search
Back to results

BI 6727 (Volasertib) Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer

Primary Purpose

Ovarian Neoplasms

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Paclitaxel
Gemcitabine
Topotecan
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)
BI 6727
Sponsored by
Boehringer Ingelheim
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ovarian Neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Confirmed recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma, peritoneal carcinoma or fallopian tube carcinoma.
  2. Platinum resistant or platinum refractory disease.
  3. Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group performance status < = 2.
  4. Life expectancy > = 3 months.
  5. At least one measurable lesion (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours version 1.1).
  6. Adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions.
  7. signed written informed consent prior to admission to the study.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Contre-indications for cytotoxic treatment according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (Arm B).
  2. Clinical evidence of active brain metastasis or leptomeningeal involvement.
  3. Other malignancy currently requiring active therapy.
  4. QTc prolongation according to Fridericia formula deemed clinically relevant by the investigator (e.g., congenital long QT syndrome, QTc according to Fridericia formula > 470 ms).
  5. Hypersensitivity to one of the trial drugs or the excipients.
  6. Serious illness or concomitant non- oncological disease.
  7. Systemic anticancer therapy within 4 weeks before the start of the study.
  8. Evidence of ileus sor sub ileus.

Sites / Locations

  • 1230.18.32003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3321A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3307A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3301A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3322A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3313A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3312A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3308A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3314A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3302A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3309A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3305A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3320A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3311A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3310A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.3315A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.42101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.42103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.34003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.46005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.46001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 1230.18.46003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

BI 6727

Cytotoxic

Arm Description

Patients receive BI 6727 infusion every 3 weeks

At the investigator discretion, patient will receive one of the following cytotoxics: topotecan, paclitaxel, gemcitabine or liposomal doxorubicin

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 24 According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) Version 1.1
DCR was defined as the proportion of patients who had an overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival of a patient was based on the investigator's assessment; it was defined as the number of days from the date of randomisation until the date of either disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Definition of disease progression according to RECIST version 1.1; Patients with measurable tumour lesions at baseline, Target-lesions: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the sum of diameters must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm,taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions Patients with non-measurable tumour lesions at baseline, Non-target lesions: requires unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as time from randomisation to death irrespective of the cause of the death.
Best Overall Response
Best overall response (BOR) is defined as the best response recorded at any time from the date of randomisation until the end of treatment. Missing categories signify that no tumour imaging has been performed post baseline, and therefore the response status could not be assessed.
Biological Tumour Response Based on Serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) According to the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria
Patients were to have a pre-treatment CA-125 of at least twice the upper limit of normal to be considered for CA-125 response. Patients were not evaluable by CA-125 if they had received mouse antibodies or if they had undergone medical and/or surgical interference with their peritoneum or pleura during the previous 28 days. In eligible patients, a CA-125 response was defined as the moment the CA- 25 was reduced by 50%, with this being confirmed with a consecutive CA-125 assessment not earlier than 28 days after the previous one. Biological response rate based on serum CA-125 levels was assessed according to the guidelines by the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup. Monitoring of blood levels of the tumour marker CA-125 was performed at screening and every 6 weeks thereafter.
Biological Progression-free Survival Based on Serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) According to the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria
Biological PFS including assessment of CA-125 levels was defined as the time from randomisation until the first occurrence of progressive disease according to CA-125, progressive disease according to radiological evidence, or death. Also according to the below criterias, In patients with radiological measurable disease, disease progression during study treatment could not be declared on the basis of CA-125 alone. Patients with elevated CA-125 pre-treatment and normalization of CA-125 had to show evidence of CA-125 ≥ to two times the upper normal limit on two occasions at least one week apart or Patients with elevated CA-125 pre-treatment, which never normalized, had to show evidence of CA-125 ≥ to two times the nadir value on two occasions at least one week apart or Patients with CA-125 in the normal range pre-treatment had to show evidence of CA-125 ≥ to two times the upper normal limit on two occasions at least one week apart.
Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL)
Time to deterioration in global health status/Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time to Deterioration in Fatigue/Quality of Life (QOL)
Time to deterioration in fatigue/Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time to Deterioration in Pain/ Quality of Life (QOL)
Time to deterioration in pain/ Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time to Deterioration in Abdominal Bloating/ Quality of Life (QOL)
Time to deterioration in abdominal bloating/ Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time to Deterioration in the Three Most Troublesome Disease Specific Symptoms/ Quality of Life (QOL)
Three most troublesome disease specific symptoms, defined by the patient at baseline. Patients that have defined more than 3 most troublesome symptoms have not been taken into account in the analysis. Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to the United States National Cancer Institute (US NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0
Incidence and intensity of adverse events according to the United States National Cancer Institute (US NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0
Clinically Relevant Changes in Laboratory and ECG Data
Clinically relevant changes in laboratory and ECG data
AUC (0-24); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to 24 Hours for BI 6727 BS
AUC (0-24); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 24 hours for BI 6727 BS
AUC (0-24); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to 24 Hours for CD 10899 BS
AUC (0-24); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 24 hours for CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727)
AUC (0-inf); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for BI 6727 BS
AUC (0-inf); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for BI 6727 BS
AUC (0-inf); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for CD 10899 BS
AUC (0-inf); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727)
Cmax; Maximum Measured Concentration of BI 6727 BS in Plasma
Cmax; maximum measured concentration of BI 6727 BS in plasma
Cmax; Maximum Measured Concentration of CD 10899 BS in Plasma
Cmax; maximum measured concentration of CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727) in plasma
Tmax; Time From Dosing to Maximum Measured Concentration of BI 6727 BS in Plasma
tmax; time from dosing to maximum measured concentration of BI 6727 BS in plasma
Tmax; Time From Dosing to Maximum Measured Concentration of CD 10899 BS in Plasma
tmax; time from dosing to maximum measured concentration of CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727) in plasma
t1/2; Terminal Half-life of BI 6727 BS in Plasma
t1/2; Terminal half-life of BI 6727 BS in plasma
t1/2; Terminal Half-life of CD 10899 BS in Plasma
t1/2; Terminal half-life of CD 10899 BS in plasma
MRT; Mean Residence Time of BI 6727 BS in the Body
MRT; Mean residence time of BI 6727 BS in the body
CL; Total Clearance of BI 6727 BS in Plasma After Intravenous Administration
CL; total clearance of BI 6727 BS in plasma after intravenous administration
Vss;Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravenous Administration for BI 6727 BS
Vss;apparent volume of distribution at steady state following intravenous administration for BI 6727 BS
Biomarkers and Pharmacogenetics Analysis (Optional)
This endpoint has not been statistically analysed in the study report

Full Information

First Posted
April 13, 2010
Last Updated
July 17, 2015
Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01121406
Brief Title
BI 6727 (Volasertib) Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer
Official Title
Phase II Randomized Trial of the Polo-like Kinase 1 Inhibitor BI 6727 Monotherapy Versus Investigator´s Choice Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Patients Resistant or Refractory to Platinum-based Cytotoxic Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is an international, randomized phase II trial. The aim is to assess the efficacy and the safety of BI 6727 Versus investigator's best choice single agent cytotoxic in recurrent third and fourth lines platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. 100 patients will be randomised at the study entry to receive either BI 6727 (Arm A: 50 patients) or non-platinum single agent cytotoxic (Arm B: 50 patients) Treatment will be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: disease control rate at week 24 according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours version 1.1. Secondary endpoints: efficacy (progression free survival, overall survival, biological tumour response, biological progression free survival assessed by serum CA 125 according to Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria, safety according to the NCI CTCAE v.3, disease symptoms control assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28 and individual symptoms questionnaires, pharmacokinetics of BI 6727. Others endpoints: biomarkers and pharmacogenetics analysis (optional)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ovarian Neoplasms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BI 6727
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive BI 6727 infusion every 3 weeks
Arm Title
Cytotoxic
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
At the investigator discretion, patient will receive one of the following cytotoxics: topotecan, paclitaxel, gemcitabine or liposomal doxorubicin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Paclitaxel
Intervention Description
Patients receive paclitaxel in a 4 week schedule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gemcitabine
Intervention Description
Patients receive gemcitabine in a 3 week schedule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Topotecan
Intervention Description
Patients receive topotecan in 3 or 4 week schedule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)
Intervention Description
Patients receive PLD in a 4 week schedule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
BI 6727
Intervention Description
Patients receive BI 6727 infusion every 3 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 24 According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) Version 1.1
Description
DCR was defined as the proportion of patients who had an overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD).
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
Progression-free survival of a patient was based on the investigator's assessment; it was defined as the number of days from the date of randomisation until the date of either disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Definition of disease progression according to RECIST version 1.1; Patients with measurable tumour lesions at baseline, Target-lesions: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the sum of diameters must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm,taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions Patients with non-measurable tumour lesions at baseline, Non-target lesions: requires unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions
Time Frame
From randomization until disease progression, death or study discontinuation; Up to 213 weeks
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS is defined as time from randomisation to death irrespective of the cause of the death.
Time Frame
From randomization until death or study discontinuation; Up to 213 weeks
Title
Best Overall Response
Description
Best overall response (BOR) is defined as the best response recorded at any time from the date of randomisation until the end of treatment. Missing categories signify that no tumour imaging has been performed post baseline, and therefore the response status could not be assessed.
Time Frame
time from the date of randomisation until study completion/discontinuation; Up to 213 weeks
Title
Biological Tumour Response Based on Serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) According to the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria
Description
Patients were to have a pre-treatment CA-125 of at least twice the upper limit of normal to be considered for CA-125 response. Patients were not evaluable by CA-125 if they had received mouse antibodies or if they had undergone medical and/or surgical interference with their peritoneum or pleura during the previous 28 days. In eligible patients, a CA-125 response was defined as the moment the CA- 25 was reduced by 50%, with this being confirmed with a consecutive CA-125 assessment not earlier than 28 days after the previous one. Biological response rate based on serum CA-125 levels was assessed according to the guidelines by the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup. Monitoring of blood levels of the tumour marker CA-125 was performed at screening and every 6 weeks thereafter.
Time Frame
At screening and every 6 weeks thereafter (Up to 213 weeks)
Title
Biological Progression-free Survival Based on Serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) According to the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria
Description
Biological PFS including assessment of CA-125 levels was defined as the time from randomisation until the first occurrence of progressive disease according to CA-125, progressive disease according to radiological evidence, or death. Also according to the below criterias, In patients with radiological measurable disease, disease progression during study treatment could not be declared on the basis of CA-125 alone. Patients with elevated CA-125 pre-treatment and normalization of CA-125 had to show evidence of CA-125 ≥ to two times the upper normal limit on two occasions at least one week apart or Patients with elevated CA-125 pre-treatment, which never normalized, had to show evidence of CA-125 ≥ to two times the nadir value on two occasions at least one week apart or Patients with CA-125 in the normal range pre-treatment had to show evidence of CA-125 ≥ to two times the upper normal limit on two occasions at least one week apart.
Time Frame
At screening and every 6 weeks thereafter (Up to 213 weeks )
Title
Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
Time to deterioration in global health status/Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time Frame
Every 6 weeks (Up to 213 weeks )
Title
Time to Deterioration in Fatigue/Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
Time to deterioration in fatigue/Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time Frame
Every 6 weeks (Up to 213 weeks )
Title
Time to Deterioration in Pain/ Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
Time to deterioration in pain/ Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time Frame
Every 6 weeks (Up to 213 weeks )
Title
Time to Deterioration in Abdominal Bloating/ Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
Time to deterioration in abdominal bloating/ Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time Frame
Every 6 weeks (Up to 213 weeks )
Title
Time to Deterioration in the Three Most Troublesome Disease Specific Symptoms/ Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
Three most troublesome disease specific symptoms, defined by the patient at baseline. Patients that have defined more than 3 most troublesome symptoms have not been taken into account in the analysis. Quality of life (QOL) and symptom control assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and individual symptom questionnaires. The time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (i.e. worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). If score is missing, and patient died within 28 days after scheduled time for completion, the patient was considered deteriorated. In this case, time to deterioration is time to death.
Time Frame
Every 6 weeks (Up to 213 weeks)
Title
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to the United States National Cancer Institute (US NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0
Description
Incidence and intensity of adverse events according to the United States National Cancer Institute (US NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0
Time Frame
From first treatment administration to 21 days after the last drug administration (Up to 1403 days)
Title
Clinically Relevant Changes in Laboratory and ECG Data
Description
Clinically relevant changes in laboratory and ECG data
Time Frame
From first treatment administration to 21 days after the last drug administration (Up to 1403 days)
Title
AUC (0-24); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to 24 Hours for BI 6727 BS
Description
AUC (0-24); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 24 hours for BI 6727 BS
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
AUC (0-24); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to 24 Hours for CD 10899 BS
Description
AUC (0-24); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 to 24 hours for CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727)
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
AUC (0-inf); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for BI 6727 BS
Description
AUC (0-inf); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for BI 6727 BS
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
AUC (0-inf); Area Under the Concentration-time Curve in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for CD 10899 BS
Description
AUC (0-inf); area under the concentration-time curve in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727)
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
Cmax; Maximum Measured Concentration of BI 6727 BS in Plasma
Description
Cmax; maximum measured concentration of BI 6727 BS in plasma
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
Cmax; Maximum Measured Concentration of CD 10899 BS in Plasma
Description
Cmax; maximum measured concentration of CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727) in plasma
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
Tmax; Time From Dosing to Maximum Measured Concentration of BI 6727 BS in Plasma
Description
tmax; time from dosing to maximum measured concentration of BI 6727 BS in plasma
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
Tmax; Time From Dosing to Maximum Measured Concentration of CD 10899 BS in Plasma
Description
tmax; time from dosing to maximum measured concentration of CD 10899 BS (metabolite of Volasertib BI 6727) in plasma
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
t1/2; Terminal Half-life of BI 6727 BS in Plasma
Description
t1/2; Terminal half-life of BI 6727 BS in plasma
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
t1/2; Terminal Half-life of CD 10899 BS in Plasma
Description
t1/2; Terminal half-life of CD 10899 BS in plasma
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
MRT; Mean Residence Time of BI 6727 BS in the Body
Description
MRT; Mean residence time of BI 6727 BS in the body
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
CL; Total Clearance of BI 6727 BS in Plasma After Intravenous Administration
Description
CL; total clearance of BI 6727 BS in plasma after intravenous administration
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
Vss;Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravenous Administration for BI 6727 BS
Description
Vss;apparent volume of distribution at steady state following intravenous administration for BI 6727 BS
Time Frame
-0.083 hours (h), 2h, 4h, 6h, 24h, 168h and 336 h after first drug administration
Title
Biomarkers and Pharmacogenetics Analysis (Optional)
Description
This endpoint has not been statistically analysed in the study report
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Confirmed recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma, peritoneal carcinoma or fallopian tube carcinoma. Platinum resistant or platinum refractory disease. Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group performance status < = 2. Life expectancy > = 3 months. At least one measurable lesion (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours version 1.1). Adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions. signed written informed consent prior to admission to the study. Exclusion criteria: Contre-indications for cytotoxic treatment according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (Arm B). Clinical evidence of active brain metastasis or leptomeningeal involvement. Other malignancy currently requiring active therapy. QTc prolongation according to Fridericia formula deemed clinically relevant by the investigator (e.g., congenital long QT syndrome, QTc according to Fridericia formula > 470 ms). Hypersensitivity to one of the trial drugs or the excipients. Serious illness or concomitant non- oncological disease. Systemic anticancer therapy within 4 weeks before the start of the study. Evidence of ileus sor sub ileus.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Boehringer Ingelheim
Organizational Affiliation
Boehringer Ingelheim
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
1230.18.32003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Brussel
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
1230.18.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
1230.18.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
1230.18.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
1230.18.3321A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Angers Cedex 9
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3307A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Bordeaux cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3301A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Caen
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3322A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Lille Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3313A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Lyon
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3312A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Nantes cedex 02
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3308A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Nice cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3314A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Paris Cedex 20
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3302A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3309A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Pierre-Bénite cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3305A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Reims cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3320A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Saint-Brieuc cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3311A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Strasbourg
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3310A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Toulouse Cedex 9
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.3315A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Vandoeuvre les Nancy cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
1230.18.42101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Bratislava
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
1230.18.42103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Poprad
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
1230.18.34006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Badalona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.34001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.34005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.34007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Girona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.34004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.34002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.34003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
1230.18.46005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Linköping
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
1230.18.46001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
1230.18.46003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26755507
Citation
Pujade-Lauraine E, Selle F, Weber B, Ray-Coquard IL, Vergote I, Sufliarsky J, Del Campo JM, Lortholary A, Lesoin A, Follana P, Freyer G, Pardo B, Vidal L, Tholander B, Gladieff L, Sassi M, Garin-Chesa P, Nazabadioko S, Marzin K, Pilz K, Joly F. Volasertib Versus Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or -Refractory Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;34(7):706-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1474. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

BI 6727 (Volasertib) Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs