustment for a possible underlying customization effect.
Time Frame
3 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
AQoL-8D (quality of life)
Description
Will be measured by comparing Quality of Life as assessed with AQoL - 8D at the beginning of the study and the end of the study (The result of the AQoL-8D is a number)
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Quality of hearing
Description
Quality of hearing as assessed with the SSQ 12 questionnaire will be compared at the beginning of the study to the results after the three weeks with the adhesive device. The results of the SSQ-12 is a number
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Word recognition score
Description
Further secondary outcomes will be assessed by comparing the results of the word recognition test in the aided condition once with the implanted device (Bonebridge) in comparison to the adhesive device (ADHEAR). Word recognition is measured in percent at two different noise levels
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Sentence test
Description
Further secondary outcomes will be assessed by comparing the results of the sentence test in the aided condition once with the implanted device (Bonebridge) in comparison to the adhesive device (ADHEAR). Sentence test results are measured as percent at a certain volume level (dB).
Time Frame
3 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients implanted with a Bonebridge device and are active users Unilateral and/or bilateral conductive hearing loss (CHL) Subjects aged 13 years or older Capable of the German language Willingness and ability to perform all tests required for the study Signed, and dated informed consent before the start of any study specific procedure Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy or breastfeeding Patient is intolerant of the materials as described by Manufacturer's IFU Patient presents with a skin or scalp condition that may preclude the attachment of the adhesive adapter. Patient cannot perform the audiological tests or is unable to fill out the questionnaires. Patient presents with retrocochlear, or central auditory disorder. any physical, psychological, or emotional disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform on test and rehabilitation procedures
Facility Information:
Facility Name
MUW, AKH
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Audiological Benefit and Improved Quality of Life With Two Bone Conduction Systems: ADHEAR vs. Bonebridge in Experienced Users

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs