search
Back to results

Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis (BEAT-Calci)

Primary Purpose

Calciphylaxis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vitamin K1
Magnesium citrate
Sodium Thiosulfate
High Flux Dialyser
Medium Cut-off Dialyser
Placebo injection (normal saline)
Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
Sponsored by
University of Sydney
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Calciphylaxis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently receiving haemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis that can be converted to haemodialysis, with planned ongoing haemodialysis a minimum of three times per week for at least the duration of the protocolised calciphylaxis treatments within this trial
  2. Have a new calciphylaxis ulcer present for less than 10 weeks
  3. Age ≥ 18 years
  4. Eligible for randomisation in at least one recruiting domain
  5. The participant and treating physician are willing and able to perform trial procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

Nil

Sites / Locations

  • Concord Repatriation General HospitalRecruiting
  • St George HospitalRecruiting
  • Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health ServiceRecruiting
  • Princess Alexandra HospitalRecruiting
  • Bundaberg Base HospitalRecruiting
  • Royal Melbourne HospitalRecruiting
  • Sunshine Hospital (Western Health)Recruiting
  • Dunedin HospitalRecruiting
  • Auckland City Hospital (Auckland DHB)Recruiting
  • North Shore Hospital (Waitemata DHB)Recruiting
  • Tauranga HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo (Double-Blind Period)

Vitamin K1 (Double-Blind Period)

Magnesium Citrate (Double-Blind Period)

Sodium Thiosulfate (Double-Blind Period)

High Flux Hemodialysis

Medium Cut-off Hemodialysis

Arm Description

Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate

Dose: 10mg Vitamin K1 capsules, administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session. Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate

Dose: 150mg Magnesium Citrate tablets, administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session. Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate

Dose: 25g Sodium Thiosulfate injection, administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis. Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate

Hemodialysis using a high flux dialyser

Hemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) - Baseline to Week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 12 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death

Secondary Outcome Measures

BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale - Baseline to Week 26
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 26 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Weeks 4
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Weeks 4 Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 12 Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 26
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 26. Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 4
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4 using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 26
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
Change over time of self-reported pain
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain over time, assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Self-reported pain at week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain use at week 12 assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Change over time of analgesic use
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 26
Analgesic use week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 12
Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use over time
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use over time
Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use at week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use at week 12
Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 4
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 4, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument
Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 12
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument
Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 26
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 26 using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument
Time to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection from Baseline to Week 26
Time in days to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection within 26 weeks post-randomisation
All-cause hospitalisation days
Count of all cause hospitalisation days (excluding day admissions for dialysis treatment within 26 weeks post-randomisation
Mortality
Incidence of mortality, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation
Kidney Transplantation
Incidence of kidney transplantation, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation
Calciphylaxis recurrence
Incidence of calciphylaxis recurrence as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

Full Information

First Posted
August 9, 2021
Last Updated
March 1, 2023
Sponsor
University of Sydney
Collaborators
Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Waitemata District Health Board
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05018221
Brief Title
Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis
Acronym
BEAT-Calci
Official Title
Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 26, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sydney
Collaborators
Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Waitemata District Health Board

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This global platform study will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care, in adult patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis.
Detailed Description
BEAT-Calci is a randomized, adaptive, multi-center, platform trial that will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care. The objective of the study is to establish high-quality evidence on the effect of a range of interventions in patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis. Calciphylaxis is a rare disease affecting 1-2 people in 10,000. The trial will commence with a Dialysis Membrane Domain and Pharmacotherapy Domain. The Pharmacotherapy Domain of BEAT-Calci is a placebo-controlled, double blind, response adaptive, randomised controlled trial that will investigate whether any of the pharmacotherapeutic agents is superior to placebo in improving outcomes. The Dialysis Membrane Domain of BEAT-Calci is an open-label, randomised controlled two-way comparison between two different dialysis technologies. The BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) is the primary endpoint for the trial. It is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of disease outcomes and will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The trial will utilise a Bayesian adaptive sample size re-estimation approach for sample size calculations. The trial will continue to recruit until predefined superiority or futility rules are met. As the trial progresses, in response to information accumulating during the trial, there are various adaptations that can occur, including addition or removal of an intervention arm, response adaptive randomisation and addition of new therapeutic domains.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Calciphylaxis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
Adaptive, platform, randomized controlled trial, involving multiple interventions spanning several domains of therapeutic care.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Blinding of all parties will not be possible for all domains. The default position of the BEAT-Calci platform is that treatments determined by randomization will be blinded to as high a level is feasible. Within practical domains, a blind will be adopted, whereby participants, site personnel, trial investigators and outcome assessors will remain blinded to the treatment from the time of randomization until database lock of the comparisons to which that participant is contributing data. In blinded domains, randomization data will not be accessible by anyone else involved in the trial with the following exceptions: (1) data managers who work on the randomization and drug management system, (2) unblinded statistician(s) involved with the response adaptive randomization, and (3) the unblinded biostatistician who prepares reports for the IDMC. Information on the blind, or lack thereof, per domain will be described in the respective Domain-Specific Appendix.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
350 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo (Double-Blind Period)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate
Arm Title
Vitamin K1 (Double-Blind Period)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dose: 10mg Vitamin K1 capsules, administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session. Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate
Arm Title
Magnesium Citrate (Double-Blind Period)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dose: 150mg Magnesium Citrate tablets, administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session. Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate
Arm Title
Sodium Thiosulfate (Double-Blind Period)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dose: 25g Sodium Thiosulfate injection, administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis. Placebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate
Arm Title
High Flux Hemodialysis
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Hemodialysis using a high flux dialyser
Arm Title
Medium Cut-off Hemodialysis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Hemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin K1
Other Intervention Name(s)
Phytonadione
Intervention Description
Vitamin K1 capsule (10mg) to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Magnesium citrate
Intervention Description
Magnesium Citrate tablet (150mg) to be administered 3 times per per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sodium Thiosulfate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intravenous Sodium Thiosulfate Injection
Intervention Description
Sodium Thiosulfate injection (25g/100ml) to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
High Flux Dialyser
Other Intervention Name(s)
High Flux Hemodialysis
Intervention Description
Hemodialysis using a high flux dialyser.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Medium Cut-off Dialyser
Other Intervention Name(s)
Medium Cut-off Hemodialysis
Intervention Description
Hemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo injection (normal saline)
Other Intervention Name(s)
0.9% sodium chloride solution
Intervention Description
Placebo to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Matching placebo capsule
Intervention Description
Placebo to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Matching placebo tablet
Intervention Description
Placebo to be administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) - Baseline to Week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 12 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Time Frame
Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale - Baseline to Week 26
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 26 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Weeks 4
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Weeks 4 Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 12 Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 26
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 26. Scale described as: Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area Development of new ulcers Amputation due to an ulcer All-cause death
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 4
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4 using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 26
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 4
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 12
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 26
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Change over time of self-reported pain
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain over time, assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Self-reported pain at week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain use at week 12 assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change over time of analgesic use
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 26
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Analgesic use week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 12
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use over time
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use over time
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use at week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use at week 12
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 4
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 4, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 12
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 26
Description
To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 26 using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Time to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection from Baseline to Week 26
Description
Time in days to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection within 26 weeks post-randomisation
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
All-cause hospitalisation days
Description
Count of all cause hospitalisation days (excluding day admissions for dialysis treatment within 26 weeks post-randomisation
Time Frame
Weeks 0-26
Title
Mortality
Description
Incidence of mortality, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Kidney Transplantation
Description
Incidence of kidney transplantation, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Calciphylaxis recurrence
Description
Incidence of calciphylaxis recurrence as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation
Time Frame
Up to 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Currently receiving haemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis that can be converted to haemodialysis, with planned ongoing haemodialysis a minimum of three times per week for at least the duration of the protocolised calciphylaxis treatments within this trial Have a new calciphylaxis ulcer present for less than 10 weeks Age ≥ 18 years Eligible for randomisation in at least one recruiting domain The participant and treating physician are willing and able to perform trial procedures Exclusion Criteria: Nil
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Arlen Wilcox
Phone
9562 5203
Email
arlen.wilcox@sydney.edu.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Meg Jardine
Phone
9562 5000
Email
meg.jardine@sydney.edu.au
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meg Jardine
Organizational Affiliation
University of Sydney
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
City
Concord
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Angus Ritchie
Facility Name
St George Hospital
City
Kogarah
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brendan Smyth
Facility Name
Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service
City
Birtinya
State/Province
Queensland
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rathika Krishnasamy
Facility Name
Princess Alexandra Hospital
City
Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carmel Hawley
Facility Name
Bundaberg Base Hospital
City
Bundaberg
State/Province
Queensland
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clyson Mutatiri
Facility Name
Royal Melbourne Hospital
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Irene Ruderman
Facility Name
Sunshine Hospital (Western Health)
City
St Albans
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eugenia Pedagogos
Facility Name
Dunedin Hospital
City
Dunedin
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rob Walker
Facility Name
Auckland City Hospital (Auckland DHB)
City
Grafton
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tze Goh
Facility Name
North Shore Hospital (Waitemata DHB)
City
Takapuna
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janak de Zoysa
Facility Name
Tauranga Hospital
City
Tauranga
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gavin McHaffie

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Trial data will be disseminated in the form of a publication to a relevant clinical journal and presentation at appropriate scientific conferences. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), may be shared with Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by a review committee identified for this purpose.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
To be confirmed
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
No data should be released that would compromise the trial, unless specifically for safety reasons. There must be a strong scientific or other legitimate rationale for the data to be used for the requested purpose. Investigators should have a period of exclusivity in which to pursue their aims with the data, before key trial data are made available to other researchers. Adequate resources must be available in order to comply with the request, and the scientific aims of the study must justify the use of such resources. Data release complies with the relevant regulations from all relevant countries.

Learn more about this trial

Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs