search
Back to results

Auditory Intraoperative Stimulation Effects on Pain and Agitation at Awakening (AUDIOPAW) (AUDIOPAW)

Primary Purpose

Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain, Adenotonsillitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Music
Mother's lap
Soundproof earplugs
Sponsored by
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Procedural Anxiety focused on measuring Auditory stimulation, adenotonsillectomy, pain, agitation, awakening

Eligibility Criteria

2 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • age 2 to 17 years old
  • scheduled for adenotonsillectomy
  • recent audiometry and tympanometry evaluation (<1 month)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no informed consent
  • other combined surgical procedures
  • comorbidities (e.g. congenital anomalies of the head-and-neck, psychomotor delay, autism spectrum disorders)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification score >2
  • ongoing chronic pharmacological therapy
  • first language not Italian
  • environmental noise exceeding limits in the operating room

Sites / Locations

  • Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo-

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Auditory stimulation 1 (Music)

Auditory stimulation 2 (Mother's lap)

Soundproof earplugs

No stimulation

Arm Description

45 deciBel Sensation Level (dB SL), normalized, high-frequency sampled W.A. Mozart Symphony n°4 in D K19 and n°5 in B-flat K22 (from Mozart Symphonies Vol. I - Adam Fisher, Dacapo Records, Frederiksberg C., Denmark, 2013)

45 dB SL, normalized and filtered, high-frequency sampled heartbeat sound, 75 bpm tempo, looped

Disposable foam earplugs with a noise attenuation of at least 30 deciBel (dB)

Current standard of care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain score (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale), self-administered (collaborative children between 3 and 8 years)
Pain score for collaborative children between 3 and 8 years will be evaluated with the self-administered Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain.
Pain score (Visual Analogue Scale), self-administered (collaborative children >=8 years) or administered by parents (non-collaborative children >=8 years)
Pain score for >=8 years old children will be evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (self administered if collaborative; administered by parents if non-collaborative children), ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain. In accordance with previous studies (Ferreira-Valente et al. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011;152:2399-2404), the scores of Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale and Visual Analogue Scale will be considered comparable and combined in one outcome variable.
Pain score (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale), evaluated by parents (for children <=3 years)
For children <=3 years, pain score will be evaluated by parents using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain.
Pain score (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain scale), evaluated by parents (for non-collaborative children between 3 and 7 years)
For non-collaborative children between 3 and 7 years, pain score will be evaluated by parents using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOPS) scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain. In accordance with previous studies, the scores of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOPS) scale will be considered comparable and combined in one outcome variable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Agitation
Evaluated using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, ranging form 0 to 20. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of agitation.
Frequency of use of pain killer drugs
Number of postoperative pain killers drugs administered

Full Information

First Posted
August 6, 2019
Last Updated
October 1, 2019
Sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04112979
Brief Title
Auditory Intraoperative Stimulation Effects on Pain and Agitation at Awakening (AUDIOPAW)
Acronym
AUDIOPAW
Official Title
Effects of Intraoperative Auditory Stimulation on Pain and Agitation at Awakening After Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy - 4 Arms, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 23, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 24, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. The management of postoperative pain and agitation after AT is still a controversial issue. Safety considerations limit the use of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, leading to inadequate control of the high levels of postoperative pain experienced by AT patients. Along with pain killers, non-pharmacological strategies have remarkable impact on pain management in children. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in The Lancet in 2015 on adult patients suggest that auditory stimulation with music in the perioperative setting, and even when patients are under general anaesthesia, can reduce postoperative pain, anxiety, and analgesia needs. The authors concluded that there is sufficient evidence to implement auditory stimulation in the treatment of all adult surgical patients, regardless of the mode of administration. Up to now, no research has investigated the effects of intraoperative auditory stimulation on pain and agitation upon awakening after AT in the pediatric population. Objective of this study is to determine the effects of intraoperative auditory stimulation on pain and agitation upon awakening after pediatric AT.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain, Adenotonsillitis
Keywords
Auditory stimulation, adenotonsillectomy, pain, agitation, awakening

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
115 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Auditory stimulation 1 (Music)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
45 deciBel Sensation Level (dB SL), normalized, high-frequency sampled W.A. Mozart Symphony n°4 in D K19 and n°5 in B-flat K22 (from Mozart Symphonies Vol. I - Adam Fisher, Dacapo Records, Frederiksberg C., Denmark, 2013)
Arm Title
Auditory stimulation 2 (Mother's lap)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
45 dB SL, normalized and filtered, high-frequency sampled heartbeat sound, 75 bpm tempo, looped
Arm Title
Soundproof earplugs
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Disposable foam earplugs with a noise attenuation of at least 30 deciBel (dB)
Arm Title
No stimulation
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Current standard of care
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Music
Intervention Description
45 dB SL, normalized, high-frequency sampled W.A. Mozart Symphony n°4 in D K19 and n°5 in B-flat K22 (from Mozart Symphonies Vol. I - Adam Fisher, Dacapo Records, Frederiksberg C., Denmark, 2013)
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Mother's lap
Intervention Description
45 dB SL, normalized and filtered, high-frequency sampled heartbeat sound, 75 bpm tempo, looped
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Soundproof earplugs
Intervention Description
Disposable foam earplugs with a noise attenuation of at least 30 dB
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain score (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale), self-administered (collaborative children between 3 and 8 years)
Description
Pain score for collaborative children between 3 and 8 years will be evaluated with the self-administered Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain.
Time Frame
Within 10 minutes after awakening
Title
Pain score (Visual Analogue Scale), self-administered (collaborative children >=8 years) or administered by parents (non-collaborative children >=8 years)
Description
Pain score for >=8 years old children will be evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (self administered if collaborative; administered by parents if non-collaborative children), ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain. In accordance with previous studies (Ferreira-Valente et al. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011;152:2399-2404), the scores of Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale and Visual Analogue Scale will be considered comparable and combined in one outcome variable.
Time Frame
Within 10 minutes after awakening
Title
Pain score (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale), evaluated by parents (for children <=3 years)
Description
For children <=3 years, pain score will be evaluated by parents using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain.
Time Frame
Within 10 minutes after awakening
Title
Pain score (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain scale), evaluated by parents (for non-collaborative children between 3 and 7 years)
Description
For non-collaborative children between 3 and 7 years, pain score will be evaluated by parents using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOPS) scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain. In accordance with previous studies, the scores of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOPS) scale will be considered comparable and combined in one outcome variable.
Time Frame
Within 10 minutes after awakening
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Agitation
Description
Evaluated using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, ranging form 0 to 20. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of agitation.
Time Frame
Within 10 minutes after awakening
Title
Frequency of use of pain killer drugs
Description
Number of postoperative pain killers drugs administered
Time Frame
Within 6 hours after the awakening

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: age 2 to 17 years old scheduled for adenotonsillectomy recent audiometry and tympanometry evaluation (<1 month) Exclusion Criteria: no informed consent other combined surgical procedures comorbidities (e.g. congenital anomalies of the head-and-neck, psychomotor delay, autism spectrum disorders) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification score >2 ongoing chronic pharmacological therapy first language not Italian environmental noise exceeding limits in the operating room
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Enrico Muzzi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo-
City
Trieste
ZIP/Postal Code
34137
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34014258
Citation
Muzzi E, Ronfani L, Bossini B, Lezcano C, Orzan E, Barbi E. Effects of Intraoperative Auditory Stimulation on Pain and Agitation on Awakening After Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul 1;147(7):638-645. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0870.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Auditory Intraoperative Stimulation Effects on Pain and Agitation at Awakening (AUDIOPAW)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs