search
Back to results

Biological and Esthetic Evaluation of Ceramic Onlay With Different Preparation Designs

Primary Purpose

Unsatisfactory Restoration of Tooth, Carious Teeth

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
shoulder finishline
butt joint with bevel
Sponsored by
Ahmed Adel Mahmoud Gadallah
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Unsatisfactory Restoration of Tooth focused on measuring ceramic onlay, conventional preparation, conservative preparation, Butt joint with bevel, shoulder finish line, biologic response

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1-From 18-70 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.30 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations.

    3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients with teeth problems indicated for posterior onlay (molars or premolars).

    1. Decayed teeth
    2. Teeth restored with large filling restorations 5- Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient less than 18 or more than 70 years
  2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
  3. Patients with poor oral hygiene, high caries risk and uncooperative patients
  4. Pregnant women
  5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
  6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
  7. Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest. 8- the presence of a removable or fixed orthodontic appliance, signs of bruxism or clenching, the absence of more than one unit in the posterior region.

Sites / Locations

  • Cairo university Faculty Of Dentistry Fixed Prosthodontics clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Experimental

Arm Label

conventional ceramic onlay with shoulder finishline

conservative ceramic onlay preparation buttjoint with bevel

Arm Description

tooth that need ceramic onlay restoration, a conventional cavity will be prepared with shoulder finishline.

tooth that need ceramic onlay restoration, a conservative cavity will be prepared with butt joint with bevel finishline.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

postoperative sensitivity
pain immediately after restoration cementation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Marginal Discoloration
Margins between tooth and restoration have discoloration. Measuring device: visual and probe (used according to USPHS instructions) Measuring unit: Alpha, Bravo B1, Bravo B2, Charlie (according to USPHS measuring units) as following: Alpha: no discoloration along the margin. Bravo B1: discoloration noted along the margin less than 50 percent of exposed margin. Bravo B2: discoloration noted along the margin greater than 50 percent of exposed margin. Charlie: discoloration penetrating along the margin.

Full Information

First Posted
February 25, 2020
Last Updated
July 28, 2021
Sponsor
Ahmed Adel Mahmoud Gadallah
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04438642
Brief Title
Biological and Esthetic Evaluation of Ceramic Onlay With Different Preparation Designs
Official Title
Biological and Esthetic Evaluation of Ceramic Onlay With Different Preparation Designs (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 9, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ahmed Adel Mahmoud Gadallah

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aim of study: is to asses biological and esthetical success of ceramic onlay restorations while preparing the teeth using shoulder finish line preparation versus butt joint with bevel preparation. Methods: Patients with need to posterior onlay restoration (premolars and molars) will be allocated into two groups either conventional (shoulder finish line) or conservative group (butt joint with bevel), after tooth preparation impression, restoration fabrication, try in, cementation and restoration will be evaluated two weeks post cementation then follow up will be held every two months for 1 year.
Detailed Description
Research objective: The aim of this study is to asses biological and esthetical success of ceramic onlay restorations while preparing the teeth using shoulder finish line preparation versus butt joint with bevel preparation. Research Procedure: Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, clinical, radiographic examination, intraoral photographs and primary impression (alginate impression*) for diagnostic cast construction. Visit 2: Tooth preparation according to its group either shoulder, or butt joint with bevel preparation, secondary impression using addition silicone rubber base material two step two viscosities technique and temporary restoration. Visit 3: evaluation of e-max press onlay ceramic restoration on the cast then evaluation intra-oral on the prepared tooth and permanent cementation of the final restoration using adhesive resin cement. Visit 4: Every 2 months post operatively follow-up visit for one year. PICOTS P: Population: Patients requiring posterior onlays. I: Intervention: butt joint finish line with bevel preparation for ceramic onlay. C: comparator: shoulder finish line preparation for ceramic onlay. O: Outcome: Primary: Postoperative sensitivity Secondary: Marginal discoloration Tertiary: Secondary Caries T: Time: 1 year. S: Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Research question For patients requiring posterior onlays, does the use of conservative preparation offer better biological response and esthetics when compared to conventional onlay preparation? Participant timeline: The patient will be treated in visits designated as follows: Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, clinical, radiographic examination, intraoral photographs and primary impression (alginate impression) for diagnostic cast construction. Visit 2: Tooth preparation according to its group either shoulder, or butt joint with bevel preparation, secondary impression using addition silicone rubber base material two step two viscosities technique and temporary restoration. Visit 3: evaluation of e-max press onlay ceramic restoration on the cast then evaluation intra-oral on the prepared tooth and permanent cementation of the final restoration using adhesive resin cement. Visit 4: Every 2 months post operatively follow-up visit for one year. Allocation Randomization: - Simple randomization will be done using computerized random number generator Allocation: Sequence generation A dental colleague will allocate the participant patients into two groups with 1:1 allocation ratio by using computerized Sequence generation Blinding Double blinding (trial participants and outcome assessor) Two dental colleague assessors who are blinded about the aim of the study and participant's allocation will be responsible for assessing the outcomes of this study. Data collection methods: Primary 1ry: Postoperative sensitivity will be assessed by asking patients according to modified USPHS criteria and given a score (Alpha, Bravo) Secondary 2ry outcome: Marginal discoloration will be assessed according to modified USPHS criteria and given a score (Alpha, Bravo B1, Bravo B2, Charlie). Tertiary 3ry outcome: Secondary Caries will be assessed by visual and given a score (Alpha, Bravo). Plans to promote participant retention & complete follow-up: The main investigator will record telephone numbers and address of the patients included in the study. All patients will be given a phone call before the next appointment. Many efforts will be done to promote participant retention such as, sending SMS greetings in the feasts, any celebration and in his/ her birthday. Data management The main investigator will enter patient data electronically. Patient files are to be stored in Numerical order in a secured place. Statistical methods Qualitative data will be presented as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact test when applicable will be used for comparisons related to qualitative variables. Friedman's test will be used to study the changes by time within each group. Dunn's test will be used for pair-wise comparisons when Friedman's test is significant. The significance level will be set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis will be performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 20 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., an IBM Company). D) Data monitoring Monitoring The main supervisor is responsible of data monitoring if harms arise, interim analysis will be done. Harms The main investigator will record, document and treat any adverse effect like pain or even failure. Expected risk to the human subjects: Possibility of restoration dislodgment (the patient should keep the restoration and contact the researcher as soon as possible as the restoration will be assessed for cementation or replacement). Possibility of restoration fracture (the patient should keep the fractured part and contact the researcher as soon as possible as a new restoration will be placed). In case failure of the onlay restoration the tooth will be assessed for the new required restorative modality. Consent Researcher will discuss the trial with all patients. Patients will then be able to have an informed discussion with the researcher. Researcher will obtain written consent from patients willing to participate in the trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Unsatisfactory Restoration of Tooth, Carious Teeth
Keywords
ceramic onlay, conventional preparation, conservative preparation, Butt joint with bevel, shoulder finish line, biologic response

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
double blinded
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
conventional ceramic onlay with shoulder finishline
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
tooth that need ceramic onlay restoration, a conventional cavity will be prepared with shoulder finishline.
Arm Title
conservative ceramic onlay preparation buttjoint with bevel
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
tooth that need ceramic onlay restoration, a conservative cavity will be prepared with butt joint with bevel finishline.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
shoulder finishline
Intervention Description
tooth will be prepared having shoulder finishline.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
butt joint with bevel
Intervention Description
tooth will be prepared having butt joint with bevel finishline.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
postoperative sensitivity
Description
pain immediately after restoration cementation
Time Frame
1 year follow up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Marginal Discoloration
Description
Margins between tooth and restoration have discoloration. Measuring device: visual and probe (used according to USPHS instructions) Measuring unit: Alpha, Bravo B1, Bravo B2, Charlie (according to USPHS measuring units) as following: Alpha: no discoloration along the margin. Bravo B1: discoloration noted along the margin less than 50 percent of exposed margin. Bravo B2: discoloration noted along the margin greater than 50 percent of exposed margin. Charlie: discoloration penetrating along the margin.
Time Frame
1 year follow up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
secondary carries
Description
carries that is developed due to restoration Measuring device: visual and probe (used according to USPHS instructions) Measuring unit: Alpha and Bravo (according to USPHS measuring units) as following: Alpha: carries absent along the margin. Bravo: carries present along the margin.
Time Frame
1 year follow up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1-From 18-70 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.30 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations. 3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients with teeth problems indicated for posterior onlay (molars or premolars). Decayed teeth Teeth restored with large filling restorations 5- Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation Exclusion Criteria: Patient less than 18 or more than 70 years Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases Patients with poor oral hygiene, high caries risk and uncooperative patients Pregnant women Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest. 8- the presence of a removable or fixed orthodontic appliance, signs of bruxism or clenching, the absence of more than one unit in the posterior region.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cairo university Faculty Of Dentistry Fixed Prosthodontics clinic
City
Giza
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
the outcome results

Learn more about this trial

Biological and Esthetic Evaluation of Ceramic Onlay With Different Preparation Designs

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs