search
Back to results

BAY43-9006 (Sorafenib) Versus Interferon Alpha-2a in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)
Interferon
Sponsored by
Bayer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Carcinoma, Renal Cell focused on measuring Renal Cell Cancer, RCC, Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients who give written informed consent prior to any study specific screening procedures with the understanding that the patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time, without prejudice Male or female patients >= 18 years of age Patients who have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks Patients, who suffer from unresectable and/or metastatic, measurable predominantly clear cell RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma) histologically or cytologically documented Patients must have undergone prior (at the time of primary diagnosis) complete surgical excision of primary RCC tumor Patients must have had no prior systemic therapy for advanced RCC. Prior systemic therapy is defined as any treatment with a chemotherapy agent (or regimen), an immunotherapy agent (or regimen) or an investigational treatment agent (or regimen) against the renal cell carcinoma. Megestrol acetate or medroxyprogesterone will constitute as a prior systemic therapy Patients who have at least one uni-dimensional measurable lesion by CT (Computed tomography)-scan or MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Patients who have an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 Adequate bone marrow, liver , and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening Hemoglobin >9.0 g/l Absolute neutrophil count ( ANC)>1,500/mm3 Platelets> or = 100,000/ul Total bilirubin < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal ALT (Alanine aminotransferase) and AST (Aspartate aminotransferase) < 2.5 x upper limit of normal (< 5 x upper limit of normal for patients with liver involvement of their cancer) Amylase and lipase < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal Serum creatinine < 2.0 x the upper limit of normal PT (Prothrombin Time) or INR (International Normalized Ratio) and PTT (Partial Thromboplastin Time) < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (patients who receive anti-coagulation treatment with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be allowed to participate. For patients on warfarin, close monitoring of at least weekly evaluations will be performed until INR is stable based on a measurement at pre dose, as defined by the local standard of care) Exclusion Criteria: Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta [Noninvasive papillary carcinoma], Tis [Carcinoma in situ: "flat tumor"]&T1 [Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue]) or any cancer curatively treated > 5 years prior to study entry Complete renal shut-down requiring hemo- or peritoneal dialysis History of cardiac disease : congestive heart failure > NYHA (New York Heart Association) class 2: active cardiovascular disease( MI (Distant metastasis) more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed); cardiac arrhythmia requiring anti-arrythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted) or uncontrolled hypertension Active clinically serious bacterial or fungal infections (>= grade 2 NCI-CTCAE (National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), Version 3) Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or chronic hepatitis B or C Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the patient is > 6 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks of study entry and is clinically stable with respect to this brain tumour site at the time of study entry. Also the patient must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper (chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies (head CT or MRI at screening always required) Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication (such as steroid anti-epileptics) History of organ allograft Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardise the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg then 600 mg

First Interferon then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg

Arm Description

Subjects received 2 tablets of Sorafenib (200 mg tablets) twice daily (bid) (ie 12-hourly) orally until progression (= first intervention period, 5.7 months [median] ) and 3 tablets of Sorafenib twice daily (ie 12-hourly) orally until the following progression (= second intervention period, 3.6 months [median]) on a continuous basis.

Interferon (IFN) α-2a was administered at a dose of 9 million international units(MIU) subcutaneously three times a week until progression (= first intervention period, 5.6 months [median]). Subjects initially started with a single dose of 3 MIU IFN and increased the dose as rapidly as possible to 9 MIU IFN three times a week within 1 or 2 weeks in first intervention period.After first progression, subjects received 2 tablets of Sorafenib (200 mg tablets) twice daily (BID) (ie 12-hourly) until the next progression (=second intervention period, 5.3 months [median]).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation
Disease Control (DC) According to Independent Central Review for the First Intervention Period
Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes.
Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes.
Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes.
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) After Intervention for the First Intervention Period
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. The respiratory domain of the FKSI comprises 2 questions:" I have been short in breath" and "I have been coughing"; its score ranges from 0 to 8.
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. The respiratory domain of the FKSI comprises 2 questions:" I have been short in breath" and "I have been coughing"; its score ranges from 0 to 8.
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the First Intervention Period
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns.
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns.
Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the First Intervention Period
The FACT-BRM comprises 40 questions within 6 domains (physical well being, social/family well being, emotional well being, additional concern: physical, and additional concern: emotional). Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total score range is from 0 to 160 with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the Second Intervention Period
The FACT-BRM comprises 40 questions within 6 domains (physical well being, social/family well being, emotional well being, additional concern: physical, and additional concern: emotional). Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total score range is from 0 to 160 with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Tumor Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes.
Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes
Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes
Progression Free Survival According to the Investigator Assessment (Second Intervention Period)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Slope - Change in Trough Concentration/Cycle
Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing every 4 weeks after the patient reached steady-state (at least 10 days at 400 mg BID (bis in die, twice daily)) to assess any potential trends in trough concentration over time.
Average of All Trough Plasma Concentrations
Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing every 4 weeks after the patient reached steady-state (at least 10 days at 400 mg BID).
Duration of Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Time to Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented
Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented
Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented
Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the First Intervention Period
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale that measures how cancer affects the daily life of a patient on an ordinal scale from grade 0 (best) to grade 5 (worst).
Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the Second Intervention Period
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale that measures how cancer affects the daily life of a patient on an ordinal scale from grade 0 (best) to grade 5 (worst).

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2005
Last Updated
October 24, 2014
Sponsor
Bayer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00117637
Brief Title
BAY43-9006 (Sorafenib) Versus Interferon Alpha-2a in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Official Title
A Randomised, Open-label, Multi-centre Phase II Study of BAY43-9006 (Sorafenib) Versus Standard Treatment With Interferon Alpha-2a in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bayer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to: Find out if patients receiving BAY43-9006 will live longer without tumor progression than those receiving standard therapy with interferon alpha-2a Find out if a higher dose of BAY43-9006 can inhibit tumor progression in patients who progressed during standard dose treatment with BAY43-9006, and for how long these patients live without progression Find out how long patients live without progression who receive BAY43-9006 after failing to respond to standard therapy with interferon alpha-2a Find out in how many percent of patients BAY43-9006 prevents the growth of or shrinks kidney tumors and/or their metastases depending on treatment and dosage Find out if BAY43-9006 has any effect on the quality of life of patients with kidney cancer Find out the level of BAY43-9006 in the blood once per month and any changes in this level Find out whether BAY43-9006 effects are associated with specific biomarkers
Detailed Description
Analyses on Biomarkers were exploratory and assessed as tertiary objective of the trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Keywords
Renal Cell Cancer, RCC, Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
189 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
First Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg then 600 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects received 2 tablets of Sorafenib (200 mg tablets) twice daily (bid) (ie 12-hourly) orally until progression (= first intervention period, 5.7 months [median] ) and 3 tablets of Sorafenib twice daily (ie 12-hourly) orally until the following progression (= second intervention period, 3.6 months [median]) on a continuous basis.
Arm Title
First Interferon then Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Interferon (IFN) α-2a was administered at a dose of 9 million international units(MIU) subcutaneously three times a week until progression (= first intervention period, 5.6 months [median]). Subjects initially started with a single dose of 3 MIU IFN and increased the dose as rapidly as possible to 9 MIU IFN three times a week within 1 or 2 weeks in first intervention period.After first progression, subjects received 2 tablets of Sorafenib (200 mg tablets) twice daily (BID) (ie 12-hourly) until the next progression (=second intervention period, 5.3 months [median]).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)
Intervention Description
Multi kinase inhibitor
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Interferon
Intervention Description
Interferon
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Description
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Description
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Disease Control (DC) According to Independent Central Review for the First Intervention Period
Description
Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Description
Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Disease Control (DC) According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Description
Disease Control (DC) was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not Progressive Disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (= total number of Complete Response (CR) + total number of Partial Response (PR) + total number of Stable Disease (SD); CR, PR, or SD had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating). CR: disappearance of tumor lesions (TL); PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of TL sizes; SD: steady state of disease; PD: an increase of at least 20% in the sum of TL sizes.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) After Intervention for the First Intervention Period
Description
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. The respiratory domain of the FKSI comprises 2 questions:" I have been short in breath" and "I have been coughing"; its score ranges from 0 to 8.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of the Respiratory Domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns. The respiratory domain of the FKSI comprises 2 questions:" I have been short in breath" and "I have been coughing"; its score ranges from 0 to 8.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the First Intervention Period
Description
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Quality of Life by Use of Total Score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The FKSI questionnaire comprises 15 questions dispatched within 4 domains (respiratory, pain, general symptoms and overall Quality of Life (QoL)) plus 2 individual items. Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) indicating the severity of symptoms. The total score range was from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating subjects reported fewer kidney cancer related symptoms and concerns.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the First Intervention Period
Description
The FACT-BRM comprises 40 questions within 6 domains (physical well being, social/family well being, emotional well being, additional concern: physical, and additional concern: emotional). Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total score range is from 0 to 160 with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Quality of Life (QoL) by Use of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic-response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The FACT-BRM comprises 40 questions within 6 domains (physical well being, social/family well being, emotional well being, additional concern: physical, and additional concern: emotional). Each question was answered on a five point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total score range is from 0 to 160 with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the First Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Effectiveness) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Side Effects) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Convenience) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Treatment Tolerability (Global Satisfaction) by Use of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for the Second Intervention Period
Description
The TSQM comprises 14 questions dispatched within 4 domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Each question was answered on either a 5-point or 7-point scale. Each domain score can vary from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating subject reported higher effectiveness of treatment, less bothered by side-effects, more convenient use of medication and overall greater satisfaction with the treatment. No total score is calculated.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Tumor Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Description
Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes.
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Description
Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Tumor Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Description
Tumor Response (= Best Overall Response) of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR), confirmed Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD)) observed during trial period assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of tumor lesions, PR was defined as a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes, SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of tumor lesions sizes
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Progression Free Survival According to the Investigator Assessment (Second Intervention Period)
Description
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first). Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Overall Survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Slope - Change in Trough Concentration/Cycle
Description
Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing every 4 weeks after the patient reached steady-state (at least 10 days at 400 mg BID (bis in die, twice daily)) to assess any potential trends in trough concentration over time.
Time Frame
From start of treatment of the first subject until 15 months later assessed every 4 weeks.
Title
Average of All Trough Plasma Concentrations
Description
Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing every 4 weeks after the patient reached steady-state (at least 10 days at 400 mg BID).
Time Frame
From start of treatment of the first subject until 15 months later assessed every 4 weeks.
Title
Duration of Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Description
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Description
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Duration of Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Description
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD) is first documented or to the date of death, whichever occurs first. Subjects still having CR or PR at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Time to Response According to the Independent Radiological Review for the First Intervention Period
Description
Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 15 months later, assessed every 8 weeks
Title
Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the First Intervention Period
Description
Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks
Title
Time to Response According to the Investigator Assessment for the Second Intervention Period
Description
Time to Response (TTR) for subjects who achieved a response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) with confirmation) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that the response was first documented
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the First Intervention Period
Description
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale that measures how cancer affects the daily life of a patient on an ordinal scale from grade 0 (best) to grade 5 (worst).
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks
Title
Analysis of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Status at the End of the Second Intervention Period
Description
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a scale that measures how cancer affects the daily life of a patient on an ordinal scale from grade 0 (best) to grade 5 (worst).
Time Frame
From randomization of the first subject until 3 years and 9 months later, assessed every 4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who give written informed consent prior to any study specific screening procedures with the understanding that the patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time, without prejudice Male or female patients >= 18 years of age Patients who have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks Patients, who suffer from unresectable and/or metastatic, measurable predominantly clear cell RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma) histologically or cytologically documented Patients must have undergone prior (at the time of primary diagnosis) complete surgical excision of primary RCC tumor Patients must have had no prior systemic therapy for advanced RCC. Prior systemic therapy is defined as any treatment with a chemotherapy agent (or regimen), an immunotherapy agent (or regimen) or an investigational treatment agent (or regimen) against the renal cell carcinoma. Megestrol acetate or medroxyprogesterone will constitute as a prior systemic therapy Patients who have at least one uni-dimensional measurable lesion by CT (Computed tomography)-scan or MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Patients who have an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 Adequate bone marrow, liver , and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening Hemoglobin >9.0 g/l Absolute neutrophil count ( ANC)>1,500/mm3 Platelets> or = 100,000/ul Total bilirubin < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal ALT (Alanine aminotransferase) and AST (Aspartate aminotransferase) < 2.5 x upper limit of normal (< 5 x upper limit of normal for patients with liver involvement of their cancer) Amylase and lipase < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal Serum creatinine < 2.0 x the upper limit of normal PT (Prothrombin Time) or INR (International Normalized Ratio) and PTT (Partial Thromboplastin Time) < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (patients who receive anti-coagulation treatment with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be allowed to participate. For patients on warfarin, close monitoring of at least weekly evaluations will be performed until INR is stable based on a measurement at pre dose, as defined by the local standard of care) Exclusion Criteria: Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta [Noninvasive papillary carcinoma], Tis [Carcinoma in situ: "flat tumor"]&T1 [Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue]) or any cancer curatively treated > 5 years prior to study entry Complete renal shut-down requiring hemo- or peritoneal dialysis History of cardiac disease : congestive heart failure > NYHA (New York Heart Association) class 2: active cardiovascular disease( MI (Distant metastasis) more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed); cardiac arrhythmia requiring anti-arrythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted) or uncontrolled hypertension Active clinically serious bacterial or fungal infections (>= grade 2 NCI-CTCAE (National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), Version 3) Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or chronic hepatitis B or C Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the patient is > 6 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks of study entry and is clinically stable with respect to this brain tumour site at the time of study entry. Also the patient must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper (chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies (head CT or MRI at screening always required) Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication (such as steroid anti-epileptics) History of organ allograft Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardise the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bayer Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Bayer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80010
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
City
Frederick
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21701
Country
United States
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89135
Country
United States
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195-0002
Country
United States
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98101
Country
United States
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33000
Country
France
City
Lille Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
59020
Country
France
City
Lyon Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
69008
Country
France
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13273
Country
France
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
France
City
Paris Cedex 15
ZIP/Postal Code
75908
Country
France
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31052
Country
France
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
City
Ulm
State/Province
Baden-Württemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
89075
Country
Germany
City
München
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
60488
Country
Germany
City
Düsseldorf
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany
City
Mainz
State/Province
Rheinland-Pfalz
ZIP/Postal Code
55131
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12203
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-210
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-115
Country
Poland
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-878
Country
Poland
City
Szczecin
ZIP/Postal Code
70-111
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-781
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
04-141
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-043
Country
Poland
City
Kazan
ZIP/Postal Code
420029
Country
Russian Federation
City
Kirov
ZIP/Postal Code
610021
Country
Russian Federation
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115478
Country
Russian Federation
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125284
Country
Russian Federation
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197758
Country
Russian Federation
City
Donetsk
ZIP/Postal Code
83092
Country
Ukraine
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61024
Country
Ukraine
City
Kiev
ZIP/Postal Code
115
Country
Ukraine
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79031
Country
Ukraine
City
Sutton
State/Province
Surrey
ZIP/Postal Code
SM2 5PT
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW3 6JJ
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19171708
Citation
Escudier B, Szczylik C, Hutson TE, Demkow T, Staehler M, Rolland F, Negrier S, Laferriere N, Scheuring UJ, Cella D, Shah S, Bukowski RM. Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon Alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1280-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3342. Epub 2009 Jan 26. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 1; 27(13):2305.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/
Description
Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer Healthcare products conducted in Europe

Learn more about this trial

BAY43-9006 (Sorafenib) Versus Interferon Alpha-2a in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs