search
Back to results

Auditory Temporal Processes in Aging

Primary Purpose

Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Aging Problems

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Auditory training with feedback
Listening paradigm with no feedback
Sponsored by
University of Maryland, College Park
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Auditory Perceptual Disorders focused on measuring Accented speech perception

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age and hearing sensitivity:
  • Younger listeners (18-40 years) with normal hearing;
  • Older listeners (65-80 years) with normal hearing;
  • Older listeners (65-80 years) with bilateral, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
  • High School Diploma,
  • native speaker of English (based on self-report)
  • normal middle-ear function (based on tympanometry)
  • normal cognitive function (based on score on Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
  • good-to-excellent word recognition scores (based on Northwestern University Test # 6 word recognition scores presented in quiet at suprathreshold levels).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-native speaker of English,
  • motor and/or speech disorders that prevent participant from providing a time-locked response,
  • presence of middle ear disease or conductive hearing loss,
  • presence of severe or profound hearing loss,
  • presence of poor word recognition scores,
  • cognitive impairment.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Maryland

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental group

Passive control group

Active Control group

Arm Description

Auditory training with feedback

Pre-post testing only; no training

Listening task with no feeback

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recognition of accented speech stimuli used for training
Scale: Accented words (n = 160) and accented sentences (n = 35 sentences) used in training; construct: measures percent correct recognition; minimum score = 0%, maximum score = 100%. Higher values are considered a better outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Generalization of benefit in recognizing accented speech
Scale: Accented words (n = 48) and accented sentences (n = 10 sentences) with new talker and speech stimuli not used in training. Construct measures percent correct recognition score for accented words and sentences not used in training, with minimum = 0% and maximum = 100%. Better performance is a higher percent correct score.
Retention of benefit in recognizing accented speech
Scale: Accented words (n = 64) and accented sentences (n = 90). For words: familiar words and familiar talkers (n = 32) and new talkers and new words (n = 32). For sentences: familiar talkers and words (used in training; n = 40), new talkers and new lists not heard before (n = 20), and talkers and sentences heard before but not used in training (n = 30). Construct: percent correct recognition for trained talker and lists, new talkers and new stimuli, and familiar talkers and lists not used in training. Construct: percent correct recognition (min = 0%, max = 100%), with better performance a higher recognition score.

Full Information

First Posted
March 6, 2018
Last Updated
February 24, 2022
Sponsor
University of Maryland, College Park
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03468660
Brief Title
Auditory Temporal Processes in Aging
Official Title
Auditory Temporal Processes, Speech Perception and Aging
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 18, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Maryland, College Park

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Older people experience great difficulty understanding speech, especially accented English, and this problem is expected to increase with the influx of immigrants who provide services to the elderly population. The research examines the underlying factors that contribute to older listeners' difficulty understanding accented speech, including those associated with age-related hearing loss, changes in processing in auditory pathways in the brain, and general cognitive decline. The investigation also evaluates the efficacy of training strategies to improve understanding of accented English by older people. Outcomes of this research are expected to improve communication between senior citizens and those with whom they interact daily, and thereby improve quality of life for the older segment of the Nation's population.
Detailed Description
This research program in speech perception and auditory psychophysics examines the hypothesis that many of the predominant difficulties in speech understanding of elderly listeners are related to underlying problems in auditory temporal processing. One form of degraded speech that is particularly difficult for elderly listeners to perceive is accented English. Alterations of speech stress and timing with accent may be viewed as a form of degradation in temporal aspects of speech prosody, and this type of temporal distortion is the focus of investigation in the next project period. Moreover, psychoacoustic results demonstrate that large age-related difficulties in temporal processing exist for the perception of auditory tempo and rhythmic characteristics of sequential stimulus patterns featuring a stressed tone. Listener processing difficulty could be attributed to peripheral and/or central processing mechanisms, as well as various cognitive factors, including the degree of familiarity with prosodic features of different native languages. The project examines the relative contribution of peripheral hearing impairment, type of stimulus temporal complexity and cognitive demand, and the linguistic background experience of listeners on the processing of temporal prosody cues in speech and non-speech stimulus patterns. The project associated with this clinical trial examines the efficacy of auditory training paradigms with stimuli that feature temporal contrasts for improving perception of accented English and non-speech sequences by older people. The research described in this application seeks to address one goal outlined by the National Institute on Aging: to develop effective interventions to maintain health and function and prevent or reduce the burden of age-related diseases, disorders, and disabilities. The approach in this research program involves (a) an assessment of the problems encountered in daily activities by the elderly population, (b) an analysis of specific task demands in relation to individual capabilities, and (c) basic research on sensory and perceptual changes with age and on the ameliorating effects of emerging technologies (including rehabilitation). This three-dimensional approach is expected to further progress toward improving communication and health-related quality of life for senior citizens.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Aging Problems
Keywords
Accented speech perception

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Experimental group Active control group Passive control group
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
82 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Auditory training with feedback
Arm Title
Passive control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Pre-post testing only; no training
Arm Title
Active Control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Listening task with no feeback
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Auditory training with feedback
Intervention Description
Experimental group receives phoneme-level and sentence-level training with feedback
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Listening paradigm with no feedback
Intervention Description
Active controls listen to acoustic stimuli with no feedback
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recognition of accented speech stimuli used for training
Description
Scale: Accented words (n = 160) and accented sentences (n = 35 sentences) used in training; construct: measures percent correct recognition; minimum score = 0%, maximum score = 100%. Higher values are considered a better outcome
Time Frame
1 day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Generalization of benefit in recognizing accented speech
Description
Scale: Accented words (n = 48) and accented sentences (n = 10 sentences) with new talker and speech stimuli not used in training. Construct measures percent correct recognition score for accented words and sentences not used in training, with minimum = 0% and maximum = 100%. Better performance is a higher percent correct score.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Retention of benefit in recognizing accented speech
Description
Scale: Accented words (n = 64) and accented sentences (n = 90). For words: familiar words and familiar talkers (n = 32) and new talkers and new words (n = 32). For sentences: familiar talkers and words (used in training; n = 40), new talkers and new lists not heard before (n = 20), and talkers and sentences heard before but not used in training (n = 30). Construct: percent correct recognition for trained talker and lists, new talkers and new stimuli, and familiar talkers and lists not used in training. Construct: percent correct recognition (min = 0%, max = 100%), with better performance a higher recognition score.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of two weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age and hearing sensitivity: Younger listeners (18-40 years) with normal hearing; Older listeners (65-80 years) with normal hearing; Older listeners (65-80 years) with bilateral, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. High School Diploma, native speaker of English (based on self-report) normal middle-ear function (based on tympanometry) normal cognitive function (based on score on Montreal Cognitive Assessment) good-to-excellent word recognition scores (based on Northwestern University Test # 6 word recognition scores presented in quiet at suprathreshold levels). Exclusion Criteria: non-native speaker of English, motor and/or speech disorders that prevent participant from providing a time-locked response, presence of middle ear disease or conductive hearing loss, presence of severe or profound hearing loss, presence of poor word recognition scores, cognitive impairment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sandra Gordon-Salant, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Maryland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Maryland
City
College Park
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20742
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31026190
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Bieber RE, Jara Ureta DA, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 26;62(4S):1131-1143. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-ASCC7-18-0122.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30599683
Citation
Bieber RE, Yeni-Komshian GH, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Dec;144(6):3191. doi: 10.1121/1.5081711.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28464671
Citation
Bieber RE, Gordon-Salant S. Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):2800. doi: 10.1121/1.4980063.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27908085
Citation
Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age effects in discrimination of intervals within accented tone sequences differing in accent type and sequence presentation rate. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Nov;140(5):3819. doi: 10.1121/1.4967512.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27036250
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Pickett EJ, Fitzgibbons PJ. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar;139(3):1132-48. doi: 10.1121/1.4943557.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25698021
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Cohen JI. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):884-97. doi: 10.1121/1.4906270.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23862836
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Cohen JI, Waldroup C. Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):618-27. doi: 10.1121/1.4807817.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21110610
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3152-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3495940.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20968326
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Schurman J. Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):EL200-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3486199.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20649238
Citation
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):444-55. doi: 10.1121/1.3397409.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19931608
Citation
Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age-related differences in discrimination of temporal intervals in accented tone sequences. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 1;264(1-2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Auditory Temporal Processes in Aging

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs