search
Back to results

Biodegradable Versus Titanium Nailing in Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children

Primary Purpose

Forearm Fracture

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland
Titanium elastic stable nail
Sponsored by
Jaakko Sinikumpu
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Forearm Fracture focused on measuring intramedullary nailing, randomised controlled trial, biodegradable, children, forearm shaft fractures

Eligibility Criteria

5 Years - 15 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • suffering from single- or both-bone forearm shaft fracture
  • child patient , age from 5 to 15 years
  • surgical fixation needed, fracture is unstable
  • cast immobilization is not rigid enough for the fracture treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • open fractures with significant soft-tissue injury
  • pathological fractures
  • if patient has a previous fracture or infection in the same forearm
  • patients with metabolic bone diseases, systematic disease
  • patient uses the medication affecting bone quality
  • resistance to infection
  • fractures older than 7 days

Sites / Locations

  • Oulu University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland

Titanium elastic stable nail

Arm Description

Treatment with biodegradable elastic stable intramedullary nail in unstable forearm shaft fracture in paediatric population

Treatment with titanium elastic stable intramedullary nail in unstable forearm shaft fracture in paediatric population

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The range of motion (ROM) of forearm measured by goniometer
The ROMs of forearm

Secondary Outcome Measures

The range of motion (ROM) of elbow and wrist measured by goniometer
The ROMs of elbow and wrist
Pain measured with visual analogue scale
general pain or pain at the fracture site in mm +/- SD , scale is from 0-100mm in visual scale where child can point the proper level of pain. 0 equals "no pain", 100 equals "the highest imaginable pain"
Radiographic bone union
plain radiographs in anterior posterior (AP) and lateral projections
Radiographic bone deformity
plain radiographs in anterior posterior and lateral projections
Magnetic resonance imagining, bone healing
MRIs in intervention group
Implant degeneration in Magnetic resonance imagining
degrading of the implant
Magnetic resonance imagining, soft tissue reaction
soft tissue reaction

Full Information

First Posted
January 5, 2018
Last Updated
March 24, 2019
Sponsor
Jaakko Sinikumpu
Collaborators
Oulu University Hospital, Bioretec Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03474900
Brief Title
Biodegradable Versus Titanium Nailing in Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children
Official Title
Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing of Forearm Shaft Fractures by Titanium Compared With Biodegradable Nails: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial in Children With at Least Two Years of Follow-up
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 20, 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jaakko Sinikumpu
Collaborators
Oulu University Hospital, Bioretec Ltd.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
There are disadvantages in Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) of forearm shaft fractures, such as soft tissue irritation and the need of implant removal. A new mini-invasive technique of intramedullary nailing with biodegradable material (BESIN) has been developed. The nails are tapped into the medullary cavity and left in place. The aim of this study was to compare BESIN technique with ESIN. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial including the patients (aged 5-15 years) who required operative treatment for forearm shaft fractures in two pediatric trauma centers, in Finland. The patients were randomized to be treated by BESIN or ESIN. Thirteen patients were required for each group, according to power analysis but altogether 35 were enrolled for potential drop-outs. Biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) nails (ActivaNail ®, Bioretec ltd, Finland) were used in 19 and titanium nails (TEN ®, Synthes ltd, USA) in 16 patients. Pain and the range of motion (ROM) of forearm, elbow and wrist were primary outcomes. Radiographs and potential complications were analyzed of all and magnetic resonance imagines (MRI) of a randomly selected subgroup in BESIN group (N=13).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Forearm Fracture
Keywords
intramedullary nailing, randomised controlled trial, biodegradable, children, forearm shaft fractures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The patients were randomised to 2 groups, titanium nailing or biodegradable nailing.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
The patient was informed about the treatment method that he or she was randomised. The operating surgeon knew the group and treatment that the patient belonged to.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
35 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment with biodegradable elastic stable intramedullary nail in unstable forearm shaft fracture in paediatric population
Arm Title
Titanium elastic stable nail
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Treatment with titanium elastic stable intramedullary nail in unstable forearm shaft fracture in paediatric population
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biodegradable elastic stable intramedullary nail
Intervention Description
The investigational implant is an ultra-high-strength biodegradable intramedullary (IM) nail of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)/tricalcium-phosphate (β-TCP) which was manufactured by Bioretec Ltd. (Hartmaninkatu 2, Tampere, Finland)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Titanium elastic stable nail
Other Intervention Name(s)
elastic stable intramedullary nail
Intervention Description
Elastic stable intramedullary nail to stabilize unstable forearm shaft fractures in children
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The range of motion (ROM) of forearm measured by goniometer
Description
The ROMs of forearm
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The range of motion (ROM) of elbow and wrist measured by goniometer
Description
The ROMs of elbow and wrist
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Pain measured with visual analogue scale
Description
general pain or pain at the fracture site in mm +/- SD , scale is from 0-100mm in visual scale where child can point the proper level of pain. 0 equals "no pain", 100 equals "the highest imaginable pain"
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Radiographic bone union
Description
plain radiographs in anterior posterior (AP) and lateral projections
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Radiographic bone deformity
Description
plain radiographs in anterior posterior and lateral projections
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Magnetic resonance imagining, bone healing
Description
MRIs in intervention group
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Implant degeneration in Magnetic resonance imagining
Description
degrading of the implant
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Magnetic resonance imagining, soft tissue reaction
Description
soft tissue reaction
Time Frame
2 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
adverse events
Description
all implant or treatment related adverse events like tissue reactions or re-factures
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: suffering from single- or both-bone forearm shaft fracture child patient , age from 5 to 15 years surgical fixation needed, fracture is unstable cast immobilization is not rigid enough for the fracture treatment Exclusion Criteria: open fractures with significant soft-tissue injury pathological fractures if patient has a previous fracture or infection in the same forearm patients with metabolic bone diseases, systematic disease patient uses the medication affecting bone quality resistance to infection fractures older than 7 days
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juhani Merikanto, Ph.D. associate professor
Organizational Affiliation
Central Finland, Central Hospital, Tampere, Finland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oulu University Hospital
City
Oulu
Country
Finland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23542745
Citation
Baldwin K, Morrison MJ 3rd, Tomlinson LA, Ramirez R, Flynn JM. Both bone forearm fractures in children and adolescents, which fixation strategy is superior - plates or nails? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):e8-e14. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829203ea.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2549074
Citation
Bostman O, Makela EA, Tormala P, Rokkanen P. Transphyseal fracture fixation using biodegradable pins. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Aug;71(4):706-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2549074. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27831975
Citation
Branch LG, Crantford C, Cunningham T, Bharti G, Thompson J, Couture D, David LR. Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Cranial Reconstruction Using Resorbable Plating Systems for the Treatment of Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jan;28(1):26-29. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003166.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18580539
Citation
Garg NK, Ballal MS, Malek IA, Webster RA, Bruce CE. Use of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for treating unstable forearm fractures in children. J Trauma. 2008 Jul;65(1):109-15. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181623309.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22207879
Citation
Gorter EA, Vos DI, Sier CF, Schipper IB. Implant removal associated complications in children with limb fractures due to trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Dec;37(6):623-7. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0087-4. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19884435
Citation
Helenius I, Lamberg TS, Kaariainen S, Impinen A, Pakarinen MP. Operative treatment of fractures in children is increasing. A population-based study from Finland. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2612-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01519.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16504778
Citation
Herman MJ, Marshall ST. Forearm fractures in children and adolescents: a practical approach. Hand Clin. 2006 Feb;22(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.10.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1659570
Citation
Hope PG, Williamson DM, Coates CJ, Cole WG. Biodegradable pin fixation of elbow fractures in children. A randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Nov;73(6):965-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B6.1659570.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16505724
Citation
Hughes TB. Bioabsorbable implants in the treatment of hand fractures: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Apr;445:169-74. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000205884.81328.cc.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24772785
Citation
Korhonen J, Sinikumpu JJ, Harmainen S, Ryhanen J, Kallio P, Serlo W. [Removal of osteosynthesis material in children and young people]. Duodecim. 2014;130(7):689-95. Finnish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22583892
Citation
Lascombes P, Nespola A, Poircuitte JM, Popkov D, de Gheldere A, Haumont T, Journeau P. Early complications with flexible intramedullary nailing in childhood fracture: 100 cases managed with precurved tip and shaft nails. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.011. Epub 2012 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24327219
Citation
Lieber J, Schmittenbecher P. Developments in the treatment of pediatric long bone shaft fractures. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Dec;23(6):427-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1360460. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27832017
Citation
Makki D, Matar HE, Webb M, Wright DM, James LA, Ricketts DM. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in paediatric forearm fractures: the rate of open reduction and complications. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Sep;26(5):412-416. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000408.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11055281
Citation
Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials. 2000 Dec;21(23):2335-46. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00101-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28954399
Citation
Prakasam M, Locs J, Salma-Ancane K, Loca D, Largeteau A, Berzina-Cimdina L. Biodegradable Materials and Metallic Implants-A Review. J Funct Biomater. 2017 Sep 26;8(4):44. doi: 10.3390/jfb8040044.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22154046
Citation
Sinikumpu JJ, Lautamo A, Pokka T, Serlo W. The increasing incidence of paediatric diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures and their internal fixation during the last decade. Injury. 2012 Mar;43(3):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25960058
Citation
van der Eng DM, Schep NW, Schepers T. Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Screw Fixation for Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Ruptures: A Meta-Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;54(4):657-62. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 May 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22415404
Citation
Wall L, O'Donnell JC, Schoenecker PL, Keeler KA, Dobbs MB, Luhmann SJ, Gordon JE. Titanium elastic nailing radius and ulna fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012 Sep;21(5):482-8. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283528db5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16293043
Citation
Waris E, Konttinen YT, Ashammakhi N, Suuronen R, Santavirta S. Bioabsorbable fixation devices in trauma and bone surgery: current clinical standing. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2004 Nov;1(2):229-40. doi: 10.1586/17434440.1.2.229.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27998641
Citation
Barber FA, Spenciner DB, Bhattacharyya S, Miller LE. Biocomposite Implants Composed of Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)/beta-Tricalcium Phosphate: Systematic Review of Imaging, Complication, and Performance Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar;33(3):683-689. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28819489
Citation
Andaloussi S, Amine Oukhouya M, Alaoui O, Atarraf K, Chater L, Afifi MA. [Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the treatment of both-bone forearm fractures in the child: about 87 cases]. Pan Afr Med J. 2017 May 30;27:68. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.68.11058. eCollection 2017. French.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9449095
Citation
Cullen MC, Roy DR, Giza E, Crawford AH. Complications of intramedullary fixation of pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):14-21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28435555
Citation
Dave MB, Parmar KD, Sachde BA. The Radial Bow following Square Nailing in Radius and Ulna Shaft Fractures in Adults and its Relation to Disability and Function. Malays Orthop J. 2016 Jul;10(2):11-15. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1607.003.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21455473
Citation
Fernandez FF, Langendorfer M, Wirth T, Eberhardt O. Failures and complications in intramedullary nailing of children's forearm fractures. J Child Orthop. 2010 Apr;4(2):159-67. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0245-y. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15446536
Citation
Firl M, Wunsch L. Measurement of bowing of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep;86(7):1047-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.14294.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29186078
Citation
Krucinska I, Zywicka B, Komisarczyk A, Szymonowicz M, Kowalska S, Zaczynska E, Struszczyk M, Czarny A, Jadczyk P, Uminska-Wasiluk B, Rybak Z, Kowalczuk M. Biological Properties of Low-Toxicity PLGA and PLGA/PHB Fibrous Nanocomposite Implants for Osseous Tissue Regeneration. Part I: Evaluation of Potential Biotoxicity. Molecules. 2017 Nov 29;22(12):2092. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122092.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28422876
Citation
Kruppa C, Bunge P, Schildhauer TA, Dudda M. Low complication rate of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of pediatric forearm fractures: A retrospective study of 202 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(16):e6669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006669.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
1727932
Citation
Sarmiento A, Ebramzadeh E, Brys D, Tarr R. Angular deformities and forearm function. J Orthop Res. 1992 Jan;10(1):121-33. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100100115.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24056134
Citation
Sinikumpu JJ, Keranen J, Haltia AM, Serlo W, Merikanto J. A new mini-invasive technique in treating pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures by bioabsorbable elastic stable intramedullary nailing: a preliminary technical report. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(4):258-64. doi: 10.1177/1457496913490459. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22986071
Citation
Sinikumpu JJ, Lautamo A, Pokka T, Serlo W. Complications and radiographic outcome of children's both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures after invasive and non-invasive treatment. Injury. 2013 Apr;44(4):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
6690445
Citation
Tarr RR, Garfinkel AI, Sarmiento A. The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Jan;66(1):65-70.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15652934
Citation
Wilkins KE. Principles of fracture remodeling in children. Injury. 2005 Feb;36 Suppl 1:A3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.007.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24624254
Citation
Xue AS, Koshy JC, Weathers WM, Wolfswinkel EM, Kaufman Y, Sharabi SE, Brown RH, Hicks MJ, Hollier LH Jr. Local foreign-body reaction to commercial biodegradable implants: an in vivo animal study. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Mar;7(1):27-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1364199. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Biodegradable Versus Titanium Nailing in Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs