search
Back to results

Auto Bilevel Adherence Following a Poor Initial Encounter With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) (BiPAPRescue)

Primary Purpose

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CPAP
Auto BiLevel
Sponsored by
Philips Respironics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Participants who meet the inclusion/exclusion criterion below and are willing to participate in the protocol when contacted will be enrolled into the study. Participants need to meet all of the following inclusion criterion below:

Inclusion Criterion:

  1. Age 21-75
  2. New Diagnosis of OSA with a baseline respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 15 events/hr of sleep determined by either full night or split night PSG
  3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent
  4. Able to follow study procedures
  5. Sub-optimal PSG titration with at least 3 hours of attempted PAP titration (defined below): and deemed by their physician as a titration failure

Sub-optimal PSG titration: at least one of the following:

  1. Poor sleep efficiency during titration period (sleep efficiency ≤ 70%) (participants may be on sleep medications as per standard lab CPAP protocol ) or;
  2. Frequent arousals based on three seconds of alpha frequency on EEG (non periodic limb movement (PLM)-related) of 20 or greater per hour during the titration portion of the study or;
  3. CPAP titration aborted due to participant's request (due to intolerance), or
  4. Persistent sleep disruption despite therapeutic CPAP therapy and in the judgment of the reviewing physician, suggesting a low probability to CPAP adherence

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in another interventional research study within the last 30 days
  2. Major uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition such as congestive heart failure, neuromuscular disease, renal failure etc.
  3. Prior CPAP or Bi-Level PAP use (within last 2 years)
  4. Chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency, moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (FEV1 < 60%), or any known condition of an elevation of arterial carbon dioxide levels while awake
  5. Surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days
  6. Presence of an untreated, diagnosable, non-OSA related sleep disorder (e.g. restless legs syndrome, insomnia, etc.)
  7. Periodic Limb movement arousal index of 10 or greater.
  8. Refusal to consider further interventions to standard CPAP to optimize positive pressure therapy (e.g. different mask than what was used in lab)
  9. PAP therapy otherwise medically complicated or contraindicated such as those with a difficult to size or adjust interface (mask) resulting in facial pain, skin irritation or trauma, or excessive air leaks
  10. Shift workers or people experiencing jet lag
  11. Known history of alcohol and or drug abuse
  12. Diagnosis of Complex Sleep Apnea, (appears to be classic obstructive or mixed sleep apnea, but exhibits disruptive central apneas and periodic breathing on CPAP) 11, 12 or persistent central apnea during diagnostic PSG.
  13. Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  14. Chronic Hypnotic use (nightly use for three months or less)

Sites / Locations

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Mayo Clinics
  • Clayton Sleep Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Auto BiLevel Group

CPAP Group

Arm Description

Auto Bilevel; auto-titrating bilevel positive airway pressure device with pressure flexing used as experimental treatment for obstructive sleep apnea

CPAP; continuous positive airway pressure used as comparator treatment for obstructive sleep apnea

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group Measured by Average Nightly Use.
Compliance was compared between the AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring the average use per night over the study period.
Percentage of Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group
Percentage of Group Compliance was compared between AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring proportion of adherent users over the treatment period. Patients with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The % of compliant patients will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each subject.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Epworth Sleepiness Scale
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is an 8 item questionnaire that measures the general level of daytime sleepiness. Participants were asked what the chance is they would doze off or fall asleep during different routine daytime situations. The survey answers questions on a scale of 0 to 3- 0 being no chance and 3 being a high chance of dozing. The lowest score possible is a 0 and the highest score possible is a 24.
Fatigue Severity Scale
The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders. Participants answer questions on a scale of 1-7, 1 being Strongly Disagree and 7 being Strongly Agree. The scores can range from 9-63. The higher the score the higher the fatigue.
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality consists of 30 questions related to the effects of fatigue on daily activities, the instrument was designed to evaluate the respondent's quality of life as it relates to disorders of excessive sleepiness. Five domains of day-to-day life are examined: activity levels, vigilance, intimacy and sexual relationships, productivity, and social outcomes. The participants answer on a scale of 0-4: 0 -I don't do this activity for other reasons,1-Yes, extreme, 2-Yes, moderate, 3-Yes, a little, 4-No. Scores can range 0-120, the lower the score the more tired or sleepy the participant is.

Full Information

First Posted
July 18, 2011
Last Updated
April 25, 2019
Sponsor
Philips Respironics
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic, Brigham and Women's Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02522442
Brief Title
Auto Bilevel Adherence Following a Poor Initial Encounter With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
Acronym
BiPAPRescue
Official Title
Phase IV Study of Bi-Level Positive Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)Compared to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Philips Respironics
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic, Brigham and Women's Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective outcome is the proportion of participants compliant (at least four hours of use per night for all nights) in the Auto Bilevel group compared to the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group after 90 days of treatment during the investigation. Proportion will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each participant. The mean and standard deviation of these mean therapy hours will then be calculated for each arm of the investigation. Participants with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The null hypothesis will be rejected if the mean of the primary objective outcome for all participants in the BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® therapy (auto Bilevel) arm is significantly greater than that for all participants in the CPAP therapy arm
Detailed Description
Initial Screening It is preferred that participant's are recruited the morning after their failed clinical CPAP titration in the lab. Participants are able to be enrolled within ninety days following this failure if circumstances preclude approach and consent the morning after titration failure. Participants will be asked to wear the Actiwatch for approximately seven days prior to the clinical titration polysomnogram (PSG; and again for seven days prior to their final visit .) Actiwatch is worn on the participant's wrist to assess sleep continuity. Participants will be asked to press the "Marker button" on the Actiwatch when they get in bed each night to have a documented time mark when the device is downloaded. Participants will also be asked to fill in the sleep diary (provided by sleep clinic) during the seven days (14 days total; 7 at the beginning of the study and 7 days prior to the 90 Day visit) they use the Actiwatch. Randomization/Therapy Initiated (Visit #1) Participants will be randomized and scheduled for a BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® titration or CPAP titration night in the lab. General therapy titration guidelines are documented in Appendix I & II (see Appendix I & II at end of document). Heart Rate Variability (HRV) will be assessed at both the diagnostic portion and titration portion of the research PSG. During the diagnostic portion of the research PSG, HRV needs to be assessed for ten minutes while the participant is awake. At the end of the titration portion of the research PSG, the HRV needs to be assessed for ten consecutive minutes while the participant is awake. Enrolled participants will then complete a questionnaire to assess functional outcomes of sleep quality (FOSQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for mask comfort and satisfaction with therapy, Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), attitudes toward use measurement, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; see Appendix III for description of measurements). Participants will be set up with their respective machines after titration or within ten days (10 +/- 2) days of titration and will take these devices home for the next three months. Thus, total participation in the trial will be on average 3-4 months. All positive airway pressure machines will include a programmed SmartCard to monitor objectively compliance. Participants randomized to standard CPAP therapy will receive a SmartCard programmed to provide CPAP at their prescribed pressure. Both the participant and the sleep health staff administering the questionnaires and psychomotor vigilance task, will be blinded to the therapy the SmartCard is programmed to provide. Participants randomized to novel therapy will receive a SmartCard programmed to provide BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex®. The SmartCard programming will be done by an unblinded study staff member. The settings for the novel therapy will be: Min Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) = 4 cmH2O for prescribed CPAP ≤ 10 cmH2O (use 6 cmH2O for prescribed CPAP > 10 cmH2O) Max Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP) = 25 cm H2O Min Pressure Support (PS) = 2 cm H2O (cannot be adjusted) MaxPS = 8 cm H2O Bi-Flex setting of 3 The SmartCard is inserted into the device to provide the programmed therapy. Both the participant and CPAP therapist will be blinded to the therapy the SmartCard is programmed to provide. The other supplies necessary to use the therapy at home will also be provided to the participant (i.e. mask, tubing, humidifier, etc.). The CPAP therapist will also provide the training necessary to use the device at home and provide a number to call in case the participant encounters any difficulty using the device at home. Standardized Counseling to Optimize Adherence to Therapy Counseling to optimize adherence to CPAP therapy will consist of: The clinician will discuss complaints regarding CPAP therapy to identify potential contributors to poor adherence to therapy. The standardized counseling to optimize adherence includes the following measures to address patient complaints and concerns: Interface Assure current mask is properly applied and headgear is properly adjusted. Persistent mask leaks or mask discomfort, skin trauma, or skin irritation will be addressed first by verifying mask and headgear adjustment and mask sizing. An alternate mask can be used if the problems cannot be addressed by fit or adjustment interventions. If mouth leaks are the primary concern and a nasal mask is being used, then a nasal/oral mask will be considered or a chin strap will be offered in combination with nasal mask use. Therapy Side Effects All patients will have initially been placed on a CPAP device with heated humidification. For continued oro-pharyngeal dryness, nasal dryness, nasal congestion, or rhinitis, humidification will be increased. Saline nasal sprays, steroids, or decongestants can be prescribed, if needed. Dyspnea on CPAP or claustrophobia will be addressed with counseling as needed. Note: Reducing the prescribed pressure to improve adherence will not be considered at this time. A standardized description of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its risks will be reviewed with the participant, as well as the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Fact Sheet Drowsy Driving (see Appendix III). A standardized description of the evidence regarding the benefits of positive pressure therapy to treat OSA will be reviewed with the participant. Participants will be instructed to use the device as much as possible while they are sleeping and to also make sure they allow an adequate opportunity to sleep each night.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
51 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Auto BiLevel Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Auto Bilevel; auto-titrating bilevel positive airway pressure device with pressure flexing used as experimental treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
Arm Title
CPAP Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
CPAP; continuous positive airway pressure used as comparator treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CPAP
Intervention Description
Continuous positive airway pressure
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Auto BiLevel
Intervention Description
Auto Bilevel positive airway pressure with Flex
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group Measured by Average Nightly Use.
Description
Compliance was compared between the AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring the average use per night over the study period.
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Percentage of Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group
Description
Percentage of Group Compliance was compared between AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring proportion of adherent users over the treatment period. Patients with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The % of compliant patients will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each subject.
Time Frame
90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Description
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is an 8 item questionnaire that measures the general level of daytime sleepiness. Participants were asked what the chance is they would doze off or fall asleep during different routine daytime situations. The survey answers questions on a scale of 0 to 3- 0 being no chance and 3 being a high chance of dozing. The lowest score possible is a 0 and the highest score possible is a 24.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Title
Fatigue Severity Scale
Description
The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders. Participants answer questions on a scale of 1-7, 1 being Strongly Disagree and 7 being Strongly Agree. The scores can range from 9-63. The higher the score the higher the fatigue.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Title
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality
Description
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality consists of 30 questions related to the effects of fatigue on daily activities, the instrument was designed to evaluate the respondent's quality of life as it relates to disorders of excessive sleepiness. Five domains of day-to-day life are examined: activity levels, vigilance, intimacy and sexual relationships, productivity, and social outcomes. The participants answer on a scale of 0-4: 0 -I don't do this activity for other reasons,1-Yes, extreme, 2-Yes, moderate, 3-Yes, a little, 4-No. Scores can range 0-120, the lower the score the more tired or sleepy the participant is.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Participants who meet the inclusion/exclusion criterion below and are willing to participate in the protocol when contacted will be enrolled into the study. Participants need to meet all of the following inclusion criterion below: Inclusion Criterion: Age 21-75 New Diagnosis of OSA with a baseline respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 15 events/hr of sleep determined by either full night or split night PSG Able and willing to provide written informed consent Able to follow study procedures Sub-optimal PSG titration with at least 3 hours of attempted PAP titration (defined below): and deemed by their physician as a titration failure Sub-optimal PSG titration: at least one of the following: Poor sleep efficiency during titration period (sleep efficiency ≤ 70%) (participants may be on sleep medications as per standard lab CPAP protocol ) or; Frequent arousals based on three seconds of alpha frequency on EEG (non periodic limb movement (PLM)-related) of 20 or greater per hour during the titration portion of the study or; CPAP titration aborted due to participant's request (due to intolerance), or Persistent sleep disruption despite therapeutic CPAP therapy and in the judgment of the reviewing physician, suggesting a low probability to CPAP adherence Exclusion Criteria: Participation in another interventional research study within the last 30 days Major uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition such as congestive heart failure, neuromuscular disease, renal failure etc. Prior CPAP or Bi-Level PAP use (within last 2 years) Chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency, moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (FEV1 < 60%), or any known condition of an elevation of arterial carbon dioxide levels while awake Surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days Presence of an untreated, diagnosable, non-OSA related sleep disorder (e.g. restless legs syndrome, insomnia, etc.) Periodic Limb movement arousal index of 10 or greater. Refusal to consider further interventions to standard CPAP to optimize positive pressure therapy (e.g. different mask than what was used in lab) PAP therapy otherwise medically complicated or contraindicated such as those with a difficult to size or adjust interface (mask) resulting in facial pain, skin irritation or trauma, or excessive air leaks Shift workers or people experiencing jet lag Known history of alcohol and or drug abuse Diagnosis of Complex Sleep Apnea, (appears to be classic obstructive or mixed sleep apnea, but exhibits disruptive central apneas and periodic breathing on CPAP) 11, 12 or persistent central apnea during diagnostic PSG. Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Chronic Hypnotic use (nightly use for three months or less)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric Powell, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Philips Respironics
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinics
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clayton Sleep Institute
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63143
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22334808
Citation
Powell ED, Gay PC, Ojile JM, Litinski M, Malhotra A. A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Feb 15;8(1):43-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1658.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Auto Bilevel Adherence Following a Poor Initial Encounter With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs