Bespoke vs Standard Instrumentation in TKR (SPHERE)
Primary Purpose
Knee Osteoarthritis
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Patient specific instrumentation
Conventional
Patient specific instrumentation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Knee Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Total knee arthroplasty, Stability, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Functional Outcome, Gait, Patient Specific Instrumentation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee which is sufficiently symptomatic to require knee arthroplasty as assessed by their consultant orthopaedic surgeon
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with inflammatory arthropathy, patients requiring bone augmentation, patients with ligament incompetence or valgus deformity >5 degrees.
Sites / Locations
- Trafford General HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Conventional
Patient specific instrumentation
Arm Description
Total knee replacement with conventional instrumentation
Total knee replacement with patient specific instrumentation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from Baseline Gait Kinematics at 1-Year
Gait of patients will be analysed pre-operatively, six-weeks post-operatively, and 1-year post-operatively by 3D motion capture technology. The change measured over time at 1-year will be the primary outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction (Pain/Hospital experience/functional ability/Surgery expectations)
Patient satisfaction will be reported using a scale on a questionnaire which asks six questions on how happy patients were with their hospital experience/level of pain/functional ability post-operatively. The questionnaire also asks whether their expectations were met. The two satisfaction questions are answered on a scale of 'Very Satisfied/Satisfied/Unsure/Dissatisfied' by ticking the appropriate box. The four questions based on patient expectation are scored on a scale of 'Excellent/Good/Unsure/Poor' by ticking the appropriate box.
Oxford Knee Score (Patient reported outcome measure of pain and function)
A joint specific questionnaire which asks patients on the level of pain and function they believe to have in their affected knee (taking into consideration the past 4 weeks only). The questionnaire consists of 12 questions. Five of the questions are pain related, and seven are aimed at function. Each question has 5 options and is scored from 0-4, with 4 being the best and 0 being the worst pain/function. The best score is therefore 48 (no pain/good function), and the worst score is 0 (pain and poor function).
Oxford Knee Score (Patient reported outcome measure of pain and function)
A joint specific questionnaire which asks patients on the level of pain and function they believe to have in their affected knee (taking into consideration the past 4 weeks only). The questionnaire consists of 12 questions. Five of the questions are pain related, and seven are aimed at function. Each question has 5 options and is scored from 0-4, with 4 being the best and 0 being the worst pain/function. The best score is therefore 48 (no pain/good function), and the worst score is 0 (pain and poor function).
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) (Patient reported outcome measure of patients' perception of their overall health)
A questionnaire on patients' perception of their overall health. The questionnaire focuses on generic health in 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression and usual activities (including work, housework, leisure, family, and study). The questions are scored using an algorithm; the result of which relates to the health status of the patient. This score ranges between 0 (equivalent to death) to 1 (equivalent to full health). It also contains a visual analogue scale where patients have to choose on a scale of 0-100 how well they believe their general health to be on that particular day, where 0 is the worst health imaginable and 100 is the best health imaginable.
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) (Patient reported outcome measure of patients'
A questionnaire on patients' perception of their overall health. The questionnaire focuses on generic health in 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression and usual activities (including work, housework, leisure, family, and study). The questions are scored using an algorithm; the result of which relates to the health status of the patient. This score ranges between 0 (equivalent to death) to 1 (equivalent to full health). It also contains a visual analogue scale where patients have to choose on a scale of 0-100 how well they believe their general health to be on that particular day, where 0 is the worst health imaginable and 100 is the best health imaginable.
Short Form-12 (SF-12) (Patient reported outcome measure of general quality of life)
A general Quality of Life score with 12 questions. It has mental and physical components which are scored from the same questions, using different algorithms. Each question is multiple choice, and the patient must tick one answer. Each answer corresponds to a standardised value, which is used in two algorithms to generate an overall score. One score is for the mental component and one is for the physical component. The physical standardized values are summed across all 12 items. 56.57706 is added to the sum to create the SF-12 physical score. 60.75781 is added to sum create the SF-12 mental score. Higher overall scores are better than lower scores.
Short Form-12 (SF-12) (Patient reported outcome measure of general quality of life)
A general Quality of Life score with 12 questions. It has mental and physical components which are scored from the same questions, using different algorithms. Each question is multiple choice, and the patient must tick one answer. Each answer corresponds to a standardised value, which is used in two algorithms to generate an overall score. One score is for the mental component and one is for the physical component. The physical standardized values are summed across all 12 items. 56.57706 is added to the sum to create the SF-12 physical score. 60.75781 is added to sum create the SF-12 mental score. Higher overall scores are better than lower scores.
Knee range of motion
Knee range of motion in degrees will be assessed using a goniometer
Knee range of motion
Knee range of motion in degrees will be assessed using a goniometer
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05579951
First Posted
October 11, 2022
Last Updated
May 17, 2023
Sponsor
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Manchester
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05579951
Brief Title
Bespoke vs Standard Instrumentation in TKR
Acronym
SPHERE
Official Title
Randomised Control Trial of Patient Specific Instrumentation vs Standard Instrumentation of the GMK-Sphere (Global Medacta Knee) Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 21, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 8, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 8, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Manchester
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Total knee replacements are operations that are offered to patients who have severe arthritis pain that is affecting daily activities that is no longer controlled with painkillers. The operation will replace the worn joints with metal implants and a plastic spacer. Total knee replacements are successful operations in the vast majority of patients. However, a small minority of patients are not entirely satisfied with the outcome of their knee replacement. Researchers are studying whether the precise positioning of the implant has an effect on the outcome.
This study will look at whether patient-specific instrumentation improves implant position and if it leads to improved patient function so that we know what to recommend in the future.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knee Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Total knee arthroplasty, Stability, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Functional Outcome, Gait, Patient Specific Instrumentation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
172 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Conventional
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Total knee replacement with conventional instrumentation
Arm Title
Patient specific instrumentation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Total knee replacement with patient specific instrumentation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Patient specific instrumentation
Intervention Description
Total knee replacement with patient specific instrumentation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional
Intervention Description
Total knee replacement with conventional instrumentation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Patient specific instrumentation
Intervention Description
Medacta GMK Sphere MyKnee Patient specific Instrumentation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from Baseline Gait Kinematics at 1-Year
Description
Gait of patients will be analysed pre-operatively, six-weeks post-operatively, and 1-year post-operatively by 3D motion capture technology. The change measured over time at 1-year will be the primary outcome.
Time Frame
1 year post-operatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Satisfaction (Pain/Hospital experience/functional ability/Surgery expectations)
Description
Patient satisfaction will be reported using a scale on a questionnaire which asks six questions on how happy patients were with their hospital experience/level of pain/functional ability post-operatively. The questionnaire also asks whether their expectations were met. The two satisfaction questions are answered on a scale of 'Very Satisfied/Satisfied/Unsure/Dissatisfied' by ticking the appropriate box. The four questions based on patient expectation are scored on a scale of 'Excellent/Good/Unsure/Poor' by ticking the appropriate box.
Time Frame
1 year post-operatively
Title
Oxford Knee Score (Patient reported outcome measure of pain and function)
Description
A joint specific questionnaire which asks patients on the level of pain and function they believe to have in their affected knee (taking into consideration the past 4 weeks only). The questionnaire consists of 12 questions. Five of the questions are pain related, and seven are aimed at function. Each question has 5 options and is scored from 0-4, with 4 being the best and 0 being the worst pain/function. The best score is therefore 48 (no pain/good function), and the worst score is 0 (pain and poor function).
Time Frame
6 weeks post-operatively
Title
Oxford Knee Score (Patient reported outcome measure of pain and function)
Description
A joint specific questionnaire which asks patients on the level of pain and function they believe to have in their affected knee (taking into consideration the past 4 weeks only). The questionnaire consists of 12 questions. Five of the questions are pain related, and seven are aimed at function. Each question has 5 options and is scored from 0-4, with 4 being the best and 0 being the worst pain/function. The best score is therefore 48 (no pain/good function), and the worst score is 0 (pain and poor function).
Time Frame
1 year post-operatively
Title
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) (Patient reported outcome measure of patients' perception of their overall health)
Description
A questionnaire on patients' perception of their overall health. The questionnaire focuses on generic health in 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression and usual activities (including work, housework, leisure, family, and study). The questions are scored using an algorithm; the result of which relates to the health status of the patient. This score ranges between 0 (equivalent to death) to 1 (equivalent to full health). It also contains a visual analogue scale where patients have to choose on a scale of 0-100 how well they believe their general health to be on that particular day, where 0 is the worst health imaginable and 100 is the best health imaginable.
Time Frame
6 weeks post-operatively
Title
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) (Patient reported outcome measure of patients'
Description
A questionnaire on patients' perception of their overall health. The questionnaire focuses on generic health in 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression and usual activities (including work, housework, leisure, family, and study). The questions are scored using an algorithm; the result of which relates to the health status of the patient. This score ranges between 0 (equivalent to death) to 1 (equivalent to full health). It also contains a visual analogue scale where patients have to choose on a scale of 0-100 how well they believe their general health to be on that particular day, where 0 is the worst health imaginable and 100 is the best health imaginable.
Time Frame
1 year post-operatively
Title
Short Form-12 (SF-12) (Patient reported outcome measure of general quality of life)
Description
A general Quality of Life score with 12 questions. It has mental and physical components which are scored from the same questions, using different algorithms. Each question is multiple choice, and the patient must tick one answer. Each answer corresponds to a standardised value, which is used in two algorithms to generate an overall score. One score is for the mental component and one is for the physical component. The physical standardized values are summed across all 12 items. 56.57706 is added to the sum to create the SF-12 physical score. 60.75781 is added to sum create the SF-12 mental score. Higher overall scores are better than lower scores.
Time Frame
6 weeks post-operatively
Title
Short Form-12 (SF-12) (Patient reported outcome measure of general quality of life)
Description
A general Quality of Life score with 12 questions. It has mental and physical components which are scored from the same questions, using different algorithms. Each question is multiple choice, and the patient must tick one answer. Each answer corresponds to a standardised value, which is used in two algorithms to generate an overall score. One score is for the mental component and one is for the physical component. The physical standardized values are summed across all 12 items. 56.57706 is added to the sum to create the SF-12 physical score. 60.75781 is added to sum create the SF-12 mental score. Higher overall scores are better than lower scores.
Time Frame
1 year post-operatively
Title
Knee range of motion
Description
Knee range of motion in degrees will be assessed using a goniometer
Time Frame
6 weeks post-operatively
Title
Knee range of motion
Description
Knee range of motion in degrees will be assessed using a goniometer
Time Frame
1 year post-operatively
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee which is sufficiently symptomatic to require knee arthroplasty as assessed by their consultant orthopaedic surgeon
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with inflammatory arthropathy, patients requiring bone augmentation, patients with ligament incompetence or valgus deformity >5 degrees.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Leela Biant
Phone
01617462391
Email
leela.biant@manchester.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lawrie Rogerson
Email
Lawrie.Rogerson@mft.nhs.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leela Biant
Organizational Affiliation
University of Manchester
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Trafford General Hospital
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lynne Webster, PhD
Phone
01612764125
Email
Lynne.Webster@mft.nhs.uk
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Study protocol and participant facing documents can be shared to other researchers upon request to the research team. Requests can be emailed to MORE@manchester.ac.uk
Learn more about this trial
Bespoke vs Standard Instrumentation in TKR
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs