Bevacizumab Versus DEX Implant Followed by Bevacizumab in ME Secondary to BRVO
Primary Purpose
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implant Injection
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Center-involved macular edema secondary to BRVO for no longer than 3 months (at the screening visit it should be ensured that the subjects will comply with the criterion of ≤ 3 months since onset of macular edema at their scheduled baseline visit).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous PRP or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye.
- Any prior or concomitant ocular treatment (e.g. anti-VEGF therapy, corticosteroids) in the study eye for macular edema secondary to BRVO, except dietary supplements or vitamins prior to inclusion in the study. Intraocular anti-VEGF treatment is permitted for the treatment of diseases of fellow eye except for those that are specifically excluded.
- Prior systemic anti-VEGF or corticosteroid therapy, investigational or approved, within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study.
- Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye at any time or use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within 12 months prior to Day 1.
- Any active intraocular, extraocular, and periocular inflammation or infection in either eye within 4 weeks of screening.
- Any history of allergy to povidone iodine.
- Known serious allergy to the fluorescein sodium for injection in angiography.
- Presence of any contraindications indicated in the EU commission/locally approved label for intravitreal aflibercept: hypersensitivity to the active substance intravitreal aflibercept or to any of the excipients; active or suspected ocular or periocular infection; active severe intraocular inflammation.
Sites / Locations
- Yeungnam university hospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Bevacizumab
Dexamethasone
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean change of best corrected visual acuity
The mean change of best corrected visual acuity from baseline to Week 24 in Snellen visual acuity
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03892434
First Posted
March 26, 2019
Last Updated
March 26, 2019
Sponsor
Yeungnam University College of Medicine
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03892434
Brief Title
Bevacizumab Versus DEX Implant Followed by Bevacizumab in ME Secondary to BRVO
Official Title
Bevacizumab Versus DEX Implant Followed by Bevacizumab in ME Secondary to BRVO
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 18, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 18, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 18, 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Yeungnam University College of Medicine
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy of sequential therapy with intravitreal dexamethasone implant followed by bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab monotherapy for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
Detailed Description
Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vessel disease following diabetic retinopathy. It is divided into central retinal vein occlusion and retinal vein occlusion. Visual disturbance resulting from retinal vein occlusion is mainly caused by macular edema, and one of the main mechanisms of macular edema is increased vascular endothelial growth factor. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor is known to cause macular edema by breaking blood retinal barrier and causing leakage. For this reason, intravitreal injection of anti - vascular endothelial growth factors is currently used to treat macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Corticosteroid is a different mechanism from anti - vascular endothelial growth factor, and it is the main mechanism to suppress macular edema, to suppress the expression of inflammatory mediators, to block the inflammatory reaction pathway, and to lower the vascular endothelial growth factor concentration in the vitreous body. The dexamethasone implant in the vitreous cavity showed the maximum visual improvement effect during 60 day after one injection, and the effect continued until about 90 days after the injection. The same effect was obtained with a fewer injection times compared to the injection of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and a variety of inflammatory. It is also effective in patients who do not respond to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors by effectively inhibiting cytokines and growth factors. However, steroids elevated intraocular pressure, it is limited in repeated use.
Intravitreal dexamethasone implantation and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor showed similar early vision improvement. The differences in these anatomical changes may be different in long-term visual prognosis. After 3 doses of loading dose of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, each group was injected with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) at each recurrence of macular edema and injected with anti-vascular endothelial factor at each macular reattachment after dexamethasone injection. The results of this study are as follows.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Bevacizumab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Dexamethasone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implant Injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant
Intervention Description
Bevacizumab 1.25mg is injected into the vitreous cavity through the pars plana using 30G needle-attached syringe for branch retinal vein occlusion, and Dexamethasone 0.75mg implant is injected using injector.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant
Intervention Description
Dexamethasone implant insertion using approved kit
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean change of best corrected visual acuity
Description
The mean change of best corrected visual acuity from baseline to Week 24 in Snellen visual acuity
Time Frame
From baseline to Week 24
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Center-involved macular edema secondary to BRVO for no longer than 3 months (at the screening visit it should be ensured that the subjects will comply with the criterion of ≤ 3 months since onset of macular edema at their scheduled baseline visit).
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous PRP or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye.
Any prior or concomitant ocular treatment (e.g. anti-VEGF therapy, corticosteroids) in the study eye for macular edema secondary to BRVO, except dietary supplements or vitamins prior to inclusion in the study. Intraocular anti-VEGF treatment is permitted for the treatment of diseases of fellow eye except for those that are specifically excluded.
Prior systemic anti-VEGF or corticosteroid therapy, investigational or approved, within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study.
Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye at any time or use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within 12 months prior to Day 1.
Any active intraocular, extraocular, and periocular inflammation or infection in either eye within 4 weeks of screening.
Any history of allergy to povidone iodine.
Known serious allergy to the fluorescein sodium for injection in angiography.
Presence of any contraindications indicated in the EU commission/locally approved label for intravitreal aflibercept: hypersensitivity to the active substance intravitreal aflibercept or to any of the excipients; active or suspected ocular or periocular infection; active severe intraocular inflammation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Min Sagong, MD
Phone
82-53-620-3443
Email
msagong@ynu.ac.kr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Yeungnam university hospital
City
Daegu
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Min Sagong, MD
Phone
82-53-620-3443
Email
msagong@ynu.ac.kr
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Bevacizumab Versus DEX Implant Followed by Bevacizumab in ME Secondary to BRVO
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs