search
Back to results

BAX 326 Surgery Study in Hemophilia B Patients

Primary Purpose

Hemophilia B

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Recombinant factor IX
Sponsored by
Baxalta now part of Shire
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hemophilia B

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 65 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant and/or legal representative has/have voluntarily provided signed informed consent.
  • Participant has severe (FIX level < 1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) hemophilia B (based on the one stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay), as tested at screening at the central laboratory.
  • Participant requires surgery
  • Participant has previously been treated with plasma-derived and/or recombinant FIX concentrate(s) for a minimum of 150 exposure days
  • Participant has no evidence of a history of FIX inhibitors
  • Participant is immunocompetent as evidenced by a CD4 count ≥ 200 cells/mm3.
  • Participant is human immunodeficiency (HIV) negative or is HIV+ with a viral load < 200 particles/μL ~ < 400,000 copies/mL.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a history of FIX inhibitors with a titer ≥ 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU) (as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or the assay employed in the respective local laboratory) at any time prior to screening.
  • Participant has a detectable FIX inhibitor at screening, with a titer ≥0.6 Bethesda Units (BU) as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay in the central laboratory.
  • Participant has a history of allergic reaction or evidence of an ongoing or recent thrombotic disease, fibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
  • Known hypersensitivity to hamster proteins or recombinant furin.
  • Evidence of an ongoing or recent thrombotic disease, fibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
  • Abnormal renal function
  • Severe chronic liver disease
  • Active hepatic disease with ALT or AST levels > 5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Diagnosis of an iherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia B.
  • Platelet count < 100,000/mL.

Sites / Locations

  • Instituto de Hematología y Medicina Clínica Rubén Dávoli
  • Specialized Haematological Hospital "Joan Pavel"
  • Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio
  • Centro Medico Imbanaco
  • Klinika detska hematologie a onkologie, Fakultni Nemocnice Motol
  • Medical University Lodz, Copernicus Hospital, Department of Hematology
  • Independent Public Pediatric Teaching Hospital, Clinical Department of Hematology and Pediatrics
  • Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine
  • Louis Turcanu Emergency Clinical Children´s Hospital
  • Federal State Institution Kirov, Hematology and Blood Transfusion Research Institute under the Federal Agency for High-Tech Medical Care
  • Children's Territorial Clinical Hospital
  • Hematology Research Center RAMS
  • State Institution "Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine under the Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

BAX326 in Surgery

Arm Description

BAX 326 (recombinant factor IX) in Surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Intraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy
Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale (according to the definitions provided below): - Excellent: Intraoperative blood loss was less than or equal to that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (≤ 100% ) - Good: Intraoperative blood loss was up to 50% more than expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (101 - 150%) - Fair: Intraoperative blood loss was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (> 150%) - None: Uncontrolled hemorrhage that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Actual Intraoperative Blood Loss
Actual intraoperative blood loss was determined by the drainage volume, if a drain was placed, and the estimated blood loss into swabs and towels during the procedure.
Actual Intraoperative Blood Loss Compared to Average and Maximum Blood Loss Predicted Preoperatively by the Operating Surgeon
Predicted average/maximum blood loss minus actual blood loss. Prior to the surgery, the surgeon predicted the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average and maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a hemostatically normal individual of the same sex, age, and stature as the study participant for the intraoperative period.
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy at Drain Removal
The postoperative hemostatic efficacy was to be assessed by the operating surgeon according to the following criteria (4-point ordinal scale): - Excellent: Volume in drain was less than or equal than that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (≤ 100% ) - Good: Volume in drain was up to 50% more than expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (101% - 150%) - Fair: Volume in drain was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (> 150%) - None: Uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy at Postoperative Day 3
Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale: - Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with BAX326 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without the need to change the Factor IX concentrate - None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy on Day of Discharge
Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale: - Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with BAX326 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without the need to change the Factor IX concentrate - None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Actual Postoperative Blood Loss
Postoperative blood loss was based on the drainage fluid and was only assessed for participants who had a drain placed during surgery.
Actual Postoperative Blood Loss Compared to Average and Maximum Blood Loss Predicated Preoperatively by the Operating Surgeon
Predicted average/maximum blood loss minus actual blood loss for participants who had a drain placed during surgery. Prior to the surgery, the surgeon will predict the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average and maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a hemostatically normal individual of the same sex, age, and stature as the study subject for the postoperative period until drain removal.
Daily Weight-Adjusted Dose of BAX326 Per Participant
Daily weight-adjusted doses of BAX326 per participant were recorded from the day of surgery until postoperative Days 11+. Each category in outcome measure includes number of all, major and minor surgeries, respectively, if different from the totals.
Total Weight-Adjusted Dose of BAX326 Per Participant
Assessed for the intra- and postoperative periods.
Number of Units of Blood Product Transfused
Blood product transfusions consisted of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or both.
Volume of Blood Product Transfused
Blood product transfusions consisted of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or both.
Safety: Number of Participants Who Developed Inhibitory Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)
Safety: Number of Participants Who Developed Total Binding Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)
If there was more than 2-dilution increase as compared to pre-study level at screening.
Safety: Number of Adverse Events Related to BAX326
Safety: Occurence of a Thrombotic Event
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) From 0 to 72 Hours Post-infusion Per Dose
AUC0-72h (area under the plasma concentration/time curve from time 0 to 72 hours) was computed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R2.
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Total Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Per Dose (Total AUC/Dose)
Total AUC/Dose is also AUC0-inf (area under the plasma concentration/time curve from time 0 to infinity) and was defined as AUC0-t + Ct / λz, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration and λz is the terminal rate constant.
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Residence Time (MRT)
The MRT is the average time that the study product stays in the body (or plasma) and is calculated as: AUMC 0-inf / AUC 0-inf, where AUMC 0-inf was determined in a similar manner as AUC 0-inf.
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Factor IX (FIX) Clearance (CL)
CL is the volume of plasma which is completely cleared of study product per unit time and is calculated as the dose divided by the total area under the curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf).
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Min
IR was defined as (C post-infusion - C pre-infusion) / Dose, where C post-infusion is the measured concentration achieved at 30±5 minutes for pre-surgical PK.
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Elimination Phase Half-life (T 1/2)
T1/2 was determined as ln2 / λz.
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
Vss was computed as CL·MRT.
Incremental Recovery (IR) at 15±5 Minutes Following Loading Dose Prior to Surgery
IR was defined as (C post-infusion - C pre-infusion) / Dose, where C post-infusion is the measured concentration achieved at 15±5 minutes for the loading dose.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 9, 2012
Last Updated
April 30, 2021
Sponsor
Baxalta now part of Shire
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01507896
Brief Title
BAX 326 Surgery Study in Hemophilia B Patients
Official Title
BAX 326 (Recombinant Factor IX): A Phase 3 Prospective, Multicenter Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety in Previously Treated Patients With Severe (FIX Level < 1%) or Moderately Severe (FIX Level 1-2%) Hemophilia B Undergoing Surgical or Other Invasive Procedures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 19, 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 15, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 15, 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Baxalta now part of Shire

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the hemostatic efficacy and safety of BAX 326 in subjects with severe (FIX level < 1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) hemophilia B undergoing major or minor elective or emergency surgical, dental or other invasive procedures.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hemophilia B

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BAX326 in Surgery
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
BAX 326 (recombinant factor IX) in Surgery
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Recombinant factor IX
Other Intervention Name(s)
BAX326, RIXUBIS
Intervention Description
Following a loading dose with BAX326, participants will receive BAX326 as a bolus infusion. The treatment regimen will be determined by the intensity and duration of the hemostatic challenge and the institution´s standard of care. The dose will be tailored to raise FIX concentration to at least 80%-100% of normal for major surgeries and to at least 30%-60% of normal for minor surgeries.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy
Description
Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale (according to the definitions provided below): - Excellent: Intraoperative blood loss was less than or equal to that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (≤ 100% ) - Good: Intraoperative blood loss was up to 50% more than expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (101 - 150%) - Fair: Intraoperative blood loss was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (> 150%) - None: Uncontrolled hemorrhage that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Time Frame
On day of surgery
Title
Actual Intraoperative Blood Loss
Description
Actual intraoperative blood loss was determined by the drainage volume, if a drain was placed, and the estimated blood loss into swabs and towels during the procedure.
Time Frame
On day of surgery
Title
Actual Intraoperative Blood Loss Compared to Average and Maximum Blood Loss Predicted Preoperatively by the Operating Surgeon
Description
Predicted average/maximum blood loss minus actual blood loss. Prior to the surgery, the surgeon predicted the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average and maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a hemostatically normal individual of the same sex, age, and stature as the study participant for the intraoperative period.
Time Frame
On day of surgery
Title
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy at Drain Removal
Description
The postoperative hemostatic efficacy was to be assessed by the operating surgeon according to the following criteria (4-point ordinal scale): - Excellent: Volume in drain was less than or equal than that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (≤ 100% ) - Good: Volume in drain was up to 50% more than expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (101% - 150%) - Fair: Volume in drain was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (> 150%) - None: Uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Time Frame
At drain removal (from 1-3 days postoperatively)
Title
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy at Postoperative Day 3
Description
Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale: - Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with BAX326 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without the need to change the Factor IX concentrate - None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Time Frame
At postoperative day 3 (approximately 72 hours postoperatively)
Title
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy on Day of Discharge
Description
Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale: - Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with BAX326 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without the need to change the Factor IX concentrate - None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate
Time Frame
At discharge from hospital (from 1-3 days postoperatively for minor surgery and approximately 2 weeks postoperatively for major surgery)
Title
Actual Postoperative Blood Loss
Description
Postoperative blood loss was based on the drainage fluid and was only assessed for participants who had a drain placed during surgery.
Time Frame
At drain removal (from 1-3 days postoperatively)
Title
Actual Postoperative Blood Loss Compared to Average and Maximum Blood Loss Predicated Preoperatively by the Operating Surgeon
Description
Predicted average/maximum blood loss minus actual blood loss for participants who had a drain placed during surgery. Prior to the surgery, the surgeon will predict the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average and maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a hemostatically normal individual of the same sex, age, and stature as the study subject for the postoperative period until drain removal.
Time Frame
At postoperative day 3 (approximately 72 hours postoperatively)
Title
Daily Weight-Adjusted Dose of BAX326 Per Participant
Description
Daily weight-adjusted doses of BAX326 per participant were recorded from the day of surgery until postoperative Days 11+. Each category in outcome measure includes number of all, major and minor surgeries, respectively, if different from the totals.
Time Frame
From initiation of surgery until discharge from hospital (from 1-3 days postoperatively for minor surgery and approximately 2 weeks postoperatively for major surgery)
Title
Total Weight-Adjusted Dose of BAX326 Per Participant
Description
Assessed for the intra- and postoperative periods.
Time Frame
From initiation of surgery until discharge from hospital (from 1-3 days postoperatively for minor surgery and approximately 2 weeks postoperatively for major surgery)
Title
Number of Units of Blood Product Transfused
Description
Blood product transfusions consisted of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or both.
Time Frame
From initiation of surgery until discharge from hospital (from 1-3 days postoperatively for minor surgery and approximately 2 weeks postoperatively for major surgery)
Title
Volume of Blood Product Transfused
Description
Blood product transfusions consisted of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or both.
Time Frame
From initiation of surgery until discharge from hospital (from 1-3 days postoperatively for minor surgery and approximately 2 weeks postoperatively for major surgery)
Title
Safety: Number of Participants Who Developed Inhibitory Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)
Time Frame
Throughout the study period (approximately 2 years 5 months)
Title
Safety: Number of Participants Who Developed Total Binding Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)
Description
If there was more than 2-dilution increase as compared to pre-study level at screening.
Time Frame
Throughout the study period (approximately 2 years 5 months)
Title
Safety: Number of Adverse Events Related to BAX326
Time Frame
Throughout the study period (approximately 2 years 5 months)
Title
Safety: Occurence of a Thrombotic Event
Time Frame
Throughout the study period (approximately 2 years 5 months)
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) From 0 to 72 Hours Post-infusion Per Dose
Description
AUC0-72h (area under the plasma concentration/time curve from time 0 to 72 hours) was computed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R2.
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion timepoints of 30 minutes, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Total Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Per Dose (Total AUC/Dose)
Description
Total AUC/Dose is also AUC0-inf (area under the plasma concentration/time curve from time 0 to infinity) and was defined as AUC0-t + Ct / λz, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration and λz is the terminal rate constant.
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion timepoints of 30 minutes, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Residence Time (MRT)
Description
The MRT is the average time that the study product stays in the body (or plasma) and is calculated as: AUMC 0-inf / AUC 0-inf, where AUMC 0-inf was determined in a similar manner as AUC 0-inf.
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion timepoints of 30 minutes, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Factor IX (FIX) Clearance (CL)
Description
CL is the volume of plasma which is completely cleared of study product per unit time and is calculated as the dose divided by the total area under the curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf).
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion timepoints of 30 minutes, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Min
Description
IR was defined as (C post-infusion - C pre-infusion) / Dose, where C post-infusion is the measured concentration achieved at 30±5 minutes for pre-surgical PK.
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion at 30 minutes
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Elimination Phase Half-life (T 1/2)
Description
T1/2 was determined as ln2 / λz.
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion timepoints of 30 minutes, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr
Title
Pre-Surgical Pharmacokinetics (PK): Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
Description
Vss was computed as CL·MRT.
Time Frame
Within 30 mins pre-infusion and post-infusion timepoints of 30 minutes, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr
Title
Incremental Recovery (IR) at 15±5 Minutes Following Loading Dose Prior to Surgery
Description
IR was defined as (C post-infusion - C pre-infusion) / Dose, where C post-infusion is the measured concentration achieved at 15±5 minutes for the loading dose.
Time Frame
Within 60 minutes prior to surgery and 15 ± 5 minutes after loading dose/rebolus, if applicable.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Main Inclusion Criteria: Participant and/or legal representative has/have voluntarily provided signed informed consent. Participant has severe (FIX level < 1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) hemophilia B (based on the one stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay), as tested at screening at the central laboratory. Participant requires surgery Participant has previously been treated with plasma-derived and/or recombinant FIX concentrate(s) for a minimum of 150 exposure days Participant has no evidence of a history of FIX inhibitors Participant is immunocompetent as evidenced by a CD4 count ≥ 200 cells/mm3. Participant is human immunodeficiency (HIV) negative or is HIV+ with a viral load < 200 particles/μL ~ < 400,000 copies/mL. Main Exclusion Criteria: Participant has a history of FIX inhibitors with a titer ≥ 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU) (as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or the assay employed in the respective local laboratory) at any time prior to screening. Participant has a detectable FIX inhibitor at screening, with a titer ≥0.6 Bethesda Units (BU) as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay in the central laboratory. Participant has a history of allergic reaction or evidence of an ongoing or recent thrombotic disease, fibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Known hypersensitivity to hamster proteins or recombinant furin. Evidence of an ongoing or recent thrombotic disease, fibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Abnormal renal function Severe chronic liver disease Active hepatic disease with ALT or AST levels > 5 times the upper limit of normal. Diagnosis of an iherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia B. Platelet count < 100,000/mL.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Takeda
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Instituto de Hematología y Medicina Clínica Rubén Dávoli
City
Rosario
ZIP/Postal Code
2000
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Specialized Haematological Hospital "Joan Pavel"
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1233
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Centro Medico Imbanaco
City
Cali
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Klinika detska hematologie a onkologie, Fakultni Nemocnice Motol
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
150 06
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Medical University Lodz, Copernicus Hospital, Department of Hematology
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
93-510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Independent Public Pediatric Teaching Hospital, Clinical Department of Hematology and Pediatrics
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
00-579
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
02-776
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Louis Turcanu Emergency Clinical Children´s Hospital
City
Timisoara
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Federal State Institution Kirov, Hematology and Blood Transfusion Research Institute under the Federal Agency for High-Tech Medical Care
City
Kirov
ZIP/Postal Code
610027
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Children's Territorial Clinical Hospital
City
Krasnodar
ZIP/Postal Code
350007
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Hematology Research Center RAMS
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Institution "Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine under the Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79044
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24697870
Citation
Windyga J, Lissitchkov T, Stasyshyn O, Mamonov V, Ghandehari H, Chapman M, Fritsch S, Wong WY, Pavlova BG, Abbuehl BE. Efficacy and safety of a recombinant factor IX (Bax326) in previously treated patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B undergoing surgical or other invasive procedures: a prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicentre, phase III study. Haemophilia. 2014 Sep;20(5):651-8. doi: 10.1111/hae.12419. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32816519
Citation
Windyga J, Timofeeva M, Stasyshyn O, Mamonov V, Lamas Castellanos JL, Lissitchkov T, Chojnowski K, Chapman M, Pavlova BG, Tangada S. Phase 3 Clinical Trial: Perioperative Use of Nonacog Gamma, a Recombinant Factor IX, in Previously Treated Patients With Moderate/Severe Hemophilia B. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029620946839. doi: 10.1177/1076029620946839.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

BAX 326 Surgery Study in Hemophilia B Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs